feat(gate): the brief's threat model on the plan side (decision 164, 218, 220)

plan-gate.mjs --record --brief <brief.md> (a known flag; its value is kept
out of the positional arguments, a missing value is a usage error) applies
the brief's threat model to the deduped findings before countRound when
threat-model.mjs usable() says it may: a backed finding (Voyage's own
security finding whose threat_model_ref equals an Outside: line's text)
leaves the counted set and the stop rule and goes to the new optional
verdict field known_outside ({id, rule_key, text, line}), carried to later
rounds until a reviewer marks it resolved or it is reported again under its
id. The verdict stores brief_path (carried when a later round has none).
The --record line adds known_outside (a count) and threat_model
({applied, why}): a threat model that is not usable backs nothing, every
security finding counts, and the output says why. extractVerdict
shape-checks both new fields.

The bare gate re-reads the brief at brief_path each run: an entry still
backed is a warning, PLAN_GATE_KNOWN_OUTSIDE; one no longer backed (line
gone, approval stale or not logged, brief unreadable, no brief_path, or not
a Voyage security finding) stops the plan, PLAN_GATE_OUTSIDE_NOT_BACKED: it
counts in full. gatePlan takes an optional threatModel for tests.

plan-review-dedup keeps threat_model_ref on a merge only when every merged
copy carries the same one; the S160 known issue is fixed: a null in a
reviewer's findings list is skipped instead of crashing the CLI.

plan-critic and scope-guardian: a security finding needs a concrete attack
path and high confidence (Claude Code's threshold, 167), uses
SECURITY_INJECTION or SECURITY_RISK, and quotes the Outside: line's text in
threat_model_ref when one applies; the json template carries the field.
/trekplan Phase 9 passes the brief path to plan-critic and --brief to
--record. Handover 4 names the two fields, the two codes and the flag.

Part 2, step 2.4 of the E plan.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

