The SC asks two things of an effort: high run: that it discovered at least
one dimension AND that the dimension list in the output brief is a TRUE
SUPERSET of the interview-derived ones. activationCheck computed
dimensions - dimensions_baseline >= 1 and returned ok on that alone. A
count delta says nothing about membership: a run that dropped two
interview dimensions and appended three discovered ones is +1 and passed
the check while violating the second half outright. Supersetness was
asserted only by Phase 4.5's prose contract that discovery appends -
nothing read it.
The stats record cannot carry the dimension names that would show it
directly: names are free prose, and lib/exporters/field-allowlist.mjs
denies prose by omission (question, project_dir, brief_path are already
excluded for that reason). So the run attests membership with
dimensions_baseline_preserved, a boolean set in a new Phase 4.5 step 5,
and the gate refuses to call activation OK without it. An ABSENT
attestation fails rather than falling back to the old count-only rule -
otherwise legacy rows would keep passing on the defect.
Producer side wired end to end: the record format, the measurement-fields
prose (five fields -> six), the exporter allowlist, the jsonl-schemas
fixture row, and the --activation-check comment in
docs/storm-measurement.md.
Review finding d2786604458207a5a73478cdcb6a54bbdb92141d (MINOR).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LuGhWAbWyRFBFeemfhxoVv
Two defects in the adoption gate, both in the direction that flatters
adoption.
1. A non-numeric empty_turns counted as an eligible run.
Number('many') is NaN, and the test was `Number.isFinite(empty) &&
empty > 0`, so NaN fell through to the eligible branch. Measured
before: 0 -> eligible, 2 -> excluded, undefined -> eligible, null ->
eligible, 'many' -> ELIGIBLE, NaN -> ELIGIBLE. The exclusion is one of
the two properties docs/storm-measurement.md names as carrying this
gate's honesty, and the run whose bookkeeping broke is the run whose
numbers deserve the least trust. Now excluded. Absent and null stay
eligible via `?? 0` - a field never written is a genuine zero on a run
where the loop never armed.
2. The printed threshold line said "adopt >= 30.0% on BOTH - decline <
15.0% on BOTH" while decideVerdict evaluates OR on both sides. S82
restored the pre-registered OR rule in the logic (c37bf50d) and left
this line describing the stricter AND gate, one line above the verdict
that OR produced. The summary is the only form of the rule most readers
ever see, so it now states EITHER on both sides and that adopt wins
ties. Found while fixing (1); not a review finding.
A test pins the printed line against the string "on BOTH" so the two
cannot drift apart again silently.
Review finding 24a76c21ffc694cd782cd449212c9502d31aeda6 (MINOR).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LuGhWAbWyRFBFeemfhxoVv
The brief pre-registers "median forbedring >= 30 % pa (a) eller (b) ->
adopt. < 15 % -> decline." decideVerdict() required BOTH metrics to clear
the adopt bar and BOTH to fall under the decline bar, a rule introduced at
execution time (plan Step 11 restated the brief's wording unchanged).
The divergence is behavioural, not cosmetic: sources +90% / dimensions +10%
is adopt under the brief and was inconclusive in code; sources +2% /
dimensions +20% is decline under the brief and was inconclusive in code.
Adopt is evaluated before decline, so the OR bars do not conflict where they
overlap. docs/storm-measurement.md §2 and the test pins follow the same rule.
The stricter AND rule may well be the better decision procedure — but
changing it after the fact is exactly what pre-registration exists to
prevent. Review finding c37bf50d.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011vPSXe88qp5aqWUqbDNWoF
The operator pointed at ~/repos/claude-code-100x/claude-code-100x/build-site.js
as the annotation reference from the start. v4.2/v4.3 built a bespoke
playground instead. v5.0.0 deleted it. v5.0.1 pointed at /playground
document-critique (Claude-leads, wrong direction). v5.0.2 was operator-led
but too thin (line-click + freeform note, no intent). v5.0.3 finally
matches the reference.
scripts/annotate.mjs rewritten:
- Markdown rendered as proper article HTML (h1/p/li/ul/table/blockquote/pre)
instead of line-numbered raw lines.
