fix(review): the coordinator and orchestrator texts say what the code does on refutation and the brief-conflict exception

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-10-26 15:18:03 +01:00
commit 738efa3e24
Signed by: ktg
SSH key fingerprint: SHA256:JakMjO6FTBBzN0Bhfj9saOoEjaFxlSdYuZQQpM/lF9Q
6 changed files with 70 additions and 7 deletions

View file

@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ Every mode that executes refuses a plan whose approval in the approval log does
| _(default)_ | Claude Code `/code-review` + `/security-review` (engine, via the Skill tool, never `--fix`), then brief-conformance + code-correctness reviewers in parallel, coordinator dedup + verdict, write `{project_dir}/review.md` with the required `verdict:`, decide with `lib/review/verdict-gate.mjs` (0 ALLOW/WARN · 1 BLOCK · 2 never green), propose recurring finding classes as project memory (operator approves each line) |
| `--project <dir>` | **Required.** Path to trekplan project folder containing `brief.md`. Review is written to `{dir}/review.md` |
| `--since <ref>` | Override "before" SHA for the diff range. Validated via `git rev-parse --verify` |
| `--quick` | `/code-review` + code-correctness reviewer only; skip brief-conformance reviewer, `/security-review` and the coordinator's reasonableness filter — fast correctness-only pass |
| `--quick` | `/code-review` + code-correctness reviewer only; skip brief-conformance reviewer, `/security-review` and the coordinator's reasonableness filter except the brief-conflict rule — fast correctness-only pass |
| `--validate` | Schema-only check on existing `{dir}/review.md` plus the verdict gate. No LLM calls. A 1.0 review without `verdict:` fails here (it still seeds a plan in soft mode) |
| `--dry-run` | Print discovered scope + triage map; skip writes |
| `--fg` | No-op alias (foreground is default) |