Round 9 (0f400d3..a10018f, WARN: 0 BLOCKER, 12 MAJOR): seven findings and three brief notes, by operator choice. Each finding began with a test that failed ona10018fon its assertion; suite 2230 (2228/0/2). - A check refused for its comment (a quote, $, backtick or backslash) keeps its command and its reason, and every reader refuses it out loud: a nested ## Verification bullet stays a criterion (PLAN_VERIFICATION_NOT_RUNNABLE) and a brief SC warns (BRIEF_SC_NOT_RUNNABLE). It was folded into a sub-point or read as prose, a regression froma10018f. Readers that took a command as runnable (the end-to-end lists) skip a refused one. - The verdict gate reads the last fenced block's info string and body from one reading, and exits 2 unless the info string is exactly json: a last block opened as ```json {x} held a BLOCKER the gate passed with exit 0 (also in 6.3.0). A last block never closed is exit 2 too. - One fence reader (findings-schema fencedBlocks) for the gate and every trailing-json reader: a fence closes only on a run at least as long as its opener, as in Markdown, so a four-backtick example of a json block is one block; CRLF and an indented fence read alike in the gate and the readers. - Files: a description runs on past a comma and onto the next line until a new entry starts (a list item on a new line, or a backticked path), and a plain path followed by a colon starts its description. Measured over all 939 Files: fields in the .md files under the marketplace and the test repo (560 of them in the 48 plan.md files outside worktrees): 0 read differently, tests-only changed in 0. - The test lock compares --cmd by its words, so other blanks between the same words are the step's command. - release-check decides "two files" on real paths: one review.md reached through a symlinked --repo is one file. - Brief notes: red proof's stopped control run has its own test (green at once, red with the branch deleted); the two tests that assumed jest is not installed run with a PATH that finds only git (red ona10018fwith a jest on PATH, green now); the Files: reader's doc states the measured counts (520 fields in 48 plan files at rounds 7-8, not "182 plans"; 560 now). Not in this round (operator 2026-10-11): a144e9ce, 1dc2e785, dc3a467e, 2fa88853, 26873fa5. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
344 lines
15 KiB
JavaScript
344 lines
15 KiB
JavaScript
// lib/review/findings-schema.mjs
|
||
// Reviewer-output JSON schema contract for /trekreview Phase 5 (NW1).
|
||
//
|
||
// brief-conformance-reviewer and code-correctness-reviewer each emit a trailing
|
||
// fenced `json` block of shape:
|
||
//
|
||
// { "reviewer": "<name>", "findings": [ { id, severity, rule_key, file, line,
|
||
// brief_ref, title, detail,
|
||
// recommended_action }, ... ] }
|
||
//
|
||
// This module codifies that contract so main can VALIDATE each reviewer's JSON
|
||
// (not merely JSON.parse it) and re-ask on *schema* failure as well as parse
|
||
// failure, replacing the fragile "parse the last json block" contract that used
|
||
// to live in commands/trekreview.md (the :202–204 prose).
|
||
//
|
||
// Load-bearing fields (the downstream dedup triplet + verdict severity) are hard
|
||
// errors: file, rule_key, severity, line. Unknown rule_keys are errors too — the
|
||
// catalogue is the contract. Descriptive fields (title/detail/recommended_action/
|
||
// brief_ref) and unknown top-level keys are tolerated (forward-compat, mirroring
|
||
// review-validator.mjs).
|
||
//
|
||
// 3-layer pattern (Content → Raw-text → CLI shim) mirroring the other validators.
|
||
|
||
import { readFileSync, existsSync, statSync } from 'node:fs';
|
||
import { resolve, sep } from 'node:path';
|
||
import { issue, fail } from '../util/result.mjs';
|
||
import { RULE_KEYS, SEVERITY_VALUES } from './rule-catalogue.mjs';
|
||
import { isMain } from '../util/is-main.mjs';
|
||
|
||
// The fields main + the coordinator depend on. Descriptive fields are not here
|
||
// on purpose: a missing recommended_action should not trigger a re-ask.
