Extract `/ultra-cc-architect-local` and `/ultra-skill-author-local` plus all 7 supporting agents, the `cc-architect-catalog` skill (13 files), the `ngram-overlap.mjs` IP-hygiene script, and the skill-factory test fixtures from `ultraplan-local` v2.4.0 into a new `ultra-cc-architect` plugin v0.1.0. Why: ultraplan-local had drifted into containing two distinct domains — a universal planning pipeline (brief → research → plan → execute) and a Claude-Code-specific architecture phase. Keeping them together forced users to inherit an unfinished CC-feature catalog (~11 seeds) when they only wanted the planning pipeline, and locked the catalog and the pipeline into the same release cadence. The architect was already optional and decoupled at the code level — only one filesystem touchpoint remained (auto-discovery of `architecture/overview.md`), which already handles absence gracefully. Plugin manifests: - ultraplan-local: 2.4.0 → 3.0.0 (description + keywords updated) - ultra-cc-architect: new at 0.1.0 (pre-release; catalog is thin, Fase 2/3 of skill-factory unbuilt, decision-layer empty, fallback list still needed) What stays in ultraplan-local: brief/research/plan/execute commands, all 19 planning agents, security hooks, plan auto-discovery of `architecture/overview.md` (filesystem-level contract, not code-level). What moved (28 files via git mv, R100 — full history preserved): - 2 commands, 8 agents, 1 skill catalog (13 files), 2 scripts, 8 fixtures Documentation updates: plugin CLAUDE.md and README.md for both plugins, root README.md (added ultra-cc-architect section, updated ultraplan-local section), root CLAUDE.md (added ultra-cc-architect to repo-struktur), marketplace.json (registered ultra-cc-architect), ultraplan-local CHANGELOG.md (v3.0.0 entry with migration guidance). Test verification: ngram-overlap.test.mjs passes 23/23 from new location. Memory updated: feedback_no_architect_until_v3.md now points at the new plugin and reframes the threshold around catalog maturity rather than an ultraplan-local milestone. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
8.5 KiB
| name | description | layer | cc_feature | source | concept | last_verified | ngram_overlap_score | review_status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cc-architect-catalog | Internal catalog for ultra-cc-architect-local — not invoked directly. Indexes CC-feature reference and pattern skills. | manifest | meta | https://docs.claude.com/en/docs/claude-code | catalog-index | 2026-04-18 | null | approved |
CC Architect Catalog — Manifest
This file is the catalog index consumed by the feature-matcher and
gap-identifier agents inside /ultra-cc-architect-local. It is NOT
intended to be auto-invoked by Claude Code's skill system — the
description above exists only so the skill loader has something to
display if it indexes this directory.
Purpose
The catalog enumerates which Claude Code features the architect command can reason about, and at which layer of abstraction. Each feature gets one or more skill files in this directory. A skill is a self-contained note about one feature at one layer.
Layers (frontmatter layer field)
| Layer | Purpose | Kilde |
|---|---|---|
reference |
Facts, API, syntax. What the feature is. | CC changelog, official docs |
pattern |
When and how to use it. Typical shapes, pitfalls. | Synthesized from practice |
decision |
Operational decision tree across features. | Synthesized. (No seeds yet.) |
Lag representeres som frontmatter-felt, ikke mappestruktur. Rationale: one feature can have skills at multiple layers without relocation, and future skill-factory output can target a specific layer without moving files.
Frontmatter contract (per skill file)
Every skill file in this directory MUST have this frontmatter. The fields are load-bearing for the architect command.
---
name: <skill-id> # unique, kebab-case
description: <one-line matcher hint> # used by feature-matcher
layer: reference | pattern | decision
cc_feature: <feature-id> # see table below
source: <URL> # canonical upstream source
concept: <short phrase> # 3–6 word concept handle
last_verified: <YYYY-MM-DD> # when a human last checked against upstream
ngram_overlap_score: null # reserved for skill-factory IP-hygiene
review_status: approved | pending | auto-merged
---
ngram_overlap_score is reserved. This command respects it (will flag
non-null values > threshold) but does not compute it. Skill-factory (a
separate later process) populates that field.
review_status: approved is the default for seeds (approved by
construction — handwritten, no third-party text copied). Future
skill-factory output will start as pending (channel 2) or
auto-merged (channel 1).
Canonical cc_feature values
| Value | Coverage |
|---|---|
hooks |
Event hooks (UserPromptSubmit, PreToolUse, PostToolUse, Stop, Notification, SessionStart, etc.) |
subagents |
Task-tool sub-agents, delegation patterns |
skills |
Claude Code skill system (not Agent SDK skills) |
output-styles |
Output style configuration |
mcp |
Model Context Protocol servers and tools |
plan-mode |
Built-in plan mode |
worktrees |
Git worktree integration |
background-agents |
run_in_background, Monitor, long-running agents |
meta |
This manifest only — not a real feature |
If a future skill covers a feature not in this list, add the row above and surface the extension in the relevant CHANGELOG entry.
