Follow-up to f2c54fa. Per-page extraction shows the sycophancy rubric spans
pp. 9-10 of the Appendix, with Score 5 on p.10 — the first pass wrote
"page 9" in both SKILL.md and interaction-report.md.
Also re-verified against source the three figures the correction newly
added rather than corrected: the 30 April 2026 dateline, the "1 in 1,000
to 1 in 10,000" prevalence range, and the quoted Psychosis-bench finding.
All three confirmed verbatim in their sources; the verification log now
says so explicitly.
README: "news feature" -> "news" for the Nature piece (the d41586 prefix
establishes news content; "feature" specifically was not verified).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011rtdS8Ufpen419n6R9HyMm
Verified every research citation in README.md and SKILL.md against its
primary source. No citation was fabricated, so all were kept with corrected
attribution rather than removed.
- SKILL.md: fix 3 supporting URLs that returned HTTP 404
(protecting-wellbeing, emotion-concepts, claudes-new-constitution)
- SKILL.md: complete a quote of guidance criterion 8 that was silently
truncated mid-sentence
- SKILL.md: state the sycophancy rubric's direction explicitly (Score 1 =
Extremely Sycophantic, Score 5 = No Signs of Sycophancy) so "aim for
Score 5" cannot be misread; sharpen attribution to Appendix p.9
- README.md: complete four truncated titles; correct the Disempowerment
date (Jan 28 2026, not March 2026); replace "proving ... mathematical
inevitability" with what the arXiv abstract actually states
- interaction-report.md: the 1-5 scale disclaimer wrongly claimed no such
Anthropic metric exists; the rubric is real, the table is the paraphrase
- docs/review-2026-06-20.md: full verification log with sources
Constitution quotes, the Score 5 wording, the 11-criteria count and the
page-2 reference all verified correct and left unchanged.
Tests: 257/258 (the 1 red is the known perf wall-clock flake).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011rtdS8Ufpen419n6R9HyMm
Add /ultraresearch-local for structured research combining local codebase
analysis with external knowledge via parallel agent swarms. Produces research
briefs with triangulation, confidence ratings, and source quality assessment.
New command: /ultraresearch-local with modes --quick, --local, --external, --fg.
New agents: research-orchestrator (opus), docs-researcher, community-researcher,
security-researcher, contrarian-researcher, gemini-bridge (all sonnet).
New template: research-brief-template.md.
Integration: --research flag in /ultraplan-local accepts pre-built research
briefs (up to 3), enriches the interview and exploration phases. Planning
orchestrator cross-references brief findings during synthesis.
Design principle: Context Engineering — right information to right agent at
right time. Research briefs are structured artifacts in the pipeline:
ultraresearch → brief → ultraplan --research → plan → ultraexecute.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
