The step check read File: anywhere on the Test first lines, so a 1.9 plan whose only File: stood mid-line validated while the executor, K6 and the red proof read no test file. From 1.9 checkSteps reads the test the way testFirstFiles does; below 1.9 it reads as before (decision 16). Found by the step 5 controller in /trekexecute --session 2; fixed on the operator's decision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
npm test now preloads tests/helpers/no-session-id.mjs, which deletes CLAUDE_CODE_SESSION_ID before any test file loads, and the 18 files that spread process.env into a child use childEnv() instead (23 sites). A live session's stop guard is no longer pointed at a temp-repo lock (S133).
engines stays >=18: --import exists from Node 18.18/20.6, and the quoted test glob already needs Node 21 (criteria-runner NODE_GLOB_MAJOR), so the real floor does not move.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
voyage-lekerepo trial (2026-10-06) point 6, operator decision 2026-10-08
(«samme skala, og du spør»): the critics rated a non-discriminating test
minor in round 3, there was no way to fix it after the last round, it was
built, and /trekreview called the same weakness MAJOR (MISSING_TEST).
- plan-critic, scope-guardian: rate on the review catalogue's tiers; a test
that cannot fail on a wrong implementation is major, never minor.
- plan-gate: an open MAJOR stops (PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR: revise and run the
next round; PLAN_GATE_OPEN_MAJOR_FINAL after the last round: ask the
operator). --accept-open records "build as is" after their yes, bound to
the round and the plan hash; never for a blocker.
- trekplan Phase 9: REVISE after the last round asks fix now (one extra
round) or build as is, instead of carrying the majors silently.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
voyage-lekerepo trial (2026-10-06) point 14, operator decision 2026-10-08
(«alle agenter, ny briefsjekk bare ved endring»):
- trekplan: the "Adaptive" hard rule (a 10-file project does not need 7
agents) contradicted Phase 5 ("All agents run for all codebase sizes");
it is gone, in line with quality before cost.
- brief-review-stamp.mjs: /trekbrief stamps the brief body when its
brief-reviewer gate passes; /trekplan Phase 4b skips its own review only
while the stamp is current. Stale (edited) or absent (another producer,
or a gate that did not pass) reviews as before. Additive optional
frontmatter fields, documented in Handover 1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
voyage-lekerepo end-to-end trial (2026-10-06), report points 2, 3, 4, 9:
11 of 13 brief criteria were NOT RUN at review with no warning in /trekbrief;
a plan `git grep` criterion passed validator, gate and three critic rounds,
then felled the run in Phase 7; the End-to-end field and Phase 7's text
search never met; a prose Verify left the test command undefined.
- criteria-runner: runnableCheck() screens a declared check without running
it (same allowlist; an npm run script is not looked up at write time);
/bin/bash tests/<script> allowed; the plan report carries end_to_end,
verified when a passed criterion runs a step's End-to-end command (the
older text form still counts).
- plan-validator 1.8: PLAN_VERIFICATION_NOT_RUNNABLE,
PLAN_STEP_VERIFY_NOT_RUNNABLE, PLAN_END_TO_END_NOT_RUNNABLE,
PLAN_END_TO_END_NOT_VERIFIED (the gate inherits them).
- brief-validator: BRIEF_SC_NOT_RUNNABLE warning; /trekbrief offers a
tests/ script; brief-reviewer no longer proposes unrunnable commands.
- trekexecute: Phase 7 copies end_to_end from the runner; Verify's test
command is its first backticked span.
Measured on the trial's own brief and plan: 11 warnings (the 11 NOT RUN),
and the plan stops on V5 git grep and the unlisted End-to-end command.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wave 1, order 3 (P3 plan mode as the start, P2 design as its own part, P9
plan side). Contracts K3-K6 for the later merges.
