open/voyage
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Releases 13 Activity

fix(review): a past-the-end line makes a finding unverified, never refuted, and the Declined to Judge copy-through is pinned

Browse source 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-10-23 17:13:03 +02:00
commit 7175783ce5
Signed by: ktg
SSH key fingerprint: SHA256:JakMjO6FTBBzN0Bhfj9saOoEjaFxlSdYuZQQpM/lF9Q
4 changed files with 87 additions and 6 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
agents/review-coordinator.md
View file

@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ is load-bearing** — see *Suppression is two-valued* below:
| Filter | Test | Fails if | Removed as |
|--------|------|----------|------------|
| Succinctness | `title.length ≤ 100` and `detail.length ≤ 800` chars | Title is a paragraph or detail is a wall of text | **never removed.** MINOR/SUGGESTION (catalogue tier): the text is trimmed (ending `[…trimmed]`), the finding is kept and counted. BLOCKER/MAJOR: kept whole, every character. |
| Accuracy | `file` resolves under the repo root AND `line` is plausible (≥ 0; ≤ file line count when known) | Path traversal escape, negative line, or impossibly large line number | **dropped** (`accuracy:refuted`) |
| Accuracy | `file` resolves under the repo root AND `line` ≥ 0 | Path traversal escape or negative line | **dropped** (`accuracy:refuted`). A line past the end of the file (when its line count is known) is not refuted: the citation is wrong, the claim is unchecked → `unverified` (`accuracy:line-out-of-range`) |
| Actionability | `recommended_action` is non-empty AND begins with an imperative verb | Empty action, "consider …" hedges, or restating the title | `unverified` (`actionability:empty`) |
A finding that carries `engine` (`code-review` / `security-review`) came
@ -126,8 +126,10 @@ voyage-lekerepo trial, 2026-10-06.)
Succinctness and Actionability read the finding's *packaging*; neither
examines the claim, so neither can establish the finding is unreal. Accuracy
does: a citation that escapes the repo root refutes the finding as a claim
about this codebase.
does: a citation that escapes the repo root, or a negative line, refutes the
finding as a claim about this codebase. A line past the end of the file does
not: the citation is wrong, the claim is unchecked. A line number alone never
refutes a finding, so it goes to `unverified` (`accuracy:line-out-of-range`).
**No finding is struck for length** (ordre 5). Before review_version 1.1 an
over-long `detail` sent a finding to `unverified`, and S118's most serious