The three producing commands name voyage:annotating where they build the page; the description of the page and the freehand revision left them. The skill: the person writes every note, Fix/Change edit only the quoted text, a Question is answered and changes nothing, the approval an edit costs is said before the edit, the page is rebuilt. Research documents on request (decision 62). Red baseline 3 runs per scenario without and with the skill; six eval cases; 11 pins.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- park-attempt-files: parks in the git dir (outside the work tree, so Sub-step C.2 never registers a parked file again), reads a path with a space, names a new file under a header it cannot read, parks a symlink, never overwrites a parked file, and exits 1 while a file the attempt made is still in the tree; the upward diff is saved in one form whatever the git config.
- brief-validator: BRIEF_SC_NOT_RUNNABLE only when a later backticked span is a command; a criterion that only names a flag or a path stays prose (Handover 1 says so now).
- review ids: counted over the final list (runContract), as fill-finding-ids counts review.md; trimmed_count matches rows by id; engine-findings and fidelity-diff use computeFindingIds; the --workflow dedup keeps one source's different findings apart, the decision-23 put-back stays one copy per triplet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
/trekbrief Phase 3 carried the interview form inline. It now asks for the
new skill voyage:interviewing by name (allowed-tools gains Skill) and keeps
only its own contract: the size class and budget, the three fixed questions
(framing first, class, storage), where each answer lands in the brief, and
the answers that decide nothing. Step 3a and the form points of Step 3c move
into the skill with their credits (Pocock, Osmani, Spec Kit; licences and
line ranges checked at the pinned commits).
Red baseline first (3 helper interviews against a fixed answer sheet,
Opus 5.5): 10-11 questions in round 1 (3 of 3), 15 of 31 without a
recommendation, a hollow answer written in as a decision (2 of 3), unasked
scope as a requirement (2 of 3). With the skill: 4, 0 of 12, 0 of 3, 0 of 3.
Fact questions and stopping did not fail without it.
Also: pointers to voyage:writing-criteria (S3) where criteria are asked and
written, both review skill names (S3 + S4) in the brief-reviewer prompt; the
intent pins that read moved text now read the skill, same assertions; the
Phase 7 line_ref moves with the shorter Phase 3; 7 eval cases (3/2/2).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The minor points (B8-B12, C13, C14, C16, C17) of the second voyage-lekerepo
trial (2026-10-08), each verified against the code and started with a test
that failed first.
- K10: optional step field `Regression:` - one command the criteria runner
allows, unpiped; plan-validator refuses one that can never run
(PLAN_STEP_REGRESSION_NOT_RUNNABLE). Any plan_version, no bump.
- K11: `On failure:` opens with revert | retry | skip | escalate, or the
validator warns (PLAN_STEP_ON_FAILURE_UNKNOWN); onFailureAction in
plan-schema.
- B8 (operator decision 2026-10-08): minors open after the last critic round
are listed numbered in the Phase 10 summary; the ones the operator picks are
fixed and get one more round (--extra-round when the 3 are spent).
- B11: plan-review dedup merges two reviewers' findings on the same file:line
with the same content (trial pair: Jaccard 0.44, overlap 0.83); the Jaccard
threshold for every other pair is unchanged.
- B12: /trekbrief Step 4c says the reviewer runs in the background and is
waited for, not "foreground, blocking".
- C13: the Phase 4 size count includes .mjs, .cjs, .mts, .cts.
- C14: --evidence shows the first output line on PASS rows.
- C16: findings-schema checks path:line citations in finding prose (error) and
in the prose around the block (warning) against the file.
- C17: git-historian gets the brief, never proposes changing a frozen file,
and names the remote from `git remote -v`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
voyage-lekerepo trial 2 (2026-10-08), report section A; the operator decided
they are fixed before the next release:
- A1: a /code-review finding whose category is simplification, efficiency,
style or readability enters as CODE_REVIEW_IMPROVEMENT (MINOR), not MAJOR.
- A2: recommended_action is the engine's own fix when transcribed, otherwise
a test-first step; never the failure scenario dressed as a remedy.
- A3: a /code-review finding outside the exact range it was given is declined
and listed, but no longer holds ALLOW back; /security-review's still does.
- A4: the manifest must_contain recipe uses grep -E -e ... -- so a pattern
like --sep is not read as an option.
