voyage/examples
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 33b58f460a
fix: the fix round before 6.3.0 (order 10)
1. A step of only tests can never be proven red. One reading,
   stepTestsOnly (lib/parsers/plan-schema.mjs, test paths from the new
   lib/util/test-path.mjs): the plan validator warns PLAN_STEP_TESTS_ONLY,
   red-proof --plan/--step adds tests_only to a not-red-at-base, and
   /trekexecute and the step helper send such a step straight up to the
   plan instead of into fix rounds that cannot succeed. /trekplan, the plan
   template and plan-critic (dimension 8, still 12) say the test belongs in
   the step that builds the behaviour.
2. Timing tests under load: the hook helper's kill limit is 30 s and per
   call overridable; SC #14 passes on the fastest of up to three runs
   against the same 800 ms limit (tests/helpers/timing.mjs).
3. The example plan's On failure lines open with a K11 word.
4. /trekreview saves the reviewer's whole answer for the findings check and
   names FINDING_PROSE_LINE_OUT_OF_RANGE (error: re-ask; warning: report).
5. The criteria runner's commands run without NODE_TEST_CONTEXT
   (commandEnv, moved to lib/util/command-env.mjs).
6. The resolver returns effort only when the brief's phase signal sets one;
   the four commands said it always did.

Also: the K2 hook tests used fixed session ids in a per-user temp dir, so
two suites running at once took each other's approval records; the ids are
now unique per run.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-09 22:16:12 +02:00
..
01-add-verbose-flag fix: the fix round before 6.3.0 (order 10) 2026-10-09 22:16:12 +02:00
02-real-cli feat(voyage)!: bulk content rewrite ultra -> voyage/trek prose [skip-docs] 2026-05-05 15:08:20 +02:00
observability fix(voyage): correct env-var names in observability/README.md 2026-05-09 09:50:48 +02:00
README.md feat(voyage)!: bulk content rewrite ultra -> voyage/trek prose [skip-docs] 2026-05-05 15:08:20 +02:00

Examples

Complete kalibrerte walk-throughs of the trekplan pipeline for realistic tasks. Each example shows the four artifacts a project directory contains after a full run:

  • brief.md — task brief from /trekbrief
  • research/*.md — research briefs from /trekresearch
  • plan.md — implementation plan from /trekplan
  • progress.json — execution log from /trekexecute

These are hand-calibrated, not LLM-generated. The point is to give a fork-er a deterministic reference — what the artifacts look like when everything goes right, with a small but real task.

Running pipeline yourself

For your own work, point the four commands at a real project directory:

mkdir -p .claude/projects/2026-05-01-my-task
/trekbrief
/trekresearch --project .claude/projects/2026-05-01-my-task
/trekplan --project .claude/projects/2026-05-01-my-task
/trekexecute --project .claude/projects/2026-05-01-my-task

The artifacts in each example mirror that flow.

Examples

01-add-verbose-flag

Task: add a --verbose flag to a small CLI parser. Touches one parser file and six command handlers; adds two tests.

Why this example: small enough to read end-to-end in 10 minutes, but exercises every artifact (research with brief-anchoring, plan with manifests, progress.json with multi-step git history). Demonstrates how plan_version: 1.7 schema looks in real life — including the manifest YAML block per step and the must_contain list-of-dicts form.

What to study first:

  1. brief.md — note the explicit Out of scope section and concrete Success Criteria (no "make it work" hand-waving).
  2. plan.md Step 1 — note that the FIRST step captures golden output before any behavior change. This is the stability harness pattern.
  3. plan.md Step 5 — note that this step touches 5 files in one commit, and the plan justifies the deviation from the 1–2 file guideline. Plan-critic should accept that justification.
  4. progress.json — every step has both commit_sha and verify_passed. Resumes work from the last completed step.

Regeneration

Each example has a REGENERATED.md documenting the version it was calibrated against. When the artifact format changes, the example needs to be re-built. See the REGENERATED.md file in each example for triggers and procedure.

Adding a new example

If you have a small, realistic task (touches 1-3 files, has a clear success criterion, finishes in under 30 minutes) and want to add it as an example:

  1. Create examples/NN-slug-here/ with the same four artifacts.
  2. Add a REGENERATED.md documenting the calibration date and version.
  3. Add a section to this README under ## Examples.
  4. Open an issue on the marketplace describing what the example teaches that 01 doesn't already teach.