The runner read bullet lines only. The repo's own example plan writes its
whole acceptance run as a fenced bash block, so `## Verification` parsed to
ZERO criteria, the runner exited 1, and Phase 7 forbade `result: completed`
- a correct plan felled every single-session run. Measured 2026-09-18 on
6cafb4c: none of the repo's plan artifacts exited 0.
Fences are now read twice over, for two opposite reasons:
- a `## ` heading INSIDE a fence is quoted text and no longer opens a
section. examples/02-real-cli/REGENERATED.md is a report that quotes a
plan outline inside one fence; it used to yield an empty section that
read as "0 of 0", and now yields the honest NO_VERIFICATION_SECTION.
- a shell-tagged fence inside the section holds the commands. The tag list
is closed (bash/sh/shell/zsh/console/shell-session): an untagged fence is
more often expected OUTPUT than input, and inventing a criterion from
output is the failure this file exists to prevent.
Blank and comment-only lines inside the block declare nothing. A `$`/`>`
console prompt is stripped; a `#` root prompt is NOT, because it cannot be
told from a comment and running a comment is the worse mistake.
Measured after the fix (parse only - one example names a fictional CLI):
examples/01 6 criteria, plan-template 2 (both placeholders, correctly NOT
RUN), the two runner fixtures 2 each, plan-run-C 1, REGENERATED.md 0 with
NO_VERIFICATION_SECTION.
Divergence from the order's premise, stated for the record: it said 2 of 3
example plans write `## Verification` as a fenced bash block. Ground truth
is 1 of 3 - REGENERATED.md has no section of its own at all - and the
example plan's block holds 6 command lines, not 5.
Red first: 4 of the 6 new tests failed before this change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
435 lines
18 KiB
JavaScript
435 lines
18 KiB
JavaScript
// tests/lib/criteria-runner.test.mjs
|
|
// The criteria runner is what makes a declared check a RUN check: it parses the
|
|
// falsifiable criteria a plan (`## Verification`) or a brief (`## Success
|
|
// Criteria`) declares, screens each command through the executor's own
|
|
// PreToolUse denylist, runs it, and returns a verdict built from exit codes.
|
|
//
|
|
// Fail-closed is the whole point: a criterion that cannot run (placeholder, no
|
|
// command, screen unavailable) must never read as "passed".
|
|
|
|
import { test } from 'node:test';
|
|
import { strict as assert } from 'node:assert';
|
|
import { spawnSync } from 'node:child_process';
|
|
import { join, dirname } from 'node:path';
|
|
import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
|
|
import { mkdtempSync, writeFileSync, readFileSync } from 'node:fs';
|
|
import { tmpdir } from 'node:os';
|
|
|
|
import {
|
|
parsePlanVerification,
|
|
parseSuccessCriteria,
|
|
screenCommand,
|
|
runCriteria,
|
|
summarize,
|
|
runPlanVerification,
|
|
runSuccessCriteriaChecks,
|
|
formatCriteriaEvidence,
|
|
render,
|
|
} from '../../lib/verification/criteria-runner.mjs';
|
|
|
|
const HERE = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
|
|
const ROOT = join(HERE, '..', '..');
|
|
const CLI = join(ROOT, 'lib', 'verification', 'criteria-runner.mjs');
|
|
const FIX = join(ROOT, 'tests', 'fixtures');
|
|
const HOOK = join(ROOT, 'hooks', 'scripts', 'pre-bash-executor.mjs');
|
|
|
|
// An exec double: maps a command string to {status, stdout, stderr}.
|
|
function execDouble(table) {
|
|
const calls = [];
|
|
const exec = (command) => {
|
|
calls.push(command);
|
|
return table[command] ?? { status: 127, stdout: '', stderr: 'not in table' };
|
|
};
|
|
exec.calls = calls;
|
|
return exec;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A screen double that allows everything, so exec behaviour can be tested alone.
