Top-down analysis charter, distinct from the bottom-up per-feature CC-NN matrix:
given modern CC (2.1.183), find the balance where a non-CC-expert still gets
Voyage's value AND Voyage does not duplicate CC features done better natively.
Two decision axes (Duplication x Expertise-bar) -> per-capability disposition
(KEEP / THIN-WRAP / DROP->NATIVE / SIMPLIFY); 5 phases (0 evidence + post-2.1.181
delta -> 1 capability inventory -> 2 CC-overlap -> 3 classify + adversarial -> 4
synthesis + backlog); output docs/voyage-vs-cc-balance-analysis.md. Execution
substrate: Dynamic Workflow (operator-authorized) in a scout-inline -> pipeline ->
synthesize-inline hybrid. Analysis only; recommendations operator-gated before impl.
MANDATED start of next session (per gitignored STATE.md). Hard constraints flagged:
Trinity Handover-1 contract + operator-pinned decisions must not be silently broken.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LqBYc8Ltrk7LipyJmGxXiB
Kjell Tore Guttormsen
1fc06502c9