Slug convention
Skill filenames follow this pattern:
<cc_feature>[-<qualifier>]-<layer>.md
- Unqualified slug (
<feature>-<layer>.md) — the baseline/canonical entry for that (feature, layer) pair. One per pair. Example:hooks-pattern.md= generic hook shapes and pitfalls. - Qualified slug (
<feature>-<qualifier>-<layer>.md) — a specialized variant covering one specific sub-pattern or use-case. Zero-or-more per pair. Example:hooks-observability-pattern.md= progressive-alert observability pattern specifically.
Qualifiers exist because one CC feature can support multiple
non-overlapping patterns at different abstraction levels. Forcing
everything into a single <feature>-<layer>.md either bloats the
canonical entry or loses useful specialization. Qualified slugs let the
catalog grow with concrete, named patterns without displacing the
baseline.
feature-matcher treats all skills with the same cc_feature + layer
as candidates and picks the most relevant to the brief (or proposes
several if they cover different aspects). See "How feature-matcher
uses this file" below.
Current seed coverage (v2.3.0 — see .drafts/ for skill-factory output)
| Feature | reference | pattern | qualified patterns | decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hooks | hooks-reference | hooks-pattern | hooks-observability-pattern | — |
| subagents | subagents-reference | subagents-pattern | — | — |
| skills | skills-reference | — | — | — |
| output-styles | output-styles-reference | — | — | — |
| mcp | mcp-reference | — | — | — |
| plan-mode | plan-mode-reference | — | — | — |
| worktrees | worktrees-reference | — | — | — |
| background-agents | background-agents-reference | — | — | — |
Total: 11 seed skills, 8 features, 2 layers. Decision-layer is intentionally empty — decisions cross features and require broader synthesis than a single seed pass can provide. Skill-factory populates decision-layer later.
How feature-matcher uses this file
- Read this file to learn the
cc_featuretaxonomy and slug convention. - Glob the directory for
*.mdfiles (excluding SKILL.md). - Parse each skill's frontmatter.
- For each feature mentioned in the brief or research, match against
cc_featurefield. Build the candidate set per feature, grouped by layer. Selection rules:- Layer preference: prefer
patternoverreferencewhen both exist (pattern is richer). - Multiple patterns per feature: when two or more pattern-layer
skills share the same
cc_feature, read eachdescriptionand pick the one(s) most relevant to the brief. If two cover non-overlapping aspects that both apply, propose both with clear rationale. Prefer the unqualified baseline (<feature>-pattern.md) when the brief does not specifically justify a qualified variant. - Be explicit: name the chosen skill in
supporting_skillsoarchitecture-criticcan verify the match.
- Layer preference: prefer
- When no skill exists for a mentioned feature, fall back to the
hardcoded minimum-list inside the
feature-matcherprompt and mark the gap in stats (fallback_used: true).
How gap-identifier uses this file
- Collect every feature referenced in
feature-matcher's output. - For each feature, check whether the catalog has at least one skill at each expected layer (reference always; pattern when complexity warrants; decision for cross-feature choices).
- Emit a gap entry for every missing (feature × layer) pair.
- Label with
skill-layer:<layer>andcc-feature:<feature>.
Non-goals for this file
- No skill-factory logic. That is a separate later process.
- No auto-discovery of new CC features.
- No n-gram computation.
- No triggering Claude Code auto-invocation (description deliberately says "not invoked directly").
Modification rules
- Adding a canonical skill: create
<feature>-<layer>.mdwith the frontmatter contract above. Bump the coverage table in this file. - Adding a qualified pattern skill: create
<feature>-<qualifier>-<layer>.mdwhen the new pattern covers a distinct sub-case that does not belong in the unqualified baseline. The qualifier MUST be kebab-case and descriptive (e.g.,observability,migration,multi-tenant). Add it to the "qualified patterns" column in the coverage table. - Choosing qualified vs. canonical: if no unqualified skill exists
yet for a
(feature, layer)pair, the new skill SHOULD be the unqualified baseline — don't ship a qualified skill without a canonical one, becausefeature-matcherprefers baseline when the brief has no specific justification for a variant. - Renaming
cc_featurevalues: update both this file AND every skill using the old value in the same commit. - Removing a skill: document in CHANGELOG under the version that drops it.
- Slug collision: two skills with the same slug are a hard error.
Skill-factory (
/ultra-skill-author-local) must refuse to promote a draft that would overwrite an approved skill. Collision is resolved either by qualifying the new slug or by revising the baseline.