- A5: indented sub-points belong to their criterion (counted), and a
criterion with sub-points and no command warns BRIEF_SC_SUBPOINTS.
- A6: a brief requiring bash 3.2 whose criterion runs plain bash warns
BRIEF_SC_BASH_NOT_PINNED; /trekbrief proposes /bin/bash.
- A7: the plan template's and /trekplan's checkpoints stage the step's files.
Tests fail on 5f9faee first (tests/lib/trial2-fixes.test.mjs, 11 of 14).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
voyage-lekerepo trial (2026-10-06) point 14, operator decision 2026-10-08
(«alle agenter, ny briefsjekk bare ved endring»):
- trekplan: the "Adaptive" hard rule (a 10-file project does not need 7
agents) contradicted Phase 5 ("All agents run for all codebase sizes");
it is gone, in line with quality before cost.
- brief-review-stamp.mjs: /trekbrief stamps the brief body when its
brief-reviewer gate passes; /trekplan Phase 4b skips its own review only
while the stamp is current. Stale (edited) or absent (another producer,
or a gate that did not pass) reviews as before. Additive optional
frontmatter fields, documented in Handover 1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
voyage-lekerepo end-to-end trial (2026-10-06), report points 2, 3, 4, 9:
11 of 13 brief criteria were NOT RUN at review with no warning in /trekbrief;
a plan `git grep` criterion passed validator, gate and three critic rounds,
then felled the run in Phase 7; the End-to-end field and Phase 7's text
search never met; a prose Verify left the test command undefined.
- criteria-runner: runnableCheck() screens a declared check without running
it (same allowlist; an npm run script is not looked up at write time);
/bin/bash tests/<script> allowed; the plan report carries end_to_end,
verified when a passed criterion runs a step's End-to-end command (the
older text form still counts).
- plan-validator 1.8: PLAN_VERIFICATION_NOT_RUNNABLE,
PLAN_STEP_VERIFY_NOT_RUNNABLE, PLAN_END_TO_END_NOT_RUNNABLE,
PLAN_END_TO_END_NOT_VERIFIED (the gate inherits them).
- brief-validator: BRIEF_SC_NOT_RUNNABLE warning; /trekbrief offers a
tests/ script; brief-reviewer no longer proposes unrunnable commands.
- trekexecute: Phase 7 copies end_to_end from the runner; Verify's test
command is its first backticked span.
Measured on the trial's own brief and plan: 11 warnings (the 11 NOT RUN),
and the plan stops on V5 git grep and the unlisted End-to-end command.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
P1 (order 2, wave 1). /trekbrief puts the task in a size class
(ceremony: small|bounded|architectural, K1; heaviest in doubt, said
aloud, overridable, only moved up) that sets the question budget and the
review cap, and asks one round of questions: facts looked up, never
asked; recommendation first; ranked by impact x uncertainty with a
visible Deferred list; stop when the next three answers can be predicted.
"høres bra ut", "gjør som du vil" and an empty answer are not approval.
K2: lib/util/approval-log.mjs, an append-only hash-chained log in the
target repo (.claude/voyage/approvals.jsonl) bound to the approved
content's sha256; append/verify (0/1/2), answer, digest. Committed by
lib/util/artifact-commit.mjs: the log always, the brief and plan only
with artifact_store: git (operator decision 2026-10-06). /trekplan
Phase 1 halts on a broken, diverged, missing or mismatched log entry;
Phase 11 logs and commits an explicit plan approval before any handoff.
Both new brief fields are optional: no brief_version bump. The
main-module guard in intent-approval.mjs and brief-validator.mjs now
compares real paths. Borrowings credited in the prose and module headers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
/trekbrief Phase 7 says the writer adds order_id / order_claimed_at /
order_reason (never typed by the model) and that the yardstick joins use on
order_id; the fixture row lists them in `fields`, EXPORT_DENYLIST names them,
and its stale line_ref (657-672) now reads 961-976; the allowlist header
names them as dropped; docs/architecture.md Stats explains them.
/trekbrief --approve now runs Phase 7 after a successful stamp, with fixed
values (mode "approve", 0 turns, brief_quality/research_topics/auto_research
from the brief's frontmatter, auto_result "manual", intent_approved true).
