caee558e79
Add /ultraresearch-local for structured research combining local codebase analysis with external knowledge via parallel agent swarms. Produces research briefs with triangulation, confidence ratings, and source quality assessment. New command: /ultraresearch-local with modes --quick, --local, --external, --fg. New agents: research-orchestrator (opus), docs-researcher, community-researcher, security-researcher, contrarian-researcher, gemini-bridge (all sonnet). New template: research-brief-template.md. Integration: --research flag in /ultraplan-local accepts pre-built research briefs (up to 3), enriches the interview and exploration phases. Planning orchestrator cross-references brief findings during synthesis. Design principle: Context Engineering — right information to right agent at right time. Research briefs are structured artifacts in the pipeline: ultraresearch → brief → ultraplan --research → plan → ultraexecute. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
918 B
918 B
CLAUDE.md Quality Criteria
Authoritative source: The detailed scoring rubric, red flags, section detection patterns, and quality signals are maintained in
agents/analyzer-agent.mdunder "## CLAUDE.md Quality Rubric (100 points)".
Quick Reference
| Criterion | Points |
|---|---|
| Commands/Workflows | 20 |
| Architecture Clarity | 20 |
| Non-Obvious Patterns | 15 |
| Conciseness | 15 |
| Currency | 15 |
| Actionability | 15 |
Grades: A (90-100), B (70-89), C (50-69), D (30-49), F (0-29)
Assessment Process
- Read the CLAUDE.md file completely
- Cross-reference with actual codebase (check commands, file refs, architecture)
- Score each criterion independently using breakdown in analyzer-agent.md
- Calculate total and assign grade
- List specific issues found
- Propose concrete improvements
See agents/analyzer-agent.md for detailed scoring breakdowns per criterion.