An adversarial read of d88245c reproduced 15 problems; all fixed here, each
with a test that fails on the old code.
- verdict-gate: a greener verdict must be backed by the LAST fence being a
`json` block of the right shape, with no BLOCKER in the JSON (any case),
in `## Findings (BLOCKER)`, or a differing finding-id list; two verdict
lines and more than one file argument are exit 2. ({}, null, lowercase
"blocker", a trailing ```jsonc and a later json fence all gave exit 0.)
- engine-findings: a transcribed "narrower" key can no longer lower an
engine tier; absolute paths under --repo-root match the scope; "12" lines
parse; an empty scope is an error; out-of-scope engine findings are
unverified (`engine:out-of-scope`) and forbid ALLOW.
- recurrence: the catch-all engine keys and keys normalised from unknown
ones are never proposed; the same unfixed finding in two iterations is not
a recurrence; proposals are validated before they are offered; \r/U+2028
and damaged markers are refused; writes go through a symlinked CLAUDE.md.
Prose points --repo at the session directory, not the git toplevel.
- Workflow substrate: engines are counted from what arrived, and the
verdict's floor is recomputed from the coordinator's findings; now tested
by running the script with stubbed Workflow globals. Two literal NUL bytes
written as \u0000 (git saw the file as binary).
- Trimming keeps Pass 1's "Also flagged by" provenance; `## Declined to
Judge` and remediation steps are required from review_version 1.1 only
(N-1); the zero-diff review now carries the JSON block the gate needs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
147 lines
5.1 KiB
JavaScript
147 lines
5.1 KiB
JavaScript
// lib/review/rule-catalogue.mjs
|
|
// Canonical rule catalogue for /trekreview.
|
|
//
|
|
// 14 rule keys, 4-tier severity (matches brief contract).
|
|
// llm-security 5-tier alignment is a v1.1 candidate.
|
|
//
|
|
// Ordre 5 (review_version 1.1) added the two engine keys: findings from Claude
|
|
// Code's own `/code-review` and `/security-review` enter the coordinator under
|
|
// them when no narrower key fits (wrap, not a new engine).
|
|
//
|
|
// `memory_route` decides where a finding class that recurs across two
|
|
// review.md files is proposed as project memory (P5, lib/review/recurrence.mjs):
|
|
// 'check' - mechanical: a deterministic check can catch it;
|
|
// 'rule' - judgement: a line in the target repo's `.claude/rules/` file;
|
|
// null - never proposed: review hygiene (about the review itself, not the
|
|
// target code), or a catch-all key (the two engine keys) whose
|
|
// members share nothing but their source.
|
|
// Routing borrowed from Pocock `skills/in-progress/retro/SKILL.md:19` (MIT).
|
|
|
|
export const SEVERITY_VALUES = Object.freeze(['BLOCKER', 'MAJOR', 'MINOR', 'SUGGESTION']);
|
|
|
|
export const CATEGORY_VALUES = Object.freeze([
|
|
'conformance',
|
|
'correctness',
|
|
'scope',
|
|
'tests',
|
|
'security',
|
|
'maintenance',
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
export const RULE_CATALOGUE = Object.freeze([
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'MISSING_BRIEF_REF',
|
|
severity: 'MAJOR',
|
|
category: 'conformance',
|
|
description: 'Finding lacks brief_ref pointing to the brief section it traces back to.',
|
|
memory_route: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'UNIMPLEMENTED_CRITERION',
|
|
severity: 'BLOCKER',
|
|
category: 'conformance',
|
|
description: 'A brief Success Criterion has no corresponding implementation in the delivered code.',
|
|
memory_route: 'rule',
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'SCOPE_CREEP_BUILT',
|
|
severity: 'MAJOR',
|
|
category: 'scope',
|
|
description: 'Code implements features beyond what the brief requested.',
|
|
memory_route: 'rule',
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'NON_GOAL_VIOLATED',
|
|
severity: 'BLOCKER',
|
|
category: 'scope',
|
|
description: 'Code implements something the brief explicitly listed as a Non-Goal.',
|
|
memory_route: 'rule',
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'MISSING_TEST',
|
|
severity: 'MAJOR',
|
|
category: 'tests',
|
|
description: 'Delivered behavior has no automated test coverage.',
|
|
memory_route: 'check',
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'SECURITY_INJECTION',
|
|
severity: 'BLOCKER',
|
|
category: 'security',
|
|
description: 'Code path constructs commands, queries, or templates from untrusted input without sanitization.',
|
|
memory_route: 'rule',
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'PLACEHOLDER_IN_CODE',
|
|
severity: 'MAJOR',
|
|
category: 'maintenance',
|
|
description: 'Committed code contains TBD/TODO/FIXME/XXX/console.log/debugger placeholders.',
|
|
memory_route: 'check',
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'MISSING_ERROR_HANDLING',
|
|
severity: 'MINOR',
|
|
category: 'correctness',
|
|
description: 'Code path can fail silently (uncaught promise, unchecked return, missing try/catch on I/O).',
|
|
memory_route: 'rule',
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'UNDECLARED_DEPENDENCY',
|
|
severity: 'MAJOR',
|
|
category: 'maintenance',
|
|
description: 'Code imports or invokes something not declared in package.json / not bundled / not present in PATH.',
|
|
memory_route: 'check',
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'PLAN_EXECUTE_DRIFT',
|
|
severity: 'MAJOR',
|
|
category: 'conformance',
|
|
description: 'Delivered code diverges from what the plan said would be built (different file, different approach, different API).',
|
|
memory_route: 'rule',
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'BROKEN_SUCCESS_CRITERION',
|
|
severity: 'BLOCKER',
|
|
category: 'conformance',
|
|
description: 'A brief Success Criterion is implemented but the verification command/test fails or is structurally incorrect.',
|
|
memory_route: 'check',
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'COVERAGE_SILENT_SKIP',
|
|
severity: 'MAJOR',
|
|
category: 'tests',
|
|
description: 'Triage gate skipped a file without recording it in the Coverage section of review.md (hidden truncation).',
|
|
memory_route: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'CODE_REVIEW_DEFECT',
|
|
severity: 'MAJOR',
|
|
category: 'correctness',
|
|
description: "A defect reported by Claude Code's /code-review that no narrower rule_key covers.",
|
|
memory_route: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
Object.freeze({
|
|
rule_key: 'SECURITY_REVIEW_VULNERABILITY',
|
|
severity: 'BLOCKER',
|
|
category: 'security',
|
|
description: "A vulnerability reported by Claude Code's /security-review that no narrower rule_key covers.",
|
|
memory_route: null,
|
|
}),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
export const MEMORY_ROUTES = Object.freeze(['check', 'rule']);
|
|
|
|
export const RULE_KEYS = Object.freeze(new Set(RULE_CATALOGUE.map((r) => r.rule_key)));
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Look up a rule entry by its key.
|
|
* @param {string} key
|
|
* @returns {object|null} the frozen entry, or null if not found
|
|
*/
|
|
export function getRule(key) {
|
|
if (typeof key !== 'string') return null;
|
|
for (const entry of RULE_CATALOGUE) {
|
|
if (entry.rule_key === key) return entry;
|
|
}
|
|
return null;
|
|
}
|