|
|
const allowAll = () => ({ allowed: true, rule: '' });
|
|
|
|
// --- parsing ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
test('parsePlanVerification: checkbox bullets become V1..Vn with their command', () => {
|
|
const md = [
|
|
'# Plan',
|
|
'',
|
|
'## Verification',
|
|
'',
|
|
'- [ ] `npm test` -> expected: exit 0',
|
|
'- [x] `node --test tests/lib/x.test.mjs` -> expected: 3 passing',
|
|
'',
|
|
'## Estimated Scope',
|
|
'',
|
|
'- [ ] `not-a-criterion` (outside the section)',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
|
|
const criteria = parsePlanVerification(md);
|
|
assert.equal(criteria.length, 2);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(criteria.map((c) => c.label), ['V1', 'V2']);
|
|
assert.equal(criteria[0].command, 'npm test');
|
|
assert.equal(criteria[1].command, 'node --test tests/lib/x.test.mjs');
|
|
assert.match(criteria[0].text, /expected: exit 0/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('parsePlanVerification: a template placeholder is unrunnable, not a command', () => {
|
|
const md = '## Verification\n\n- [ ] `{exact command}` -> expected: `{exact output}`\n';
|
|
const criteria = parsePlanVerification(md);
|
|
assert.equal(criteria.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(criteria[0].command, null);
|
|
assert.equal(criteria[0].reason, 'placeholder');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('parsePlanVerification: a missing section yields no criteria', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parsePlanVerification('# Plan\n\n## Steps\n\n- do a thing\n'), []);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('parseSuccessCriteria: bullets become SC1..SCn and take the FIRST backticked span', () => {
|
|
const md = [
|
|
'## Success Criteria',
|
|
'',
|
|
'- All existing tests pass: `npm test` exits 0',
|
|
'- Endpoint returns 200: `curl -s localhost:3000/health` -> `"ok"`',
|
|
'- No new runtime dependencies are introduced',
|
|
'',
|
|
'## Research Plan',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
|
|
const criteria = parseSuccessCriteria(md);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(criteria.map((c) => c.label), ['SC1', 'SC2', 'SC3']);
|
|
assert.equal(criteria[0].command, 'npm test');
|
|
assert.equal(criteria[1].command, 'curl -s localhost:3000/health');
|
|
assert.equal(criteria[2].command, null);
|
|
assert.equal(criteria[2].reason, 'no-command');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- screening -------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
test('screenCommand: the real executor denylist blocks a catastrophic command', () => {
|
|
const verdict = screenCommand('rm -rf ~', { hookPath: HOOK });
|
|
assert.equal(verdict.allowed, false);
|
|
assert.match(verdict.rule, /rm -rf|destruction/i);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('screenCommand: an ordinary command passes the real denylist', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(screenCommand('npm test', { hookPath: HOOK }).allowed, true);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('screenCommand: an unavailable screen denies (fail-closed, never silently allows)', () => {
|
|
const verdict = screenCommand('npm test', { hookPath: join(ROOT, 'hooks', 'scripts', 'no-such-hook.mjs') });
|
|
assert.equal(verdict.allowed, false);
|
|
assert.match(verdict.rule, /screen unavailable/i);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- running ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
test('runCriteria: exit 0 passes, a non-zero exit fails, output is captured', () => {
|
|
const criteria = parsePlanVerification(
|
|
'## Verification\n\n- [ ] `good`\n- [ ] `bad`\n'
|
|
);
|
|
const exec = execDouble({
|
|
good: { status: 0, stdout: 'all green\n', stderr: '' },
|
|
bad: { status: 1, stdout: '', stderr: '1 failing\n' },
|
|
});
|
|
const results = runCriteria(criteria, { exec, screen: allowAll });
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(results.map((r) => r.status), ['passed', 'failed']);
|
|
assert.equal(results[0].exitCode, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(results[1].exitCode, 1);
|
|
assert.match(results[1].output, /1 failing/);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(exec.calls, ['good', 'bad']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('runCriteria: a blocked command is marked blocked and is NEVER executed', () => {
|
|
const criteria = parsePlanVerification('## Verification\n\n- [ ] `rm -rf ~`\n');
|
|
const exec = execDouble({});
|
|
const results = runCriteria(criteria, {
|
|
exec,
|
|
screen: () => ({ allowed: false, rule: 'Filesystem root/home destruction' }),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(results[0].status, 'blocked');
|
|
assert.equal(results[0].exitCode, null);
|
|
assert.match(results[0].output, /Filesystem root\/home destruction/);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(exec.calls, [], 'a blocked command must not reach the shell');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('runCriteria: a criterion with no command is unrunnable, not passed', () => {
|
|
const criteria = parseSuccessCriteria('## Success Criteria\n\n- No new dependencies\n');
|
|
const results = runCriteria(criteria, { exec: execDouble({}), screen: allowAll });
|
|
assert.equal(results[0].status, 'unrunnable');
|
|
assert.equal(results[0].exitCode, null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('runCriteria: output is capped so a verbose command cannot flood a prompt', () => {
|
|
const criteria = parsePlanVerification('## Verification\n\n- [ ] `loud`\n');
|
|
const exec = execDouble({ loud: { status: 0, stdout: 'x'.repeat(10000), stderr: '' } });
|
|
const results = runCriteria(criteria, { exec, screen: allowAll, maxOutput: 200 });
