Plan Step 1. Builds the probe vehicle and the checklist; does NOT answer it.
The four questions all require the operator in a live Cowork session on this
Mac, and that is a fact about the measurement rather than a caveat: measured
2026-09-04, the session mode is not readable from disk (cowork_settings.json
carries only extraKnownMarketplaces; the desktop config carries
coworkNetworkMode and a trusted-folder list, neither states where a session
runs), and the other three each need a plugin installed in a live session.
The step's Verify is therefore RED on purpose and stays red until the operator
answers:
test "$(grep -cE '...' docs/cowork-probe.md)" = 4 -> exit 1 (0 of 4 matched)
Validated in both directions: a fully answered copy exits 0, a copy with three
of four answered exits 1. The gate can pass, so its failure means something.
Probe vehicle: jobbsok-probe, exactly four files under
tests/fixtures/cowork-probe/ -- manifest, skills/probe-versjon/SKILL.md,
.mcp.json declaring the stdio server probe-tools, and probe_tools.py (standard
library only). Smoke-tested from Claude Code: initialize handshake completes,
tools/list returns probe_ping, tools/call returns an interpreter version, an
unknown tool name is rejected. What is NOT verified is whether Cowork ever
starts it -- that is the question.
Archive is built from an explicit four-file include list, never zip -r over the
repo root; verified to contain no .git, STATE.md, .venv or .claude/ entry.
The degradation branch for each possible nei is written down now, before any
answer is known, so it is not decided under pressure later.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
De to maskinelle sjekkene paa at planrevisjonen holder laa i en scratchpad og
var i ferd med aa bli borte (samme naeromkomst som oekt 2s script). Flyttet inn
i repoet, gjort sted-uavhengige (repo-roten resolveres fra $0) og med en guard
naar plan.md/brief.md mangler -- de er local-only paa denne offentlige remoten,
og «fant ingenting» skal ikke lese som «alt groent» (exit 2, ikke 0).
Kjoert fra tests/plan-gates/ etter flyttingen:
brief_criteria.sh PASS=33 FAIL=0
stale_text.sh PASS=12 FAIL=0
Negativkontroll: mot en tom plan gir brief_criteria.sh PASS=6 FAIL=27 og exit 1,
og manglende fil gir SKIP + exit 2. Gaten kan altsaa feile.
PM-autorisert forsteg (amendment til ordre 20260904T150903Z), utenfor planens
sesjon-1-gjerde.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Operatoerbeslutning (b): revider planen foer M1. Ordre
20260904T135502Z-687411640-from-.claude, ti punkter, alle utfoert i
plan.md og brief.md under .claude/projects/ (local-only, gitignored) --
denne seksjonen i revisjonsrapporten er den sporede baereren.
Gater ved levering, kjoert 2026-09-04:
- plan-validator.mjs --strict: valid, 56 steg, 0 errors/warnings
- brief-validator.mjs: valid, 0 errors/warnings
- oekt 2s gate-script (33 grep-kriterier): PASS=33 FAIL=0
- grep -c 'Pass 2' plan.md: 6
- de tolv "Foreldet tekst"-greppene: PASS=12 FAIL=0
Ingen kode skrevet, ingen M1-steg utfoert. 56 steg inn, 56 steg ut.
Tre avvik fra ordreteksten, begrunnet i rapporten: --check i 5 av 6
Cowork-steg (steg 16 er M1, sak_status.py finnes foerst i steg 17);
det tolvte scriptet i avviksnoten er jobbsok_tools.py, ikke
kandidat_schema.py (som allerede sto der); Pass 2-seksjonen staar sist
i fila, der trekplan.md anviser, med peker fra planhodet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Measures the two planning sessions and plan.md against docs/build-brief.md:
step traceability (0 of 56 unanchored, 15 derived), blocker closure (5 of 9
closed in step text, 4 partial), review-count discrepancies, dedup false
negative reproduced (Jaccard 0.236/0.404 vs 0.7), session token and cost
profile, and whether /trekplan --brief docs/build-brief.md is a valid input
(it is not: FM_MISSING). Recommendation: revise the listed steps first, then
M1 GO. No change to plan.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
