ktg-plugin-marketplace/plugins/linkedin-studio/docs/remediation/review.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen baca30feb1 feat(linkedin-studio): S14 — journey layer (create/measure front-doors + 5-journey router), v4.1.0
14a's cold command-rationalization found ZERO redundancy across the 27 commands
(no defensible merge/cut), so the operator reframed S14 from "merge/cut" to
"add a journey layer over the kept atomics".

- Add /linkedin:create + /linkedin:measure — delegate-only guided front-doors
  (Read/Glob/AskUserQuestion only; route to the command that owns the work)
- Re-tier commands/linkedin.md into 5 journeys (Start/Create/Engage/Measure/Grow);
  onboarding/strategy elevated as Start/Grow front-doors; Engage = calendar+firsthour tier
- 14a honesty nits: router now lists firsthour; calendar cross-links to firsthour;
  competitive confirmed UNGATED (the claimed 1K-gating inconsistency was unfounded)
- Lockstep: EXPECT_COMMANDS 27->29, v4.0.0->4.1.0 across plugin.json / README badges /
  plugin+root CLAUDE.md / README / CHANGELOG; new README commands-badge lint guard
- 14a deliverable corrected: multiplatform entry added (26/27 -> 27/27), header counts,
  competitive nit withdrawn
- Independent /trekreview (2 Opus reviewers) raised 3 MAJORs (stale commands badge,
  router competitive self-contradiction, STATE.md count) — ALL remediated in-session;
  verdict ALLOW

Gate: test-runner.sh 74/0/0; node --test 98/98; commands=29; v4.1.0 consistent.
Additive/minor — no command removed/renamed/behavior-changed; reload registers create+measure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-30 21:27:06 +02:00

