linkedin-studio/assets/checklists/quality-scorecard.md
Kjell Tore Guttormsen 4dc868ea62 feat(ultraplan-local): v1.6.0 — /ultraresearch-local deep research command
Add /ultraresearch-local for structured research combining local codebase
analysis with external knowledge via parallel agent swarms. Produces research
briefs with triangulation, confidence ratings, and source quality assessment.

New command: /ultraresearch-local with modes --quick, --local, --external, --fg.
New agents: research-orchestrator (opus), docs-researcher, community-researcher,
security-researcher, contrarian-researcher, gemini-bridge (all sonnet).
New template: research-brief-template.md.

Integration: --research flag in /ultraplan-local accepts pre-built research
briefs (up to 3), enriches the interview and exploration phases. Planning
orchestrator cross-references brief findings during synthesis.

Design principle: Context Engineering — right information to right agent at
right time. Research briefs are structured artifacts in the pipeline:
ultraresearch → brief → ultraplan --research → plan → ultraexecute.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-08 08:58:35 +02:00

3.5 KiB

Post Quality Scorecard (Pre-Publish Check)

Use this scorecard before publishing ANY post to predict performance.


Scoring System

Rate each criterion 0-3:

  • 0 = Missing/Poor
  • 1 = Basic
  • 2 = Good
  • 3 = Excellent

Profile Alignment (Weight: 2x)

Criterion Score Notes
Topic matches your 5 core areas /3 Algorithm checks expertise
Consistent with recent content /3 Topical authority signal
Language/tone matches profile /3 Authenticity marker
Subtotal /9 x 2 = /18

Hook Strength (Weight: 2x)

Criterion Score Notes
Works in 140 characters /3 Mobile threshold
Creates curiosity gap /3 Click-through driver
Promises clear value /3 Worth reading?
Subtotal /9 x 2 = /18

Dwell Time Potential (Weight: 1.5x)

Criterion Score Notes
Length 1,200-1,800 characters /3 Optimal range
White space formatting /3 Easy to read
Encourages re-reading /3 Saves, bookmarks
Subtotal /9 x 1.5 = /13.5

Engagement Triggers (Weight: 1.5x)

Criterion Score Notes
CTA invites 15+ word comments /3 High-value engagement
Shareable (others want to amplify) /3 Viral potential
Save-worthy (reference value) /3 Top algorithm signal
Subtotal /9 x 1.5 = /13.5

Format Optimization (Weight: 1x)

Criterion Score Notes
Right format for content /3 Carousel/text/image
Mobile-optimized /3 70% mobile users
No external links in body /3 Avoid penalty
Subtotal /9 x 1 = /9

Voice Authenticity (Weight: 1x)

Criterion Score Notes
Sounds like the author (not generic AI) /3 Check against voice samples
Uses natural contractions and phrasing /3 Conversational, not formal
Includes specific personal detail or anecdote /3 Personal observation or reference
Subtotal /9 x 1 = /9

Total Score: /81

Pass/Fail Thresholds

Score Action
57+ Excellent - post with confidence
46-56 Good - consider one improvement
34-45 Review needed - improve weakest area
Under 34 Don't post - rework significantly

360Brew Validation (Critical)

Before posting, verify your profile passes the 360Brew test:

  • Profile clearly shows expertise in post topic
  • Headline includes relevant keywords
  • Recent activity supports topical authority
  • Featured section demonstrates credibility

If profile doesn't support the post topic, fix profile FIRST.


Quick Score (30-Second Version)

For quick posts, use this simplified check:

  1. On-topic for my expertise? (Y/N)
  2. Hook works in 140 chars? (Y/N)
  3. Clear value delivered? (Y/N)
  4. Ends with engagement prompt? (Y/N)
  5. No external links in body? (Y/N)

All 5 = Yes? -> Post it. Any No? -> Fix first.


Pre-Publish Basic Checklist

Before finalizing any post, verify:

  • Hook works in first 110-140 characters
  • Character count within optimal range
  • Short paragraphs with white space
  • Tone is authentic, not corporate
  • Provides genuine value to readers
  • CTA is specific and natural
  • Passes the "mobile test" (readable on phone)
  • Passes thought leadership test: Does it help someone make a better decision or think differently?