1. plan-review-dedup skips only a null or undefined finding; any other
entry that is not an object (a string, a number, an array) goes on as
before E, a finding with no valid severity that the plan gate counts as
a blocker (it was dropped, so a string blocker recorded PASS).
2. plan-gate --record: a previous finding that rule A carried as counted and
whose id is backed this round leaves the counted set, the counts, the
verdict and the stop rule's summary (it was counted and listed in
known_outside at once: BLOCK, not-fewer, and --accept-open refused).
3. A known_outside entry keeps rule_keys; extractVerdict accepts it (a list
of strings), and the bare gate re-checks with the same keys the recorder
used, so a merged finding whose security key is only in rule_keys is a
WARN, not a STOP.
4. plan-critic, scope-guardian and /trekplan Phase 9's round-2 sentences say
the Critic Verdict also lists known_outside and each is marked by id in
previous. Code already accepts such a mark (dedup passes it; countRound
ignores ids it does not carry; --record removes the entry on true);
pinned in diff mode and full count.
5. The approval prose names ## Threat Model where it named only ## Intent +
## Goal: skills/annotating/SKILL.md (description, step 4, guard list),
docs/command-modes.md, Handover 1's intent_approved_hash row, README
(approval, Approve row, intent approval gate) and CLAUDE.md's /trekbrief
row.
6. threat-model.mjs gains usableInRepo (a brief path relative to the repo
top level) and repoRelativeBrief; --record stores brief_path relative to
the top level, never absolute, and both gates read it from there, so the
gate run from a subdirectory reads the same brief. reviewThreatModel
uses usableInRepo. Handover 4 and the gate header say so.
7. review-finalize's outside pass puts an entry back only when no finding
carries its row yet (engine-compare rowOf): an engine finding listed in
known_outside while its payload is saved went back twice.
8. A test runs scripts/release-check.mjs on a review whose known_outside
entry the brief does not back: exit 2 (control: backed passes the review
check).
Existing tests changed: plan-gate-threat-model's entry-keys assertion now
expects rule_keys (item 3), and its planted non-security entry drops the
security key from rule_keys too, since the gate reads rule_keys (item 3).
Part 2 fix round of the E plan.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
plan-gate.mjs --record --brief <brief.md> (a known flag; its value is kept
out of the positional arguments, a missing value is a usage error) applies
the brief's threat model to the deduped findings before countRound when
threat-model.mjs usable() says it may: a backed finding (Voyage's own
security finding whose threat_model_ref equals an Outside: line's text)
leaves the counted set and the stop rule and goes to the new optional
verdict field known_outside ({id, rule_key, text, line}), carried to later
rounds until a reviewer marks it resolved or it is reported again under its
id. The verdict stores brief_path (carried when a later round has none).
The --record line adds known_outside (a count) and threat_model
({applied, why}): a threat model that is not usable backs nothing, every
security finding counts, and the output says why. extractVerdict
shape-checks both new fields.
The bare gate re-reads the brief at brief_path each run: an entry still
backed is a warning, PLAN_GATE_KNOWN_OUTSIDE; one no longer backed (line
gone, approval stale or not logged, brief unreadable, no brief_path, or not
a Voyage security finding) stops the plan, PLAN_GATE_OUTSIDE_NOT_BACKED: it
counts in full. gatePlan takes an optional threatModel for tests.
plan-review-dedup keeps threat_model_ref on a merge only when every merged
copy carries the same one; the S160 known issue is fixed: a null in a
reviewer's findings list is skipped instead of crashing the CLI.
plan-critic and scope-guardian: a security finding needs a concrete attack
path and high confidence (Claude Code's threshold, 167), uses
SECURITY_INJECTION or SECURITY_RISK, and quotes the Outside: line's text in
threat_model_ref when one applies; the json template carries the field.
/trekplan Phase 9 passes the brief path to plan-critic and --brief to
--record. Handover 4 names the two fields, the two codes and the flag.
Part 2, step 2.4 of the E plan.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
lib/review/rule-catalogue.mjs gains SECURITY_RISK (BLOCKER, category
security, memory route rule): Voyage's own security key for a finding by
its own reviewers that SECURITY_INJECTION does not cover.
SECURITY_REVIEW_VULNERABILITY is described as the engines' key only.
plan-critic and scope-guardian name SECURITY_INJECTION or SECURITY_RISK
and no longer the engines' key.
