Ordre 5 (wave 1, P11 + P5), review_version 1.1. - K7: `verdict: ALLOW | WARN | BLOCK` is required in review.md (strict error, soft warning for 1.0 reviews). New CLI lib/review/verdict-gate.mjs: 0 = ALLOW/WARN, 1 = BLOCK, 2 = could not decide (never green); a verdict greener than the file's own BLOCKERs or JSON block is exit 2. Realpath main guard (the old file:// guard exits 0 under a symlink - measured). - No finding is struck for length: succinctness trims only MINOR/SUGGESTION text (catalogue tier), keeps BLOCKER/MAJOR whole, counts trims; the coordinator lists what it declined to judge. - Claude Code's /code-review and /security-review run as the engine via the Skill tool (never --fix/--comment/--post/ultra); lib/review/engine-findings.mjs turns their findings into a reviewer payload; two catalogue keys (CODE_REVIEW_DEFECT, SECURITY_REVIEW_VULNERABILITY), catalogue 12 -> 14. An engine that did not run forbids ALLOW. - Every BLOCKER is written as a numbered `### Step R<n>` with its source finding (strict error REVIEW_MISSING_REMEDIATION_STEP). - P5: lib/review/recurrence.mjs - a finding class in two review.md files (current + git history, no new store) becomes one proposal, routed by the catalogue's memory_route; written only between Voyage markers in .claude/rules/voyage-review-lessons.md under a size budget, CLAUDE.md gets a pointer only; the operator approves every line (Phase 8.7). - Workflow substrate: catalogue enum in step; a missing reviewer or engine forbids ALLOW there too (it returned ALLOW on zero findings before). - Fixtures review-run-A/B said WARN over a BLOCKER; now BLOCK. Borrowed and credited in code: Superpowers (declined-to-judge), ai-native-sdlc (cap only nits; mistake/fix/check), Spec Kit (managed block; converge steps), Pocock (retro routing), Kiro (verdict file + gate; evidence per lesson), Cherny (engine -> brief control order; review -> memory; budget). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
133 lines
5.7 KiB
JavaScript
133 lines
5.7 KiB
JavaScript
// lib/review/engine-findings.mjs
|
|
// Claude Code's review as the engine (ordre 5, P11 — wrap, not a new engine).
|
|
//
|
|
// /trekreview Phase 4.7 starts Claude Code's own `/code-review` and
|
|
// `/security-review` through the Skill tool (never with `--fix`, never anything
|
|
// that edits code). Their findings come back as text: per finding a file
|
|
// location, a one-sentence summary, a failure scenario and an optional category
|
|
// slug (code.claude.com/docs/en/tools-reference.md, `ReportFindings`). The
|
|
// orchestrator transcribes them into a small JSON list; THIS module turns that
|
|
// list into a reviewer payload the coordinator already understands, so the
|
|
// engine's findings meet Voyage's brief control in the same dedup + verdict.
|
|
//
|
|
// Input (one engine per call):
|
|
// { "engine": "code-review" | "security-review",
|
|
// "findings": [ { "file": "...", "line": 12, "summary": "...",
|
|
// "failure_scenario": "...", "category": "correctness",
|
|
// "rule_key": "<optional narrower catalogue key>" } ] }
|
|
//
|
|
// Output: { reviewer, findings: [...catalogue-conformant...], out_of_scope: [...] }
|
|
// - rule_key: the given one when it is in the catalogue, else
|
|
// CODE_REVIEW_DEFECT (MAJOR) / SECURITY_REVIEW_VULNERABILITY (BLOCKER).
|
|
// - A finding on a file outside the review scope is NOT dropped silently: it
|
|
// lands in `out_of_scope` for the Coverage section (`/security-review`
|
|
// diffs against origin's default branch, which can be wider than the
|
|
// review's SHA range).
|
|
//
|
|
// CLI: node lib/review/engine-findings.mjs [--scope <file-list.txt>] <engine-findings.json>
|
|
// exit 0 = payload on stdout; 1 = input invalid (errors on stderr); 2 = could not run.
|
|
|
|
import { readFileSync, existsSync, realpathSync } from 'node:fs';
|
|
import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
|
|
import { computeFindingId } from '../parsers/finding-id.mjs';
|
|
import { RULE_KEYS, getRule } from './rule-catalogue.mjs';
|
|
import { validateFindings } from './findings-schema.mjs';
|
|
|
|
export const ENGINES = Object.freeze({
|
|
'code-review': Object.freeze({
|
|
reviewer: 'claude-code-review',
|
|
rule_key: 'CODE_REVIEW_DEFECT',
|
|
brief_ref: 'NFR — code correctness (Claude Code /code-review)',
|
|
}),
|
|
'security-review': Object.freeze({
|
|
reviewer: 'claude-security-review',
|
|
rule_key: 'SECURITY_REVIEW_VULNERABILITY',
|
|
brief_ref: 'NFR — security (Claude Code /security-review)',
|
|
}),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
function normPath(p) {
|
|
return String(p ?? '').replace(/^\.\//, '').trim();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Convert one engine's transcribed findings into a coordinator payload.
