Add /ultraresearch-local for structured research combining local codebase analysis with external knowledge via parallel agent swarms. Produces research briefs with triangulation, confidence ratings, and source quality assessment. New command: /ultraresearch-local with modes --quick, --local, --external, --fg. New agents: research-orchestrator (opus), docs-researcher, community-researcher, security-researcher, contrarian-researcher, gemini-bridge (all sonnet). New template: research-brief-template.md. Integration: --research flag in /ultraplan-local accepts pre-built research briefs (up to 3), enriches the interview and exploration phases. Planning orchestrator cross-references brief findings during synthesis. Design principle: Context Engineering — right information to right agent at right time. Research briefs are structured artifacts in the pipeline: ultraresearch → brief → ultraplan --research → plan → ultraexecute. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
8.4 KiB
Carousel Templates
Slide-by-slide blueprints for LinkedIn carousels (PDF document posts). Carousels have the highest engagement rate of all LinkedIn formats (6.6%) because they maximize dwell time and encourage swipe completion.
Universal Design Specs
- Slide dimensions: 1080 x 1350 px (4:5 portrait, recommended)
- Font: Sans-serif, minimum 24pt body, 36pt+ headlines
- Colors: Max 3 per carousel (background, text, accent)
- Text per slide: 5-7 lines maximum
- Optimal length: 5-8 slides (including cover and CTA). 7 slides is the sweet spot (18% better performance)
- Export format: PDF
- Caption length: 300-500 characters with hook and context
Template 1: How-To Guide
Best for: Teaching a process, explaining a method, step-by-step instructions Structure: 6-8 slides
| Slide | Purpose | Content Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cover/Hook | Bold question or promise: "How to [achieve X] in [timeframe]" |
| 2 | Problem | "Most people [common mistake]. Here's what actually works." |
| 3 | Step 1 | Step name + 2-3 lines of explanation |
| 4 | Step 2 | Step name + 2-3 lines of explanation |
| 5 | Step 3 | Step name + 2-3 lines of explanation |
| 6 | Step 4 | Step name + 2-3 lines of explanation |
| 7 | Step 5 | Step name + 2-3 lines of explanation |
| 8 | Common mistakes | "3 mistakes to avoid: [quick list]" |
| 9 | Summary | Recap all steps in a numbered list |
| 10 | CTA | "Save this for later. Follow for more [topic]." |
Cover slide formula:
How to [specific outcome]
(without [common pain point])
[Your name] | [Your title]
Step slide formula:
Step [N]: [Action verb] + [Object]
[2-3 sentences explaining the step]
Pro tip: [One practical detail]
Caption template:
Most [audience] struggle with [problem].
I've been doing [process] for [timeframe], and here's the method that consistently works.
Swipe through for the full breakdown.
Save this if you want to come back to it later.
#[topic] #[niche] #[format]
Template 2: Listicle / Top N
Best for: Curated lists, tool recommendations, lessons learned, tips Structure: 6-8 slides (1 item per slide)
| Slide | Purpose | Content Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cover/Hook | "[N] [things] every [audience] should know about [topic]" |
| 2 | Item 1 | Name/Title + Why it matters (2-3 lines) |
| 3 | Item 2 | Name/Title + Why it matters |
| 4 | Item 3 | Name/Title + Why it matters |
| 5 | Item 4 | Name/Title + Why it matters |
| 6 | Item 5 | Name/Title + Why it matters |
| 7 | Item 6 | Name/Title + Why it matters |
| 8 | Item 7 | Name/Title + Why it matters |
| 9 | Bonus | "One more that most people miss: [unexpected item]" |
| 10 | CTA | "Which one was new to you? Tell me in the comments." |
Cover slide formula:
[N] [things] that changed how I
[outcome]
(#[N] surprised me the most)
Item slide formula:
#[N]: [Item name]
[Why it matters in 2-3 lines]
[Optional: One specific example or data point]
Caption template:
I spent [timeframe] learning about [topic].
Here are [N] things I wish someone told me from the start.
#[N] is the one most people get wrong.
Which one resonates most? Drop a number in the comments.
