Case 8 failed 2 of 12 in the PM re-measurement of ea66a98 on correct replies
that said "passed" without PASS. The patterns now spell each letter as a
class ([Pp][Aa][Ss][Ss]...) instead of relying on a regex flag, since a grader
file carries only `pattern`. The verb forms pass/passes/passed and
fail/fails/failed are verdicts; a preceding "not " or "n't " still refuses.
Measured on the PM's recorded replies (distinct runs): old says-pass 10/12 on
case 8 (reproduces the finding), new 12/12; says-pass on case 6 replies 0/8
both, says-fail 8/8 on case 6 and 0/12 on case 8 both.
Suite after git add: 1235 tests, 1233/0/2.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The scaffold writes a current intent_approved_hash (sha256 over ## Intent +
## Goal) into the case-4 brief. Chose a literal marker over running
intent-approval.mjs --stamp in the scaffold because --stamp emits a
brief-approved record into the live stats the yardstick reads: every eval
run would count as an approval.
New grader no-intent-halt (regex, trace, not_contains
code\W{1,12}BRIEF_INTENT_): a halt at the intent gate fails the case
instead of passing it for the wrong gate.
says-fail / says-pass take FAILED / PASSED as the verdict word. v2's word
boundary dropped them. The one says-fail failure (PM, 1 of 7) is not
explained: its trace was deleted, and 0 of 13 kept replies used another
spelling than FAIL.
Case 4 alone, 10 runs: 10 of 10. In 3 of 10 the child ran the intent gate
first, passed it and went on to the brief-validator. That order halted the
case before. Before the fix, same day: 5 of 6.
Green: tests/lib/proevesett.test.mjs 9 of 9.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
New case plan-halts-without-intent-approval (expectation committed before
its first run): a 2.1 brief WITH phase_signals and no intent marker.
Graders: intent-approval.mjs --check ran; the trace carries the gate's own
JSON code for BRIEF_INTENT_NOT_APPROVED; no Agent; no plan.md.
review-requires-project: the arg parser now has a CLI that checks the
required flag and prints 'Error: --project <dir> is required.' + usage
(exit 1, code ARG_REQUIRED_MISSING). trekreview.md runs it with
$ARGUMENTS (it passed "$@", which the Bash tool never has, so the parser
never ran — 0 Bash calls in the PM's case-5 traces) and relays its stderr
instead of composing the line. The grader project-required (reply regex,
unstable on backticks) is replaced by parser-ran + names-missing-project
(trace, the parser's JSON code), the same form as names-rule.
Graders: no-error-code is bound to the validator's JSON output form and
covers every REVIEW_* code (WRONG_TYPE and VERSION_FORMAT were missing);
says-pass/says-fail reject a preceding NOT and a longer word; every case
with no-write also gets no-bash-write (redirect, tee, touch, cp, mv, rm,
sed -i in the Bash command). Checked on the PM's 10 recorded traces: no
false positive; known-positive/negative still split.
Red 348aa95 6/7 → green 7/7. Suite 1231: 1229 pass / 0 fail / 2 skip.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Seven `claude plugin eval` cases under evals/, runs: 1, deterministic graders
only (regex, tool_used, file_exists), no ablation. Each case tests one thing
Voyage promises and stops within minutes, headless:
- plan-requires-brief, plan-project-not-initialized, plan-rejects-unknown-export,
review-requires-project: argument guards stop before any Agent or Write.
- plan-halts-without-phase-signals: a brief_version 2.1 brief without
phase_signals halts /trekplan at the sequencing gate, before the swarm.
- review-validate-flags-bad-finding-id (known-positive) and
review-validate-passes-clean-review (known-negative): /trekreview --validate
names REVIEW_BAD_FINDING_ID on a planted bad ID and stays clean on a valid file.
Each case's expected_outcome is committed here, before the suite has run.
Fixtures are written by an inline scaffold.sh (needs --scaffold): chose inline
heredocs because a run cannot read the eval directory, and the add_dirs path
mapping is not documented. evals/results/ is ignored.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