|
||
export const FINDING_REQUIRED_FIELDS = Object.freeze([
|
||
'severity',
|
||
'rule_key',
|
||
'file',
|
||
'line',
|
||
]);
|
||
|
||
// The fenced blocks of a Markdown text, in order, read as Markdown reads a
|
||
// backtick fence: an opening line of three or more backticks whose info string
|
||
// holds no backtick, closed only by a line of backticks at least as long as the
|
||
// opening run (round 9: any three closed any opener, so a four-backtick example
|
||
// of a json block split there). A block never closed runs to the end of the
|
||
// text (`closed: false`). Indented or not, a fence counts, also inside a list
|
||
// item; a `\r` before a line break is no part of the line, so a CRLF file reads
|
||
// as its LF twin. A JSON string cannot hold a line break, so three backticks
|
||
// inside one ("a fenced ```bash block") never end a block, and three backticks
|
||
// after text on the same line are no fence (release review of 6.3.0, rounds
|
||
// 7-9). `info` is the info string as written, trailing blanks dropped; `body`
|
||
// is the text between the fence lines, as written.
|
||
// One reader for the verdict gate and every trailing-json reader: the review
|
||
// validator, the synthesis digest, fill-finding-ids, recurrence, fidelity-diff.
|
||
const FENCE_OPEN = /^[ \t]*(`{3,})([^`]*)$/;
|
||
const FENCE_CLOSE = /^[ \t]*(`{3,})[ \t]*$/;
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* @param {string} text
|
||
* @returns {Array<{info: string, body: string, closed: boolean}>}
|
||
*/
|
||
export function fencedBlocks(text) {
|
||
const blocks = [];
|
||
if (typeof text !== 'string') return blocks;
|
||
let open = null;
|
||
for (let at = 0; at <= text.length;) {
|
||
const nl = text.indexOf('\n', at);
|
||
const end = nl === -1 ? text.length : nl;
|
||
const line = text.slice(at, end).replace(/\r$/, '');
|
||
if (open === null) {
|
||
const m = FENCE_OPEN.exec(line);
|
||
if (m) open = { run: m[1].length, info: m[2].replace(/[ \t]+$/, ''), start: end + 1 };
|
||
} else {
|
||
const m = FENCE_CLOSE.exec(line);
|
||
if (m && m[1].length >= open.run) {
|
||
blocks.push({ info: open.info, body: text.slice(open.start, at), closed: true });
|
||
open = null;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
if (nl === -1) break;
|
||
at = nl + 1;
|
||
}
|
||
if (open !== null) blocks.push({ info: open.info, body: text.slice(open.start), closed: false });
|
||
return blocks;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/** A `json` block: its info string is exactly `json` (any case). */
|
||
export function isJsonBlock(block) {
|
||
return block.info.toLowerCase() === 'json';
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* Extract the inner body of the LAST closed `json` block in `text`. The
|
||
* contract pins the JSON block as the LAST fence so prose above it never
|
||
* confuses the parser.
|
||
* @param {string} text
|
||
* @returns {string|null} the JSON source, or null if no json fence is present.