docs/HANDOVER-CONTRACTS.md

@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ prose form (relaxed in S26 so the template's prose emission parses).
    - at least one step has `End-to-end:` with a backticked command — the "run the thing" step;
    - the optional step fields `Interface in:`, `Interface out:`, `Review focus:` are never empty when present (consumers tolerate their absence);
    - `ceremony` is one of the three classes; an `architectural` plan has `## Design` with the subsections Architecture, Data Flow, Interfaces, Data Models, Error Handling, Module Map, Architecture Rules, Requirements Check, plus `## Test Strategy`; the module map (mermaid) has no cycle; every architecture rule says "checked by `<command>`" (with a Proof column naming an existing step) or "advisory — `.claude/rules/<file>.md`".
-6. **`## Critic Verdict`** (written by `lib/validators/plan-gate.mjs --record`, never by hand): one fenced `json` block, schema `voyage.plan-verdict/1` — `round`, `max_rounds` (3), `extra_rounds`, `plan_sha256`, `verdict` (`BLOCK` | `REVISE` | `PASS`), `counts`, `findings` (deduplicated, each with `severity`). `plan_sha256` hashes the plan minus its review log (the `> **Plan quality:` line and the sections Critic Verdict, Revisions, Plan Quality Score; an old Adversarial Pass 2 section is plan text and hashed), with CRLF and line-end whitespace normalized. The verdict sits inside the plan because Claude Code's plan approval hands a hook the plan file's text and nothing beside it. **Optional rule-A fields** (decision 43; `DIFF_FIELDS` in `lib/review/critic-diff.mjs`): each one is optional, and absent means round-1 behaviour, so an older block gives the same exit codes. Top level: `diff_base` (the sha256 the round was counted against), `diff_note` (one line: why a round from round 2 on was counted fully), `resolved` (the ids of previous findings that left the count). Per finding: `op_line` and `op_line_end` (the cited lines in the operative text), `line_end`, `rule_keys` (the union of the keys dedup merged), `original_severity` (what a reviewer rated, set whenever the counted `severity` differs), `lowered_by` (`rule A: outside the diff since round <P>` or `rule B: <caught_by>`), `caught_by` (the test, `Regression:` command or gate a rule-B lowering names), `lowering_refused` (why a rule-B lowering was refused) and `carried_from` (the round a carried finding first appeared). `severity` is always the counted severity. `recordVerdict` called without `base`, `baseNote` and `planPaths` records as before, plus the rule-B record, and a per-finding `rule_keys` from dedup is always passed through (an optional field). **Optional stop-rule fields** (decisions 217, 220; `lib/review/stop-rule.mjs`): `rounds` (one `{round, blocking, newByClass}` per recorded round, carried from the previous verdict; `newByClass` is `null` for a round counted in full) and `stop_rule` (`{fired, reason: same-class | not-fewer | null, classes, perRound}`); a verdict without them starts its history at the next round. `accepted_open.under` is `"stop-rule"` for an acceptance made after the stop rule fired.
+6. **`## Critic Verdict`** (written by `lib/validators/plan-gate.mjs --record`, never by hand): one fenced `json` block, schema `voyage.plan-verdict/1` — `round`, `max_rounds` (3), `extra_rounds`, `plan_sha256`, `verdict` (`BLOCK` | `REVISE` | `PASS`), `counts`, `findings` (deduplicated, each with `severity`). `plan_sha256` hashes the plan minus its review log (the `> **Plan quality:` line and the sections Critic Verdict, Revisions, Plan Quality Score; an old Adversarial Pass 2 section is plan text and hashed), with CRLF and line-end whitespace normalized. The verdict sits inside the plan because Claude Code's plan approval hands a hook the plan file's text and nothing beside it. **Optional rule-A fields** (decision 43; `DIFF_FIELDS` in `lib/review/critic-diff.mjs`): each one is optional, and absent means round-1 behaviour, so an older block gives the same exit codes. Top level: `diff_base` (the sha256 the round was counted against), `diff_note` (one line: why a round from round 2 on was counted fully), `resolved` (the ids of previous findings that left the count). Per finding: `op_line` and `op_line_end` (the cited lines in the operative text), `line_end`, `rule_keys` (the union of the keys dedup merged), `original_severity` (what a reviewer rated, set whenever the counted `severity` differs), `lowered_by` (`rule A: outside the diff since round <P>` or `rule B: <caught_by>`), `caught_by` (the test, `Regression:` command or gate a rule-B lowering names), `lowering_refused` (why a rule-B lowering was refused) and `carried_from` (the round a carried finding first appeared). `severity` is always the counted severity. `recordVerdict` called without `base`, `baseNote` and `planPaths` records as before, plus the rule-B record, and a per-finding `rule_keys` from dedup is always passed through (an optional field). **Optional stop-rule fields** (decisions 217, 220; `lib/review/stop-rule.mjs`): `rounds` (one `{round, blocking, newByClass}` per recorded round, carried from the previous verdict; `newByClass` is `null` for a round counted in full) and `stop_rule` (`{fired, reason: same-class | not-fewer | null, classes, perRound}`); a verdict without them starts its history at the next round. `accepted_open.under` is `"stop-rule"` for an acceptance made after the stop rule fired. **Optional threat-model fields** (E 2.4, decisions 164, 218; `lib/review/threat-model.mjs`): `known_outside` (one `{id, rule_key, text, line}` per security finding of plan-critic or scope-guardian whose `threat_model_ref` equals the text of an `Outside:` line of the brief's `## Threat Model`, `line` being that text; it left the counted findings and the stop rule, and stays listed in later rounds until a reviewer marks it resolved or it is reported again under its id) and `brief_path` (the brief `--record --brief` read, carried when a later round has none); a verdict without them lists no known issue.
 7. **Every plan_version, no version bump** (a plan without the field validates unchanged; voyage-lekerepo trial 2, 2026-10-08):
    - **K10 — `Regression:`** (optional step field): ONE backticked command the criteria runner's allowlist runs, with no pipe and no `&&` (first backticked span, as for `Verify:`). The executor runs it green before the step's checkpoint; a step without it runs nothing new. `Verify:` stays the step's own red-first test. One that can never run is `PLAN_STEP_REGRESSION_NOT_RUNNABLE` (an error; a warning under `--soft`).
    - **K11 — `On failure:`** opens with one of `revert`, `retry`, `skip`, `escalate` (case-insensitive; a leading `**`, `_`, backtick or `-` is ignored, other leading characters are not; `onFailureAction` in `lib/parsers/plan-schema.mjs`), the words `/trekexecute` reads; any other opening is the warning `PLAN_STEP_ON_FAILURE_UNKNOWN`. A missing `On failure:` is unchanged (the executor defaults to `escalate`).
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ The strongest validation in the entire pipeline. `/trekplan` Phase 8 **must** ru
 | `PLAN_STEP_PATH_NOT_A_PATH` | 1.9: a `Files:` entry opens with a backticked span that is no path (a call `parse()`, an option, a URL, a backticked placeholder such as `` `TBD` `` or `` `none` ``, a mixed-case bare name such as `` `Parser` ``; operator decision 22); error, a warning under `--soft` | Put the path first; the span goes in the description; a file named `Parser` is written `./Parser` |
 | `PLAN_STEP_PATH_UNTICKED` | Below 1.9, warning: the `Files:` reader found a path outside backticks; the plan is read as before (a warning under `--strict` too) | Backtick the path; from 1.9 an unticked path is refused |
 