Valgt fordi PM 04.10 (point 3): fix the code, not the criterion - the
approval must leave the trekbrief record. Measured hole: okf-wiki v1-k has
brief-approved 04.10 17:12Z and trekplan 17:29Z, but only a 03.10 trekbrief
record with intent_approved false. CLAUDE.md, README.md and
docs/command-modes.md say so. The manual path is unchanged.
npm test 1309 -> 1362 (1360 pass / 0 fail / 2 skip).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Verified 2026-10-02 against code.claude.com/docs/en/model-config and
/sub-agents. On the Anthropic API opus -> Opus 5.5 and sonnet ->
Sonnet 5.5 (default effort medium), fable -> Fable 5.1 (default high).
Three more claims in the same section were false and are corrected:
an agent without effort: inherits the session level, not the model
default; MAX_THINKING_TOKENS=0 has no effect on Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5
or Fable; effort is capped by maxEffortLevel or an organization cap.
"Mythos-class" is replaced by the docs' own wording. History is
untouched (CHANGELOG, the measurement docs, the Path C line).
STATE said seven files but listed six; the red pin found exactly
these six. The end-state registry line names a CC changelog fact and
stays as history.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Operator decision 27.09.2026: Voyage works the PM way, so nothing in it
starts Claude Code. Work that needs another session becomes an order plus
a starter line the user gives a session they open themselves; Voyage
never starts the session.
/trekexecute's multi-session path (Phase 2.6) now prepares one wave at a
time: worktree per session, then lib/util/session-orders.mjs writes one
order per session (worktree, steps, done-condition, starter) plus
orders/wave.json, and the run stops. Running the same command again reads
each session's progress file (status mode), merges sequentially with
push-before-cleanup as before, and prepares the next wave. Phase 2.5 skips
the destructive pre-flight while a wave is in flight. Phase 7.6 recovery is
handed over the same way. Hard rule 21: never start Claude Code.
Removed with it, because they existed only for launched children: the
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY billing check (and its dry-run line and Hard rule 1
exception), the hooks-fire version precheck, the safety preamble, the
scoped-tool/turn/budget flags, templates/headless-launch-template.md, the
decomposer's launch.sh (now orders.md), /trekplan's "launch", the README
billing and MCP tuning sections, and scripts/q3-cache-prefix-experiment.mjs
(an experiment that spawned the binary; its results stay in docs/).
/trekresearch's deep-research pre-gate no longer runs the binary for its
version; the post-hoc check was already the authoritative guard.
Chose orders + starters over in-session subagents because the order's done
criterion asks for exactly that, and because /trekexecute disallows the
Agent tool on purpose (Hard rule 10); reopening that is a separate change.
Gate: 54 -> 0 hit lines outside EXEMPT. npm test 1250 (1245 pass, 0 fail,
5 skipped: 3 are the retired-reference scan without its local list).
verify.sh 7/0. The fixture run (tests/lib/session-orders.test.mjs) writes
two orders and wave.json for wave 1 and leaves a trap binary untouched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
M1: headings inside fenced code blocks and HTML comments are text, not
headings, and ## Intent / ## Goal must each appear exactly once. A second
section, an example section in a code block or comment, or a '## ' line in
a code block inside Intent no longer carries the old approval: check gives
INVALID (duplicate) or STALE, stamp refuses a duplicate. A plain brief
hashes exactly as before (pinned), so no stamped brief goes stale.
Re-run of the PM's 29 probes: vi-a, vi-b, vii-a, vii-b now stop; the rest
unchanged. The PM's p7c probe was a no-op (its replace string is not in the
base brief); vii-c is covered by its own test, red on 66e1fa1.
M2: /trekbrief --approve takes <project-dir | brief-file>. New
intent-approval.mjs --resolve decides: a directory → <dir>/brief.md and
/trekplan --project; a file → itself and /trekplan --brief. Phase 4h and the
stamp line use {BRIEF_PATH}; /trekplan's halt table names
/trekbrief --approve {brief_path}, which works on both brief modes, and so
does the gate's hint. HANDOVER-CONTRACTS' "open to every producer's brief"
is now true. Chose fixing the path over rewording the contract because two
real briefs (docs/*-brief.md) had no approval path at all.
