linkedin-studio/assets/checklists/quality-scorecard.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 69840e7a94 fix(linkedin-studio): S2 harden post — Step-5 buzzword gate + scorecard hook-band consistency
P4 close-out (4 edits / 2 files · lint 81/0 · counts 29/19/26/6):
- post.md Step 5: add no-buzzword checklist line (was missing; banned list = content rule #4)
- quality-scorecard.md l.32/114: one-sided "140" hook bound -> "110-140" (matches l.128, resolves self-contradiction)
- quality-scorecard.md: add no-buzzword line to Pre-Publish Basic Checklist

Shared scorecard fix benefits 8 consumers; only post hardened this session (react/batch/video/pipeline get own EVALUATE in S3/S5/S6/S8). Local-only per push policy.
2026-06-18 13:32:56 +02:00

3.8 KiB

Post Quality Scorecard (Pre-Publish Check)

Use this scorecard before publishing ANY post to predict performance.


Scoring System

Rate each criterion 0-3:

  • 0 = Missing/Poor
  • 1 = Basic
  • 2 = Good
  • 3 = Excellent

Profile Alignment (Weight: 2x)

Criterion Score Notes
Topic matches your 5 core areas /3 Algorithm checks expertise
Consistent with recent content /3 Topical authority signal
Language/tone matches profile /3 Authenticity marker
Subtotal /9 x 2 = /18

Hook Strength (Weight: 2x)

Criterion Score Notes
Works in 110-140 characters /3 Mobile band (floor + ceiling)
Creates curiosity gap /3 Click-through driver
Promises clear value /3 Worth reading?
Subtotal /9 x 2 = /18

Dwell Time Potential (Weight: 1.5x)

Criterion Score Notes
Length 1,200-1,800 characters /3 Optimal range
White space formatting /3 Easy to read
Encourages re-reading /3 Saves, bookmarks
Subtotal /9 x 1.5 = /13.5

Engagement Triggers (Weight: 1.5x)

Criterion Score Notes
CTA invites 15+ word comments /3 High-value engagement
Shareable (others want to amplify) /3 Viral potential
Save-worthy (reference value) /3 Top algorithm signal
Subtotal /9 x 1.5 = /13.5

Format Optimization (Weight: 1x)

Criterion Score Notes
Right format for content /3 Carousel/text/image
Mobile-optimized /3 70% mobile users
No external links in body /3 Avoid penalty
Subtotal /9 x 1 = /9

Voice Authenticity (Weight: 1x)

Criterion Score Notes
Sounds like the author (not generic AI) /3 Check against voice samples
Uses natural contractions and phrasing /3 Conversational, not formal
Includes specific personal detail or anecdote /3 Personal observation or reference
Subtotal /9 x 1 = /9

Total Score: /81

Pass/Fail Thresholds

Score Action
57+ Excellent - post with confidence
46-56 Good - consider one improvement
34-45 Review needed - improve weakest area
Under 34 Don't post - rework significantly

Profile/Topic Relevance Validation (Critical)

Before posting, verify your profile supports the post's topic (topic/interest relevance is a confirmed 2026 ranking input — see references/algorithm-signals-reference.md):

  • Profile clearly shows expertise in post topic
  • Headline includes relevant keywords
  • Recent activity supports topical authority
  • Featured section demonstrates credibility

If profile doesn't support the post topic, fix profile FIRST.


Quick Score (30-Second Version)

For quick posts, use this simplified check:

  1. On-topic for my expertise? (Y/N)
  2. Hook works in 110-140 chars? (Y/N)
  3. Clear value delivered? (Y/N)
  4. Ends with engagement prompt? (Y/N)
  5. No external links in body? (Y/N)

All 5 = Yes? -> Post it. Any No? -> Fix first.


Pre-Publish Basic Checklist

Before finalizing any post, verify:

  • Hook works in first 110-140 characters
  • Character count within optimal range
  • Short paragraphs with white space
  • Tone is authentic, not corporate
  • No corporate buzzwords (leverage, synergy, paradigm shift, thought leader, disruptive, value proposition, ecosystem, holistic approach)
  • Provides genuine value to readers
  • CTA is specific and natural
  • Passes the "mobile test" (readable on phone)
  • Passes thought leadership test: Does it help someone make a better decision or think differently?