Template 3: Story / Before-After
Best for: Personal narratives, transformation stories, lessons from failure Structure: 6-8 slides
| Slide | Purpose | Content Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cover/Hook | "How [situation] changed everything I knew about [topic]" |
| 2 | Setting | "[Timeframe] ago, I was [situation]." |
| 3 | Problem | "The problem: [specific challenge in 2-3 lines]" |
| 4 | Turning point | "Then [event/realization] happened." |
| 5 | What changed | "I started [new approach]. Here's what shifted:" |
| 6 | Result 1 | Before: [old state] → After: [new state] |
| 7 | Result 2 | Before: [old state] → After: [new state] |
| 8 | Result 3 | Before: [old state] → After: [new state] |
| 9 | Lesson | "The real lesson: [insight in 2-3 lines]" |
| 10 | CTA | "Has this happened to you? I'd love to hear your story." |
Cover slide formula:
[Time period] ago, I [starting state].
Today, [current state].
Here's what changed.
Before/After slide formula:
BEFORE:
[Specific old behavior or result]
AFTER:
[Specific new behavior or result]
The difference: [one-line insight]
Caption template:
[Timeframe] ago, I made a mistake that [consequence].
Looking back, it was the best thing that could have happened.
Swipe through for the full story and the lesson I learned.
What's a mistake that turned into your biggest learning?
Template 4: Comparison / vs.
Best for: Tool comparisons, approach differences, myth-busting, framework contrasts Structure: 6-8 slides
| Slide | Purpose | Content Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cover/Hook | "[Option A] vs [Option B]: Which one actually works?" |
| 2 | Context | "Everyone argues about [topic]. Here's what the data says." |
| 3 | Dimension 1 | [Criteria]: A = [detail] / B = [detail] |
| 4 | Dimension 2 | [Criteria]: A = [detail] / B = [detail] |
| 5 | Dimension 3 | [Criteria]: A = [detail] / B = [detail] |
| 6 | Dimension 4 | [Criteria]: A = [detail] / B = [detail] |
| 7 | Dimension 5 | [Criteria]: A = [detail] / B = [detail] |
| 8 | Summary table | Side-by-side with checkmarks/scores |
| 9 | Verdict | "My recommendation: [nuanced answer based on context]" |
| 10 | CTA | "Which one do you use? Agree or disagree with my verdict?" |
Cover slide formula:
[Option A] vs. [Option B]
I tested both.
Here's what I found.
Comparison slide formula:
[Criteria name]
[Option A]: [Rating or description]
[Option B]: [Rating or description]
Winner: [A or B] (because [one-line reason])
Caption template:
"Should I use [A] or [B]?"
I get asked this [frequency]. So I compared them across [N] dimensions.
The answer isn't what you'd expect.
Swipe through for the breakdown. My verdict is on slide [N].
Template 5: Framework / Mental Model
Best for: Original frameworks, decision matrices, thinking models Structure: 6-8 slides
| Slide | Purpose | Content Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cover/Hook | "The [Name] Framework: How to [outcome]" |
| 2 | Problem | "Why most [audience] fail at [topic]" |
| 3 | Overview | Visual diagram or named components of the framework |
| 4 | Component 1 | Name + What it means + How to apply |
| 5 | Component 2 | Name + What it means + How to apply |
| 6 | Component 3 | Name + What it means + How to apply |
| 7 | Component 4 | Name + What it means + How to apply |
| 8 | Example | "Here's what it looks like in practice: [specific scenario]" |
| 9 | Quick-start | "Start here: [simplest first step]" |
| 10 | CTA | "Save this framework. Tag someone who needs it." |
Cover slide formula:
The [Name] Framework
[One-line promise of what it enables]
[Optional: diagram or visual representation]
Component slide formula:
[Component Name]
What: [Definition in 1 line]
Why: [Why it matters in 1 line]
How: [Actionable step in 1-2 lines]
Caption Best Practices
Carousels need strong captions because the caption appears alongside the cover slide. A weak caption means no one swipes.
Caption structure:
- Hook (first line): Question, bold claim, or surprising stat
- Context (1-2 lines): Why this matters to your audience
- Swipe prompt: "Swipe through for..." or "Slide [N] is the one most miss"
- Engagement CTA: Question that invites comments
- Hashtags: 3-4 maximum, at the end
Do:
- Reference a specific slide to create curiosity
- Ask which point resonated most
- Tell them to save it for later
Don't:
- Write a long caption that says everything the slides say
- Use "link in comments" (carousel IS the content)
- Add more than 4 hashtags
Carousel Quality Checklist
- Cover slide has a clear promise or question
- Each slide has one point (not multiple ideas)
- Text is readable on mobile without zooming (24pt+ body)
- 5-8 slides total (7 is optimal. Completion drops 40% beyond 15)
- Last slide has a clear CTA
- Caption hooks attention and prompts swipe
- Consistent font, colors, and layout across all slides
- Exported as PDF, under 100 MB