|
|
assert.ok(results[0].output.length < 400, `capped, got ${results[0].output.length}`);
|
|
assert.match(results[0].output, /truncated/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- the verdict -----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
test('summarize: one failing criterion makes the run NOT ok', () => {
|
|
const results = [
|
|
{ status: 'passed' }, { status: 'failed' }, { status: 'passed' },
|
|
];
|
|
const s = summarize(results, { requireCommand: true });
|
|
assert.equal(s.ok, false);
|
|
assert.equal(s.failed, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(s.passed, 2);
|
|
assert.equal(s.total, 3);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('summarize: in plan mode an unrunnable criterion makes the run NOT ok', () => {
|
|
const s = summarize([{ status: 'passed' }, { status: 'unrunnable' }], { requireCommand: true });
|
|
assert.equal(s.ok, false);
|
|
assert.equal(s.unrunnable, 1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('summarize: in brief mode an unrunnable criterion is reported, not failed', () => {
|
|
const s = summarize([{ status: 'passed' }, { status: 'unrunnable' }], { requireCommand: false });
|
|
assert.equal(s.ok, true);
|
|
assert.equal(s.unrunnable, 1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('summarize: a blocked criterion is never ok, in either mode', () => {
|
|
for (const requireCommand of [true, false]) {
|
|
assert.equal(summarize([{ status: 'blocked' }], { requireCommand }).ok, false);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('summarize: zero criteria is NOT ok in plan mode (a plan that promises nothing)', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(summarize([], { requireCommand: true }).ok, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- the single-session path, end to end -----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
test('runPlanVerification: a plan whose success criterion FAILS fells the run', () => {
|
|
const report = runPlanVerification(join(FIX, 'plan-verification-fails.md'));
|
|
assert.equal(report.kind, 'plan');
|
|
assert.equal(report.summary.ok, false);
|
|
assert.equal(report.summary.failed, 1);
|
|
const failed = report.results.find((r) => r.status === 'failed');
|
|
assert.ok(failed, 'the failing criterion is reported by label');
|
|
assert.match(failed.label, /^V\d+$/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('runPlanVerification: a plan whose criteria all pass is ok', () => {
|
|
const report = runPlanVerification(join(FIX, 'plan-verification-passes.md'));
|
|
assert.equal(report.summary.ok, true);
|
|
assert.equal(report.summary.failed, 0);
|
|
assert.equal(report.summary.total, 2);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('runPlanVerification: a plan with no ## Verification section is NOT ok', () => {
|
|
const dir = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'criteria-runner-'));
|
|
const p = join(dir, 'plan.md');
|
|
writeFileSync(p, '# Plan\n\n## Steps\n\n- do a thing\n');
|
|
const report = runPlanVerification(p);
|
|
assert.equal(report.summary.ok, false);
|
|
assert.equal(report.error.code, 'NO_VERIFICATION_SECTION');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('render: the report names every non-passing criterion and its exit code', () => {
|
|
const report = runPlanVerification(join(FIX, 'plan-verification-fails.md'));
|
|
const text = render(report);
|
|
assert.match(text, /FAILED/);
|
|
assert.match(text, /exit 1/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- the CLI ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
function cli(args) {
|
|
return spawnSync(process.execPath, [CLI, ...args], { encoding: 'utf8', cwd: ROOT });
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
test('CLI: --plan exits 1 when a criterion fails', () => {
|
|
const r = cli(['--plan', join(FIX, 'plan-verification-fails.md')]);
|
|
assert.equal(r.status, 1, r.stderr);
|
|
assert.match(r.stdout, /FAILED/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('CLI: --plan exits 0 when every criterion passes', () => {
|
|
const r = cli(['--plan', join(FIX, 'plan-verification-passes.md')]);
|
|
assert.equal(r.status, 0, r.stderr + r.stdout);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('CLI: --json emits a parseable report with the summary', () => {
|
|
const r = cli(['--plan', join(FIX, 'plan-verification-fails.md'), '--json']);
|
|
assert.equal(r.status, 1);
|
|
const out = JSON.parse(r.stdout);
|
|
assert.equal(out.summary.ok, false);
|
|
assert.equal(out.results.length, out.summary.total);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('CLI: a missing file exits 2 — a read error is not a failed criterion', () => {
|
|
const r = cli(['--plan', join(FIX, 'no-such-plan.md')]);
|
|
assert.equal(r.status, 2);
|
|
assert.match(r.stderr, /criteria-runner/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('CLI: an unknown argument exits 2 with usage', () => {
|
|
const r = cli(['--nope']);
|
|
assert.equal(r.status, 2);
|
|
assert.match(r.stderr, /usage/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('CLI: no mode flag exits 2 — it never guesses which artifact it was given', () => {
|
|
const r = cli([]);
|
|
assert.equal(r.status, 2);
|
|
assert.match(r.stderr, /usage/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- the brief path: evidence handed to a read-only reviewer ----------------
|
|
//
|
|
// D-04: brief-conformance-reviewer is asked to judge whether a Success
|
|
// Criterion's verification command "exists and passes", but its tools are
|
|
// Read/Glob/Grep — it cannot run anything. /trekreview runs the commands and
|
|
// hands over the RESULT, and the block it hands over is built by code so the
|
|
// orchestrator cannot narrate a pass that never happened.
