Ordre 5 (wave 1, P11 + P5), review_version 1.1. - K7: `verdict: ALLOW | WARN | BLOCK` is required in review.md (strict error, soft warning for 1.0 reviews). New CLI lib/review/verdict-gate.mjs: 0 = ALLOW/WARN, 1 = BLOCK, 2 = could not decide (never green); a verdict greener than the file's own BLOCKERs or JSON block is exit 2. Realpath main guard (the old file:// guard exits 0 under a symlink - measured). - No finding is struck for length: succinctness trims only MINOR/SUGGESTION text (catalogue tier), keeps BLOCKER/MAJOR whole, counts trims; the coordinator lists what it declined to judge. - Claude Code's /code-review and /security-review run as the engine via the Skill tool (never --fix/--comment/--post/ultra); lib/review/engine-findings.mjs turns their findings into a reviewer payload; two catalogue keys (CODE_REVIEW_DEFECT, SECURITY_REVIEW_VULNERABILITY), catalogue 12 -> 14. An engine that did not run forbids ALLOW. - Every BLOCKER is written as a numbered `### Step R<n>` with its source finding (strict error REVIEW_MISSING_REMEDIATION_STEP). - P5: lib/review/recurrence.mjs - a finding class in two review.md files (current + git history, no new store) becomes one proposal, routed by the catalogue's memory_route; written only between Voyage markers in .claude/rules/voyage-review-lessons.md under a size budget, CLAUDE.md gets a pointer only; the operator approves every line (Phase 8.7). - Workflow substrate: catalogue enum in step; a missing reviewer or engine forbids ALLOW there too (it returned ALLOW on zero findings before). - Fixtures review-run-A/B said WARN over a BLOCKER; now BLOCK. Borrowed and credited in code: Superpowers (declined-to-judge), ai-native-sdlc (cap only nits; mistake/fix/check), Spec Kit (managed block; converge steps), Pocock (retro routing), Kiro (verdict file + gate; evidence per lesson), Cherny (engine -> brief control order; review -> memory; budget). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
207 lines
8.1 KiB
JavaScript
207 lines
8.1 KiB
JavaScript
import { test } from 'node:test';
|
|
import { strict as assert } from 'node:assert';
|
|
import { spawnSync } from 'node:child_process';
|
|
import { mkdtempSync, writeFileSync, rmSync, symlinkSync } from 'node:fs';
|
|
import { tmpdir } from 'node:os';
|
|
import { join, dirname } from 'node:path';
|
|
import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
|
|
import { validateReviewContent } from '../../lib/validators/review-validator.mjs';
|
|
|
|
const VALIDATOR = join(dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)), '..', '..', 'lib', 'validators', 'review-validator.mjs');
|
|
|
|
const GOOD_REVIEW = `---
|
|
type: trekreview
|
|
review_version: "1.0"
|
|
created: 2026-05-01
|
|
task: "Add JWT auth"
|
|
slug: jwt-auth
|
|
project_dir: .claude/projects/2026-04-30-jwt-auth/
|
|
brief_path: .claude/projects/2026-04-30-jwt-auth/brief.md
|
|
scope_sha_start: abc123
|
|
scope_sha_end: def456
|
|
reviewed_files_count: 7
|
|
verdict: ALLOW
|
|
findings:
|
|
- 0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567
|
|
- fedcba9876543210fedcba9876543210fedcba98
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Review
|
|
|
|
## Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
Verdict: ALLOW.
|
|
|
|
## Coverage
|
|
|
|
| File | Treatment | Reason |
|
|
|------|-----------|--------|
|
|
| lib/foo.mjs | deep-review | risk |
|
|
|
|
## Remediation Summary
|
|
|
|
None.
|
|
`;
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — happy path', () => {
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(GOOD_REVIEW, { strict: true });
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, true, JSON.stringify(r.errors));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — wrong type rejected (REVIEW_WRONG_TYPE)', () => {
|
|
const t = GOOD_REVIEW.replace('type: trekreview', 'type: trekbrief');
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(t);
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, false);
|
|
assert.ok(r.errors.find(e => e.code === 'REVIEW_WRONG_TYPE'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — missing required field (REVIEW_MISSING_FIELD)', () => {
|
|
const t = GOOD_REVIEW.replace(/^brief_path: .*\n/m, '');
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(t);
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, false);
|
|
assert.ok(r.errors.find(e => e.code === 'REVIEW_MISSING_FIELD' && /brief_path/.test(e.message)));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — missing required body section in strict (REVIEW_MISSING_SECTION)', () => {
|
|
const t = GOOD_REVIEW.replace(/## Coverage[\s\S]*?(?=## Remediation)/m, '');
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(t, { strict: true });
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, false);
|
|
assert.ok(r.errors.find(e => e.code === 'REVIEW_MISSING_SECTION' && /Coverage/.test(e.message)));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — Coverage section is REQUIRED (no soft demotion to make Coverage optional)', () => {
|
|
const t = GOOD_REVIEW.replace(/## Coverage[\s\S]*?(?=## Remediation)/m, '');
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(t, { strict: true });
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — soft mode demotes section errors to warnings', () => {
|
|
const t = GOOD_REVIEW.replace(/## Remediation Summary[\s\S]*$/m, '');
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(t, { strict: false });
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, true);
|
|
assert.ok(r.warnings.find(w => w.code === 'REVIEW_MISSING_SECTION'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — missing frontmatter is hard error (FM_MISSING)', () => {
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent('# review\n\nno frontmatter\n');
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, false);
|
|
assert.ok(r.errors.find(e => e.code === 'FM_MISSING'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — findings not an array → REVIEW_BAD_FINDINGS_TYPE', () => {
|
|
// Replace block-style list with scalar → parser yields string
|
|
const t = GOOD_REVIEW.replace(
|
|
/findings:\n - 0123[\s\S]*?- fedcba[0-9a-f]+/,
|
|
'findings: not-an-array',
|
|
);
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(t);
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, false);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
r.errors.find(e => e.code === 'REVIEW_BAD_FINDINGS_TYPE'),
|
|
`expected REVIEW_BAD_FINDINGS_TYPE, got: ${JSON.stringify(r.errors)}`,
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — finding-ID not 40-char hex → REVIEW_BAD_FINDING_ID', () => {
|
|
const t = GOOD_REVIEW.replace(
|
|
'0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567',
|
|
'NOT-A-VALID-HEX-ID',
|
|
);
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(t);
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, false);
|
|
assert.ok(r.errors.find(e => e.code === 'REVIEW_BAD_FINDING_ID'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — empty findings array is acceptable (no findings = ALLOW verdict)', () => {
|
|
const t = GOOD_REVIEW.replace(
|
|
/findings:\n - 0123[\s\S]*?- fedcba[0-9a-f]+/,
|
|
'findings: []',
|
|
);
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(t);
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, true, JSON.stringify(r.errors));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---- K7: the verdict is required in review.md (ordre 5) ----------------------
|
|
|
|
const NO_VERDICT = GOOD_REVIEW.replace(/^verdict: .*\n/m, '');
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — strict mode rejects a review.md without verdict (REVIEW_MISSING_VERDICT)', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(!/^verdict:/m.test(NO_VERDICT), 'fixture control: the verdict line is gone');
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(NO_VERDICT, { strict: true });
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, false, 'a review without a verdict must not pass the write-time check');
|
|
assert.ok(r.errors.find(e => e.code === 'REVIEW_MISSING_VERDICT'), JSON.stringify(r.errors));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — soft (read-time) mode only warns on a missing verdict (N-1 window for 1.0 reviews)', () => {
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(NO_VERDICT, { strict: false });
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, true, JSON.stringify(r.errors));
|
|
assert.ok(r.warnings.find(w => w.code === 'REVIEW_MISSING_VERDICT'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — a verdict outside ALLOW|WARN|BLOCK is an error in both modes', () => {
|
|
const t = GOOD_REVIEW.replace('verdict: ALLOW', 'verdict: PASS');
|
|
for (const strict of [true, false]) {
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(t, { strict });
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, false);
|
|
assert.ok(r.errors.find(e => e.code === 'REVIEW_BAD_VERDICT'));
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ---- A BLOCKER is written as a plan step Handover 6 can append (ordre 5) ----
|
|
|
|
const BLOCKER_ID = '763d174e6c519fafbadcba5d1706708479e36e61';
|
|
const WITH_BLOCKER = GOOD_REVIEW.replace('verdict: ALLOW', 'verdict: BLOCK') + `
|
|
\`\`\`json
|
|
{"verdict": "BLOCK", "counts": {"BLOCKER": 1, "MAJOR": 0, "MINOR": 0, "SUGGESTION": 0},
|
|
"findings": [{"id": "${BLOCKER_ID}", "severity": "BLOCKER", "rule_key": "UNIMPLEMENTED_CRITERION", "file": "lib/login.mjs", "line": 23}]}
|
|
\`\`\`
|
|
`;
|
|
const STEP = `
|
|
## Remediation Steps
|
|
|
|
### Step R1: Return 401 on a bad password
|
|
|
|
- **Files:** \`lib/login.mjs\`
|
|
- **Source finding:** \`${BLOCKER_ID}\`
|
|
- **Verify:** re-run /trekreview → finding \`${BLOCKER_ID}\` absent
|
|
`;
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — strict: a BLOCKER without a numbered remediation step is an error', () => {
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(WITH_BLOCKER, { strict: true });
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, false);
|
|
assert.ok(r.errors.find(e => e.code === 'REVIEW_MISSING_REMEDIATION_STEP'), JSON.stringify(r.errors));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — strict: a BLOCKER with its "Step R1 … Source finding" passes', () => {
|
|
const t = WITH_BLOCKER.replace('## Remediation Summary', `${STEP}\n## Remediation Summary`);
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(t, { strict: true });
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, true, JSON.stringify(r.errors));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — soft: a missing remediation step only warns', () => {
|
|
const r = validateReviewContent(WITH_BLOCKER, { strict: false });
|
|
assert.equal(r.valid, true);
|
|
assert.ok(r.warnings.find(w => w.code === 'REVIEW_MISSING_REMEDIATION_STEP'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('validateReview — a clean review with zero findings validates with `findings: []` (a bare `findings:` does not)', () => {
|
|
const ids = /findings:\n(?: - [0-9a-f]{40}\n)+/;
|
|
assert.match(GOOD_REVIEW, ids, 'fixture control');
|
|
assert.equal(validateReviewContent(GOOD_REVIEW.replace(ids, 'findings: []\n'), { strict: true }).valid, true);
|
|
assert.equal(validateReviewContent(GOOD_REVIEW.replace(ids, 'findings:\n'), { strict: true }).valid, false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('review-validator CLI — run through a symlink and a path with a space it still validates (exit 1, not a silent 0)', () => {
|
|
const dir = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'review validator '));
|
|
try {
|
|
const link = join(dir, 'validator link.mjs');
|
|
symlinkSync(VALIDATOR, link);
|
|
const p = join(dir, 'no verdict.md');
|
|
writeFileSync(p, NO_VERDICT);
|
|
const r = spawnSync(process.execPath, [link, p], { encoding: 'utf-8' });
|
|
assert.equal(r.status, 1, r.stdout + r.stderr);
|
|
assert.match(r.stderr, /REVIEW_MISSING_VERDICT/);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
rmSync(dir, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
}
|
|
});
|