config-audit/commands/knowledge-refresh.md

---
name: config-audit:knowledge-refresh
description: Keep the best-practices register fresh — flag stale entries, poll sources for new/changed practices, with human-approved writes only
argument-hint: "[--stale-after N] [--no-candidates]"
allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, WebSearch, WebFetch
model: opus
---

# Config-Audit: Knowledge Refresh

The "living" part of the living knowledge base. The optimization lens (`/config-audit
optimize`) is only as good as the best-practices register it reads — and Claude Code moves
fast. This command keeps `knowledge/best-practices.json` current in two ways:

- **Stale check (deterministic):** every CONFIRMED entry carries a `source.verified` date.
  An entry older than the threshold (default **90 days**) is flagged for re-verification —
  its source may have changed since.
- **Candidate poll (web):** scan the CC changelog + the Anthropic "Steering Claude Code"
  docs/blog for *new* best-practices the register doesn't yet hold, or *changed* guidance
  that contradicts an existing entry.

**The Iron rule (Verifiseringsplikt): nothing is ever auto-written.** Every change — a
bumped `verified` date, an updated claim, a brand-new entry — is presented to the user and
applied only on explicit approval, and only after the live source has actually been
re-read. No unverified claim enters the register.

## Implementation

### Step 1: Parse arguments

From `$ARGUMENTS`:
- `--stale-after N` → override the staleness threshold (integer days; default 90).
- `--no-candidates` → run the deterministic stale check only; skip the web poll.

Tell the user what's happening:

```
## Knowledge Refresh

Checking the best-practices register for stale entries (sources that may need
re-verification) and polling for new Claude Code practices...
```

### Step 2: Run the stale-check CLI

```bash
TODAY=$(date +%F)
STALE_AFTER=""
if echo "$ARGUMENTS" | grep -qE -- '--stale-after'; then
  STALE_AFTER="--stale-after $(echo "$ARGUMENTS" | sed -nE 's/.*--stale-after[ =]+([0-9]+).*/\1/p')"
fi
node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scanners/knowledge-refresh-cli.mjs \
  --reference-date "$TODAY" $STALE_AFTER \
  --output-file ~/.claude/config-audit/sessions/knowledge-refresh.json 2>/dev/null; echo $?
```

Exit code **0** = all fresh, **1** = some stale (advisory, normal), **3** = real error →
"The refresh check couldn't run — the register file may be missing or invalid."

### Step 3: Read the payload + present stale entries

Read `~/.claude/config-audit/sessions/knowledge-refresh.json` with the Read tool. It has
`counts {total, stale, fresh}`, a `stale[]` array (each: `id, verified, ageDays, url,
claim`), `referenceDate`, and `staleAfterDays`.

Present the stale entries as a markdown table (per the UX rules — never show the raw JSON):

| Entry | Claim (short) | Verified | Age (days) | Source |
|-------|---------------|----------|------------|--------|

If `counts.stale === 0`, say so plainly: "✓ All N register entries were re-verified within
the last {staleAfterDays} days." Then continue to the candidate poll (unless `--no-candidates`).

### Step 4: Candidate + source-change poll (web — skip if `--no-candidates`)

Tell the user this takes a moment ("Polling the changelog + Anthropic docs, ~20-40s...").

1. **Re-verify each stale entry.** `WebFetch` the entry's `source.url` and check whether the
   claim it backs is **still accurate**. Three outcomes:
   - *Still holds* → propose bumping `source.verified` to today (no claim change).
   - *Changed* → propose an updated `claim`/`recommendation` quoting the new source text.
   - *Cannot verify* (page gone, paywalled, contradicts) → propose **nothing**; flag it
     "needs manual review" (Verifiseringsplikt: never bump a date you couldn't confirm).
2. **Look for new practices.** `WebSearch` the CC changelog and the "Steering Claude Code"
   blog/docs for steering/config guidance not already represented by an entry's `lensCheck`.
   For each genuine new practice, draft a **candidate** entry (next free `BP-<TOPIC>-NNN` id,
   `confidence: "confirmed"` only if a primary source confirms it — otherwise mark `inferred`
   and do **not** present it as user-facing).

### Step 5: Present everything for approval — write nothing yet

Group the proposals and ask the user to approve per item:

- **Re-verify (date bump):** "{id} — source re-read, claim still holds → bump verified to {today}?"
- **Update (claim drift):** show the old vs. new claim + the quoted source line.
- **New candidate:** show the drafted entry (id, claim, mechanism, recommendation, source).
- **Needs manual review:** list, with why it couldn't be auto-verified. (No write offered.)

Be explicit: **"I will not change any file until you approve specific items."**

### Step 6: Apply approved writes (only the approved ones)

For each approved item:
1. Edit `knowledge/best-practices.json` — bump `source.verified`, update the `claim`/
   `recommendation`, or append the new entry. Keep the file's 2-space JSON formatting.
2. If a `knowledge/*.md` mirror states the same fact, update it too so the human-readable
   mirror doesn't drift from the register.
3. **Validate before declaring done** — re-run the register schema check and confirm zero errors:
   ```bash
   node --test ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/tests/lib/best-practices-register.test.mjs 2>&1 | tail -5
   ```
   If validation fails, revert that edit and report it — never leave the register invalid.

Report exactly what changed (ids + fields), and what was deferred to manual review.

### Step 7: Next steps

- `/config-audit optimize` — the lens now reads the refreshed register; re-run it to pick up
  any new or changed mechanism-fit rules.
- Re-run `/config-audit knowledge-refresh --no-candidates` anytime for a quick staleness scan
  without the web poll.
- Commit the register change (`knowledge/best-practices.json` + any `.md` mirror) with a
  `chore(knowledge):` message so the provenance bump is in git history.

## Notes

- **Deterministic core, web-driven shell.** The stale classification is byte-stable and
  unit-tested (`tests/lib/knowledge-refresh.test.mjs`, `tests/scanners/knowledge-refresh-cli.test.mjs`);
  the candidate poll + writes are web/judgment-driven and deliberately **not** byte-stable
  (mirrors `/config-audit optimize`).
- **Read-only CLI.** `knowledge-refresh-cli.mjs` never writes the register; all writes happen
  here, in the command, after approval.
- The `-cli` suffix keeps it out of the scan-orchestrator, so the scanner count and the
  snapshot suite are unaffected.