- plan_version 1.8 (1.7 plans stay valid): Test first on every step, one
End-to-end ("run the thing") step, optional Interface in / Interface out /
Review focus fields, a ceremony class in the header (absent =
architectural), and for architectural plans a ## Design part: module map
without cycles, architecture rules that name their enforcer and the step
that proves them, a requirements check asked as keep / change.
- K3 lib/validators/plan-gate.mjs: the critic verdict is recorded INSIDE the
plan (Claude Code's plan approval hands a hook only the plan file's text),
bound to the hash taken before the reviewers read it; 0 go / 1 stop / 2
could not run; at most 3 critic rounds, then stop and ask.
- K5 lib/verification/arch-rules.mjs: runs the target repo's own
dependency-cruiser or import-linter (installs nothing; 2 = not measured,
never green); --prove --rule shows pass -> fail on a planted violation of
that rule -> pass. Verified against dependency-cruiser 18.5.0 and
import-linter 2.15; madge 8.0.0 left out (missed a planted .mjs cycle).
- K6 lib/verification/plan-scope-sweep.mjs: changed files no step names.
- /trekplan Phases 8-10: design part, bounded critic loop, the gate before
"execute", a plan-mode path through ExitPlanMode (not yet run end to end
inside plan mode). plan-critic 10 -> 12 dimensions; scope-guardian checks
the ceremony.
- Fixed on the way: plan-validator and plan-review-dedup used the
file://argv[1] main guard (no-op under a symlink or a space); CRLF plans
failed every manifest; the dedup dropped finding severity.
Borrowed, credited in place: obra/superpowers, Kiro (docs), addyosmani/
agent-skills, mattpocock/skills, GitHub Spec Kit, bashebr/ai-native-sdlc,
Boris Cherny's public threads.
Suite 1497 (1495 / 0 / 2), 86 new tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An adversarial read of d88245c reproduced 15 problems; all fixed here, each
with a test that fails on the old code.
- verdict-gate: a greener verdict must be backed by the LAST fence being a
`json` block of the right shape, with no BLOCKER in the JSON (any case),
in `## Findings (BLOCKER)`, or a differing finding-id list; two verdict
lines and more than one file argument are exit 2. ({}, null, lowercase
"blocker", a trailing ```jsonc and a later json fence all gave exit 0.)
- engine-findings: a transcribed "narrower" key can no longer lower an
engine tier; absolute paths under --repo-root match the scope; "12" lines
parse; an empty scope is an error; out-of-scope engine findings are
unverified (`engine:out-of-scope`) and forbid ALLOW.
- recurrence: the catch-all engine keys and keys normalised from unknown
ones are never proposed; the same unfixed finding in two iterations is not
a recurrence; proposals are validated before they are offered; \r/U+2028
and damaged markers are refused; writes go through a symlinked CLAUDE.md.
Prose points --repo at the session directory, not the git toplevel.
- Workflow substrate: engines are counted from what arrived, and the
verdict's floor is recomputed from the coordinator's findings; now tested
by running the script with stubbed Workflow globals. Two literal NUL bytes
written as \u0000 (git saw the file as binary).
- Trimming keeps Pass 1's "Also flagged by" provenance; `## Declined to
Judge` and remediation steps are required from review_version 1.1 only
(N-1); the zero-diff review now carries the JSON block the gate needs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ordre 5 (wave 1, P11 + P5), review_version 1.1.
- K7: `verdict: ALLOW | WARN | BLOCK` is required in review.md (strict
error, soft warning for 1.0 reviews). New CLI lib/review/verdict-gate.mjs:
0 = ALLOW/WARN, 1 = BLOCK, 2 = could not decide (never green); a verdict
greener than the file's own BLOCKERs or JSON block is exit 2. Realpath
main guard (the old file:// guard exits 0 under a symlink - measured).
- No finding is struck for length: succinctness trims only MINOR/SUGGESTION
text (catalogue tier), keeps BLOCKER/MAJOR whole, counts trims; the
coordinator lists what it declined to judge.