Red ff760ed 9/29 → green 29/29. Suite 1219: 1217 pass / 0 fail / 2 skip.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
New lib/stats/stats-append.mjs: one record on stdin, appended to
<data dir>/<kind>-stats.jsonl. The data dir is CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA, else
~/.claude/plugins/data/voyage-ktg-plugin-marketplace (the yardstick's
default). A failed write exits 1 with a reason: reported, never silent.
/trekbrief Phase 7 and /trekplan Phase 12 now run it instead of
"append to ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}/…; skip silently". intent-approval's
resolveApprovalDataDir delegates to the same resolver.
Chose a stdin heredoc over a --json argument because a JSON record in a
shell argument breaks on quotes in task text. Only trekbrief and trekplan
are rewired (økt 2's countable form needs exactly those two); the other
commands' stats prose is unchanged and docs/architecture.md says so.
Red a358059 7/7 → green 7/7. Suite 1208: 1206 pass / 0 fail / 2 skip.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Veikart steg 1, økt 1 av 2. The three holes measured in the grounds:
(1) ## Intent / ## Goal were only checked for existence, (2) no approval
marker existed, (3) brief-approved was emitted only on the auto path.
- lib/validators/intent-approval.mjs: --check / --stamp. The marker is
intent_approved_hash (sha256 over normalized ## Intent + ## Goal) +
intent_approved_at. Editing either section after approval → STALE.
- /trekplan Phase 1 (Read the brief, both --brief and --project): runs
--check and HALTS on BRIEF_INTENT_NOT_APPROVED / _STALE / _INVALID with
the remedy spelled out; an unrunnable check halts too.
- /trekbrief Phase 4h (before the Phase 5 fork, asked even in --quick):
shows Intent + Goal verbatim, AskUserQuestion Approve / Revise / Leave;
only "Approve" runs --stamp. --stamp emits brief-approved, so the manual
(default) path records it; the auto path's own emission is removed.
New mode /trekbrief --approve <project-dir> = Phase 4h alone.
- README, CLAUDE.md, command-modes, HANDOVER-CONTRACTS §Handover 1,
jsonl-schemas (trekbrief-stats gains intent_approved).
Valgt ingen brief_version-bump fordi skjemaendringen er rent additiv (to
valgfrie felt) og kravet sitter i /trekplan — enhver produsents brief kan
godkjennes via /trekbrief --approve uten produsentendring. Valgt eget
--check-kall i stedet for et flagg på brief-validator fordi --brief-stien
i dag ikke kjører validatoren i det hele tatt; et nytt validatorkall der
ville også stoppe på andre feil. Valgt fallback-datamappe = målestokkens
(plugins/data/voyage-…) fordi CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA er tom i Bash-miljøet og
event-emits egen fallback er stille skip — slik ble brief-approved 0 records.
What the marker does NOT prove (module header, command prose, contract):
same user, same machine — any session can stamp. A trace, not a signature.
Suite 1183 → 1201 (1199/0/2). Mutants M1–M5 (stale check off, check
always valid, gate line removed, stamp emits nothing, no normalization)
each fell ≥ 1 test. yardstick unchanged: RED, 1 of 3 countable.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
gemini-bridge is dropped by operator directive (three repetitions). The drop is
permanent, not a wait-for-SDK-upgrade state, so the change clears every LIVE
surface that could still steer a run toward the agent and leaves the historical
record alone.
Live surfaces cleared: agents/gemini-bridge.md deleted; trekresearch (bridge
launch block, --local help, high-effort always-on pair, stats record,
degradation list), trekplan, trekbrief, research-orchestrator (mode table,
agent table, prompting block, summary line), README (feature prose, mode table,
agent prose, mermaid EXTERNAL node, conditional legend, optional-MCP
requirement, --local section), CLAUDE.md, settings.json (the whole
trekresearch.geminiBridge block), both templates, architecture.md,
command-modes.md.
trekplan high-effort Adversarial Pass 2 now degrades EXPLICITLY: it emits its
section with status "unavailable, skipped" instead of failing or vanishing. A
high-effort plan carrying no Pass 2 marker is indistinguishable from one whose
Pass 2 crashed, which is the failure mode this wording exists to prevent.
gemini_used is deliberately KEPT as a vestigial trekresearch stats field pinned
to false. Removing it would break the observability export schema for existing
consumers, and the directive was about the agent, not the field.
