ktg-plugin-marketplace/plugins/llm-security/commands/pre-deploy.md

101 lines
5 KiB
Markdown

---
name: security:pre-deploy
description: Pre-deployment security checklist — verify enterprise controls, compliance, and production readiness
allowed-tools: Read, Glob, Grep, AskUserQuestion
model: sonnet
---
# /security pre-deploy
Running pre-deployment security checklist...
## Automated Checks
Run each check and record status (PASS / FAIL / WARN / N/A).
### 1 — Deny-first permissions
Read `.claude/settings.json` and `~/.claude/settings.json`. Look for `"permissions"` block with a deny-first or allowlist-only policy (e.g., `"defaultMode": "allowList"` or explicit deny rules). Status: PASS if deny-first found, WARN if not configured, FAIL if allow-all detected.
### 2 — Secrets hook active
Read `hooks/hooks.json` (or `.claude/hooks.json`). Check for a `PreToolUse` hook matching `Edit|Write` that references `pre-edit-secrets`. Status: PASS if found, FAIL if absent.
### 3 — Path guard active
Same hooks.json or global `~/.claude/settings.json` hooks. Check for a `PreToolUse` hook matching `Write` or `Edit|Write` that references `pre-write-pathguard`. Status: PASS if found locally or globally, FAIL if absent in both.
### 4 — Destructive command guard
Same hooks.json. Check for a `PreToolUse` hook matching `Bash` that references `pre-bash-destructive` or equivalent firewall script. Status: PASS if found, WARN if absent.
### 5 — MCP servers verified
Read `.mcp.json` if it exists. For each server listed, check whether it is a known/trusted server (Linear, MS Learn, Tavily, GitHub, etc.) vs. unknown third-party. Flag any unknown servers. Status: PASS if all known, WARN if unknown servers present, N/A if no .mcp.json.
### 6 — No hardcoded secrets
Grep source files (excluding `node_modules`, `.git`, `*.md`) for common secret patterns: `API_KEY`, `api_key`, `secret`, `password`, `token`, `bearer`, `sk-`, `-----BEGIN`. Status: PASS if no hits, FAIL if hits found.
### 7 — .gitignore covers secrets
Read `.gitignore`. Check for entries covering `.env`, `.env.*`, `credentials`, `*.key`, `*.pem`, `secrets*`. Status: PASS if at least 3 of these patterns present, WARN if partial, FAIL if absent.
### 8 — CLAUDE.md has security section
Read `CLAUDE.md`. Check for a section or heading mentioning security, secrets, hooks, or permissions. Status: PASS if found, WARN if absent.
### 9 — Sandbox enabled
Read settings files. Check for `"sandbox": true` or sandbox-related configuration. Status: PASS if enabled, WARN if not configured (sandbox is opt-in).
### 10 — Audit logging configured
Check hooks.json for any `Stop` or `PostToolUse` hooks that write audit logs, or check settings for audit log paths. Status: PASS if found, WARN if absent.
## Manual Verification
Ask the user these questions using AskUserQuestion (one at a time):
1. "Is this project deployed under an Anthropic Enterprise plan? (SSO, SCIM, and audit logging are enterprise-only controls.)"
2. "Has a DPIA (Data Protection Impact Assessment) been completed for this AI solution?"
3. "Is there a documented incident response plan for AI failures or security incidents?"
Record answers and include in the report.
## Report
Generate the report using `templates/unified-report.md` (ANALYSIS_TYPE: pre-deploy) as the format reference. Structure:
```
## Pre-Deployment Security Checklist
Passed: X/10 automated checks
| # | Check | Status | Detail |
|---|--------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
| 1 | Deny-first permissions | ... | ... |
| 2 | Secrets hook | ... | ... |
| 3 | Path guard | ... | ... |
| 4 | Destructive cmd guard | ... | ... |
| 5 | MCP servers verified | ... | ... |
| 6 | No hardcoded secrets | ... | ... |
| 7 | .gitignore covers secrets| ... | ... |
| 8 | CLAUDE.md security docs | ... | ... |
| 9 | Sandbox enabled | ... | ... |
|10 | Audit logging | ... | ... |
## Manual Verification
- [ ] Enterprise plan: [user answer]
- [ ] DPIA completed: [user answer]
- [ ] Incident response plan: [user answer]
## Recommendations
[List FAIL items first, then WARN items, with specific remediation steps for each.]
```
## Verdict
Map the pass count to a risk band and verdict:
| Pass Count | Risk Band | Verdict |
|-----------|-----------|---------|
| 10/10 | Low | Ready for deployment — all automated checks passed. |
| 8-9/10 | Medium | Nearly ready — address the remaining items before deploying. |
| 6-7/10 | High | Significant gaps — resolve FAIL items before deployment. |
| 4-5/10 | Critical | Not ready — major security gaps. Immediate remediation needed. |
| 0-3/10 | Extreme | Critical risk — deployment blocked until fundamental controls are in place. |
State the verdict and risk band clearly at the end of the report.