The count moves from 17 to 18 in every pin: rule-catalogue.test,
claude-md-scope [CAT] (which now also refuses a stale 17), doc-consistency,
review-prose-pins, docs/architecture.md and the two reviewer agents.
critic-severity-rules pins three security keys; its "every security key
named" check leaves out the engines' key, and a new pin says the critic
never names it.
Existing tests changed for the planned rule: the four count pins above
(17 -> 18), and critic-severity-rules' two-key test (now three keys).
tests/lib/engine-findings.test.mjs: a comment naming the "(17 keys)" pin
now says 18.
Part 2, step 2.3 of the E plan.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
/trekplan Phase 9: when --record or the gate reports the stop rule there
is no new round; AskUserQuestion with the class and counts, "Known issue"
(--accept-open, a security finding refused) or "New mechanism" (stop, the
plan stays unapproved); the round-3 blocker path never offers
--extra-round after the stop rule. Phase 10 prints round of
max_rounds + extra_rounds.
/trekexecute Phase 7.2 step 4: after a round-2 BLOCK or fixed-pending,
before any R-step, review-rounds.mjs prepare --dry-run; review-stop-rule:
gives the same question ("Known issue" = /trekreview --answers, a BLOCKER
keeps the merge locked; "New mechanism" = stop). /trekreview Phase 3 tells
the stop rule's exit 1 from the cap's. plan-critic and scope-guardian:
rule_key names the class, never the instance.
New pins in review-loop-docs, critic-severity-rules and review-prose-pins.
Part 1, step 1.4 of the E plan.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A new skill, voyage:reviewing-adversarially (contract S4): no praise, no
finding without a source (file:line or a quoted line), no downgrade without
a reason, summary-only said and not judged, a Declined to Judge list, claims
checked against the diff rather than the report, axes kept separate.
Red baseline first: six review runs by helpers without the skill (two
invented fixtures) had no separate Declined to Judge list in 6 of 6, an
unsourced finding in 6 of 6, praise in 2 of 6 and a verdict on something
unmeasured in 4 of 6. With the skill: 6 of 6, 0, 0 and 0.
- brief-conformance-reviewer, code-correctness-reviewer, review-coordinator
and scope-guardian preload it through skills:; the 21-line "Interaction
Awareness - MANDATORY OVERRIDE" block copied into three of them is gone.
Each agent keeps its own role.
- The two reviewers and scope-guardian end with their own Declined to Judge
list; /trekreview names the skill at spawn and passes the reviewers'
lines to the coordinator, which copies them into review.md as prose
(the JSON declined_to_judge array and the verdict are unchanged).
- Eval cases 3 / 2 / 1; pins in tests/lib/skills-review-prose-pins.test.mjs.
- tests/fixtures/jsonl-schemas.md: the trekreview-stats line_ref moves with
Phase 8 (636-686).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
voyage-lekerepo trial (2026-10-06) point 6, operator decision 2026-10-08
(«samme skala, og du spør»): the critics rated a non-discriminating test
minor in round 3, there was no way to fix it after the last round, it was
built, and /trekreview called the same weakness MAJOR (MISSING_TEST).
- plan-critic, scope-guardian: rate on the review catalogue's tiers; a test
that cannot fail on a wrong implementation is major, never minor.
- plan-gate: an open MAJOR stops (PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR: revise and run the
next round; PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR_FINAL after the last round: ask the
operator). --accept-open records "build as is" after their yes, bound to
the round and the plan hash; never for a blocker.
- trekplan Phase 9: REVISE after the last round asks fix now (one extra
round) or build as is, instead of carrying the majors silently.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wave 1, order 3 (P3 plan mode as the start, P2 design as its own part, P9
plan side). Contracts K3-K6 for the later merges.
- plan_version 1.8 (1.7 plans stay valid): Test first on every step, one
End-to-end ("run the thing") step, optional Interface in / Interface out /
Review focus fields, a ceremony class in the header (absent =
architectural), and for architectural plans a ## Design part: module map
without cycles, architecture rules that name their enforcer and the step
that proves them, a requirements check asked as keep / change.
- K3 lib/validators/plan-gate.mjs: the critic verdict is recorded INSIDE the
plan (Claude Code's plan approval hands a hook only the plan file's text),
bound to the hash taken before the reviewers read it; 0 go / 1 stop / 2
could not run; at most 3 critic rounds, then stop and ask.
