// tests/lib/test-first-multi-file.test.mjs
// Plan step 3 (files-backticks trial 4): below plan_version 1.9 every test file
// on the `Test first:` `File:` line is read, not only the first backticked
// span. 6.3.1 read the first span alone, so a step whose `Files:` were its two
// `Test first:` files was not seen as tests-only when the second file is not a
// test by its path. One reading: testFirstFiles (plan-schema.mjs), used by
// stepTestsOnly; the executor and the step helper say the same in prose.

import { test } from 'node:test';
import { strict as assert } from 'node:assert';
import { readFileSync } from 'node:fs';
import { dirname, join } from 'node:path';
import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
import * as m from '../../lib/parsers/plan-schema.mjs';
import { validatePlanContent } from '../../lib/validators/plan-validator.mjs';
import { isTestPath } from '../../lib/util/test-path.mjs';
import { buildPlan } from '../helpers/plan-v18-builder.mjs';

const HERE = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
const ROOT = join(HERE, '..', '..');

/** A 1.8-shaped step section: `Files:` and the `Test first:` lines given. */
const step = (files, testFirst) => [
  '### Step 1: x', '',
  `- **Files:** ${files}`,
  '- **Changes:** x',
  '- **Test first:**',
  ...testFirst,
  '- **Verify:** `node --test tests/a.test.mjs` -> expected: exit 0',
].join('\n');

const TWO = step('`tests/a.test.mjs`, `checks/smoke.mjs`', [
  '  - File: `tests/a.test.mjs`, `checks/smoke.mjs` (new)',
  '  - Verifies: both checks run',
]);

const testFirstFiles = (body, version) => {
  assert.equal(typeof m.testFirstFiles, 'function', 'plan-schema.mjs exports testFirstFiles');
  return m.testFirstFiles(m.parseStepFields(body), version);
};

test('a 1.8 step whose Files are its two Test first files is tests-only', () => {
  // checks/smoke.mjs is not a test by its path: only the Test first line makes it one.
  assert.equal(m.stepTestsOnly(TWO).testsOnly, true, JSON.stringify(m.stepTestsOnly(TWO)));
});

test('testFirstFiles returns every path on the File: line, below 1.9 and without a version', () => {
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(TWO, '1.8'), ['tests/a.test.mjs', 'checks/smoke.mjs']);
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(TWO, null), ['tests/a.test.mjs', 'checks/smoke.mjs']);
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(TWO), ['tests/a.test.mjs', 'checks/smoke.mjs']);
});

test('testFirstFiles: a call, an option or a URL on the File: line is not read; paths are normalised and deduplicated', () => {
  const body = step('`tests/a.test.mjs`', [
    '  - File: `tests/a.test.mjs`, `parse()`, `--watch`, `https://example.invalid/x.mjs`, `./tests/a.test.mjs`',
    '  - Verifies: x',
  ]);
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(body, '1.8'), ['tests/a.test.mjs']);
});

test('testFirstFiles: a Verifies: line, or a span before File: on the line, is never read', () => {
  const body = step('`tests/a.test.mjs`', [
    '  - see `lib/before.mjs` File: `tests/a.test.mjs`',
    '  - Verifies: `lib/other.mjs` returns `src/x.mjs`',
  ]);
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(body, '1.8'), ['tests/a.test.mjs']);
  const none = step('`tests/a.test.mjs`', ['  - Verifies: `tests/a.test.mjs` runs']);
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(none, '1.8'), []);
});

test('a code file beside the test on the File: line still makes the step not tests-only when Files has more', () => {
  const body = step('`tests/a.test.mjs`, `src/cli.mjs`', [
    '  - File: `tests/a.test.mjs`, `parse()` (new)',
    '  - Verifies: x',
  ]);
  assert.equal(m.stepTestsOnly(body).testsOnly, false);
});

// ---- plan_version 1.9 (plan step 5) ----------------------------------------
// From 1.9 a `Test first:` `File:` line is every line that opens with `File:`
// (after an optional list marker and `**`), backticked or not, and its rest is
// one entry read by entryPaths: the leading backticked paths are the test
// files, the rest is description. The validator puts the same grammar on it.

