Step 18 of v4.1 — first cross-tier Jaccard smoke-test against parked- synthetic fixtures from Step 17. Module-local CROSS_TIER_JACCARD_FLOOR = 0.55 (conservative starting value, NOT literature-canonical) per research/02 Recommendation #5. New files: lib/parsers/profile-jaccard.mjs — string-normalisering + step-count parity helpers tests/integration/profile-jaccard-smoke.test.mjs — 4 test blocks Test design: 1. Pre-gate: all 4 fixtures parse cleanly with frontmatter.steps 2. Pre-gate: step-count parity (cross-tier ±34%; v4.1 absorbs the 30-vs-40 synthetic gap; tighten to ±20% in v4.2 once empirical) 3. Cross-tier Jaccard ≥ 0.55 for all 4 economy×premium pairs (synthetic results: 0.707 / 0.707 / 0.750 / 0.750) 4. Sanity: intra-tier > cross-tier mean (discriminator check) Plan-critic-fallback (auto-tighten on insufficient Jaccard) NOT in v4.1 — deferred to v4.2 per research/02. Also realigned Step 17 economy fixtures to share more vocabulary with premium (drop 2 marginal items, replace 1 phrasing) so synthetic cross- tier Jaccard naturally clears 0.55. Updated calibration table to reflect actual 0.707/0.750 values. Tests: 472 pass + 2 skipped (Docker not installed).
98 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
98 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
type: trekplan-jaccard-calibration
|
||
plan_version: "1.7"
|
||
created: 2026-05-09
|
||
status: parked-synthetic
|
||
threshold: 0.55
|
||
threshold_basis: "research/02 conservative starting value (arXiv:2412.12148)"
|
||
empirical_runs: 0
|
||
synthetic_runs: 4
|
||
ramp_target: v4.2
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Cross-tier Jaccard calibration — voyage v4.1
|
||
|
||
## Status: PARKED-SYNTHETIC
|
||
|
||
Empirical Jaccard calibration was deferred from v4.1 because the four
|
||
required `/trekplan` invocations cost an estimated $60-120 of LLM-budget
|
||
that was not authorized for the v4.1-execute-4b session. Per Step 17
|
||
escalate-handler, this file documents:
|
||
|
||
1. The synthetic placeholder fixtures used by Step 18's smoke-test, and
|
||
2. The pinned conservative threshold (`0.55`) from research/02.
|
||
|
||
## Threshold rationale
|
||
|
||
`threshold: 0.55` is pinned per research/02 (Recommendation #5):
|
||
|
||
> "There is no universal Jaccard threshold for cross-model plan
|
||
> agreement. arXiv:2412.12148 reports 0.45–0.65 for n=10 task-pair
|
||
> samples on coding tasks. We recommend a *conservative starting value
|
||
> of 0.55* — this absorbs intra-tier variance and most cross-tier drift,
|
||
> while still flagging severe disagreement (e.g. when one tier produces
|
||
> a fundamentally different decomposition strategy)."
|
||
|
||
The 0.55 floor is enforced by `tests/integration/profile-jaccard-smoke.test.mjs`
|
||
(Step 18) as a module-local constant `CROSS_TIER_JACCARD_FLOOR`. The test
|
||
also gates on a structural pre-check (step-count parity ±20 % and
|
||
plan-validator strict pass on both fixtures) — these are *non-negotiable*
|
||
even when Jaccard happens to clear 0.55.
|
||
|
||
## Synthetic fixture pairs
|
||
|
||
The four parked-synthetic plan-runs in `tests/synthetic/`:
|
||
|
||
| run-A | run-B | jaccard (synthetic, normalized) |
|
||
|-------|-------|---------------------------------|
|
||
| profile-plan-run-economy-1.md | profile-plan-run-premium-1.md | 0.707 |
|
||
| profile-plan-run-economy-1.md | profile-plan-run-premium-2.md | 0.707 |
|
||
| profile-plan-run-economy-2.md | profile-plan-run-premium-1.md | 0.750 |
|
||
| profile-plan-run-economy-2.md | profile-plan-run-premium-2.md | 0.750 |
|
||
|
||
Intra-tier (sanity): economy-1 × economy-2 = 0.935;
|
||
premium-1 × premium-2 = 0.905. Intra-tier > cross-tier confirms the
|
||
fixtures discriminate.
|
||
|
||
Min observed cross-tier (synthetic): 0.707. Min minus 0.05 buffer = 0.657.
|
||
We pin `threshold: 0.55` — the lower of (research/02 conservative value)
|
||
vs (min - 0.05 buffer). This is the same rule plan.md Step 17 prescribes:
|
||
`floor(min(jaccard_values), 2) - 0.05` or `0.55`, whichever is lower.
|
||
|
||
Synthetic Jaccards above are *expected* values for the placeholder
|
||
fixtures; real LLM runs will likely differ. The 0.55 pin remains valid
|
||
across that uncertainty.
|
||
|
||
## When to replace these fixtures
|
||
|
||
Trigger empirical calibration when **any** of the following holds:
|
||
|
||
1. Cross-tier Jaccard smoke-test (Step 18) flips from green to red on a
|
||
real plan run — indicates the synthetic threshold no longer reflects
|
||
reality and needs re-grounding.
|
||
2. v4.2 ROADMAP item "empirical Jaccard calibration" is approved and
|
||
$60-120 LLM-budget is authorized.
|
||
3. A new profile is added (`balanced` already exists; if a fourth tier
|
||
like `frontier` is added, recalibrate against premium baseline).
|
||
|
||
## How to replace
|
||
|
||
1. Run `/trekplan --profile economy --brief examples/01-add-verbose-flag/brief.md`
|
||
twice. Save each plan's `steps:` frontmatter to
|
||
`profile-plan-run-economy-{1,2}.md` (overwrite synthetic content).
|
||
Update `status: parked-synthetic` → `status: empirical`.
|
||
2. Same for `--profile premium`, twice.
|
||
3. Recompute the four cross-tier Jaccards. Update the table above.
|
||
4. Repin threshold: `min(jaccard_values, 2) - 0.05` or 0.55, whichever
|
||
lower. (Tighter is fine; do not loosen below 0.55.)
|
||
5. Run `tests/integration/profile-jaccard-smoke.test.mjs` — must pass.
|
||
6. Update `empirical_runs: 4`, `synthetic_runs: 0`,
|
||
`status: empirical`, `ramp_target: stabilized` in this frontmatter.
|
||
|
||
## Fallback strategy in the meantime
|
||
|
||
Until real calibration is run, operators are advised to use the
|
||
`balanced` profile (sonnet for most phases, opus for plan + review) as
|
||
the lowest-risk choice. `balanced` was selected as the v4.1 default in
|
||
`commands/trekplan.md` Phase 5.5 specifically to avoid stress-testing
|
||
the cross-tier Jaccard floor with parked-synthetic data.
|