ktg-plugin-marketplace/plugins/ultra-cc-architect/commands/ultra-cc-architect-local.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen ab504bdf8c refactor(marketplace): split cc-architect from ultraplan-local into its own plugin
Extract `/ultra-cc-architect-local` and `/ultra-skill-author-local` plus all 7
supporting agents, the `cc-architect-catalog` skill (13 files), the
`ngram-overlap.mjs` IP-hygiene script, and the skill-factory test fixtures
from `ultraplan-local` v2.4.0 into a new `ultra-cc-architect` plugin v0.1.0.

Why: ultraplan-local had drifted into containing two distinct domains — a
universal planning pipeline (brief → research → plan → execute) and a
Claude-Code-specific architecture phase. Keeping them together forced users
to inherit an unfinished CC-feature catalog (~11 seeds) when they only
wanted the planning pipeline, and locked the catalog and the pipeline into
the same release cadence. The architect was already optional and decoupled
at the code level — only one filesystem touchpoint remained
(auto-discovery of `architecture/overview.md`), which already handles
absence gracefully.

Plugin manifests:
- ultraplan-local: 2.4.0 → 3.0.0 (description + keywords updated)
- ultra-cc-architect: new at 0.1.0 (pre-release; catalog is thin, Fase 2/3
  of skill-factory unbuilt, decision-layer empty, fallback list still
  needed)

What stays in ultraplan-local: brief/research/plan/execute commands, all
19 planning agents, security hooks, plan auto-discovery of
`architecture/overview.md` (filesystem-level contract, not code-level).

What moved (28 files via git mv, R100 — full history preserved):
- 2 commands, 8 agents, 1 skill catalog (13 files), 2 scripts, 8 fixtures

Documentation updates: plugin CLAUDE.md and README.md for both plugins,
root README.md (added ultra-cc-architect section, updated ultraplan-local
section), root CLAUDE.md (added ultra-cc-architect to repo-struktur),
marketplace.json (registered ultra-cc-architect), ultraplan-local
CHANGELOG.md (v3.0.0 entry with migration guidance).

Test verification: ngram-overlap.test.mjs passes 23/23 from new location.

Memory updated: feedback_no_architect_until_v3.md now points at the new
plugin and reframes the threshold around catalog maturity rather than an
ultraplan-local milestone.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-30 17:18:47 +02:00

