Visjons-diskusjon gjennomført (F1-tuning: korrekt? → optimal?). Visjonen dekomponert i 4 byggeklosser, sekvensert i 2 faser. Fase 1 (optimerings-linse + levende kunnskapsbase) designet og operatør-låst; Fase 2 (maskinvid kampanje + varig backlog) utsatt til eget GO. Låste beslutninger: strukturert register (linsen leser; markdown som speil); ny familie CA-OPT med hybrid motor (determ. pre-filter → opus-analyzer), presisjons-gated. GO-ready plan i docs/v5.7-optimization-lens-plan.md; STATE oppdatert. Ingen produksjonskode (bevisst diskusjons-sesjon). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.4 KiB
v5.7 — Optimization Lens + Living Knowledge Base (Plan)
Outcome of the 2026-06-20 vision discussion. This is the first concrete realization of the operator's "F1-tuning" north star (see auto-memory
config-audit-vision). The shift is from "is the config correct?" (today's health scanners) to "is the config optimal / best-practice-tuned?".Status: GO-ready design. Implementation is a SEPARATE GO, chunk by chunk. The discussion session deliberately stopped before code (per STATE.md). This doc mirrors the verification-protocol format of
docs/v5.5-steering-model-plan.md.
The four building blocks (full vision)
The vision decomposes into four blocks. v5.7 builds Fase 1 (blocks 1+2 lite). Blocks 3+4 are Fase 2 (deferred, own GO).
| # | Block | Phase | One-liner |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Optimization lens | Fase 1 | New finding family: "you USE mechanism X, but Y fits this content better" (mechanism-fit). |
| 2 | Living knowledge base | Fase 1 | Structured, provenance-stamped register the lens reads + semi-auto refresh. |
| 3 | Machine-wide campaign | Fase 2 | A durable ledger above sessions: audit N repos over many sessions, resumable, machine-wide roll-up. |
| 4 | Durable backlog + execution | Fase 2 | One cross-repo prioritized backlog (critical/high/med/low) the user picks from; per-repo plans exported to each repo's docs/. |
Why Fase 1 first (operator-confirmed): the value of a machine-wide campaign (Fase 2) depends on the lens being good. Building the campaign shell on today's correctness-only scanners would underdeliver the vision. So: establish + validate the lens on ONE repo, then scale.
Decisions locked (2026-06-20)
- Sequence: Fase 1 (lens + knowledge) first, then Fase 2 (campaign + backlog). (operator)
- Knowledge format: structured register (YAML/JSON) the lens reads directly; markdown kept as a human-readable mirror. (operator, over markdown-only)
- Lens engine: new finding family with a hybrid motor — deterministic pre-filter → opus analyzer that judges mechanism-fit and cites the register rule; precision-gated. (operator, over extend-feature-gap / pure-deterministic-scanner)
Fase 1 — two deliverables
Leveranse A — Living knowledge register
Today knowledge/*.md (8 files) is prose with a Source: … verified DATE header, and the
v5.5 V-rows are an ad-hoc table. The foundation exists; what's missing is a
machine-consumable form with provenance per claim.
- Format: one register (e.g.
knowledge/best-practices.yaml), one entry = one best-practice rule, with fields:id / claim / mechanism / recommendation / source-url / verified-date / confidence {confirmed|inferred|unverified} / lens-check (which detector consumes it). - Markdown stays as the readable mirror; the v5.5 V-rows are migrated into the register (formalizing the existing claim→source→CONFIRMED protocol).
- "Living" =
/config-audit knowledge-refresh(semi-auto, human-approved writes): polls CC changelog + Anthropic docs/blog, flagsstale(older than N days / source changed) andcandidate(new practice found), presents for approval. Mirrors thearchitectplugin's kb-update poll. No unverified claim is ever auto-written (Verifiseringsplikt).