const PATH_CODES = ['PLAN_STEP_PATH_NOT_FIRST', 'PLAN_STEP_PATH_NOT_A_PATH'];
// A plan of the given version whose first step has `Files:` `files` and the
// `Test first:` `File:` line `fileLine` (both verbatim).
const planWith = (version, files, fileLine) => buildPlan({
  version,
  steps: [{ filesRaw: files, testFirstRaw: fileLine }, { endToEnd: 'bash tests/e2e.sh' }],
});

test('1.9: every leading backticked path on the File: line is a test file', () => {
  const body = step('`tests/a.test.mjs`, `tests/b.test.mjs`', [
    '  - File: `tests/a.test.mjs`, `tests/b.test.mjs` (new)',
    '  - Verifies: x',
  ]);
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(body, '1.9'), ['tests/a.test.mjs', 'tests/b.test.mjs']);
});

test('decision 20: a backticked path in the description of the File: line is not a test file, at 1.9 and below', () => {
  const body = step('`tests/a.test.mjs`', [
    '  - File: `tests/a.test.mjs` (new), covers `tests/b.test.mjs`',
    '  - Verifies: x',
  ]);
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(body, '1.9'), ['tests/a.test.mjs']);
  // Operator decision 20 (12.10): below 1.9 too, only the paths right after File:.
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(body, '1.8'), ['tests/a.test.mjs']);
});

test('decision 20: a code file named only in the File: line description keeps the step from being tests-only, at 1.9 and 1.8', () => {
  const files = '`tests/a.test.mjs`, `checks/smoke.mjs`';
  const line = '  - File: `tests/a.test.mjs` (new), covers `checks/smoke.mjs`';
  const body = step(files, [line, '  - Verifies: x']);
  assert.equal(m.stepTestsOnly(body, '1.9').testsOnly, false, JSON.stringify(m.stepTestsOnly(body, '1.9')));
  assert.equal(m.stepTestsOnly(body, '1.8').testsOnly, false, JSON.stringify(m.stepTestsOnly(body, '1.8')));

  const v19 = validatePlanContent(planWith('1.9', files, line));
  assert.ok(!v19.warnings.some((w) => w.code === 'PLAN_STEP_TESTS_ONLY'), JSON.stringify(v19.warnings));
  assert.deepEqual(v19.errors.filter((e) => PATH_CODES.includes(e.code)), [], JSON.stringify(v19.errors));
  const v18 = validatePlanContent(planWith('1.8', files, line));
  assert.ok(!v18.warnings.some((w) => w.code === 'PLAN_STEP_TESTS_ONLY'), JSON.stringify(v18.warnings));
});

test('1.9: a File: line that opens with `parse()` is refused as no path (error strict, warning soft)', () => {
  const text = planWith('1.9', '`tests/a.test.mjs`', '  - File: `parse()`');
  const strict = validatePlanContent(text);
  const e = strict.errors.find((i) => i.code === 'PLAN_STEP_PATH_NOT_A_PATH');
  assert.ok(e, JSON.stringify(strict.errors));
  assert.match(e.message, /Step 1/);
  assert.match(e.message, /Test first/);
  const soft = validatePlanContent(text, { strict: false });
  assert.ok(soft.warnings.some((w) => w.code === 'PLAN_STEP_PATH_NOT_A_PATH'), JSON.stringify(soft.warnings));
  assert.deepEqual(soft.errors.filter((i) => PATH_CODES.includes(i.code)), []);
});

test('1.9: an unticked File: line gets PLAN_STEP_PATH_NOT_FIRST next to PLAN_STEP_NO_TEST_FIRST', () => {
  const r = validatePlanContent(planWith('1.9', '`tests/a.test.mjs`', '  - File: tests/a.test.mjs'));
  const codes = r.errors.map((e) => e.code);
  assert.ok(codes.includes('PLAN_STEP_PATH_NOT_FIRST'), codes.join(','));
  assert.ok(codes.includes('PLAN_STEP_NO_TEST_FIRST'), codes.join(','));
  const e = r.errors.find((i) => i.code === 'PLAN_STEP_PATH_NOT_FIRST');
  assert.match(e.message, /Step 1/);
  assert.match(e.message, /tests\/a\.test\.mjs/);
});

// ---- operator decision 20 (12.10), review 6c31212c --------------------------
// Below 1.9 too, a step's test files are the backticked paths that stand right
// after `File:`, separated only by commas or whitespace. A path in the
// description after them (`covers parse() in src/parser.mjs`) is no test file,
// so a step that builds that source is not tests-only and its source is never
// locked. Each `File:` marker on a line starts its own run, as 6.3.1 read the
// first span after each marker.