-**The plan gate (K3).** `node lib/validators/plan-gate.mjs <plan.md> [--json]` decides whether a plan may go on: **0** = it validates strict, its `## Critic Verdict` matches the current text, no BLOCKER is open, and every open MAJOR was accepted by the operator; **1** = stop, with `reasons` (`PLAN_GATE_INVALID_PLAN`, `PLAN_GATE_VERSION` — below plan_version 1.8, `PLAN_GATE_NO_VERDICT`, `PLAN_GATE_VERDICT_MALFORMED`, `PLAN_GATE_VERDICT_STALE`, `PLAN_GATE_OPEN_BLOCKER`, `PLAN_GATE_ROUNDS_EXHAUSTED`, `PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR` — rounds left: revise, `PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR_FINAL` — after the last round: ask the operator, `PLAN_GATE_STOP_RULE` — the stop rule fired with a blocking finding open and not accepted; it replaces the open-blocker and open-major reasons) and `warnings` (`PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR` for majors the operator accepted, `PLAN_GATE_OPEN_BLOCKER` for blockers accepted under the stop rule); **2** = could not read the plan. `--hash <plan.md>` prints the operative hash; Phase 9 takes it before the reviewers read the plan. `--record <plan.md> --reviewed <hash>` reads plan-review-dedup output on stdin (which lists the reviewers that delivered, `sources`) and writes the next round; exit 2 when a reviewer is missing or the plan changed since `--hash`; it refuses round 4 (exit 1, stop and ask) unless `--extra-round` follows the operator's yes, and refuses that flag before the cap is spent; after a verdict whose stop rule fired it refuses any new round (exit 1, `PLAN_GATE_STOP_RULE`, `--extra-round` included). The stop rule: no new round after round N ≥ 2 when one finding class has new blocking findings in rounds N−1 and N, or when the blocking findings did not get fewer; a class is the catalogue rule key, else the reviewer's dimension (the `rule_key` before the first `/`). Unrated findings count as blockers. The review log is excluded from the hash only up to its first other heading, so a step placed under it is hashed. `--accept-open <plan.md>` records the operator's "build as is" for the current round's open MAJORs (`accepted_open` in the verdict block, bound to the round and the plan hash; only after the last round; never for a BLOCKER; exit 1 when rounds are left, the verdict is stale, a blocker is open or no major is). After the stop rule fired it is allowed with rounds left and accepts the open BLOCKERs and MAJORs as known issues, except a counting security finding (exit 1, `PLAN_GATE_SECURITY_OPEN`). Operator decision 2026-10-08: open majors used to be warnings, and a weakness the critics named was built and came back from `/trekreview` as MAJOR. plan-critic and scope-guardian rate on the review catalogue's tiers. The verdict is a trace of the review, not a signature.
+**The plan gate (K3).** `node lib/validators/plan-gate.mjs <plan.md> [--json]` decides whether a plan may go on: **0** = it validates strict, its `## Critic Verdict` matches the current text, no BLOCKER is open, and every open MAJOR was accepted by the operator; **1** = stop, with `reasons` (`PLAN_GATE_INVALID_PLAN`, `PLAN_GATE_VERSION` — below plan_version 1.8, `PLAN_GATE_NO_VERDICT`, `PLAN_GATE_VERDICT_MALFORMED`, `PLAN_GATE_VERDICT_STALE`, `PLAN_GATE_OPEN_BLOCKER`, `PLAN_GATE_ROUNDS_EXHAUSTED`, `PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR` — rounds left: revise, `PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR_FINAL` — after the last round: ask the operator, `PLAN_GATE_STOP_RULE` — the stop rule fired with a blocking finding open and not accepted; it replaces the open-blocker and open-major reasons, `PLAN_GATE_OUTSIDE_NOT_BACKED` — a `known_outside` entry the brief at `brief_path` no longer backs: its `Outside:` line is gone, the threat model is not usable (no section, malformed, the intent approval stale or not logged, the brief unreadable) or no `brief_path` is named; it counts in full) and `warnings` (`PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR` for majors the operator accepted, `PLAN_GATE_OPEN_BLOCKER` for blockers accepted under the stop rule, `PLAN_GATE_KNOWN_OUTSIDE` for `known_outside` entries the brief still backs); **2** = could not read the plan. `--hash <plan.md>` prints the operative hash; Phase 9 takes it before the reviewers read the plan. `--record <plan.md> --reviewed <hash>` reads plan-review-dedup output on stdin (which lists the reviewers that delivered, `sources`) and writes the next round; exit 2 when a reviewer is missing or the plan changed since `--hash`; it refuses round 4 (exit 1, stop and ask) unless `--extra-round` follows the operator's yes, and refuses that flag before the cap is spent; after a verdict whose stop rule fired it refuses any new round (exit 1, `PLAN_GATE_STOP_RULE`, `--extra-round` included). `--brief <brief.md>` (a value, never the plan path) applies the brief's threat model before the round is counted, only when it is usable (present, well formed, and the intent approval current by the marker and the approval log, the two checks `/trekplan` Phase 1 runs): a security finding of the two reviewers (never an engine's) whose `threat_model_ref` equals an `Outside:` line's text goes to `known_outside`; otherwise every security finding counts, and the output's `threat_model` (`{applied, why}`) says why. The output line also carries `known_outside` (how many are listed). plan-review-dedup keeps a finding's `threat_model_ref` on a merge only when every merged copy carries the same one. The stop rule: no new round after round N ≥ 2 when one finding class has new blocking findings in rounds N−1 and N, or when the blocking findings did not get fewer; a class is the catalogue rule key, else the reviewer's dimension (the `rule_key` before the first `/`). Unrated findings count as blockers. The review log is excluded from the hash only up to its first other heading, so a step placed under it is hashed. `--accept-open <plan.md>` records the operator's "build as is" for the current round's open MAJORs (`accepted_open` in the verdict block, bound to the round and the plan hash; only after the last round; never for a BLOCKER; exit 1 when rounds are left, the verdict is stale, a blocker is open or no major is). After the stop rule fired it is allowed with rounds left and accepts the open BLOCKERs and MAJORs as known issues, except a counting security finding (exit 1, `PLAN_GATE_SECURITY_OPEN`). Operator decision 2026-10-08: open majors used to be warnings, and a weakness the critics named was built and came back from `/trekreview` as MAJOR. plan-critic and scope-guardian rate on the review catalogue's tiers. The verdict is a trace of the review, not a signature.
 
 **Rule A and the diff (decision 43).** Round 1 is unchanged. From round 2 on, `--record` counts the round against the operative text the previous round reviewed, and both reviewers mark each previous finding by id (`previous`). The gate counts by this rule, not the session: