ktg-plugin-marketplace/plugins/linkedin-thought-leadership/references/thought-leadership-angles.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 39f8b275a6 feat(linkedin-thought-leadership): v1.0.0 — initial open-source import
Build LinkedIn thought leadership with algorithmic understanding,
strategic consistency, and AI-assisted content creation. Updated for
the January 2026 360Brew algorithm change.

16 agents, 25 commands, 6 skills, 9 hooks, 24 reference docs.

Personal data sanitized: voice samples generalized to template,
high-engagement posts cleared, region-specific references replaced
with placeholders.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-07 22:09:03 +02:00

5.8 KiB

Thought Leadership Angles

This document provides frameworks for identifying thought leadership angles from any type of content or context.

Core Principle

Thought leadership isn't about what you know—it's about how you help others see differently. Any content can become thought leadership by finding the right angle.

8 Universal Angles

1. The Contrarian Take

Pattern: Challenge conventional wisdom or popular opinion Works for: Research, trends, industry news, best practices Structure: "Everyone thinks X, but here's why Y..." Example: "84% need data overhauls for AI" → "The real problem isn't the data—it's that we're asking the wrong questions"

2. The Pattern Recognition

Pattern: Connect dots others haven't connected Works for: Multiple data points, trends, personal observations Structure: "I've noticed X in [area 1] and Y in [area 2]—here's the pattern..." Example: Salesforce data + your org's experience → "This explains why our AI pilots succeed but scaling fails"

3. The Uncomfortable Truth

Pattern: Say what everyone knows but nobody wants to admit Works for: Industry challenges, organizational issues, failed approaches Structure: "Let's talk about what we're not talking about..." Example: "We pretend AI failures are tech problems. They're actually leadership problems."

4. The Future Implication

Pattern: Extrapolate what current developments mean for the future Works for: New tech, policy changes, market shifts Structure: "If X is true today, then Y will happen tomorrow..." Example: "If 84% need data overhauls now, the winners in 2027 will be..."

5. The Personal Lesson

Pattern: Share what you learned through experience (especially failures) Works for: Project outcomes, career moments, mistakes made Structure: "I used to believe X. Here's what changed my mind..." Example: "We spent €2M on our data platform. Here's what we should have done instead."

6. The Reframe

Pattern: Change how people think about a familiar concept Works for: Common terms, standard practices, industry jargon Structure: "We call it X, but it's actually Y..." Example: "We call it 'AI readiness.' I call it 'organizational courage.'"

7. The Practical Breakdown

Pattern: Make complex topics actionable Works for: Research findings, technical concepts, strategic frameworks Structure: "Here's what [complex thing] actually means for you..." Example: "Salesforce says you need zero-copy architecture. Here's what to do Monday morning."

8. The Human Story

Pattern: Use narrative to illustrate larger points Works for: Case studies, team experiences, customer interactions Structure: "Let me tell you about [person/situation] and what it teaches us..." Example: "Our AI lead quit last month. Her resignation letter should be required reading."

Angle Selection Framework

Step 1: Identify Your Raw Material

What do you have?

  • Research/data
  • Personal experience
  • Industry observation
  • Technical knowledge
  • Organizational learning
  • Customer insight
  • Failed attempt
  • Success story

Step 2: Ask The Angle Questions

For Data/Research:

  • What does this really mean? (Practical Breakdown)
  • What are people missing? (Pattern Recognition)
  • What's the uncomfortable conclusion? (Uncomfortable Truth)
  • How does conventional wisdom fail here? (Contrarian)

For Personal Experience:

  • What did I learn the hard way? (Personal Lesson)
  • What mistake did I make? (Uncomfortable Truth)
  • What changed my thinking? (Reframe)
  • What will others encounter? (Future Implication)

For Observations:

  • What pattern am I seeing? (Pattern Recognition)
  • What's nobody talking about? (Uncomfortable Truth)
  • How should we think about this differently? (Reframe)
  • What does this mean for the future? (Future Implication)

Step 3: Test For Thought Leadership Value

A good angle must pass at least two of these tests:

  • Perspective shift: Does it make people see things differently?
  • Actionable: Can someone do something with this insight?
  • Memorable: Will people remember and share this?
  • Credible: Is it backed by evidence or genuine experience?
  • Timely: Is it relevant to current conversations?

Combining Angles

The most powerful posts often combine 2-3 angles:

Pattern Recognition + Uncomfortable Truth: "I've noticed everyone investing in AI infrastructure (Pattern), but nobody wants to admit it'll take 3 years (Uncomfortable Truth)"

Personal Lesson + Practical Breakdown: "We failed at our first AI project (Personal Lesson). Here's the checklist we now use (Practical Breakdown)"

Contrarian + Future Implication: "Everyone's racing to implement AI (Contrarian: slow down), but in 2 years the winners will be those who built foundations first (Future Implication)"

Industry-Agnostic Application

These angles work across all industries because they're about types of thinking, not specific domains:

  • Tech: Pattern Recognition + Future Implication
  • Healthcare: Uncomfortable Truth + Practical Breakdown
  • Finance: Contrarian + Personal Lesson
  • Public Sector: Reframe + Uncomfortable Truth
  • Education: Personal Lesson + Human Story
  • Consulting: Pattern Recognition + Practical Breakdown

Red Flags (Avoid These)

  • Echo chamber: Repeating what everyone already says
  • Humble brag: Disguised self-promotion without insight
  • Vague wisdom: Platitudes without specifics
  • Pure promotion: Marketing disguised as thought leadership
  • Borrowed authority: Citing research without adding perspective

The Thought Leadership Test

Before posting, ask:

  1. Does this help someone make a better decision?
  2. Does this change how someone thinks about something?
  3. Would I find this valuable if someone else wrote it?

If you answer "no" to all three, find a different angle.