|
||
*/
|
||
export function extractFindingsBlock(text) {
|
||
const json = fencedBlocks(text).filter((b) => b.closed && isJsonBlock(b));
|
||
return json.length > 0 ? json[json.length - 1].body : null;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
function validateFinding(finding, index, errors) {
|
||
const loc = `findings[${index}]`;
|
||
if (finding === null || typeof finding !== 'object' || Array.isArray(finding)) {
|
||
errors.push(issue('FINDING_NOT_OBJECT', `${loc} is not an object`, undefined, loc));
|
||
return;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (typeof finding.file !== 'string' || finding.file.length === 0) {
|
||
errors.push(issue('FINDING_MISSING_FILE', `${loc}.file must be a non-empty string`, undefined, loc));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (typeof finding.rule_key !== 'string' || finding.rule_key.length === 0) {
|
||
errors.push(issue('FINDING_MISSING_RULE_KEY', `${loc}.rule_key must be a non-empty string`, undefined, loc));
|
||
} else if (!RULE_KEYS.has(finding.rule_key)) {
|
||
errors.push(issue(
|
||
'FINDING_UNKNOWN_RULE_KEY',
|
||
`${loc}.rule_key "${finding.rule_key}" is not in the rule catalogue`,
|
||
'Use a rule_key from lib/review/rule-catalogue.mjs',
|
||
loc,
|
||
));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (typeof finding.severity !== 'string' || !SEVERITY_VALUES.includes(finding.severity)) {
|
||
errors.push(issue(
|
||
'FINDING_BAD_SEVERITY',
|
||
`${loc}.severity must be one of ${SEVERITY_VALUES.join('|')}, got ${JSON.stringify(finding.severity)}`,
|
||
undefined,
|
||
loc,
|
||
));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (typeof finding.line !== 'number' || !Number.isInteger(finding.line) || finding.line < 0) {
|
||
errors.push(issue(
|
||
'FINDING_BAD_LINE',
|
||
`${loc}.line must be an integer ≥ 0, got ${JSON.stringify(finding.line)}`,
|
||
'Use 0 for file-scoped findings without a specific line.',
|
||
loc,
|
||
));
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* Validate an already-parsed reviewer-output payload against the schema.
|
||
* Accumulates every error (so a re-ask can name all problems at once).
|
||
* @param {unknown} payload
|
||
* @returns {import('../util/result.mjs').Result}
|
||
*/
|
||
// A reviewer that reads the diff cites the line in the PATCH, not in the file:
|
||
// the voyage-lekerepo trial (2026-10-06) cited tests/cli.test.mjs:194 for a
|
||
// 124-line file, the coordinator then set the only brief-anchored MAJOR aside,
|
||
// and the claim itself was right. With a repo root, a line past the end of a
|
||
// file that exists is an error, so Phase 5's bounded re-ask fixes it before the
|
||
// coordinator ever sees it. A file absent from the tree is not judged here.
|
||
function readLineCount(root, file) {
|
||
const abs = resolve(root, file);
|
||
if (abs !== root && !abs.startsWith(root + sep)) return null;
|
||
try {
|
||
if (!statSync(abs).isFile()) return null;
|
||
const text = readFileSync(abs, 'utf-8');
|
||
if (text === '') return 0;
|
||
return text.endsWith('\n') ? text.split('\n').length - 1 : text.split('\n').length;
|
||
} catch {
|
||
return null;
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* Line counts for one validation, each file read once however often it is
|
||
* cited: a reviewer that cited the 3,000-line commands/trekexecute.md 40
|
||
* times read it 40 times, again on every re-ask (release review of 6.3.0,
|
||
* round 7). The map lives for one call, so an edited file is read afresh.
|
||
*/
|
||
function lineCounter(repoRoot) {
|
||
const root = resolve(repoRoot);
|
||
const counts = new Map();
|
||
return (file) => {
|
||
if (!counts.has(file)) counts.set(file, readLineCount(root, file));
|
||
return counts.get(file);
|
||
};
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
function checkLineRange(finding, index, lineCount, errors) {
|
||
if (!finding || typeof finding.file !== 'string' || !Number.isInteger(finding.line) || finding.line <= 0) return;
|
||
const n = lineCount(finding.file);
|
||
if (n === null || finding.line <= n) return;
|
||
errors.push(issue(
|
||
'FINDING_LINE_OUT_OF_RANGE',
|
||
`findings[${index}] cites ${finding.file}:${finding.line}, but the file has ${n} lines`,
|
||
'Cite the line number in the file itself (Read it), not the line in the diff or patch.',
|
||
));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// The same check for a `path:line` (or `path:a-b`) a reviewer writes in prose:
|
||
// a finding's title/detail/recommended_action/brief_ref, and the text around
|
||
// the JSON block. code-correctness-reviewer wrote "`tests/contract.sh:119`
|
||
// relies on git" about a 33-line file, and nothing looked (voyage-lekerepo
|
||
// trial 2, 2026-10-08). In a finding's fields a line past the end of a file
|
||
// that exists is an error (the re-ask can fix the block); in the prose around
|
||
// the block it is a warning (see validateReviewerOutput). A path absent from
|
||
// the tree is not judged. The path needs an extension, so `localhost:8080` and
|
||
// `host.example:443` are no citation of anything in the tree; a path glued to
|
||
// a `\` or `:` (a Windows path) is not read as one relative to the root.