- Claude Code's /code-review and /security-review run as the engine via the
Skill tool (never --fix/--comment/--post/ultra); lib/review/engine-findings.mjs
turns their findings into a reviewer payload; two catalogue keys
(CODE_REVIEW_DEFECT, SECURITY_REVIEW_VULNERABILITY), catalogue 12 -> 14.
An engine that did not run forbids ALLOW.
- Every BLOCKER is written as a numbered `### Step R<n>` with its source
finding (strict error REVIEW_MISSING_REMEDIATION_STEP).
- P5: lib/review/recurrence.mjs - a finding class in two review.md files
(current + git history, no new store) becomes one proposal, routed by the
catalogue's memory_route; written only between Voyage markers in
.claude/rules/voyage-review-lessons.md under a size budget, CLAUDE.md gets
a pointer only; the operator approves every line (Phase 8.7).
- Workflow substrate: catalogue enum in step; a missing reviewer or engine
forbids ALLOW there too (it returned ALLOW on zero findings before).
- Fixtures review-run-A/B said WARN over a BLOCKER; now BLOCK.
Borrowed and credited in code: Superpowers (declined-to-judge), ai-native-sdlc
(cap only nits; mistake/fix/check), Spec Kit (managed block; converge steps),
Pocock (retro routing), Kiro (verdict file + gate; evidence per lesson),
Cherny (engine -> brief control order; review -> memory; budget).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
P1 (order 2, wave 1). /trekbrief puts the task in a size class
(ceremony: small|bounded|architectural, K1; heaviest in doubt, said
aloud, overridable, only moved up) that sets the question budget and the
review cap, and asks one round of questions: facts looked up, never
asked; recommendation first; ranked by impact x uncertainty with a
visible Deferred list; stop when the next three answers can be predicted.
"høres bra ut", "gjør som du vil" and an empty answer are not approval.
K2: lib/util/approval-log.mjs, an append-only hash-chained log in the
target repo (.claude/voyage/approvals.jsonl) bound to the approved
content's sha256; append/verify (0/1/2), answer, digest. Committed by
lib/util/artifact-commit.mjs: the log always, the brief and plan only
with artifact_store: git (operator decision 2026-10-06). /trekplan
Phase 1 halts on a broken, diverged, missing or mismatched log entry;
Phase 11 logs and commits an explicit plan approval before any handoff.
Both new brief fields are optional: no brief_version bump. The
main-module guard in intent-approval.mjs and brief-validator.mjs now
compares real paths. Borrowings credited in the prose and module headers.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
/trekexecute writes run status stopped (dirty-tree stop, entry-condition stop, escalation) and step status blocked (Step 0 sandbox sentinel); the validator rejected the first and warned on the second. Both are real states lib/util/session-orders.mjs already reads (ENDED_BAD), so the validator learns them. The step-status list is exported as PROGRESS_STEP_STATUSES (was an inline literal) so tests check prose against it instead of keeping a copy. docs/HANDOVER-CONTRACTS.md Handover 5 rows updated.
Red: 3 of 4 new tests fail on the pre-fix code (stopped run status, PROGRESS_STEP_STATUSES export, blocked step status). Regression guard (green on arrival): every run status but completed stays resumable.
progress-validator 16/16. Suite 1368 (1366/0/2).
Voyage order 20261005T104513Z-1250514346, plan step 1/5.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
M4: the halt regex matched any **halt** in a 2500-char window, so the PM's
mutant (first **halt** → "continue anyway") survived. Two new tests pin the
sentence right after the gate command and the could-not-run halt. Mutant
run: old test ok, both new tests not ok.
M5: nothing guarded 2045432's allowlist line. New test: trekbrief keeps
intent_approved, drops task/project_dir. Mutant (line removed): not ok.
M3 (red): the header claims a reflow keeps the approval; joining lines is
STALE. Pins the honest wording + the STALE behaviour.