357 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
name: ultra-cc-architect-local
description: Match brief+research against available Claude Code features; produce architecture note with explicit gaps
argument-hint: "--project <dir> [--fg | --quick | --no-gaps]"
model: opus
allowed-tools: Agent, Read, Glob, Grep, Write, Edit, Bash, AskUserQuestion
---
# Ultra CC Architect Local v1.0
Valgfri pipeline-kommando som matcher oppgavens behov (brief +
research) mot tilgjengelige Claude Code-features (Hooks, Subagents,
Skills, Output Styles, MCP, Plan Mode, Worktrees, Background Agents)
og produserer et arkitekturnotat med eksplisitt gap-seksjon.
Pipelinen er 5-stegs når denne kommandoen er med:
```
/ultrabrief-local → brief.md
/ultraresearch-local → research/*.md
/ultra-cc-architect-local → architecture/overview.md + gaps.md (this command)
/ultraplan-local → plan.md
/ultraexecute-local → execution
```
**Designprinsipp — selvlærende, men ikke autonom.** Kommandoen leser
en kuratert skill-katalog (`skills/cc-architect-catalog/`) med seed-
skills for hver CC-feature. Katalogen utvides over tid av en egen
skill-factory (separat utviklingsprosess). Arkitekturnotatet er et
forslag — brukeren godkjenner før plan-fasen.
**Pipeline-integrasjon.** `/ultraplan-local` oppdager automatisk
`{project_dir}/architecture/overview.md` og bruker feature-forslagene
som priors (ikke mandater) under exploration og planning.
## Phase 1 — Parse mode and validate input
Parse `$ARGUMENTS` for flags. Ordered precedence:
1. **`--project <dir>`** (PÅKREVD) — les `{dir}/brief.md` og
auto-oppdag `{dir}/research/*.md`. Skriv til `{dir}/architecture/`.
Hvis `{dir}` eller `{dir}/brief.md` mangler:
```
Error: project directory not initialized. Run /ultrabrief-local first.
Missing: {dir}/brief.md
```
Sett **project_dir = {dir}**, **brief_path = {dir}/brief.md**.
Sett **architecture_dir = {dir}/architecture/** — opprettes i
Phase 2 hvis den mangler.
2. **`--fg`** — no-op alias beholdt for bakoverkompatibilitet. Alle faser
kjører alltid inline i main-kontekst som av v2.4.0. Sett
**execution = foreground** (eneste modus).
3. **`--quick`** — hopp over Phase 6 (adversarial review). Sett
**mode = quick**.
4. **`--no-gaps`** — utelat `gaps.md` (gap-seksjonen beholdes internt
i `overview.md`). Sett **mode_suffix = no-gaps**. (Kan kombineres
med `--quick`.)
5. Hvis `--project` mangler: vis usage og stopp:
```
Usage: /ultra-cc-architect-local --project <dir> [--fg] [--quick] [--no-gaps]
A project directory is required. Run /ultrabrief-local first to create one.
Modes:
default Foreground pipeline → overview.md + gaps.md
--fg No-op alias (foreground is the only mode as of v2.4.0)
--quick Skip adversarial review (no architecture-critic pass)
--no-gaps Do not write gaps.md (gap-section stays inside overview.md)
Examples:
/ultra-cc-architect-local --project .claude/projects/2026-04-18-jwt-auth
/ultra-cc-architect-local --project .claude/projects/2026-04-18-jwt-auth --fg
/ultra-cc-architect-local --project .claude/projects/2026-04-18-jwt-auth --fg --quick
Pipeline position (5-steg):
/ultrabrief-local → /ultraresearch-local → /ultra-cc-architect-local
→ /ultraplan-local → /ultraexecute-local
```
Ikke fortsett forbi dette steget hvis `--project` mangler.
### Les briefen
Les `{brief_path}` og parse frontmatter. Hent:
- `task` — one-liner for stats
- `slug` — brukes i overview-frontmatter
- `project_dir` — hvis satt, kryssjekk mot flag; mismatch → advarsel,
men bruk flag-verdien
- `brief_quality` — `complete | partial`. Partial briefer er lovlige;
noter i overview.md under "Open questions".
### Scan research/
Glob `{project_dir}/research/*.md`. Lagre liste som
**research_paths**. Zero research er lovlig.
### Rapporter detektert modus
```
Mode: foreground{, quick}{, no-gaps}
Project: {project_dir}
Brief: {brief_path} ({brief_quality})
Research: {N} files detected
```
## Phase 2 — Forbered output-mappe (foreground)
Opprett `{architecture_dir}` hvis den ikke eksisterer (`mkdir -p`).
Rapporter til brukeren:
```
Architecture pipeline running in foreground.
