fix(review): a past-the-end line makes a finding unverified, never refuted, and the Declined to Judge copy-through is pinned

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

lib/review/coordinator-contract.mjs

@@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ export const JUDGE_DETAIL_MAX = 800;
  * (agents/review-coordinator.md Pass 3 — "Speculative 'code might break
  * somewhere' findings have no anchor").
  *
- * `accuracy:refuted` (Pass 2 Accuracy — a citation escaping the repo root) and
+ * `accuracy:refuted` (Pass 2 Accuracy — a citation escaping the repo root, or
+ * a negative line; a line past the end of the file does not refute) and
  * `file-existence:refuted` (Pass 3 — absent from both working tree and diff)
  * are emitted by the LLM coordinator, whose fs/judgement branches this module
  * excludes. They are declared here anyway: the vocabulary is owned in one
@@ -79,14 +80,17 @@ export const REFUTING_REASONS = Object.freeze(new Set([
  * finding, so `succinctness:*` is no longer emitted (a stray one still fails
  * closed through `classifySuppression`). `file-existence:indeterminate`
  * is emitted by the LLM coordinator's Pass 3 (which runs the fs Glob this
- * module deliberately excludes); the vocabulary is owned here so prose and lib
- * cannot drift.
+ * module deliberately excludes), and `accuracy:line-out-of-range` by its
+ * Pass 2 Accuracy (a line past the end of the file: the citation is wrong, the
+ * claim is unchecked, so a line number alone never refutes); the vocabulary is
+ * owned here so prose and lib cannot drift.
  */
 export const UNVERIFIED_REASONS = Object.freeze([
   'actionability:empty',
   'engine:out-of-scope',
   'unknown-rule_key',
   'file-existence:indeterminate',
+  'accuracy:line-out-of-range',
 ]);
 // The brief-conflict mark (`contradicts_brief`) is in neither set on purpose:
 // it is a field on a KEPT finding, never a `suppressed_reason`. As a reason it