// The review's exact input: the description names a call and the source.
const REVIEW_FILES = '`src/parser.mjs`, `tests/parser.test.mjs`';
const REVIEW_LINE = '  - File: `tests/parser.test.mjs` (new) \u2014 covers `parse()` in `src/parser.mjs`';

test('decision 20: the review input (6c31212c) gives only the test below 1.9, is not tests-only, and gets no PLAN_STEP_TESTS_ONLY', () => {
  const body = step(REVIEW_FILES, [REVIEW_LINE, '  - Verifies: x']);
  for (const v of ['1.8', '1.7', null, undefined]) {
    assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(body, v), ['tests/parser.test.mjs'], `version ${v}`);
  }
  assert.equal(m.stepTestsOnly(body, '1.8').testsOnly, false, JSON.stringify(m.stepTestsOnly(body, '1.8')));
  assert.equal(m.stepTestsOnly(body).testsOnly, false, JSON.stringify(m.stepTestsOnly(body)));
  const v18 = validatePlanContent(planWith('1.8', REVIEW_FILES, REVIEW_LINE));
  assert.ok(!v18.warnings.some((w) => w.code === 'PLAN_STEP_TESTS_ONLY'), JSON.stringify(v18.warnings));
});

test('decision 20: two leading tests (comma or space) before a description that names a source give the two tests at 1.8 and 1.9', () => {
  for (const lead of ['`tests/a.test.mjs`, `tests/b.test.mjs`', '`tests/a.test.mjs` `tests/b.test.mjs`']) {
    const body = step('`tests/a.test.mjs`, `tests/b.test.mjs`, `src/a.mjs`', [
      `  - File: ${lead} (new) - covers \`run()\` in \`src/a.mjs\``,
      '  - Verifies: x',
    ]);
    for (const v of ['1.8', '1.9']) {
      assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(body, v), ['tests/a.test.mjs', 'tests/b.test.mjs'], `${v}: ${lead}`);
    }
  }
});

test('decision 20: a 1.8 line with two File: markers, each followed by a test, gives both tests (6.3.1 read both)', () => {
  const body = step('`tests/a.test.mjs`, `tests/b.test.mjs`', [
    '  - File: `tests/a.test.mjs` (new) and File: `tests/b.test.mjs` (existing)',
    '  - Verifies: x',
  ]);
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(body, '1.8'), ['tests/a.test.mjs', 'tests/b.test.mjs']);
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(body, null), ['tests/a.test.mjs', 'tests/b.test.mjs']);
});

// ---- operator decisions 28 (13.10) and 31 (14.10), review bd2520b0 ---------
// Below 1.9 the run after `File:` also goes on past a note in brackets
// (`(new)`, `*(new)*`, `(existing ...)`) and the whole words `and`, `plus` and
// `+`, to a further path only when it is clearly a test; a path that is not
// ends the run, and so does any other text. At 1.9 nothing changes.

const OLDER = ['1.8', '1.7', null];
const fileLine = (rest) => step('`tests/a.test.mjs`, `tests/b.test.mjs`', [`  - File: ${rest}`, '  - Verifies: x']);

test('decisions 28 and 31: below 1.9 a test after a note, and, plus or + is read', () => {
  const lines = [
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` (new), `tests/b.test.mjs` (new),',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` and `tests/b.test.mjs`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` (existing) + `tests/b.test.mjs`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` (existing, the parser) plus `tests/b.test.mjs`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` *(new)*, `tests/b.test.mjs`',
  ];
  for (const rest of lines) {
    for (const v of OLDER) {
      assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(fileLine(rest), v), ['tests/a.test.mjs', 'tests/b.test.mjs'], `version ${v}: ${rest}`);
    }
  }
});