|
||
const PROSE_CITE = /(?<![\w./\\:-])((?:\.{0,2}\/)?[\w.-]+(?:\/[\w.-]+)*\.[A-Za-z0-9]+):(\d+)(?:[-–—](\d+))?(?![\w])/g;
|
||
const PROSE_FIELDS = Object.freeze(['title', 'detail', 'recommended_action', 'brief_ref']);
|
||
|
||
function checkProseCitations(text, where, lineCount, errors, seen) {
|
||
if (typeof text !== 'string' || text === '') return;
|
||
PROSE_CITE.lastIndex = 0;
|
||
let m;
|
||
while ((m = PROSE_CITE.exec(text)) !== null) {
|
||
const line = Math.max(Number(m[2]), m[3] === undefined ? 0 : Number(m[3]));
|
||
if (line <= 0) continue;
|
||
const n = lineCount(m[1]);
|
||
if (n === null || line <= n) continue;
|
||
const key = `${where}\u0000${m[0]}`;
|
||
if (seen.has(key)) continue;
|
||
seen.add(key);
|
||
errors.push(issue(
|
||
'FINDING_PROSE_LINE_OUT_OF_RANGE',
|
||
`${where} cites ${m[0]}, but ${m[1]} has ${n} lines`,
|
||
'Cite the line number in the file itself (Read it), not the line in the diff or patch. A line that is no ' +
|
||
'longer in the file is cited with its revision, `<rev>:<path>:<line>` (`v6.2.0:hooks/x.mjs:120`), which ' +
|
||
'is not judged against today\'s file.',
|
||
));
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
function checkFindingProse(finding, index, lineCount, errors, seen) {
|
||
if (!finding || typeof finding !== 'object') return;
|
||
for (const field of PROSE_FIELDS) {
|
||
checkProseCitations(finding[field], `findings[${index}].${field}`, lineCount, errors, seen);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* @param {unknown} payload
|
||
* @param {{ repoRoot?: string }} [opts] - with a repo root, cited lines are checked against the files:
|
||
* each finding's `file:line`, and every `path:line` in its prose fields
|
||
*/
|
||
export function validateFindings(payload, opts = {}) {
|
||
return validatePayload(payload, opts.repoRoot ? lineCounter(opts.repoRoot) : null);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// One line counter for one validation: the JSON block and the prose around it share it.
|
||
function validatePayload(payload, lineCount) {
|
||
if (payload === null || typeof payload !== 'object' || Array.isArray(payload)) {
|
||
return fail(issue('FINDINGS_NOT_OBJECT', `Reviewer output must be a JSON object, got ${Array.isArray(payload) ? 'array' : typeof payload}`));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const errors = [];
|
||
const warnings = [];
|
||
|
||
if (typeof payload.reviewer !== 'string' || payload.reviewer.length === 0) {
|
||
warnings.push(issue('FINDINGS_MISSING_REVIEWER', 'Reviewer output should carry a non-empty "reviewer" name'));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (!Array.isArray(payload.findings)) {
|
||
errors.push(issue('FINDINGS_NOT_ARRAY', `Field "findings" must be an array, got ${typeof payload.findings}`));
|
||
return { valid: false, errors, warnings, parsed: payload };
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
const seen = new Set();
|
||
for (let i = 0; i < payload.findings.length; i++) {
|
||
validateFinding(payload.findings[i], i, errors);
|
||
if (lineCount) {
|
||
checkLineRange(payload.findings[i], i, lineCount, errors);
|
||
checkFindingProse(payload.findings[i], i, lineCount, errors, seen);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
return { valid: errors.length === 0, errors, warnings, parsed: payload };
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/**
|
||
* Validate a reviewer's raw output text: extract the last json fence, parse it,
|
||
* then schema-validate. Parse-stage failures get stable codes so they flow
|
||
* through the same bounded re-ask path as schema failures.
