M1 (PM probes vi-a, vi-b, vii-a, vii-b, vii-c): extractSection takes the first
## Intent and does not see code blocks or HTML comments, so an added, hidden
or cut-off section rides on the old approval. 5 red. vii-d (comment inside
Intent) and the plain-brief hash are pinned green so the fix cannot move them.
M2: --approve resolves only <dir>/brief.md; a brief planned with
--brief docs/x-brief.md has no approval path but a raw --stamp. 4 red.
The stamp helper now substitutes {BRIEF_PATH} as well as {PROJECT_DIR}.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Veikart steg 1, økt 1 av 2. 18 tests, all failing today:
(a) a brief without an approval marker → the gate line in
commands/trekplan.md exits non-zero (today: no gate, planning proceeds);
(b) marker + ## Intent or ## Goal edited after approval → stale, stops;
(c) a valid marker passes (known negative), and edits outside the two
sections or whitespace-only reflow keep it valid;
(d) the stamp runs before the Phase 5 manual/auto fork and emits
brief-approved, so the manual (default) path records it too.
The gate and stamp lines are extracted from the command prose and
executed, so removing the line or stubbing the module fells the test.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