M7 (red): the trekreview exemption is not documented as a bypass of the
same trust class as self-stamping (header, HANDOVER-CONTRACTS, trekplan).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
M1: headings inside fenced code blocks and HTML comments are text, not
headings, and ## Intent / ## Goal must each appear exactly once. A second
section, an example section in a code block or comment, or a '## ' line in
a code block inside Intent no longer carries the old approval: check gives
INVALID (duplicate) or STALE, stamp refuses a duplicate. A plain brief
hashes exactly as before (pinned), so no stamped brief goes stale.
Re-run of the PM's 29 probes: vi-a, vi-b, vii-a, vii-b now stop; the rest
unchanged. The PM's p7c probe was a no-op (its replace string is not in the
base brief); vii-c is covered by its own test, red on 66e1fa1.
M2: /trekbrief --approve takes <project-dir | brief-file>. New
intent-approval.mjs --resolve decides: a directory → <dir>/brief.md and
/trekplan --project; a file → itself and /trekplan --brief. Phase 4h and the
stamp line use {BRIEF_PATH}; /trekplan's halt table names
/trekbrief --approve {brief_path}, which works on both brief modes, and so
does the gate's hint. HANDOVER-CONTRACTS' "open to every producer's brief"
is now true. Chose fixing the path over rewording the contract because two
real briefs (docs/*-brief.md) had no approval path at all.
Red ff760ed 9/29 → green 29/29. Suite 1219: 1217 pass / 0 fail / 2 skip.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
M1 (PM probes vi-a, vi-b, vii-a, vii-b, vii-c): extractSection takes the first
## Intent and does not see code blocks or HTML comments, so an added, hidden
or cut-off section rides on the old approval. 5 red. vii-d (comment inside
Intent) and the plain-brief hash are pinned green so the fix cannot move them.
M2: --approve resolves only <dir>/brief.md; a brief planned with
--brief docs/x-brief.md has no approval path but a raw --stamp. 4 red.
The stamp helper now substitutes {BRIEF_PATH} as well as {PROJECT_DIR}.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Veikart steg 1, økt 1 av 2. 18 tests, all failing today:
(a) a brief without an approval marker → the gate line in
commands/trekplan.md exits non-zero (today: no gate, planning proceeds);
(b) marker + ## Intent or ## Goal edited after approval → stale, stops;
(c) a valid marker passes (known negative), and edits outside the two
sections or whitespace-only reflow keep it valid;
(d) the stamp runs before the Phase 5 manual/auto fork and emits
brief-approved, so the manual (default) path records it too.
The gate and stamp lines are extracted from the command prose and
executed, so removing the line or stubbing the module fells the test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Review finding 91e21c1f (MAJOR emitted, catalogue tier BLOCKER). Live in every
session regardless of the STORM flag.
The hard-block tier is the one thing no operator flag unlocks - not `strict`,
not `--soft`, not VOYAGE_QUERY_PRIVACY_ALLOW=1 - so a format it misses is a
secret leaving the machine in an outbound query with no second gate behind it.
Two patterns keyed on a run of consecutive alphanumerics, which a `-` or `_`
inside the token body breaks:
- /\bsk-[A-Za-z0-9]{20,}\b/ was commented "OpenAI/Anthropic-style" but the run
ends after `api03` (3 chars) in an Anthropic Console key, so
sk-ant-api03-<~95> passed through. Measured by execution, not read.
- /\bghp_[A-Za-z0-9]{36,}\b/ covered only the classic prefix: github_pat_<...>
and gho_<36> passed through; ghp_<36> was blocked.
Widened with one pattern per real-world format rather than one loose pattern,
so each stays readable and its length floor stays honest:
- sk-ant-<scheme>-<20+ base64url> (covers api03 and oat01)
- gh[pousr]_<36+> (classic PAT, OAuth, user, server, refresh)
- github_pat_<20+ incl. underscore> (fine-grained, real format is <22>_<59>)
Patterns whose body class includes `-`/`_` carry no trailing \b - it would not
fire on a non-word final character. The existing sk-/AKIA/xox/PEM patterns are
unchanged; the AWS comment is accurate as written, so it was left alone.