Not touched: CHANGELOG history and the measurement/decision docs keep their
gemini references. They record what a past version did or what was measured
then; rewriting them is the same defect class as bumping a version string
inside a measurement doc.
Driven test-first. Five new pins in tests/lib/doc-consistency.test.mjs, verified
RED before the edits, including a KNOWN-POSITIVE CONTROL asserting the
historical records still DO carry gemini references — so the empty result on
live surfaces is a measurement and not a broken query (Verifiseringsloven
ansikt 4). Agent inventory 24 -> 23 (20 spawnable + 3 orchestrator reference
docs); the <example>-block floor moves 34 -> 32 because an agent legitimately
left the inventory, not because examples went missing from a surviving one.
Docs: docs/T1-cc26-delegated-orchestration.md §8 item 3 claimed both the §6
synthesis-agent PoC and the §5 bake-off were "designed but unbuilt". That was
written in S7 and falsified the same afternoon by S12, which ran the §6 PoC and
recorded Δ main-context (faithful flow) = 0.0%, NEGATIVE. The stale wording is
what caused the settled PoC to be re-ordered as new work on 2026-09-02, so it is
struck rather than deleted and §6 gained a RUN AND DECLINED status block. The
finding is structural, not stochastic: Phase 5 spawns the exploration swarm
foreground (trekplan.md:158,338-341), so the outputs are already resident in
main before Phase 7 — delegating only the Phase-7 digest evicts nothing.
Also measured 2026-09-03 (CC 2.1.259): claude -p --output-format stream-json
runs on subscription auth with no ANTHROPIC_API_KEY and now emits a
subagent_stats block, so S12's environment-block premise is half stale. Recorded
in §8 item 4. It lowers the cost of §5; it changes nothing about §6.
Suite 1041 (1039/0/2), up from 1036 by exactly the five tests added.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
akashic-intelligence lost /trekplan Phase 9 twice to reviewer agents that
never returned. Reproduced here and measured: the cause is the Agent tool's
`name` parameter, not the agent definitions.
Passing `name` does not label a subagent - it changes its kind. The spawn is
recorded as taskKind "in_process_teammate" (spawnDepth 0) instead of a real
subagent (spawnDepth 1). A teammate's final assistant text is not a return
value; it reaches the parent only if the teammate itself calls
SendMessage(to: "main"). plan-critic and scope-guardian declare
tools: [Read, Glob, Grep] - no SendMessage - so as teammates they are
structurally incapable of returning, whatever the prompt says.
Denominators: named 0/5 returned; named + explicit SendMessage 1/1; unnamed
3/3 (plan-critic and scope-guardian each returned full findings + the JSON
block in ~110s). Model override 2/2 non-returning, so the override is not
the variable. All 5 named agents produced correct final text in their
transcripts - only delivery failed, and that output is recoverable on disk.
The defect is a harness behaviour, so it is documented rather than silently
worked around: docs/agent-return-channel-defect.md carries the mechanism,
every denominator, the two broken queries that nearly became facts, the
unmeasured cells, and a recommended working shape for consumers (use agents,
drop `name`; do not fall back to inline review, which costs the dedup step).
Prevention is pinned, TDD red->green: the four spawning commands each state
the rule and name the mechanism, and doc-consistency derives the spawning set
from the command files so the pin cannot go vacuous.
Suite 1013 (1011/0/2), +5 from baseline 1008.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014MfB5Ecp8vvGyou8uFGxBV
Implements the CLAUDE.md cross-cutting invariant "brief framing must match
operator intent" as a controlled brief_version 2.1->2.2 bump (operator option A1).
Three defense layers, version-gated at >=2.2 so existing 2.0/2.1 briefs stay
valid (forward + backward compatible), mirroring the phase_signals >=2.1 gate:
- L1 framing: enum field (preserve|refine|replace|new-direction). Enum-checked
on any version when present (BRIEF_INVALID_FRAMING); missing at >=2.2 ->
BRIEF_MISSING_FRAMING. /trekbrief Phase 2.5 collects it BEFORE any brief prose
(non-skippable, even in --quick).
- L2 memory alignment: new brief-reviewer dimension 6 comparing brief Intent/Goal
+ framing against operator memory for explicit contradictions; degrades to
score 5 (N/A) when no memory context is supplied. Wired into Phase 4e gate
(memory_alignment.score >= 4).
