open/ktg-plugin-marketplace
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Releases Wiki Activity Actions

docs(linkedin-studio): remove independently-reviewed claim, honest reframe

Browse source 
Wave 3 / Step 11 of the remediation plan (Phase 1 — usable by a non-author).

The README claimed 'the version that ships is the version that's actually been
independently reviewed' — an overclaim the operator correction flagged: the cold
review is a CAPABILITY the pipeline can run, not a guarantee every shipped edition
received. Reframe to the honest capability:
- Long-Form Engine bullet: the draft CAN be frozen and re-read by reviewers with no
  drafting-session context (argument, language, facts, reader-fit) before lock, so a
  cold pass catches what the framing-biased in-session gates miss; run inline (Step
  6.5) or via /linkedin:headless-review for maximum independence. No claim about what
  every shipped edition went through.
- Pipeline diagram annotation '(independent re-read)' -> '(cold, headless)'.

Verify: grep -ni 'independently reviewed' README.md -> no matches.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 2026-05-30 00:59:31 +02:00
commit 4052b649f2
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
plugins/linkedin-studio/README.md
View file

@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ For the pieces that build authority — newsletter editions, essays, series arti
skeleton gate ──▶ voice scrub ──▶ fact-check ──▶ editorial craft gate ──▶ skeleton gate ──▶ voice scrub ──▶ fact-check ──▶ editorial craft gate ──▶
persona resonance ──▶ cold adversarial review ──▶ visual assets ──▶ LOCK ──▶ hook conversion persona resonance ──▶ cold adversarial review ──▶ visual assets ──▶ LOCK ──▶ hook conversion
(before prose) (de-AI) (sources) (is it well-made?) (before prose) (de-AI) (sources) (is it well-made?)
(does it land?) (independent re-read) (does it land?) (cold, headless)
``` ```
Each gate exists because skipping it is expensive: Each gate exists because skipping it is expensive:
@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ Each gate exists because skipping it is expensive:
- **Skeleton before prose** — spine errors get caught in 15 minutes at the outline stage instead of a full day post-draft. - **Skeleton before prose** — spine errors get caught in 15 minutes at the outline stage instead of a full day post-draft.
- **Fact-check before lock** — claims after the model's knowledge cutoff *must* be web-searched; the more convincing a draft reads, the more verification, not less. - **Fact-check before lock** — claims after the model's knowledge cutoff *must* be web-searched; the more convincing a draft reads, the more verification, not less.
- **Editorial craft gate** — an editor (not a reader) judges prose craft and narrative architecture: the blind spots a resonance sweep structurally cannot see. - **Editorial craft gate** — an editor (not a reader) judges prose craft and narrative architecture: the blind spots a resonance sweep structurally cannot see.
- **Cold adversarial review** — three reviewers re-read a frozen draft with *no* drafting-session context, so the version that ships is the version that's actually been independently reviewed. - **Cold adversarial review** — before lock, the draft can be frozen and re-read by reviewers carrying *no* drafting-session context (argument integrity, language, facts, and reader-fit), so a cold pass catches what the framing-biased in-session gates miss. Run it inline (Step 6.5) or in a fresh session via `/linkedin:headless-review` for maximum independence.
The cost of fixing an error in a published edition is too high — so the gates run upstream, where fixes are cheap. The cost of fixing an error in a published edition is too high — so the gates run upstream, where fixes are cheap.