Formats verified against GitHub's token-format documentation and Anthropic key
anatomy before the patterns were written, not from memory:
- github.blog/engineering/platform-security/behind-githubs-new-authentication-token-formats/
- gh[pousr]_ + 36 chars; github_pat_ + <22>_<59> = 93 total
- sk-ant-api03- + ~95 base64url chars (base64url includes _ and -)
6 new tests: three table rows for the missed formats, and three that pin each
one blocked with `strict: false` AND the opt-in env var set at once - the
property that makes this tier meaningful.
Suite 952 (950/0/2, baseline 937 + 15 across both Track A fixes).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013zNqxP8qTWgJhn3wMYUFEh
The documented `brief-validator.mjs <brief.md>` invocation (no flags) always
bailed to Usage/exit 2. Root cause: when --min-version is absent, minIdx is -1,
so the skip index minIdx+1 was 0 — excluding argv index 0, exactly where the
file positional sits in the no-flag case. Any leading flag (--soft, --json)
pushed the file to index >=1 and masked the bug, so the function-level tests
never caught it.
Guard the skip index to -1 when --min-version is absent. Add two CLI regression
tests (execFileSync, matching the next-session-prompt-validator pattern):
no-flag invocation reaches validation, and --min-version still skips its value
token to find the file. Suite 822 -> 824 (822/0/2).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WH1krHamUehZh6JqVqs85t
The economy profile's cross-tier Jaccard floor (0.55) rests on parked-synthetic
fixtures; empirical Step-17 calibration is v4.2-budget-gated ($60–120,
unauthorized). Fork resolved as label-not-calibrate: the experimental status,
previously prose-only in docs/profiles.md, now lives in the profile data and is
machine-checked. No new user-facing capability — honest labeling + a guard.
- lib/profiles/economy.yaml: add `experimental: true` (with rationale comment).
- lib/validators/profile-validator.mjs: recognize `experimental` as an OPTIONAL
boolean; non-boolean → PROFILE_INVALID_ENUM. Absent ⇒ tier is stable
(premium/balanced unaffected, profile_version stays 1.0 — additive).
- README.md + docs/operations.md + docs/profiles.md: flag the `economy` table
row "⚠ Experimental (uncalibrated Jaccard floor)".
- tests/synthetic/profile-jaccard-calibration.md + analysis §6/§10 + backlog
plan §S34: cross-reference the marker; mark V30/S34 done.
+5 tests (739 → 744, 742/2/0): economy declares experimental:true; premium and
balanced do not; validator rejects non-boolean experimental; every profile-doc
economy row is flagged; the flag tracks the calibration's parked-synthetic
status (must drop in the same change that lands real calibration).
Closes the balance backlog (4/4, S31–S34). claude plugin validate green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
The plan template (templates/plan-template.md:21) emits plan_version ONLY in
the prose blockquote metadata line:
> Generated by trekplan v{version} on {YYYY-MM-DD} — `plan_version: 1.7`
It carries no frontmatter plan_version (the frontmatter block is trekreview-only
and holds source_findings). But PLAN_VERSION_REGEX in lib/parsers/plan-schema.mjs
was `^`-anchored (/m), matching ONLY line-start (frontmatter). The backtick-
wrapped prose form never matched → extractPlanVersion returned null → every real
generated plan got a spurious PLAN_NO_VERSION warning from plan-validator.
Not caught earlier because no test ran the parser against the actual template;
the synthetic fixtures all carry frontmatter plan_version and parse fine.
Internal source contradiction surfaced: the parser comment documents intent
"frontmatter OR doc body", planning-orchestrator.md:228 + the template place it
in the prose line, while HANDOVER-CONTRACTS.md calls it a frontmatter field.
