Extract `/ultra-cc-architect-local` and `/ultra-skill-author-local` plus all 7 supporting agents, the `cc-architect-catalog` skill (13 files), the `ngram-overlap.mjs` IP-hygiene script, and the skill-factory test fixtures from `ultraplan-local` v2.4.0 into a new `ultra-cc-architect` plugin v0.1.0. Why: ultraplan-local had drifted into containing two distinct domains — a universal planning pipeline (brief → research → plan → execute) and a Claude-Code-specific architecture phase. Keeping them together forced users to inherit an unfinished CC-feature catalog (~11 seeds) when they only wanted the planning pipeline, and locked the catalog and the pipeline into the same release cadence. The architect was already optional and decoupled at the code level — only one filesystem touchpoint remained (auto-discovery of `architecture/overview.md`), which already handles absence gracefully. Plugin manifests: - ultraplan-local: 2.4.0 → 3.0.0 (description + keywords updated) - ultra-cc-architect: new at 0.1.0 (pre-release; catalog is thin, Fase 2/3 of skill-factory unbuilt, decision-layer empty, fallback list still needed) What stays in ultraplan-local: brief/research/plan/execute commands, all 19 planning agents, security hooks, plan auto-discovery of `architecture/overview.md` (filesystem-level contract, not code-level). What moved (28 files via git mv, R100 — full history preserved): - 2 commands, 8 agents, 1 skill catalog (13 files), 2 scripts, 8 fixtures Documentation updates: plugin CLAUDE.md and README.md for both plugins, root README.md (added ultra-cc-architect section, updated ultraplan-local section), root CLAUDE.md (added ultra-cc-architect to repo-struktur), marketplace.json (registered ultra-cc-architect), ultraplan-local CHANGELOG.md (v3.0.0 entry with migration guidance). Test verification: ngram-overlap.test.mjs passes 23/23 from new location. Memory updated: feedback_no_architect_until_v3.md now points at the new plugin and reframes the threshold around catalog maturity rather than an ultraplan-local milestone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.1 KiB
3.1 KiB
| name | description | layer | cc_feature | source | concept | last_verified | ngram_overlap_score | review_status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| subagents-reference | CC subagents — how the Task tool spawns isolated agent instances with scoped tools and context. | reference | subagents | https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents | task-tool-delegation | 2026-04-18 | null | approved |
Subagents — Reference
Subagents are fresh Claude instances spawned via the Task tool. Each receives a task prompt, a tool subset, and no memory of the parent conversation except what the parent explicitly passes. They return a single final message to the parent.
Anatomy
A subagent has:
- A name — either a built-in type (
general-purpose,Explore,Plan) or a plugin-defined type (code-reviewer,test-runner, ...). - A system prompt — defined by the agent type. The parent cannot override it.
- A tool set — subset of the parent's tools, as declared in the
agent definition's frontmatter
tools:field. - A task prompt — what the parent asks it to do. Self-contained; the subagent has no access to prior messages.
- A model — either explicit in the agent definition (
model: opus | sonnet | haiku) or inherited from the parent.
How to define a subagent
A plugin agent is a markdown file in agents/ with frontmatter:
---
name: code-reviewer
description: <when to invoke, include examples>
model: sonnet
tools: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob"]
---
<system prompt content>
The description field is how Claude decides when to spawn this
subagent. Include concrete trigger examples.
How to invoke
Parent calls the Task / Agent tool with:
subagent_type— the agent's namedescription— short label for logsprompt— the self-contained task
Optional:
run_in_background: true— agent runs in the background; parent is notified on completion.isolation: "worktree"— agent runs in a temporary git worktree (isolated copy of the repo).
Return protocol
- Foreground agent: parent blocks until the agent returns. Return value is a single text message.
- Background agent: parent continues. On completion, the harness injects a notification into the parent's next turn.
Isolation guarantees
- No conversation history sharing. Each subagent starts cold.
- Separate context window. A subagent can read large files without polluting the parent's context.
- Separate tool permissions. A subagent with only
Readtools cannot write files, even if the parent can.
Cost and latency
- Every subagent call is a full model call with its own token budget.
- Model choice matters: Sonnet is ~5× cheaper than Opus; Haiku is cheaper still but cannot be used (per project policy).
- Parallel subagents: the parent can launch multiple in one message; the harness runs them concurrently. Total latency ≈ slowest agent.
Failure modes
- Subagent hits context limit → partial or missing return.
- Subagent runs in background and the parent conversation ends → result may be orphaned.
- Subagent's return message hallucinates file paths → caller must verify.