open/voyage
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Wiki Activity Actions
voyage/tests/fixtures/bakeoff
History
Exact
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 869bf318d2 feat(voyage): S10 — NW2 part A (Workflow port + fidelity harness + smoke) 
Build the prose-vs-Workflow bake-off machinery for /trekreview Phase 5-6 and
run a 1-run/arm smoke to de-risk before the full measurement (operator posture:
build + smoke, then pause for go/no-go on the full >=3-runs/arm run).

New:
- lib/review/fidelity-diff.mjs (+ tests) — the PRIMARY metric: parse two
  review.md (or two structured arm outputs) and compare verdict + jaccard over
  (file,line,rule_key)-IDs + per-finding severity/rule_key. Reuses jaccard +
  frontmatter + NW1 findings-schema + finding-id. fidelityDiffStructured avoids
  rendering review.md per run.
- scripts/trekreview-armB.workflow.mjs — Arm B: Phase 5-6 as a Workflow
  (parallel([conformance, correctness]) schema-forced -> JS dedup-by-triplet ->
  agent(review-coordinator) verdict schema). Path-based input via args (reviewers
  carry Read). Inlines dedup + the 12-key rule_key enum (scripts have no imports).
- tests/fixtures/bakeoff/ — committable fixture: real diff of b149538 (NW1) +
  brief reconstructed from plan S9. Both arms review the same pinned input.
- docs/T2-bakeoff-results.md — smoke results + verdict + go/no-go recommendation.

Smoke result: SMOKE PASS. Arm B runs the full pipeline (3 agents) with ZERO
classifier interference; fidelity EQUIVALENT to Arm A at the verdict level
(both ALLOW; jaccard 1.0). Caveat: the clean TDD'd fixture yielded ~0 findings,
so finding-SET fidelity was not stressed (only verdict fidelity proven). A
reviewer-level divergence appeared (Arm B raised 1 raw finding, coordinator
filtered it; Arm A raised 0) — to be quantified in the full run on a
richer-finding-surface fixture. NOT the T2 §5 POSITIVE/NEGATIVE verdict.

Suite 647 -> 662 (660 pass / 2 skip / 0 fail; +15 fidelity-diff). claude plugin
validate clean (known root-CLAUDE.md warning only). Plan: docs/W1-narrow-wins-plan.md S10.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
2026-06-18 14:40:19 +02:00
..
brief.md feat(voyage): S10 — NW2 part A (Workflow port + fidelity harness + smoke) 2026-06-18 14:40:19 +02:00
delivered.diff feat(voyage): S10 — NW2 part A (Workflow port + fidelity harness + smoke) 2026-06-18 14:40:19 +02:00
README.md feat(voyage): S10 — NW2 part A (Workflow port + fidelity harness + smoke) 2026-06-18 14:40:19 +02:00

README.md

NW2 bake-off fixture (S10)

Fixed, committable input for the prose-vs-Workflow /trekreview bake-off (T2 §5). Both arms review the same delivered diff against the same brief, so any difference in review.md is attributable to the orchestration substrate (prose Arm A vs Workflow Arm B), not to the input.

What's here

  • brief.md — the contract. Reconstructed faithfully from the real NW1 contract (docs/W1-narrow-wins-plan.md §S9): goal, SC1–SC4, NG1–NG3, constraints, NFRs.
  • delivered.diff — the real delivered diff of commit b149538 (git diff b149538^ b149538): the NW1 implementation (lib/review/findings-schema.mjs + tests + commands/trekreview.md Phase 5). 3 files, +438/-3.

Why this commit

b149538 (NW1/S9) is a genuine delivered-diff + brief pair already in this repo's history — real code, real contract, fully self-contained (no external deps), and small/cheap (ideal for the de-risking smoke run). It is not finding-free (a strict correctness reviewer has surface to flag), so the fidelity comparison is informative. A larger commit can be substituted for the full ≥3-runs/arm measurement if more finding surface is wanted.

Triage map (deterministic, pinned)

Per the Phase-4 path-pattern classifier, none of the 3 files match skip or deep-review patterns → all summary-only:

commands/trekreview.md → summary-only
lib/review/findings-schema.mjs → summary-only
tests/lib/findings-schema.test.mjs → summary-only

How it's consumed

The bake-off pins Phases 1–4 (brief + diff + triage above) and passes them to both arms:

  • Arm A (prose): current /trekreview Phase 5–6 behaviour.
  • Arm B (Workflow): scripts/trekreview-armB.workflow.mjs via the Workflow tool, args = { brief, diff, triage }.

Each arm yields a structured {verdict, findings}; the PRIMARY metric is fidelityDiffStructured (lib/review/fidelity-diff.mjs) — same verdict + equivalent finding set (IDs / severities / rule_keys).