test('decisions 28 and 31: below 1.9 a near miss gives only the first test', () => {
  // Both read as tests by lib/util/test-path.mjs alone (a specs/ folder); the
  // run refuses them all the same: a document or a data file outside tests/.
  assert.equal(isTestPath('docs/specs/api.md'), true);
  assert.equal(isTestPath('api/specs/openapi.yaml'), true);
  const lines = [
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` (new) - covers `src/a.mjs`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` (new), `src/a.mjs`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` (new) or `tests/b.test.mjs`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` (new), covers `tests/b.test.mjs`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` (new) and `src/a.mjs`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` (new) and `https://example.invalid/tests/b.test.mjs`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` (new) and `docs/specs/api.md`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` (new), `api/specs/openapi.yaml`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` android `tests/b.test.mjs`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` andand `tests/b.test.mjs`',
    '`tests/a.test.mjs` plusand `tests/b.test.mjs`',
  ];
  for (const rest of lines) {
    for (const v of OLDER) {
      assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(fileLine(rest), v), ['tests/a.test.mjs'], `version ${v}: ${rest}`);
    }
  }
});

test('decisions 28 and 31: below 1.9 the run after a note stops at the first source path', () => {
  const rest = '`tests/a.test.mjs` (new), `tests/b.test.mjs`, `src/a.mjs`, `tests/c.test.mjs`';
  for (const v of OLDER) {
    assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(fileLine(rest), v), ['tests/a.test.mjs', 'tests/b.test.mjs'], `version ${v}`);
  }
});

test('decisions 28 and 31: at 1.9 the two-test line with notes still gives only the first test', () => {
  const body = fileLine('`tests/a.test.mjs` (new), `tests/b.test.mjs` (new),');
  assert.deepEqual(testFirstFiles(body, '1.9'), ['tests/a.test.mjs']);
});

// ---- one definition in the prose (plan step 11, review cf241526) -----------
// The executor and the step helper define the step's test files once, as
// decisions 20 and 31 read them; every other place points at that definition.
// Operator decision 30 (14.10): red proof reads that list from the plan, so
// neither the helper nor the executor passes --tests; it prints the list it
// ran (`tests`), and the lock's --files is that printed list. A plan or step
// red proof cannot read is `plan-unreadable`: the helper stops before it
// builds, the executor corrects its own call and restarts the step once with
// a fresh build helper (`build (restart)`), outside the fix rounds. A --tests
// that differs is still refused (`tests-mismatch`, the plan's list in
// `plan_tests`), but the documented call never gives one.

const EXEC = ['commands', 'trekexecute.md'];
const HELPER = ['agents', 'step-implementer.md'];
const readRel = (rel) => readFileSync(join(ROOT, ...rel), 'utf8');
const count = (text, s) => text.split(s).length - 1;

test('prose: neither file reads every backticked span on the File: line any more', () => {
  for (const rel of [EXEC, HELPER]) {
    const text = readRel(rel);
    assert.equal(count(text, 'every backticked span on that line'), 0, `${rel.join('/')} still says "every backticked span on that line"`);
  }
});

test('prose: the decision-20 definition stands exactly once in each file and keeps the pinned phrase', () => {
  for (const rel of [EXEC, HELPER]) {
    const text = readRel(rel);
    assert.equal((text.match(/operator decision 20(?!\d)/g) || []).length, 1, `${rel.join('/')} holds the decision-20 definition once`);
    assert.ok(text.includes('every file on the `Test first:` `File:` line'), `${rel.join('/')} keeps the pinned phrase`);
  }
});

test('prose: the executor definition names decisions 30 and 31, tests-mismatch, plan_tests and plan-unreadable, and keeps its line shape', () => {
  const lines = readRel(EXEC).split('\n');
  const i = lines.findIndex((l) => l.startsWith("**The step's test files** are"));
  assert.ok(i >= 0, 'the definition line is there');
  const def = lines[i];
  assert.ok(def.includes('operator decision 20'), 'the definition line carries decision 20');
  assert.ok(def.includes('operator decision 30'), 'the definition line carries decision 30');
  assert.ok(def.includes('`tests-mismatch`'), 'the definition names tests-mismatch');
  assert.ok(def.includes('`plan_tests`'), 'the definition names plan_tests');
  assert.ok(def.includes('`plan-unreadable`'), 'the definition names plan-unreadable');
  assert.ok(def.includes('`--files` is the list red proof printed as `tests`'), 'the definition says the lock follows the printed list');
  assert.ok(def.endsWith(' The'), `the definition line still ends with " The": ${def.slice(-40)}`);
  assert.ok(lines[i + 1].startsWith('plan template lists them'), `the next line: ${lines[i + 1]}`);
});