|
|
|
|
test('runSuccessCriteriaChecks: each criterion gets a real result, prose ones are NOT RUN', () => {
|
|
const report = runSuccessCriteriaChecks(join(FIX, 'brief-success-criteria.md'));
|
|
assert.equal(report.kind, 'brief');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(report.results.map((r) => r.label), ['SC1', 'SC2', 'SC3']);
|
|
assert.equal(report.results[0].status, 'passed');
|
|
assert.equal(report.results[1].status, 'failed');
|
|
assert.equal(report.results[1].exitCode, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(report.results[2].status, 'unrunnable');
|
|
assert.equal(report.summary.ok, false, 'a failing criterion is never ok, in either mode');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('runSuccessCriteriaChecks: a brief with no Success Criteria section reports the code', () => {
|
|
const dir = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'criteria-runner-'));
|
|
const p = join(dir, 'brief.md');
|
|
writeFileSync(p, '# Brief\n\n## Goal\n\nSomething.\n');
|
|
const report = runSuccessCriteriaChecks(p);
|
|
assert.equal(report.error.code, 'NO_SUCCESS_CRITERIA_SECTION');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(report.results, []);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('formatCriteriaEvidence: one row per criterion, with command and exit code', () => {
|
|
const report = runSuccessCriteriaChecks(join(FIX, 'brief-success-criteria.md'));
|
|
const block = formatCriteriaEvidence(report);
|
|
for (const label of ['SC1', 'SC2', 'SC3']) assert.match(block, new RegExp(`\\| ${label} \\|`));
|
|
assert.match(block, /PASS/);
|
|
assert.match(block, /FAILED/);
|
|
assert.match(block, /NOT RUN/);
|
|
assert.match(block, /exit 1/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('formatCriteriaEvidence: the block forbids inferring a pass for a criterion with no result', () => {
|
|
const report = runSuccessCriteriaChecks(join(FIX, 'brief-success-criteria.md'));
|
|
const block = formatCriteriaEvidence(report);
|
|
assert.match(block, /NOT RUN/);
|
|
assert.match(
|
|
block, /never.*(infer|assume)/i,
|
|
'the evidence block must state in-band that NOT RUN is not a pass — the reviewer cannot re-run it',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('formatCriteriaEvidence: an unreadable section still yields a block that says so', () => {
|
|
const dir = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'criteria-runner-'));
|
|
const p = join(dir, 'brief.md');
|
|
writeFileSync(p, '# Brief\n\n## Goal\n\nSomething.\n');
|
|
const block = formatCriteriaEvidence(runSuccessCriteriaChecks(p));
|
|
assert.match(block, /NO_SUCCESS_CRITERIA_SECTION/);
|
|
assert.match(block, /no criteria were run/i);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('CLI: --evidence emits the reviewer block, and --brief still exits 1 on a failure', () => {
|
|
const r = cli(['--brief', join(FIX, 'brief-success-criteria.md'), '--evidence']);
|
|
assert.equal(r.status, 1, r.stderr);
|
|
assert.match(r.stdout, /\| SC1 \|/);
|
|
assert.match(r.stdout, /NOT RUN/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('CLI: --evidence and --json together exit 2 — one output shape at a time', () => {
|
|
const r = cli(['--brief', join(FIX, 'brief-success-criteria.md'), '--evidence', '--json']);
|
|
assert.equal(r.status, 2);
|
|
assert.match(r.stderr, /usage/);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// --- the repo's OWN plan format --------------------------------------------
|
|
//
|
|
// D-03's runner read bullet lines only. The repo's own example plan writes its
|
|
// `## Verification` as a fenced bash block, so it parsed to ZERO criteria, the
|
|
// runner exited 1, and Phase 7 forbade `result: completed` — a correct plan
|
|
// felled every single-session run. Measured 2026-09-18 (PM checkpoint on
|
|
// 6cafb4c): 0 of the repo's plan artifacts exited 0.
