Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
5f9faeed4a
fix: close the six defects an independent review found in the trial fixes
Independent read-only review of c56f852..2d29966 (2026-10-08), each defect
reproduced by the reviewer; each new test fails on that code.

- test-lock green ran ANY allowlisted command: `green --cmd "git status"`
  marked a red step green and the stop guard let it stop. The lock now
  stores the step's test command (`lock --cmd`); `green` runs only that
  one (a different --cmd, or a lock without one, exits 2). trekexecute D1
  calls `green` with no command, which also removes the quoting hazard.
- plan-gate --accept-open worked at round 1 and passed the gate; it now
  refuses while rounds are left.
- findings-schema --repo-root swallowed a following flag, or took a root
  that does not exist, and silently skipped the line check: exit 2.
- brief-review-stamp hashed only the body, so a changed `framing` or
  `research_topics` stayed "current"; it now covers the reviewed
  frontmatter too (only the post-review stamps are left out).
- red-proof red_kind read an assertion message naming SyntaxError as a
  load error; the signatures are now specific.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 07:17:45 +02:00
2d29966f51
fix(plan): an open MAJOR stops the plan; after the last round the operator decides
voyage-lekerepo trial (2026-10-06) point 6, operator decision 2026-10-08
(«samme skala, og du spør»): the critics rated a non-discriminating test
minor in round 3, there was no way to fix it after the last round, it was
built, and /trekreview called the same weakness MAJOR (MISSING_TEST).

- plan-critic, scope-guardian: rate on the review catalogue's tiers; a test
  that cannot fail on a wrong implementation is major, never minor.
- plan-gate: an open MAJOR stops (PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR: revise and run the
  next round; PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR_FINAL after the last round: ask the
  operator). --accept-open records "build as is" after their yes, bound to
  the round and the plan hash; never for a blocker.
- trekplan Phase 9: REVISE after the last round asks fix now (one extra
  round) or build as is, instead of carrying the majors silently.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-08 07:07:00 +02:00
f5ca220bc0
feat(plan): plan 1.8, the plan gate, the design part and the plan-side checks
Wave 1, order 3 (P3 plan mode as the start, P2 design as its own part, P9
plan side). Contracts K3-K6 for the later merges.

- plan_version 1.8 (1.7 plans stay valid): Test first on every step, one
  End-to-end ("run the thing") step, optional Interface in / Interface out /
  Review focus fields, a ceremony class in the header (absent =
  architectural), and for architectural plans a ## Design part: module map
  without cycles, architecture rules that name their enforcer and the step
  that proves them, a requirements check asked as keep / change.
- K3 lib/validators/plan-gate.mjs: the critic verdict is recorded INSIDE the
  plan (Claude Code's plan approval hands a hook only the plan file's text),
  bound to the hash taken before the reviewers read it; 0 go / 1 stop / 2
  could not run; at most 3 critic rounds, then stop and ask.
- K5 lib/verification/arch-rules.mjs: runs the target repo's own
  dependency-cruiser or import-linter (installs nothing; 2 = not measured,
  never green); --prove --rule shows pass -> fail on a planted violation of
  that rule -> pass. Verified against dependency-cruiser 18.5.0 and
  import-linter 2.15; madge 8.0.0 left out (missed a planted .mjs cycle).
- K6 lib/verification/plan-scope-sweep.mjs: changed files no step names.
- /trekplan Phases 8-10: design part, bounded critic loop, the gate before
  "execute", a plan-mode path through ExitPlanMode (not yet run end to end
  inside plan mode). plan-critic 10 -> 12 dimensions; scope-guardian checks
  the ceremony.
- Fixed on the way: plan-validator and plan-review-dedup used the
  file://argv[1] main guard (no-op under a symlink or a space); CRLF plans
  failed every manifest; the dedup dropped finding severity.

Borrowed, credited in place: obra/superpowers, Kiro (docs), addyosmani/
agent-skills, mattpocock/skills, GitHub Spec Kit, bashebr/ai-native-sdlc,
Boris Cherny's public threads.

Suite 1497 (1495 / 0 / 2), 86 new tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 20:10:57 +02:00