test('prose: both definitions name decision 31 and read past (new), and, plus or + below 1.9', () => {
  for (const rel of [EXEC, HELPER]) {
    const text = readRel(rel).replace(/\n\s*/g, ' ');
    const at20 = text.search(/operator decision 20(?!\d)/);
    const head = text.lastIndexOf('every file on the `Test first:` `File:` line', at20);
    assert.ok(at20 > 0 && head >= 0, `${rel.join('/')}: the definition is there`);
    const def = text.slice(head, at20);
    assert.ok(def.includes('operator decision 31'), `${rel.join('/')}: the definition names operator decision 31`);
    assert.ok(def.includes('`plus`'), `${rel.join('/')}: the definition names plus`);
    assert.ok(def.includes('`(new)`'), `${rel.join('/')}: the definition names (new)`);
  }
});

test('prose: the executor exit-2 row names plan-unreadable first, the one restart outside the fix rounds, and tests-mismatch with plan_tests', () => {
  const row = readRel(EXEC).split('\n').find((l) => l.startsWith('| 2 | `"not-run"`'));
  assert.ok(row, 'the exit-2 row is there');
  for (const s of ['`plan-unreadable`', '`tests-mismatch`', '`plan_tests`', 'fresh build helper', 'outside the fix rounds',
    'absolute path', 'reruns only its own red proof', '`build (restart)`', '`cost_if_wrong`', '`attempts`',
    '`iterations_remaining`', '`error`', '`--resume`']) {
    assert.ok(row.includes(s), `the exit-2 row names ${s}`);
  }
  assert.match(row, /decision[- ]log\s+entry/, 'the exit-2 row records a decision-log entry');
});

test('prose: a second plan-unreadable goes up to the plan (stop class 4 row, Back to planning)', () => {
  const text = readRel(EXEC);
  const row4 = text.split('\n').find((l) => l.startsWith('| 4 | the plan |'));
  assert.ok(row4, 'the stop-class-4 row is there');
  assert.ok(row4.includes('`plan-unreadable`'), 'the stop-class-4 row names plan-unreadable');
  const b = text.indexOf('**Back to planning**');
  assert.ok(b > 0, 'the Back to planning paragraph is there');
  const end = text.indexOf('\n\n', b);
  const para = text.slice(b, end < 0 ? undefined : end);
  assert.ok(para.includes('`plan-unreadable`'), 'the Back to planning paragraph names plan-unreadable');
});

test('prose: the exit-1 otherwise row no longer counts tests_only: null', () => {
  const row = readRel(EXEC).split('\n').find((l) => l.startsWith('| 1, `not-red-at-base`, otherwise'));
  assert.ok(row, 'the exit-1 otherwise row is there');
  assert.ok(!row.includes('tests_only: null'), 'the exit-1 otherwise row no longer says tests_only: null');
});

test('prose: no red-proof call line in either file passes --tests (operator decision 30)', () => {
  for (const rel of [EXEC, HELPER]) {
    const calls = readRel(rel).split('\n').filter((l) => l.includes('red-proof.mjs --red-only') || l.includes('red-proof.mjs --base'));
    assert.ok(calls.length > 0, `${rel.join('/')}: a red-proof call line is there`);
    for (const l of calls) assert.ok(!l.includes('--tests'), `${rel.join('/')}: the call passes --tests: ${l}`);
  }
});

test('prose: below 1.8 a plan that names no test file gets --tests from the files the helper wrote (operator decision 41, review 7b3b59ed)', () => {
  const esc = (s) => s.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&');
  const phrase = (s) => new RegExp(s.split(/\s+/).map(esc).join('\\s+'));
  const d41 = /\boperator\s+decision\s+41(?!\d)/;
  const NTFG = '`no test files given`';
  const has = (text, s, where) => assert.match(text, phrase(s), `${where} holds "${s}"`);

  // The helper: the sentence that holds `no test files given`.
  const h = readRel(HELPER);
  const at = h.search(phrase(NTFG));
  assert.ok(at >= 0, 'the helper names `no test files given`');
  const before = h.slice(0, at);
  const ends = [...before.matchAll(/\.\s/g)];
  const start = ends.length ? ends[ends.length - 1].index + 1 : 0;
  const rest = h.slice(at);
  const stop = rest.search(/\.(\s|$)/);
  const sentence = h.slice(start, stop < 0 ? undefined : at + stop + 1);
  has(sentence, 'below 1.8', 'the helper sentence');
  has(sentence, '`--tests <the test files you wrote', 'the helper sentence');
  assert.match(sentence, d41, 'the helper sentence names operator decision 41');
  const pu = h.match(/plan-unreadable[^.]*do not build/);
  assert.ok(pu && pu.index < at, 'the helper sentence stands after the plan-unreadable sentence');