|
|
|
|
const SHELL_BLOCK_PLAN = [
|
|
'# Plan',
|
|
'',
|
|
'## Verification',
|
|
'',
|
|
'Final acceptance run after step 3:',
|
|
'',
|
|
'```bash',
|
|
'npm test # all green',
|
|
'# a comment-only line is not a criterion',
|
|
'',
|
|
'node --test tests/lib/x.test.mjs',
|
|
'```',
|
|
'',
|
|
'## Estimated Scope',
|
|
'',
|
|
'```bash',
|
|
'not-a-criterion --outside-the-section',
|
|
'```',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
|
|
test('parsePlanVerification: a fenced shell block yields one criterion per command line', () => {
|
|
const criteria = parsePlanVerification(SHELL_BLOCK_PLAN);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(criteria.map((c) => c.label), ['V1', 'V2']);
|
|
assert.equal(criteria[0].command, 'npm test # all green');
|
|
assert.equal(criteria[1].command, 'node --test tests/lib/x.test.mjs');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('parsePlanVerification: a fenced block and a bullet list declaring the same commands parse identically', () => {
|
|
const fenced = '## Verification\n\n```bash\nnpm test\nnode --test tests/lib/x.test.mjs\n```\n';
|
|
const bulleted = '## Verification\n\n- [ ] `npm test`\n- [ ] `node --test tests/lib/x.test.mjs`\n';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
parsePlanVerification(fenced).map((c) => [c.label, c.command]),
|
|
parsePlanVerification(bulleted).map((c) => [c.label, c.command]),
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('parsePlanVerification: only a shell-tagged fence is read as commands', () => {
|
|
const md = '## Verification\n\n```json\n{"expected": "output"}\n```\n\n- [ ] `npm test`\n';
|
|
const criteria = parsePlanVerification(md);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(criteria.map((c) => c.command), ['npm test'],
|
|
'an untagged or non-shell fence holds expected output, not commands — never invent a criterion from it');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('parsePlanVerification: a `## ` heading inside a fence is quoted text, not a section', () => {
|
|
const md = '# Report\n\n```\n# Plan\n## Verification\n## Plan-critic notes\n```\n\nNo real section here.\n';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parsePlanVerification(md), []);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Every plan artifact the repo ships must survive its own runner. This test
|
|
// parses; it never runs — one example plan names a fictional CLI on purpose.
|
|
const PLAN_ARTIFACTS = [
|
|
'examples/01-add-verbose-flag/plan.md',
|
|
'templates/plan-template.md',
|
|
'tests/fixtures/plan-verification-fails.md',
|
|
'tests/fixtures/plan-verification-passes.md',
|
|
'tests/synthetic/plan-run-C.md',
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
test("the repo's own plan artifacts each declare at least one criterion", () => {
|
|
for (const rel of PLAN_ARTIFACTS) {
|
|
const criteria = parsePlanVerification(readFileSync(join(ROOT, rel), 'utf8'));
|
|
assert.ok(criteria.length >= 1, `${rel} parsed to ${criteria.length} criteria`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// examples/02-real-cli/REGENERATED.md is a REPORT that quotes a plan outline
|
|
// inside a fence; it has no `## Verification` of its own. The honest answer is
|
|
// NO_VERIFICATION_SECTION — not an empty section that reads as "0 of 0".
|
|
test('a report that merely quotes a plan outline has no ## Verification section', () => {
|
|
const report = runPlanVerification(join(ROOT, 'examples/02-real-cli/REGENERATED.md'));
|
|
assert.equal(report.error?.code, 'NO_VERIFICATION_SECTION');
|
|
assert.equal(report.summary.ok, false);
|
|
});
|