| type |
review_version |
created |
task |
slug |
project_dir |
brief_path |
scope_sha_start |
scope_sha_end |
reviewed_files_count |
findings |
| trekreview |
1.0 |
|
{Task description from brief.md} |
|
.claude/projects/{YYYY-MM-DD}-{slug}/ |
.claude/projects/{YYYY-MM-DD}-{slug}/brief.md |
| sha-from-progress.json/session_start_sha-OR-null-if-mtime-fallback |
|
|
| sha-of-HEAD-at-review-time |
|
|
|
| 0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567 |
| fedcba9876543210fedcba9876543210fedcba98 |
|
Review: {Task description}
Executive Summary
Two-to-four sentences: how was the brief honored, what is the verdict
(BLOCK / WARN / ALLOW), and what is the most important finding the user
should look at first.
Coverage
| File |
Treatment |
Reason |
| lib/foo.mjs |
deep-review |
matched deep-review pattern |
| lib/bar.mjs |
summary-only |
low-risk, no test patterns matched |
| dist/bundle.js |
skip |
matches generated-file pattern |
commands/baz.md [uncommitted] |
deep-review |
working-tree change since session_start_sha |
[uncommitted] annotation appears in the treatment column for files
in the working tree (uncommitted at review time). This is a brief-level
contract — see brief.md Assumptions section.
Findings (BLOCKER)
{finding-id-1-40-char-hex}
- file: lib/foo.mjs
- line: 42
- rule_key: BROKEN_SUCCESS_CRITERION
- brief_ref: SC3 — "review.md is parseable as input to /trekplan"
- title: Plan-validator rejects review.md when source_findings is flow-style
- detail: The validator at lib/validators/plan-validator.mjs:N reads
source_findings via parseDocument(), which does not support flow-style
YAML arrays. The fixture review-run-A.md uses flow-style — Handover 6
is broken end-to-end.
- recommended_action: Update template to use block-style YAML, regenerate
fixtures, add explicit test in tests/lib/source-findings.test.mjs.
Findings (MAJOR)
{finding-id-2-40-char-hex}
- file: agents/code-correctness-reviewer.md
- line: 34
- rule_key: MISSING_BRIEF_REF
- brief_ref: SC1 — "Every BLOCKER/MAJOR finding has rationale_anchor"
- title: Agent prompt does not require brief_ref in output JSON
- detail: The trailing JSON block in the agent prompt does not list
brief_ref as a required field. Findings emitted by this agent will fail
review-validator strict mode.
- recommended_action: Add
brief_ref to the required-fields list in the
prompt's JSON template.
Findings (MINOR)
{finding-id-3-40-char-hex}
- file: lib/parsers/finding-id.mjs
- line: 18
- rule_key: MISSING_ERROR_HANDLING
- brief_ref: NFR — "Token budget honesty"
- title: TypeError thrown without surrounding context
- detail: When called with bad input, throws bare TypeError. Caller has no
way to know which field was malformed — error message is informative but
the error itself has no
cause chain.
- recommended_action: Optional improvement: wrap error.cause with the
composite input that caused the throw.
Findings (SUGGESTION)
{finding-id-4-40-char-hex}
- file: README.md
- line: 24
- rule_key: PLACEHOLDER_IN_CODE
- brief_ref: Constraint — "Path-guard respect"
- title: TODO comment about cookie path
- detail: README mentions a TODO about cookie regeneration. Not a code
bug but worth noting for v1.1 cleanup.
- recommended_action: Track in TODO.md if not already.
Remediation Summary
- 1 BLOCKER → must address before next plan iteration
- 1 MAJOR → should address before next plan iteration
- 1 MINOR → nice-to-have for v1.1
- 1 SUGGESTION → log and move on
If running /trekplan --brief review.md, the planner will consume
the BLOCKER + MAJOR findings as plan goals (their recommended_action
becomes the step intent). MINOR + SUGGESTION are skipped for v1.0
plan-input.
{
"verdict": "BLOCK",
"counts": { "BLOCKER": 1, "MAJOR": 1, "MINOR": 1, "SUGGESTION": 1 },
"findings": [
{
"id": "0123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef01234567",
"severity": "BLOCKER",
"rule_key": "BROKEN_SUCCESS_CRITERION",
"file": "lib/foo.mjs",
"line": 42,
"brief_ref": "SC3",
"title": "Plan-validator rejects review.md when source_findings is flow-style",
"detail": "The validator ...",
"recommended_action": "Update template to use block-style YAML ..."
},
{
"id": "fedcba9876543210fedcba9876543210fedcba98",
"severity": "MAJOR",
"rule_key": "MISSING_BRIEF_REF",
"file": "agents/code-correctness-reviewer.md",
"line": 34,
"brief_ref": "SC1",
"title": "Agent prompt does not require brief_ref in output JSON",
"detail": "The trailing JSON block ...",
"recommended_action": "Add brief_ref to the required-fields list ..."
}
]
}