fix(ui): English labels where Voyage shows Norwegian to every user

Operator decision 56 (2026-10-17): the product shows English.

- Annotation HTML: the intent buttons, sidebar badges and the copied
  prompt read Fix / Change / Question. The stored keys stay
  fiks / endre / spørsmål, so annotations saved earlier still load.
- /trekreview project-memory approval: "Add the line" / "Not now".
- README, CLAUDE.md, docs/architecture.md, package.json and plugin.json
  describe what the product shows; README's hollow-answer line and the
  "anslag" in the profile section are English; a Norwegian code comment
  in profile-validator.mjs translated.

The Norwegian hollow-answer list in approval-log.mjs and trekbrief.md
stays: it matches what a user types. Both new tests failed on the code
before the change. Suite 2606 (2604/0/2).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

README.md

@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ Interactive requirements-gathering command. Runs a **question round sized to the
 
 **Ceremony by size.** The task is put in one of three classes, `small`, `bounded` or `architectural` (the heaviest when in doubt), said aloud, overridable by you, and only ever moved up when the task proves bigger. The class sets the question budget (a `small` task: at most 4 questions, in one round) and the review cap, and is written to the brief as `ceremony:`.
 
-**The question round.** Facts are looked up in the repo, never asked. Every question that can be answered now is asked at once, the recommended answer first, ranked by impact × uncertainty; what the budget leaves out is on a visible Deferred list, and what can be predicted is written down as an assumption you see before approving. «Høres bra ut», «gjør som du vil» and an empty answer decide nothing.
+**The question round.** Facts are looked up in the repo, never asked. Every question that can be answered now is asked at once, the recommended answer first, ranked by impact × uncertainty; what the budget leaves out is on a visible Deferred list, and what can be predicted is written down as an assumption you see before approving. A hollow answer ("sounds good", "do as you like") or an empty one decides nothing.
 
 Then `brief-reviewer` scores the draft on six dimensions (completeness, consistency, testability, scope clarity, research-plan validity, memory alignment) and gates publication, up to 1 / 2 / 3 review iterations by class; force-stop yields a `brief_quality: partial` brief with the failing dimensions documented.
 
@@ -705,8 +705,8 @@ annotation surface the operator pointed at:
   - **Section** (auto-detected from the nearest h1/h2 above).
   - **Anchored to** — the exact text you selected, or the element's
     first ~200 chars if you didn't select.
-  - **Three intent buttons:** **Fiks** (something is wrong — fix it),
-    **Endre** (change the wording / content), **Spørsmål** (an open
+  - **Three intent buttons:** **Fix** (something is wrong — fix it),
+    **Change** (the wording / content), **Question** (an open
     question — clarify or answer). Colored: red / orange / blue.
   - **Comment** textarea (optional but helpful).
   - **Cancel** / **Save**. Save stays disabled until you pick an intent.
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ Lookup order:
 
 A brief's `phase_signals` (written by `/trekbrief`) can set the model for research, plan, execute and review; where it does, it comes before the profile.
 
-See [`docs/profiles.md`](docs/profiles.md) for the decision tree, custom-profile authoring, and cost estimation disclaimer (the per-profile cost numbers are *anslag*, not contractual SLAs).
+See [`docs/profiles.md`](docs/profiles.md) for the decision tree, custom-profile authoring, and cost estimation disclaimer (the per-profile cost numbers are estimates, not contractual SLAs).
 
 ## Observability (v4.1.0)