Operator-chosen fix (parser, not template): relax the regex to
`/(?:^|`)plan_version:.../m` so it matches line-start (frontmatter) OR the
backtick-prefixed prose form. Honors the parser's own documented contract,
fixes all existing + future plans, changes no plan output, touches one code
file — vs the template-fix which would alter every plan's shape, contradict
planning-orchestrator.md, and force a 3-file doc reconciliation (scope creep).
TDD (red first): added prose-form + canonical-template regression pins in
plan-schema.test.mjs and a no-PLAN_NO_VERSION pin in plan-validator.test.mjs;
all 3 red on the `^`-anchored regex, green after the relax. The template pin
ties the parser directly to the real generated artifact.
S22 defect closed in docs/S22-happy-path-dogfood.md (§Pipeline defects + log).
Tests: 728 (726 pass / 2 skip / 0 fail; live `node --test`, = 725 baseline +3).
plugin validate passes (1 accepted CLAUDE.md-at-root warning).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
Closes devils-advocate audit #4–#6 (MAJOR×MED). Four additive, non-breaking
changes to the v5.5 framing-alignment machinery:
1. --min-brief-version <ver> gate (audit #4). Opt-in version floor on
/trekplan + /trekresearch, forwarded to brief-validator as --min-version.
New opts.minBriefVersion warns BRIEF_VERSION_BELOW_MINIMUM (never blocks)
when a brief declares a version below the floor; trekreview exempt; absent
opt = no check. CLI shim parses --min-version and skips its value token in
filePath detection.
2. memory_alignment.status field (audit #5). brief-reviewer now emits
status: verified | n_a | contradictions so a score-5 N/A (no memory) is
distinguishable from a score-5 verified-aligned brief — the score≥4 gate
passes in both, status reveals whether the wrong-premise defense ran.
3. Document pre-2.2 = zero framing enforcement (audit #4). HANDOVER-CONTRACTS
§Handover 1 now states the producer-elective hole + two remedies. Also
fixes a stale "current is 2.1" line (current is 2.2).
4. Soften flagship overselling (audit #6). CLAUDE.md Context-Engineering
principle now hedges that main-context relief is asserted-by-design, not
measured (T1 PoC found Δ≈0); README carried no false claim to fix.
TDD: 8 new tests written failing-first (5 validator, 1 trekbrief status pin,
2 doc-consistency cross-file pins). Suite 691→699 (697 pass / 2 skip / 0 fail).
No flagship prose-pin added (deliberate, per S19 anti-bloat).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
Implements the CLAUDE.md cross-cutting invariant "brief framing must match
operator intent" as a controlled brief_version 2.1->2.2 bump (operator option A1).
Three defense layers, version-gated at >=2.2 so existing 2.0/2.1 briefs stay
valid (forward + backward compatible), mirroring the phase_signals >=2.1 gate:
- L1 framing: enum field (preserve|refine|replace|new-direction). Enum-checked
on any version when present (BRIEF_INVALID_FRAMING); missing at >=2.2 ->
BRIEF_MISSING_FRAMING. /trekbrief Phase 2.5 collects it BEFORE any brief prose
(non-skippable, even in --quick).
- L2 memory alignment: new brief-reviewer dimension 6 comparing brief Intent/Goal
+ framing against operator memory for explicit contradictions; degrades to
score 5 (N/A) when no memory context is supplied. Wired into Phase 4e gate
(memory_alignment.score >= 4).
- L3 obligatory ## TL;DR (<=5 content lines) at >=2.2; soft cap ->
BRIEF_TLDR_TOO_LONG warning.
trekreview briefs are exempt from the framing/TL;DR gate. Handover 1 PUBLIC
CONTRACT doc, README "What's new", and the CLAUDE.md invariant + agents table
(brief-reviewer 5->6 dimensions) updated to 2.2 (schema axis only; plugin
version badge + CHANGELOG remain S10).