Leveranse B — Optimization lens (new family, e.g. CA-OPT)
A new finding layer that reads CLAUDE.md / rules / skills / hooks and checks each against the register's mechanism-fit rules. Content is already source-anchored from the Anthropic "Steering Claude Code" blog (read 2026-06-20):
| Signal in config | Best-practice rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Lifecycle phrasing ("after every commit, do X") in CLAUDE.md | → hook (deterministic) | blog |
| Path-specific instruction, unscoped | → path-scoped rule (paths:) |
blog |
| 30-line procedure in CLAUDE.md | → skill | blog |
| "Never do X" as an instruction | → permission/hook (an instruction is the wrong tool for absolute prohibitions) | blog |
Custom output-style missing keep-coding-instructions |
(already covered by CA-OST-001) | blog/docs |
This is v5.7 D "mechanism-fit" promoted to a real family, driven by the register instead of hardcoded rules.
- Hybrid motor: cheap deterministic pre-filter (line counts, lifecycle keywords,
path-specificity) → opus analyzer agent (sibling of
feature-gap-agent) that judges fit and cites the register rule. Precision-gated (emit only on high confidence). - Overlap with
feature-gap: feature-gap = "you DON'T use feature X"; optimization lens = "you USE mechanism X, but Y fits THIS content better." Decision: separate family to keep those two intents clean. - Findings fold into existing posture/report/plan flow → Fase 2 campaign inherits them for free.
Proposed chunking (one GO'd session each; per chunk-work-before-compaction)
- Chunk 1 — Register foundation. Structured register format + schema validation +
migrate existing
knowledge/+ v5.5 V-rows into it + tests. (No output change → byte-stable.) - Chunk 2 — The lens (
CA-OPT). Deterministic pre-filter + opus analyzer agent + humanizer/scoring wiring + fixtures + byte-stability strip. (New family → additive.) - Chunk 3 —
knowledge-refresh. Semi-auto poller:--dry-run, stale/candidate flagging, human-approved writes. (The "living" part.)
Dependency order: Chunk 1 → Chunk 2 (lens reads register) → Chunk 3 (keeps register fresh).
Verification (per plan-quality rule)
- Register: schema validates; every entry has source + verified-date;
knowledge-refresh --dry-runlists stale/candidate without writing. - Lens: a fixture repo with KNOWN mechanism-fit problems (procedure-in-CLAUDE.md, unscoped path-rule) → lens flags exactly those; zero false positives on a clean fixture. Precision target stated explicitly (lens is precision-gated).
- Byte-stability: new
CA-OPTfamily is additive → follow the post-B2 "preserve frozen + strip" regime (do NOT re-seed); regen only SC-5 default-output. New scanner family also bumpsscanners_okon the deterministic fixture → mirror thestrip-added-scannerprecedent from CA-OST (v5.6 C).
Fase 2 — deferred (own GO, after Fase 1 validated)
- Block 3 — Machine-wide campaign: a durable campaign ledger above sessions (repo list + per-repo status pending/audited/planned/implemented + machine-wide roll-up by severity), resumable across sessions. Start thin (ledger + roll-up), not full orchestration.
- Block 4 — Durable backlog + execution: make persistence explicit + versioned/
migratable; one cross-repo prioritized backlog the user picks from; per-repo plans
optionally exported to each repo's own
docs/("planer følger arbeidsstedet"); reuse existing backup/rollback for execution. - Persistence note: sessions already live in
~/.claude/config-audit/sessions/(OUTSIDE the plugin dir → survive uninstall/reinstall/upgrade — verified). Fase 2 adds an explicit version field + migration so upgrades don't break the ledger.
Synergy / open threads
/repo-initsynergy: once the lens exists, it becomes the quality meter for what/repo-initproduces — evaluate repo-init output with the same lens.- Open: final ID prefix for the family (
CA-OPTproposed); register file format (YAML vs JSON);knowledge-refreshpoll cadence + which sources beyond changelog/blog.