feat(voyage): S18 — framing-hardening (min-version gate + memory status + pre-2.2 doc + flagship hedge)

Closes devils-advocate audit #4–#6 (MAJOR×MED). Four additive, non-breaking
changes to the v5.5 framing-alignment machinery:

1. --min-brief-version <ver> gate (audit #4). Opt-in version floor on
   /trekplan + /trekresearch, forwarded to brief-validator as --min-version.
   New opts.minBriefVersion warns BRIEF_VERSION_BELOW_MINIMUM (never blocks)
   when a brief declares a version below the floor; trekreview exempt; absent
   opt = no check. CLI shim parses --min-version and skips its value token in
   filePath detection.

2. memory_alignment.status field (audit #5). brief-reviewer now emits
   status: verified | n_a | contradictions so a score-5 N/A (no memory) is
   distinguishable from a score-5 verified-aligned brief — the score≥4 gate
   passes in both, status reveals whether the wrong-premise defense ran.

3. Document pre-2.2 = zero framing enforcement (audit #4). HANDOVER-CONTRACTS
   §Handover 1 now states the producer-elective hole + two remedies. Also
   fixes a stale "current is 2.1" line (current is 2.2).

4. Soften flagship overselling (audit #6). CLAUDE.md Context-Engineering
   principle now hedges that main-context relief is asserted-by-design, not
   measured (T1 PoC found Δ≈0); README carried no false claim to fix.

TDD: 8 new tests written failing-first (5 validator, 1 trekbrief status pin,
2 doc-consistency cross-file pins). Suite 691→699 (697 pass / 2 skip / 0 fail).
No flagship prose-pin added (deliberate, per S19 anti-bloat).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-06-19 13:33:00 +02:00
commit 987e847ea1
11 changed files with 145 additions and 13 deletions

View file

@ -358,3 +358,38 @@ test('validateBrief — v5.5 trekreview brief not subject to framing/TL;DR gate'
assert.ok(!r.errors.find(e => e.code === 'BRIEF_MISSING_FRAMING'));
assert.ok(!r.errors.find(e => e.code === 'BRIEF_MISSING_SECTION' && /TL;DR/.test(e.message)));
});
// S18 — opt-in --min-brief-version gate. Warns (never blocks) when a brief
// declares a version below the caller's floor, sidestepping framing enforcement.
const BRIEF_21 = GOOD_BRIEF
.replace('brief_version: "2.0"', 'brief_version: "2.1"')
.replace('source: interview\n', 'source: interview\nphase_signals_partial: true\n');
test('validateBrief — S18 min-version: older brief below floor warns but does not block', () => {
const r = validateBriefContent(BRIEF_21, { strict: true, minBriefVersion: '2.2' });
assert.equal(r.valid, true, `must warn, not block: ${JSON.stringify(r.errors)}`);
assert.ok(
r.warnings.find(w => w.code === 'BRIEF_VERSION_BELOW_MINIMUM'),
`expected BRIEF_VERSION_BELOW_MINIMUM; warnings=${JSON.stringify(r.warnings)}`,
);
});
test('validateBrief — S18 min-version: absent opt means no version-floor check', () => {
const r = validateBriefContent(BRIEF_21, { strict: true });
assert.ok(!r.warnings.find(w => w.code === 'BRIEF_VERSION_BELOW_MINIMUM'));
});
test('validateBrief — S18 min-version: brief meeting the floor does not warn', () => {
const r = validateBriefContent(GOOD_BRIEF_22, { strict: true, minBriefVersion: '2.2' });
assert.ok(!r.warnings.find(w => w.code === 'BRIEF_VERSION_BELOW_MINIMUM'));
});
test('validateBrief — S18 min-version: 2.0 brief below 2.2 floor warns', () => {
const r = validateBriefContent(GOOD_BRIEF, { minBriefVersion: '2.2' });
assert.ok(r.warnings.find(w => w.code === 'BRIEF_VERSION_BELOW_MINIMUM'));
});
test('validateBrief — S18 min-version: trekreview brief is exempt (no framing to bypass)', () => {
const r = validateBriefContent(REVIEW_AS_BRIEF, { minBriefVersion: '2.2' });
assert.ok(!r.warnings.find(w => w.code === 'BRIEF_VERSION_BELOW_MINIMUM'));
});