Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2491f5c732 feat: initial companion repo for OpenClaw vs Claude Code article

40 files demonstrating every major OpenClaw capability using Claude Code:
- 3 agents (researcher, writer, reviewer)
- 3 skills (daily-briefing, slack-message, web-research)
- 2 security hooks (pre-tool-use blocker, post-tool-use logger)
- 10 self-contained examples with copy-paste prompts
- Complete feature map (20 capabilities, 11 full match, 7 different, 2 gap)
- Security docs including NemoClaw comparison
- Automation, messaging, browser, memory documentation

Zero dependencies. Clone and run.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-03-26 09:47:29 +01:00

1.9 KiB

Raw Blame History

Example 06: Multi-Agent Orchestration

Capability: Claude Code can spawn sub-agents with distinct roles, run them in parallel or in sequence, and combine their outputs into a final result.

OpenClaw equivalent: Sub-agents, agent-to-agent messaging, mesh workflows.

Prerequisites

This example uses the agents defined in .claude/agents/:

researcher.md - web research and source gathering
writer.md - structured content drafting
reviewer.md - accuracy and quality review

These agents load automatically when Claude Code opens this project.

The Prompt

Use the researcher agent to find information about how Claude Code handles
agent isolation and worktree sandboxing (introduced in v2.1.49 and v2.1.50).

Then use the writer agent to draft a 300-word technical summary of the findings,
written for a developer audience. No jargon without explanation.

Finally, use the reviewer agent to check the draft for technical accuracy.
If the reviewer finds any issues, have the writer fix them before showing
me the final version.

What Happens

Claude Code will:

Invoke the researcher agent via the Agent tool with the research task
Receive the research output and pass it to the writer agent
Invoke the writer agent to produce the 300-word draft
Invoke the reviewer agent with both the draft and source material
If the reviewer flags issues, loop back to the writer for a revision
Present the final reviewed draft

Why This Matters

Agent Teams (v2.1.32) gives Claude Code a mesh model that matches OpenClaw's sub-agent architecture. Worktree isolation (v2.1.50) means each agent gets its own working directory, preventing file conflicts in parallel runs.

The researcher-writer-reviewer pattern is the same loop that produces articles for fromaitochitta.com. The agents here are minimal versions of that pipeline.

1.9 KiB Raw Blame History