- L3 obligatory ## TL;DR (<=5 content lines) at >=2.2; soft cap ->
BRIEF_TLDR_TOO_LONG warning.
trekreview briefs are exempt from the framing/TL;DR gate. Handover 1 PUBLIC
CONTRACT doc, README "What's new", and the CLAUDE.md invariant + agents table
(brief-reviewer 5->6 dimensions) updated to 2.2 (schema axis only; plugin
version badge + CHANGELOG remain S10).
Iron Law followed: validator tests red->green first. Tests 586 -> 606
(+20, 604 pass / 2 skip). claude plugin validate passes (pre-existing
CLAUDE.md root-context warning unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
8 sites across 3 orchestrator agents + trekbrief/trekplan/trekresearch asserted 'the harness does not expose the Agent tool to sub-agents' as present fact -- the rationale for the v2.4.0 inline migration. CC 2.1.172 (verified) lets sub-agents spawn sub-agents up to 5 levels deep, so the claim is false. Replaced each with verified history (pre-2.1.172) + current fact + forward pointer to the decision matrix (W1/CC-26). Decision-neutral: states fact without pre-empting the orchestration redesign. CHANGELOG history left untouched. Tests 578/0/2; claude plugin validate passes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
v5.0.0 added a read-only HTML render. v5.0.1 deleted that and pointed at
/playground document-critique, which pre-generates Claude's suggestions
and asks the operator to approve/reject them. The operator asked for the
opposite — a surface where THEY drive every annotation. v5.0.2 lands it.
scripts/annotate.mjs (~430 lines, zero deps) takes any artifact .md and
writes a self-contained HTML next to it. The HTML renders the document
with line numbers, lets the operator click any line to add their own
note (inline textarea, save with Cmd+Enter or button), keeps a sidebar
of all notes (editable + deletable + persisted in localStorage per
artifact path), and exposes Copy Prompt to gather every note into one
structured prompt. Operator copies, pastes back, Claude revises the .md.
The three producing commands now run annotate.mjs at their last step and
print the file:// link with explicit "Click any line to add YOUR OWN note"
instructions. The v5.0.1 /playground document-critique line is gone.
npm test green: 516 tests, 514 pass, 0 fail, 2 skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The v5.0.0 stop-gap had /trekbrief, /trekplan, and /trekreview each render
a read-only {artifact}.html (via scripts/render-artifact.mjs) AND print a
vague "run the /playground plugin" instruction. In practice the read-only
HTML was redundant with what /playground produces and the instruction
wasn't copy-paste-ready — the operator had to guess the right invocation.
v5.0.1 deletes scripts/render-artifact.mjs + its test + npm run render,
and makes each producing command end with a single boxed, literal,
copy-paste-ready line:
/playground build a document-critique playground for {artifact_path}
One paste from the operator launches the official playground skill's
document-critique template, which builds an interactive HTML — artifact
on the left, per-line Approve/Reject/Comment cards on the right, Copy
Prompt button at the bottom. Mark suggestions, click Copy Prompt, paste
back, Claude revises the .md. Doc-consistency test pins the literal
invocation so the prose cannot soften back into vagueness.
npm test green: 503 tests, 501 pass, 0 fail, 2 skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The v4.2/v4.3 bespoke playground SPA (~388 KB), the /trekrevise command,
Handover 8 (annotation → revision), the supporting lib/ modules
(anchor-parser, annotation-digest, markdown-write, revision-guard), the
Playwright e2e suite, and the @playwright/test / @axe-core/playwright
devDeps are removed. A browser walkthrough found the playground borderline
unusable, and it duplicated the official /playground plugin's
document-critique / diff-review templates.
In their place: scripts/render-artifact.mjs — a small, zero-dependency
renderer that turns a brief/plan/review .md into a self-contained,
design-system-styled, zero-network .html (frontmatter folded into a
<details> block). /trekbrief, /trekplan, and /trekreview call it on their
last step and print the file:// link; to annotate, run /playground
(document-critique) on the .md and paste the generated prompt back.
Resolves the v4.3.1-deferred findings as moot (their target files are
deleted). npm test green: 509 tests, 507 pass, 0 fail, 2 skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