|
||
* @param {string} rawText
|
||
* @returns {import('../util/result.mjs').Result}
|
||
*/
|
||
export function validateReviewerOutput(rawText, opts = {}) {
|
||
const block = extractFindingsBlock(rawText);
|
||
if (block === null) {
|
||
return fail(issue(
|
||
'FINDINGS_NO_JSON_BLOCK',
|
||
'No trailing fenced ```json block found in reviewer output',
|
||
'Reviewers must end their output with a single ```json findings block.',
|
||
));
|
||
}
|
||
let parsed;
|
||
try {
|
||
parsed = JSON.parse(block);
|
||
} catch (e) {
|
||
return fail(issue('FINDINGS_PARSE_ERROR', `Reviewer JSON block did not parse: ${e.message}`));
|
||
}
|
||
const lineCount = opts.repoRoot ? lineCounter(opts.repoRoot) : null;
|
||
const r = validatePayload(parsed, lineCount);
|
||
if (!lineCount) return r;
|
||
// The prose around the block (the text outside the LAST json fence; the
|
||
// block itself was checked field by field above) is a WARNING, not an error:
|
||
// the bounded re-ask asks for the JSON block only, which cannot correct that
|
||
// prose, and nothing downstream reads it — an error there could only stop a
|
||
// review over text no one uses (independent review, 2026-10-08).
|
||
const at = rawText.lastIndexOf(block);
|
||
const found = [];
|
||
checkProseCitations(rawText.slice(0, at) + rawText.slice(at + block.length), 'reviewer prose', lineCount, found, new Set());
|
||
return found.length === 0 ? r : { ...r, warnings: [...r.warnings, ...found] };
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// ---- CLI shim ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
||
function isDir(p) {
|
||
try { return statSync(p).isDirectory(); } catch { return false; }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if (isMain(import.meta.url)) {
|
||
const args = process.argv.slice(2);
|
||
const rootIdx = args.indexOf('--repo-root');
|
||
const repoRoot = rootIdx >= 0 ? args[rootIdx + 1] : undefined;
|
||
// Without the flag nothing is skipped (rootIdx + 1 would be 0: the file).
|
||
const skipIdx = rootIdx >= 0 ? rootIdx + 1 : -1;
|
||
const filePath = args.find((a, i) => !a.startsWith('--') && i !== skipIdx);
|
||
// A missing value, a flag in its place, or a root that is not a directory
|
||
// would switch the line check off without a word: a usage error instead.
|
||
const badRoot = rootIdx >= 0 && (!repoRoot || repoRoot.startsWith('--') || !isDir(repoRoot));
|
||
if (!filePath || badRoot) {
|
||
process.stderr.write('Usage: findings-schema.mjs [--json] [--repo-root <dir>] <reviewer-output.txt|.md>\n');
|
||
process.exit(2);
|
||
}
|
||
if (!existsSync(filePath)) {
|
||
process.stderr.write(`findings-schema: file not found: ${filePath}\n`);
|
||
process.exit(2);
|
||
}
|
||
const r = validateReviewerOutput(readFileSync(filePath, 'utf-8'), { repoRoot });
|
||
if (args.includes('--json')) {
|
||
process.stdout.write(JSON.stringify({ valid: r.valid, errors: r.errors, warnings: r.warnings }, null, 2) + '\n');
|
||
} else {
|
||
process.stdout.write(`findings-schema: ${r.valid ? 'PASS' : 'FAIL'} ${filePath}\n`);
|
||
for (const e of r.errors) process.stderr.write(` ERROR [${e.code}] ${e.message}\n`);
|
||
for (const w of r.warnings) process.stderr.write(` WARN [${w.code}] ${w.message}\n`);
|
||
}
|
||
process.exit(r.valid ? 0 : 1);
|
||
}
|