Project: {project_dir}
Brief: {brief_path}
Research: {N} briefs
Output: {architecture_dir}/overview.md (+ gaps.md)
```
Fortsett deretter inline til neste fase.
> **Hvorfor foreground?** Som av v2.4.0 spawnes `architect-orchestrator`
> ikke lenger som en background-agent. Claude Code-harnessen eksponerer
> ikke Agent-tool til sub-agenter, så en orchestrator startet med
> `run_in_background: true` kan ikke spawne `feature-matcher` /
> `gap-identifier` / `architecture-critic`-swarm og degraderer stille til
> enkelt-kontekst-resonnering. Å kjøre fasene inline i main-kontekst holder
> swarm-en intakt. Bruk `claude -p` i et separat terminal-vindu for
> langvarige headless-kjøringer.
---
**Alle resterende faser kjører inline i hovedkommandoens kontekst.**
---
## Phase 3 — Read inputs and audit the catalog
Les briefen i sin helhet. Hent Intent, Goal, Non-Goals, Constraints,
Preferences, NFRs, Success Criteria, Research Plan, Open Questions,
Prior Attempts.
Les hver research-brief sitt Executive Summary + Recommendation
(23 setninger per brief).
Les `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/cc-architect-catalog/SKILL.md` for å
lære taxonomy og lag-modellen.
Glob `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/cc-architect-catalog/*.md`
(unntatt `SKILL.md`). Hvis glob returnerer null filer: sett
`catalog_empty = true` (ikke feil — `feature-matcher` har fallback).
Opprett `{architecture_dir}` hvis den ikke eksisterer.
## Phase 4 — Feature matching (parallel swarm)
Launch to agents i parallell, i én melding:
- **feature-matcher** (model: sonnet). Prompt med brief_path,
research_paths, catalog_root, project_dir.
- **gap-identifier** (model: sonnet). Samme input. Jobber uavhengig
av feature-matcher (off briefen og katalogen direkte).
Pass konkrete filstier, ikke inlined content.
Etter begge returnerer:
- `fallback_used = true` hvis `catalog_empty` eller feature-matcher
rapporterer det.
- Trekk ut feature-liste, rationales, confidences, integration-noter
fra feature-matcher.
- Trekk ut gaps, out-of-scope, katalog-dekningsstats fra
gap-identifier.
## Phase 5 — Synthesize architecture/overview.md
Skriv `{architecture_dir}/overview.md`.
**Frontmatter:**
```yaml
---
task: <from brief>
slug: <from brief>
created: <ISO date>
source_brief: <relative path to brief.md>
source_research: [<list of relative research paths>]
skills_consulted: [<list of skill `name` values>]
cc_features_proposed: [<list of feature_id values>]
review_status: pending
---
```
**Seks seksjoner i denne rekkefølgen:**
1. **Context** — 3 setninger. Paraphrase brief Intent + Goal.
2. **Proposed CC features** — tabell: Feature | Rationale (brief
anchor) | Supporting skill | Confidence. Én rad per foreslått
feature. Behold primary/secondary/fallback-grupperingen som
underseksjoner hvis feature-matcher leverte dem.
3. **Feature composition** — hvordan features samspiller. Sekvens,
konflikter, delte tilstander, fallbacks. 36 bullets.
4. **Coverage gaps identified** — **ALLTID tilstede**, også når tom.
Hvis tom, skriv "No coverage gaps identified — catalog covers all
features this task requires." Hvis ikke-tom, oppsummer hver gap i
én linje. Full issue-draft-tekst går til `gaps.md` i Phase 7 (med
mindre `--no-gaps`).
5. **Alternatives considered** — minst én alternativ feature-
kombinasjon med grunn for avvisning. Rationale må referere
briefen.
6. **Open questions** — hva plan-fasen må avgjøre. Inkluder evt.
uløste tradeoffs fra feature-matcher + briefens egne Open
Questions.
## Phase 6 — Adversarial review
**Hvis mode = quick:** hopp over denne fasen. Sett
`critic_verdict = "SKIPPED"` og `guardian_verdict = "SKIPPED"`.
Fortsett til Phase 7.
Launch to reviewere i parallell:
- **architecture-critic** (model: sonnet). Input: overview.md,
brief_path, research_paths, catalog_root.
- **scope-guardian** (model: sonnet). Prompt **eksplisitt**: "The
artifact under review is an architecture note (not an implementation
plan). Verify that the proposed features align with brief