  // The executor: the definition line and the exit-2 row.
  const lines = readRel(EXEC).split('\n');
  const def = lines.find((l) => l.startsWith("**The step's test files** are"));
  assert.ok(def, 'the executor definition line is there');
  for (const s of [NTFG, 'naming the test files it wrote', 'the `tests:` line the helper copied into its report']) {
    has(def, s, 'the executor definition line');
  }
  assert.match(def, d41, 'the executor definition line names operator decision 41');
  assert.ok(def.endsWith(' The'), `the definition line still ends with " The": ${def.slice(-40)}`);
  const row = lines.find((l) => l.startsWith('| 2 | `"not-run"`'));
  assert.ok(row, 'the exit-2 row is there');
  const r = row.search(phrase(NTFG));
  assert.ok(r >= 0, 'the exit-2 row names `no test files given`');
  const after = row.slice(r);
  for (const s of ['is not a finding', 'the `tests:` line in the helper\'s report', 'tolerated as `"not-run"`']) {
    has(after, s, 'the exit-2 row after `no test files given`');
  }
  assert.match(after, d41, 'the exit-2 row names operator decision 41');

  // Handover 4, invariant 7.
  const ho = readRel(['docs', 'HANDOVER-CONTRACTS.md']);
  const a7 = ho.indexOf('7. **Every plan_version');
  const a8 = ho.indexOf('8. **', a7);
  assert.ok(a7 >= 0 && a8 > a7, 'Handover 4 invariants 7 and 8 are there');
  const inv7 = ho.slice(a7, a8);
  for (const s of [NTFG, 'naming the test files it wrote', 'the `tests:` line in the helper\'s report']) {
    has(inv7, s, 'Handover 4 invariant 7');
  }
  assert.match(inv7, d41, 'Handover 4 invariant 7 names operator decision 41');
});

test('prose: the helper stops on plan-unreadable before the 1.8 branches and locks the printed list', () => {
  const text = readRel(HELPER);
  const pu = text.match(/plan-unreadable[^.]*do not build/);
  assert.ok(pu, 'the helper does not build on plan-unreadable');
  const below = text.indexOf('Below 1.8');
  assert.ok(below > 0, 'the helper still has its Below 1.8 branch');
  assert.ok(pu.index < below, 'the plan-unreadable sentence stands before "Below 1.8"');
  assert.ok(text.includes('`--files` is the list red proof printed'), 'the lock follows the printed list');
  assert.ok(text.includes('copy that line into the report'), 'the helper copies the tests line into the report');
});

test('prose: the round label build (restart) is named by the executor prompt, the report heading and the helper build mode', () => {
  const ex = readRel(EXEC);
  assert.ok(ex.split('\n').some((l) => l.includes('(`build`, `build (restart)`, or `fix round R`)')), 'the Sub-step C prompt line names build (restart)');
  const h = readRel(HELPER);
  assert.ok(h.split('\n').includes('## Step {N} - {build | build (restart) | fix round R}'), 'the helper report heading names build (restart)');
  const a = h.indexOf('## Mode `build`');
  const z = h.indexOf('## Mode `fix`');
  assert.ok(a >= 0 && z > a, 'the helper has both modes');
  assert.match(h.slice(a, z), /build \(restart\)[^.]*one\s+copy\s+of\s+each\s+test\s+case/);
});

test('prose: the old rerun wording is gone from both files', () => {
  const ex = readRel(EXEC);
  for (const s of ['runs it once more with the list it printed', 'reruns once with the list red proof printed', 'the list red proof accepted']) {
    assert.ok(!ex.includes(s), `commands/trekexecute.md still says "${s}"`);
  }
  const h = readRel(HELPER);
  assert.doesNotMatch(h, /once\s+more[^.]*plan_tests/);
  for (const s of ['after a rerun, `plan_tests`', 'the list red proof accepted']) {
    assert.ok(!h.includes(s), `agents/step-implementer.md still says "${s}"`);
  }
});