|
|
* @param {{ engine: string, findings: object[] }} input
|
|
* @param {{ scopeFiles?: string[] }} [opts]
|
|
* @returns {{ ok: boolean, errors: string[], payload?: { reviewer: string, findings: object[] }, out_of_scope?: object[] }}
|
|
*/
|
|
export function toReviewerPayload(input, opts = {}) {
|
|
const errors = [];
|
|
const spec = ENGINES[input?.engine];
|
|
if (!spec) return { ok: false, errors: [`engine must be one of ${Object.keys(ENGINES).join('|')}, got ${JSON.stringify(input?.engine)}`] };
|
|
if (!Array.isArray(input.findings)) return { ok: false, errors: ['findings must be an array'] };
|
|
const scope = opts.scopeFiles ? new Set(opts.scopeFiles.map(normPath)) : null;
|
|
|
|
const findings = [];
|
|
const out_of_scope = [];
|
|
input.findings.forEach((f, i) => {
|
|
const file = normPath(f?.file);
|
|
const summary = String(f?.summary ?? '').trim();
|
|
if (!file) errors.push(`findings[${i}].file is empty`);
|
|
if (!summary) errors.push(`findings[${i}].summary is empty`);
|
|
if (!file || !summary) return;
|
|
const line = Number.isInteger(f.line) && f.line >= 0 ? f.line : 0;
|
|
const rule_key = typeof f.rule_key === 'string' && RULE_KEYS.has(f.rule_key) ? f.rule_key : spec.rule_key;
|
|
const out = {
|
|
id: computeFindingId(file, line, rule_key),
|
|
severity: getRule(rule_key).severity,
|
|
rule_key,
|
|
file,
|
|
line,
|
|
brief_ref: spec.brief_ref,
|
|
title: summary,
|
|
detail: [String(f.failure_scenario ?? '').trim(), f.category ? `(engine category: ${f.category})` : '']
|
|
.filter(Boolean).join(' ') || summary,
|
|
recommended_action: `Resolve: ${summary}`,
|
|
engine: input.engine,
|
|
};
|
|
if (scope && !scope.has(file)) out_of_scope.push(out);
|
|
else findings.push(out);
|
|
});
|
|
if (errors.length > 0) return { ok: false, errors };
|
|
|
|
const payload = { reviewer: spec.reviewer, findings };
|
|
const v = validateFindings(payload);
|
|
if (!v.valid) return { ok: false, errors: v.errors.map((e) => `${e.code}: ${e.message}`) };
|
|
return { ok: true, errors: [], payload, out_of_scope };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
function isMain() {
|
|
try {
|
|
return realpathSync(process.argv[1]) === realpathSync(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
|
|
} catch {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (isMain()) {
|
|
const args = process.argv.slice(2);
|
|
const scopeIdx = args.indexOf('--scope');
|
|
const scopePath = scopeIdx === -1 ? null : args[scopeIdx + 1];
|
|
const filePath = args.find((a, i) => !a.startsWith('--') && (scopeIdx === -1 || i !== scopeIdx + 1));
|
|
if (!filePath || !existsSync(filePath) || (scopePath && !existsSync(scopePath))) {
|
|
process.stderr.write('Usage: engine-findings.mjs [--scope <file-list.txt>] <engine-findings.json>\n');
|
|
process.exit(2);
|
|
}
|
|
let input;
|
|
let scopeFiles;
|
|
try {
|
|
input = JSON.parse(readFileSync(filePath, 'utf-8'));
|
|
if (scopePath) scopeFiles = readFileSync(scopePath, 'utf-8').split('\n').map((l) => l.trim()).filter(Boolean);
|
|
} catch (e) {
|
|
process.stderr.write(`engine-findings: could not read input: ${e.message}\n`);
|
|
process.exit(2);
|
|
}
|
|
const r = toReviewerPayload(input, { scopeFiles });
|
|
if (!r.ok) {
|
|
for (const e of r.errors) process.stderr.write(` ERROR ${e}\n`);
|
|
process.exit(1);
|
|
}
|
|
process.stdout.write(JSON.stringify({ ...r.payload, out_of_scope: r.out_of_scope }, null, 2) + '\n');
|
|
process.exit(0);
|
|
}
|