Iron Law followed: validator tests red->green first. Tests 586 -> 606
(+20, 604 pass / 2 skip). claude plugin validate passes (pre-existing
CLAUDE.md root-context warning unchanged).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
v5.1.0 shipped with an unquoted brief_version: 2.1 in trekbrief-template.md.
parseScalar coerced it to Number 2.1, and the sequencing gate guarded on
typeof === 'string', silently bypassing BRIEF_V51_MISSING_SIGNALS.
Three-part atomic fix:
- brief-validator.mjs:87+149 now accepts both string and number forms via
String(fm.brief_version) coercion.
- trekbrief-template.md quotes the value so new briefs parse as String.
- doc-consistency.test.mjs pins the QUOTED form going forward.
Three regression tests added in brief-validator.test.mjs.
The v4.2/v4.3 bespoke playground SPA (~388 KB), the /trekrevise command,
Handover 8 (annotation → revision), the supporting lib/ modules
(anchor-parser, annotation-digest, markdown-write, revision-guard), the
Playwright e2e suite, and the @playwright/test / @axe-core/playwright
devDeps are removed. A browser walkthrough found the playground borderline
unusable, and it duplicated the official /playground plugin's
document-critique / diff-review templates.
In their place: scripts/render-artifact.mjs — a small, zero-dependency
renderer that turns a brief/plan/review .md into a self-contained,
design-system-styled, zero-network .html (frontmatter folded into a
<details> block). /trekbrief, /trekplan, and /trekreview call it on their
last step and print the file:// link; to annotate, run /playground
(document-critique) on the .md and paste the generated prompt back.
Resolves the v4.3.1-deferred findings as moot (their target files are
deleted). npm test green: 509 tests, 507 pass, 0 fail, 2 skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3 new test files, 24 cases (8 per validator):
- baseline (no annotation fields) still valid
- revision: 0 / revision: 5 accepted
- source_annotations list-of-dict accepted
- annotation_digest string accepted
- revision_reason accepted
- all 4 fields together accepted
- unrecognized future field tolerated (forward-compat policy)
Pin against future strict-key refactors. No production code change — pure regression pin.
Step 20 of v4.1 — implements drift detection in plan-validator.mjs per
brief Assumptions block 7: "Mismatch (e.g. korrupt manuell endring)
emitterer MANIFEST_PROFILE_DRIFT-warning fra plan-validator i --strict-modus."
Logic (after validateAllManifests in validatePlanContent):
1. Strict-mode only — soft mode never emits drift warnings.
2. Plan frontmatter must declare 'profile: <name>' to establish baseline.
3. For each step manifest, if profile_used is set AND differs from plan
profile, emit warning (NOT error) with code MANIFEST_PROFILE_DRIFT
and location 'step N: profile_used = X, plan profile = Y'.
Forward-compat preserved: drift is a warning, plan remains valid:true.
Operators see the drift in --strict mode without parsing breaking.
New files:
tests/validators/plan-validator-profile-drift.test.mjs — 4 tests
tests/fixtures/plan-profile-drift.md — drift fixture
Tests verify:
1. drift detected in strict mode → MANIFEST_PROFILE_DRIFT in warnings
2. drift NOT detected in soft mode → strict gate honored
3. matching profile → no drift warning
4. no plan-level profile → drift detection silent (no baseline)
Tests: 479 pass + 2 skipped (Docker not installed).
Step 6 of v3.4.1 plan. Adds the validator quartet
(Content/Object/Consistency/CLI) for NEXT-SESSION-PROMPT.local.md
frontmatter (produced_by, produced_at). State-anchored staleness check
is the primary refusal; 24h wall-clock drift downgraded to soft warning
to avoid false positives on weekend pauses.
Internal scaffolding consumed by Step 8 (Phase 1.5 wire-up). User-facing
docs land with Step 14 (CHANGELOG + README + version bump).
Tests 335 -> 346 (+11): 9 unit + 2 CLI shim cases.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
