--- description: "Effect case for annotating (two arms: with and without the plugin). The scenario where Voyage's baseline helpers failed without the skill (measured in session 19.10, Opus 5.5 high, on this project): the person pasted one Fix and one Question back from the annotation page, and 3 of 3 answered the Question but also changed the plan because of it (a new row under alternatives, a new rule in Step 2), and 3 of 3 applied the Fix to steps the note did not name. The operator grants Read, Glob, Grep, Edit and Bash, and sets the judge model explicitly (never Haiku)." expected_outcome: "Step 1 lists tests/signups.test.mjs under Files; nothing else in plan.md changes; the reply answers why commas and not a repeated flag." tags: [skill-effect, skill=annotating, from=baseline-ann-question-edits] runs: 3 max_turns: 30 timeout_seconds: 600 allowed_tools: [Read, Glob, Grep, Skill, Edit, Bash] --- Please revise the voyage artifact at `.claude/voyage/projects/2026-10-19-potluck-diet/plan.md` with the operator annotations below. Each annotation has an intent — **Fix** (something is wrong / fix it), **Change** (change wording/content), or **Question** (operator question — clarify or answer). The quote shows what the operator anchored to. Treat the operator notes as authoritative direction. ## Annotations (2 total) ### 1. [Fix] Section: Step 1: Store tags with a sign-up Quote: «Files: `src/signups.mjs`» Comment: Step 1 also edits tests/signups.test.mjs, list it under Files. ### 2. [Question] Section: Step 2: Parse tags on the command line Quote: «splits on commas and passes the list on» Comment: Why commas and not a repeated --tag flag? Which one is easier for the organiser to type?