- park-attempt-files: parks in the git dir (outside the work tree, so Sub-step C.2 never registers a parked file again), reads a path with a space, names a new file under a header it cannot read, parks a symlink, never overwrites a parked file, and exits 1 while a file the attempt made is still in the tree; the upward diff is saved in one form whatever the git config.
- brief-validator: BRIEF_SC_NOT_RUNNABLE only when a later backticked span is a command; a criterion that only names a flag or a path stays prose (Handover 1 says so now).
- review ids: counted over the final list (runContract), as fill-finding-ids counts review.md; trimmed_count matches rows by id; engine-findings and fidelity-diff use computeFindingIds; the --workflow dedup keeps one source's different findings apart, the decision-23 put-back stays one copy per triplet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Pass 1 merged two different /code-review findings on (bin/slug.mjs, 46, CODE_REVIEW_DEFECT) and the second lost its row and its action. A reviewer never duplicates itself: its second finding on a triplet under another title stays its own row, with the id over rule_key#2 (the form critic-diff already uses); fill-finding-ids counts the same way (voyage-lekerepo trial 5, finding 7).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
voyage-lekerepo trial 2 (2026-10-08), report section A; the operator decided
they are fixed before the next release:
- A1: a /code-review finding whose category is simplification, efficiency,
style or readability enters as CODE_REVIEW_IMPROVEMENT (MINOR), not MAJOR.
- A2: recommended_action is the engine's own fix when transcribed, otherwise
a test-first step; never the failure scenario dressed as a remedy.
- A3: a /code-review finding outside the exact range it was given is declined
and listed, but no longer holds ALLOW back; /security-review's still does.
- A4: the manifest must_contain recipe uses grep -E -e ... -- so a pattern
like --sep is not read as an option.
- A5: indented sub-points belong to their criterion (counted), and a
criterion with sub-points and no command warns BRIEF_SC_SUBPOINTS.
- A6: a brief requiring bash 3.2 whose criterion runs plain bash warns
BRIEF_SC_BASH_NOT_PINNED; /trekbrief proposes /bin/bash.
- A7: the plan template's and /trekplan's checkpoints stage the step's files.
Tests fail on 5f9faee first (tests/lib/trial2-fixes.test.mjs, 11 of 14).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
voyage-lekerepo end-to-end trial (2026-10-06), report points 1, 5, 11:
- engine-findings: recommended_action is "Fix <file:line> so this no longer
happens: <failure scenario>", not "Resolve: <title>" (8 of 8 engine
findings were set aside as actionability:empty); the coordinator never
sets an engine finding aside for Actionability.
- findings-schema --repo-root: a cited line past the end of an existing
file is FINDING_LINE_OUT_OF_RANGE, so Phase 5's bounded re-ask fixes it
before the coordinator sees it. The reviewers' instruction said "the
actual line number from the diff"; it now says the file's own line,
never the patch's.
- fill-finding-ids.mjs: the coordinator (no shell) writes @@ID_<n>@@ and
trekreview Phase 7 computes them over (file, line, rule_key); an
unresolved placeholder or a wrong 40-hex id fails. The 4-field id with
`title` the docs named is gone; the code always used three.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