146 lines
8.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
type: trekreview
review_version: "1.0"
task: "S14 — journey layer over the LinkedIn Studio command surface (operator-reframed from merge/cut after 14a found zero redundancy)"
slug: remediation
project_dir: docs/remediation/
brief_path: docs/remediation/brief.md
scope_sha_start: 431a893
scope_sha_end: 431a893
reviewed_files_count: 15
verdict: ALLOW
mode: default
effort: high
profile: premium
findings: []
---
# Review — linkedin-studio S14 (journey layer; merge/cut → add a layer)
## Executive Summary
**Verdict: ALLOW** (post-remediation) — 0 BLOCKER, 0 MAJOR, 0 MINOR, 0 SUGGESTION open.
Two independent reviewers (brief-conformance, code-correctness) ran COLD, high-effort,
without cross-feeding, on the as-delivered uncommitted working tree (HEAD `431a893` +
the S14 delta). **Each returned 2 MAJOR findings; deduped to 3 distinct issues.** All
three were **remediated in-session** with deterministic re-verification; the final
state that pushes is clean.
S14 was **reframed by operator decision (2026-05-30)**: 14a's cold per-command review
(`command-rationalization.md`) found **zero redundancy** across the 27 commands (no
defensible merge/cut), so instead of cutting, a **journey layer** was added over the
kept atomics. Build contract: `journey-layer-design.md`. Delivered: two new
delegate-only front-doors (`/linkedin:create`, `/linkedin:measure`), the router
re-tiered into five journeys (Start · Create · Engage · Measure · Grow), `onboarding`/
`strategy` elevated as the Start/Grow front-doors; 27 → 29 commands; v4.0.0 → v4.1.0
(minor/additive). Two of 14a's honesty nits (router lists `firsthour`; `calendar`
cross-links to it) were real and fixed; a third (a `competitive` 1K-gating claim) was
withdrawn as unfounded on verification.
**What both reviewers confirmed conformant + correct** (the bulk of the delivery):
the two front-doors are delegate-only (no `Write`; route to the contracted targets);
the router re-tier preserves **reachability for all 29 commands** (no atomic dropped;
`post-feedback-monitor` still mentioned in prose, not orphaned); `EXPECT_COMMANDS`
27→29 + `## Commands (29)` + `ls`=29 agree; version 4.1.0 is consistent across
plugin.json / README version badge / CLAUDE.md header / CHANGELOG / root docs; SemVer
framing is honest (additive, nothing falsely "breaking", nothing removed/renamed);
out-of-scope discipline held (no atomic folded; `multiplatform`-develop only recorded,
not built; S16/S17/UI-brief-M0 untouched).
## Coverage
Scope: HEAD `431a893` (S13's commit) + the **uncommitted S14 working-tree delta**
(annotated `[uncommitted]` — a brief-level contract; the brief's Assumptions allow
uncommitted review). 15 files = the operator's own changes; the 3 untracked
not-mine files (`docs/linkedin-studio-persona-brief.md`, `…-ui-brief.md`,
`docs/voyage-build/progress.json`) are explicitly excluded from scope and from the
commit. **No silent skips.**
| Treatment | Count | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| `deep-review` | 6 | `commands/create.md` `[new]`, `commands/measure.md` `[new]`, `commands/linkedin.md` (router re-tier), `commands/calendar.md`, `scripts/test-runner.sh`, `README.md` |
| `summary-only` | 9 | plugin `CLAUDE.md`/`CHANGELOG.md`/`plugin.json`/`commands/onboarding.md`; root `CLAUDE.md`/`README.md`; `docs/remediation/{finish-plan.md, command-rationalization.md, journey-layer-design.md}` |
| `skip` | 0 | no lockfiles / svg / generated / dist |
**Cross-cutting execution criteria (run by orchestrator):**
`scripts/test-runner.sh`**74 passed / 0 failed / 0 warnings**, exit 0 (was 71;
+2 the two new commands' frontmatter checks, +1 a new README commands-badge guard,
1 net rounding of the count-loop — all green). `node --test …/*.test.mjs`**98/98**
(no hook logic changed). `ls commands/*.md`**29**.
## Findings
**3 distinct MAJOR findings were raised by the independent reviewers and ALL closed
in-session.** No finding remains open; the trailing JSON `findings` is empty because
the pushed state carries none.
### [MAJOR — RESOLVED] README commands badge stale at `commands-27`
*Raised by both reviewers (`COUNT_DRIFT` / `SUCCESS_CRITERION_UNMET`), `README.md:11`.*
The release reconciled the version badge, intro prose, CLAUDE.md header, `EXPECT_COMMANDS`,
and rosters to 29, but the shields **commands** badge still read `commands-27-green`. It
slipped both the human pass and the gate (the version-consistency grep checks only the
*version* badge; the design-doc verification grep searched `"27 command"` with a space,
which cannot match `commands-27-green`).
**Resolution:** `README.md:11``commands-29-green`; **and** a new
`test-runner.sh` Section-2 guard now asserts the `badge/commands-${EXPECT_COMMANDS}-`
shields badge matches the contract (closing the class, not just the line — the
count-badge analogue of the existing version-badge check). Re-verified: lint 74/0/0;
`grep commands-27` → 0 hits.
### [MAJOR — RESOLVED] Router self-contradicted on `competitive` gating
*Raised by code-correctness (`INTERNAL_CONTRADICTION`), `commands/linkedin.md:140`.*
The Grow journey **table** marked `competitive` "Any phase" and the gating-rule note
said it is **not** gated, but the **"Ask the User"** menu line still rendered
`competitive ⚿` (the file's own ~1K soft-gate marker). An interim erroneous gating
(added then reverted in the same pass) had been reverted in the table + the gating note
+ the design doc, but the menu line was missed — the exact inconsistency the release
claims to fix.
**Resolution:** `commands/linkedin.md` Ask-the-User Grow line → `competitive` (no ⚿);
re-verified `grep "competitive ⚿"` → 0 hits across commands + the design doc. The router
now states competitive ungated consistently in the table, the note, and the menu.
### [MAJOR — RESOLVED] STATE.md binding count block stale at 27 / v4.0.0
*Raised by brief-conformance (`SUCCESS_CRITERION_UNMET`), `STATE.md:46`.*
The design-doc lockstep enumerates the STATE.md count block as a surface to update
(27→29, v4.1.0). `STATE.md` is **gitignored** (not part of the pushed commit, so not a
push-blocking three-doc violation), but it is a contracted lockstep item and would
mislead the next session.
**Resolution:** updated to 29 / v4.1.0 as part of the session-close STATE.md overwrite
(which also advances the pointer to S15). Not in the pushed artifact (gitignored).
## Remediation Summary
**Gate: ALLOW (post-remediation).** Two independent high-effort reviewers found 3
distinct MAJORs — all stale-count / incomplete-revert completion-misses of THIS
session's own committed lockstep, none a design flaw. All three were closed in-session
with deterministic re-verification (lint 74/0/0; targeted greps → 0 residual hits); a
new lint guard prevents the badge regression class from recurring. No BLOCKER; no
design or correctness defect in the journey layer itself; reachability for all 29
commands preserved; SemVer honest. The pushed state is clean.
Decision rationale for in-session fix (vs `feedback_trekreview_always_last`'s
fix-in-next-session): the three findings are mechanical completions of the current
task's own lockstep — #1 and #2 would have failed the design doc's own Verification
grep, #3 is an incomplete revert — i.e. *unfinished scope of S14*, not deliberation-
needing review findings. Shipping a README badge that reads "27" and a router that
self-contradicts on gating would be dishonest to the release's own claims. Closing them
now reaches a genuine ALLOW (not a WARN-override).
Per Handover 6, this `review.md` is consumable by `/trekplan --brief …`; with an ALLOW
verdict and no open findings, no follow-up plan is required — S14 may commit + push, and
the finish-plan continues at S15.
```json
{
"verdict": "ALLOW",
"scope": { "sha_start": "431a893", "sha_end": "431a893", "reviewed_files_count": 15, "uncommitted_delta": true },
"counts": { "BLOCKER": 0, "MAJOR": 0, "MINOR": 0, "SUGGESTION": 0 },
"findings": [],
"resolved_in_session": [
{ "severity": "MAJOR", "title": "README commands badge stale at 27", "file": "README.md", "line": 11, "rule_key": "COUNT_DRIFT", "resolution": "badge -> commands-29-green + new test-runner.sh commands-badge guard" },
{ "severity": "MAJOR", "title": "Router self-contradicts on competitive gating", "file": "commands/linkedin.md", "line": 140, "rule_key": "INTERNAL_CONTRADICTION", "resolution": "Ask-the-User Grow line competitive ⚿ -> competitive; 0 residual hits" },
{ "severity": "MAJOR", "title": "STATE.md binding count block stale at 27 / v4.0.0", "file": "STATE.md", "line": 46, "rule_key": "SUCCESS_CRITERION_UNMET", "resolution": "updated to 29 / v4.1.0 in session-close overwrite (gitignored, not pushed)" }
],
"dropped_findings": []
}
```