- Pencil-toggle annotation mode in the topbar, default ON.
- Select text OR click any element → form popover at cursor.
- Three intent buttons: Fiks (red) / Endre (orange) / Spørsmål (blue).
- Comment textarea. Save (Cmd+Enter), Cancel (Esc).
- Section context auto-detected from nearest h1/h2.
- Sidebar panel: annotations grouped by section, intent badges,
snippet quotes, delete buttons, click-to-scroll with flash highlight.
- Copy Prompt: structured markdown export with intent labels.
- localStorage persistence keyed on absolute artifact path
(voyage-annotate:v2: prefix to avoid colliding with v5.0.2 state).
Tests: 12 (up from 10), all passing. npm test: 518 / 516 pass / 0 fail / 2 skipped.
Reference: ~/repos/claude-code-100x/claude-code-100x/build-site.js
lines 1431–2255 (annotation UI section).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
v5.0.0 added a read-only HTML render. v5.0.1 deleted that and pointed at
/playground document-critique, which pre-generates Claude's suggestions
and asks the operator to approve/reject them. The operator asked for the
opposite — a surface where THEY drive every annotation. v5.0.2 lands it.
scripts/annotate.mjs (~430 lines, zero deps) takes any artifact .md and
writes a self-contained HTML next to it. The HTML renders the document
with line numbers, lets the operator click any line to add their own
note (inline textarea, save with Cmd+Enter or button), keeps a sidebar
of all notes (editable + deletable + persisted in localStorage per
artifact path), and exposes Copy Prompt to gather every note into one
structured prompt. Operator copies, pastes back, Claude revises the .md.
The three producing commands now run annotate.mjs at their last step and
print the file:// link with explicit "Click any line to add YOUR OWN note"
instructions. The v5.0.1 /playground document-critique line is gone.
npm test green: 516 tests, 514 pass, 0 fail, 2 skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The v5.0.0 stop-gap had /trekbrief, /trekplan, and /trekreview each render
a read-only {artifact}.html (via scripts/render-artifact.mjs) AND print a
vague "run the /playground plugin" instruction. In practice the read-only
HTML was redundant with what /playground produces and the instruction
wasn't copy-paste-ready — the operator had to guess the right invocation.
v5.0.1 deletes scripts/render-artifact.mjs + its test + npm run render,
and makes each producing command end with a single boxed, literal,
copy-paste-ready line:
/playground build a document-critique playground for {artifact_path}
One paste from the operator launches the official playground skill's
document-critique template, which builds an interactive HTML — artifact
on the left, per-line Approve/Reject/Comment cards on the right, Copy
Prompt button at the bottom. Mark suggestions, click Copy Prompt, paste
back, Claude revises the .md. Doc-consistency test pins the literal
invocation so the prose cannot soften back into vagueness.
npm test green: 503 tests, 501 pass, 0 fail, 2 skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The v4.2/v4.3 bespoke playground SPA (~388 KB), the /trekrevise command,
Handover 8 (annotation → revision), the supporting lib/ modules
(anchor-parser, annotation-digest, markdown-write, revision-guard), the
Playwright e2e suite, and the @playwright/test / @axe-core/playwright
devDeps are removed. A browser walkthrough found the playground borderline
unusable, and it duplicated the official /playground plugin's
document-critique / diff-review templates.
In their place: scripts/render-artifact.mjs — a small, zero-dependency
renderer that turns a brief/plan/review .md into a self-contained,
design-system-styled, zero-network .html (frontmatter folded into a
<details> block). /trekbrief, /trekplan, and /trekreview call it on their
last step and print the file:// link; to annotate, run /playground
(document-critique) on the .md and paste the generated prompt back.
Resolves the v4.3.1-deferred findings as moot (their target files are
deleted). npm test green: 509 tests, 507 pass, 0 fail, 2 skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