requirements. Flag scope creep (features not justified by the brief)
and scope gaps (brief requirements no proposed feature addresses)."
Håndter verdikter:
- **PASS + ALIGNED** — note ferdig. `review_status: approved`.
- **REVISE** fra critic — revidér notatet i plass, adresser hver
major finding. Re-launch architecture-critic én gang. Fortsatt
REVISE → emit findings som `## Review notes`-seksjon nederst,
fortsett. Ikke loop.
- **BLOCK** fra critic — revidér for å fjerne blocker (typisk
hallucinert feature eller manglende anchor). Re-launch én gang.
Fortsatt BLOCK → `review_status: needs_rewrite`, surface findings
i Open Questions.
- **CREEP / GAP / MIXED** fra guardian — append `## Scope review`-
subseksjon med funnene. Ikke re-synthesize med mindre combined med
critic REVISE/BLOCK.
Oppdater `review_status` i frontmatter etter resultatet.
## Phase 7 — Present, write gaps.md, stats
**gaps.md** — skrives med mindre `--no-gaps`. Format:
```markdown
# Coverage gaps — <task>
These are issue-ready drafts. Copy to the project's git host manually
when you decide a gap warrants tracking. No auto-creation.
---
<gap 1 full draft>
---
<gap 2>
...
```
Zero gaps: skriv en-liner ("No coverage gaps identified.") slik at
filstaten er deterministisk.
**Stats** — append én linje til
`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}/ultra-cc-architect-local-stats.jsonl`:
```json
{
"ts": "<ISO-8601>",
"task": "<brief task, first 100 chars>",
"mode": "<default|quick|no-gaps|quick+no-gaps|foreground|foreground+quick|...>",
"slug": "<from brief>",
"project_dir": "<project_dir>",
"architecture_path": "<architecture_dir>/overview.md",
"gaps_path": "<architecture_dir>/gaps.md | null>",
"skills_catalog_size": <N>,
"skills_consulted": <N>,
"features_proposed": <N>,
"gaps_identified": <N>,
"critic_verdict": "<PASS|REVISE|BLOCK|SKIPPED>",
"guardian_verdict": "<ALIGNED|CREEP|GAP|MIXED|SKIPPED>",
"fallback_used": <true|false>
}
```
Hvis `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}` ikke er satt eller ikke skrivbar, skip
stats silently.
**Summary til brukeren:**
```
## Ultra-CC-Architect Complete
**Task:** <task>
**Project:** <project_dir>
**Architecture note:** <architecture_dir>/overview.md
**Gaps draft:** <architecture_dir>/gaps.md | skipped (--no-gaps)
**Features proposed:** N (primary: N, secondary: N, fallback: N)
**Gaps identified:** N
**Review:** <critic_verdict> / <guardian_verdict>
### Primary features
- <feature 1>: <one-line rationale>
- <feature 2>: ...
### Top gaps (if any)
- <gap 1>
- <gap 2>
Next step: /ultraplan-local --project <project_dir>
(the architecture note is auto-discovered as extra context)
```
## Hard rules
- **Catalog is ground truth.** Hver foreslått feature må komme fra
katalogens `cc_feature`-taxonomy eller feature-matcher's dokumenterte
fallback-liste. `architecture-critic` blokkerer hallucinated
features.
- **Brief is anchor.** Hver foreslått feature må sitere en konkret
brief-seksjon (Intent/Goal/Constraint/NFR/Success Criterion). Features
uten anchor fjernes under review.
- **Gap ≠ error.** "Coverage gaps identified"-seksjonen er **alltid**
til stede — tom eller full. Brief §4.5 ("Mangel ≠ feil").
- **No auto-issue-creation.** Gaps er drafts i `gaps.md`. Brukeren
avgjør hva som postes.
- **Sonnet for sub-agents.** Opus kun for orchestrator og hoved-
kommandoen.
- **Privacy.** Aldri logg secrets, tokens, credentials fra brief,
research eller katalog.
- **Idempotent.** Re-kjøring overskriver `overview.md` og `gaps.md`.
Stats-linjene akkumuleres.
- **Graceful degradation.** Tom katalog → fallback-liste. Manglende
research → jobb kun fra brief. Partial brief → noter i Open
Questions.
- **Additiv i pipeline.** `/ultraplan-local` oppdager overview.md
automatisk men må fungere uendret om filen mangler.
- **No third-party content copied** (brief §4.4). Seed-skills er
håndskrevet. Fremtidig skill-factory-output håndterer IP-hygiene
separat.
- **No n-gram computation here.** Feltet `ngram_overlap_score`
respekteres (ikke-null > threshold → flagge), men beregnes av
skill-factory, ikke denne kommandoen.