- K5 lib/verification/arch-rules.mjs: runs the target repo's own
dependency-cruiser or import-linter (installs nothing; 2 = not measured,
never green); --prove --rule shows pass -> fail on a planted violation of
that rule -> pass. Verified against dependency-cruiser 18.5.0 and
import-linter 2.15; madge 8.0.0 left out (missed a planted .mjs cycle).
- K6 lib/verification/plan-scope-sweep.mjs: changed files no step names.
- /trekplan Phases 8-10: design part, bounded critic loop, the gate before
"execute", a plan-mode path through ExitPlanMode (not yet run end to end
inside plan mode). plan-critic 10 -> 12 dimensions; scope-guardian checks
the ceremony.
- Fixed on the way: plan-validator and plan-review-dedup used the
file://argv[1] main guard (no-op under a symlink or a space); CRLF plans
failed every manifest; the dedup dropped finding severity.
Borrowed, credited in place: obra/superpowers, Kiro (docs), addyosmani/
agent-skills, mattpocock/skills, GitHub Spec Kit, bashebr/ai-native-sdlc,
Boris Cherny's public threads.
Suite 1497 (1495 / 0 / 2), 86 new tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Phase 9's dedup hand-off was broken on two layers, both surfaced by the S22
dogfood: (a) plan-critic + scope-guardian (Read/Glob/Grep, no Write) were told
to write /tmp/*-out.json the dedup helper reads — they cannot; (b) even with
Write, their Output format emits markdown, not the helper's
{agent,findings:[{file,line,rule_key,text}]} schema. readJsonOrNull then
swallowed the absent files -> a silent empty merge that discarded every finding.
Fix (operator-chosen A'): keep the reviewers read-only; make the hand-off run.
- plan-review-dedup.mjs gains a --stdin mode reading {plan_critic,scope_guardian};
malformed stdin exits non-zero so a broken hand-off surfaces loudly instead of
collapsing into a silent empty merge. File mode + its tests are untouched.
- plan-critic.md + scope-guardian.md now emit a trailing machine-readable `json`
findings block (the inline hand-off; no Write tool needed).
- trekplan.md + planning-orchestrator.md Phase 9 rewritten in lockstep: extract
both blocks, pipe via heredoc into --stdin. No temp files, portable, no
pathguard dependency.
TDD: malformed-stdin test failed first (CLI ignored stdin -> exit 0 = the bug),
green after impl. New S23 doc-pin asserts both docs use --stdin (not the dead
/tmp paths) and both agents declare the json block. Suite 724 (722/2/0); live
HEAD baseline was 720, not the stale 705 STATE carried forward.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
Flip model: sonnet → model: opus across 20 agent files, 4 prose references
in commands (trekplan, trekresearch), trekendsession command frontmatter,
and CLAUDE.md tables. Aligns CLAUDE.md premium-profile row to actual
premium.yaml content (all-opus, which has been the case since v4.1.0 but
the doc was drift). Companion to VOYAGE_PROFILE=premium env-var (set in
~/.zshenv same day) — env-var governs orchestrator phase model; this
commit governs sub-agent models which are frontmatter-pinned and not
reachable by the profile resolver.
npm test: 516 pass, 0 fail, 2 skipped (unchanged from baseline).
Operator rationale: complete Opus coverage across all Voyage activity,
including the 20 sub-agents that the profile system does not control
(architecture-mapper, task-finder, plan-critic, scope-guardian,
brief-reviewer, code-correctness-reviewer, brief-conformance-reviewer,
review-coordinator, session-decomposer, plus the 6 researcher agents,
plus the 5 codebase-analysis agents).
Cost implication: sub-agent runs ~5x more expensive vs sonnet. Accepted.
Add /ultraresearch-local for structured research combining local codebase
analysis with external knowledge via parallel agent swarms. Produces research
briefs with triangulation, confidence ratings, and source quality assessment.
New command: /ultraresearch-local with modes --quick, --local, --external, --fg.
New agents: research-orchestrator (opus), docs-researcher, community-researcher,
security-researcher, contrarian-researcher, gemini-bridge (all sonnet).
New template: research-brief-template.md.
Integration: --research flag in /ultraplan-local accepts pre-built research
briefs (up to 3), enriches the interview and exploration phases. Planning
orchestrator cross-references brief findings during synthesis.
Design principle: Context Engineering — right information to right agent at
right time. Research briefs are structured artifacts in the pipeline:
ultraresearch → brief → ultraplan --research → plan → ultraexecute.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
