docs(linkedin-studio): remove independently-reviewed claim, honest reframe
Wave 3 / Step 11 of the remediation plan (Phase 1 — usable by a non-author). The README claimed 'the version that ships is the version that's actually been independently reviewed' — an overclaim the operator correction flagged: the cold review is a CAPABILITY the pipeline can run, not a guarantee every shipped edition received. Reframe to the honest capability: - Long-Form Engine bullet: the draft CAN be frozen and re-read by reviewers with no drafting-session context (argument, language, facts, reader-fit) before lock, so a cold pass catches what the framing-biased in-session gates miss; run inline (Step 6.5) or via /linkedin:headless-review for maximum independence. No claim about what every shipped edition went through. - Pipeline diagram annotation '(independent re-read)' -> '(cold, headless)'. Verify: grep -ni 'independently reviewed' README.md -> no matches. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
86e4d5109b
commit
4052b649f2
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ For the pieces that build authority — newsletter editions, essays, series arti
|
|||
skeleton gate ──▶ voice scrub ──▶ fact-check ──▶ editorial craft gate ──▶
|
||||
persona resonance ──▶ cold adversarial review ──▶ visual assets ──▶ LOCK ──▶ hook conversion
|
||||
(before prose) (de-AI) (sources) (is it well-made?)
|
||||
(does it land?) (independent re-read)
|
||||
(does it land?) (cold, headless)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Each gate exists because skipping it is expensive:
|
||||
|
|
@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ Each gate exists because skipping it is expensive:
|
|||
- **Skeleton before prose** — spine errors get caught in 15 minutes at the outline stage instead of a full day post-draft.
|
||||
- **Fact-check before lock** — claims after the model's knowledge cutoff *must* be web-searched; the more convincing a draft reads, the more verification, not less.
|
||||
- **Editorial craft gate** — an editor (not a reader) judges prose craft and narrative architecture: the blind spots a resonance sweep structurally cannot see.
|
||||
- **Cold adversarial review** — three reviewers re-read a frozen draft with *no* drafting-session context, so the version that ships is the version that's actually been independently reviewed.
|
||||
- **Cold adversarial review** — before lock, the draft can be frozen and re-read by reviewers carrying *no* drafting-session context (argument integrity, language, facts, and reader-fit), so a cold pass catches what the framing-biased in-session gates miss. Run it inline (Step 6.5) or in a fresh session via `/linkedin:headless-review` for maximum independence.
|
||||
|
||||
The cost of fixing an error in a published edition is too high — so the gates run upstream, where fixes are cheap.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue