`uv sync --frozen` resolved ruff 0.15.22 and the tree read clean. A loose
install resolves 0.16.6, under which the SAME untouched code reports 148
findings -- 4 more than round 9 counted, because this round added four files.
All of them are new rules rather than new defects: 0.16 widened the default
rule set to whole families (YTT, ASYNC, PL, ISC, C4, UP, B, SIM, FURB, ...).
(`[skip-docs]` is for CLAUDE.md, which a lint-configuration change does not
reach. README's developer section IS updated in this commit.)
THE DEFECT IS NOT THE 148, IT IS THAT NOBODY CHOSE THEM. `[tool.ruff]` set only
`line-length` and `target-version`, so the acceptance was ruff's default, and
the tree stayed green only as long as the lockfile froze an old ruff. `select`
is now written down: `E4`, `E7`, `E9`, `F` (the historical default), `I`
because this tree already keeps imports sorted, and `RUF100` so a `noqa` that
has stopped meaning anything is caught rather than left as decoration. Pin
`ruff>=0.9` -> `ruff>=0.16.6,<0.17`.
Per rule, before -> after: RUF100 50 -> 0, I001 20 -> 0, ISC004 19, PLW1510 8,
C408 8, EXE001 6, RUF007 5, PLE2515 4, UP031 3, B017 3, and fourteen more with
2 or fewer -- the families out of the declared set are 0 by selection, and 148
is the number to start from if they are adopted, which is a separate decision
and not one to take inside a version-pin commit. 57 were auto-fixed; one E402
was reintroduced by the import-sorting fix merging a block away from its
`noqa`, and got the directive back rather than a bare one.
`S` IS MEASURED OUT, NOT ASSUMED OUT: it reports 2657 `S101` on a suite whose
every assertion is an `assert`, and `S603` flags 19 subprocess calls of which
one was ever marked -- selecting it buys 18 suppressions and no defect. Two
`noqa` directives naming non-selected rules were dropped with that reason
recorded in the configuration instead.
THE TWO FILES 0.16 WOULD REFORMAT ARE MARKDOWN, NOT PYTHON: `README.md` and
`docs/2026-09-08-blindsone-below-k-k2.md`. 0.16 formats fenced Python inside
markdown, and both blocks are RECORDS -- the second is a quotation of
`COST_VOCABULARY` as it stood when that measurement was taken. Reformatting a
quotation makes it stop being one, so markdown is excluded from the formatter
and `ruff format --check .` stays in the acceptance over `.py`.
`tools/okf_consume_measure.py` is fenced by the order as run-not-edited, so its
three findings are exempted by path with the reason and the debt named, and its
bytes are untouched.
THE LOCKFILE TRAP IS CLOSED, NOT AVOIDED. `uv.lock` predated the `[ocr]` extra,
so any unlocked resolve wrote that extra's transitive tree back into it -- 681
insertions over 4 deletions, twice now, and round 9 recorded the cause as
`uv run` OUTSIDE the project when it is `uv run` without `--frozen` INSIDE it.
The relock is complete for every declared extra (703 insertions, 26 deletions),
and measured after it, an unfrozen `uv run` leaves the file alone.
`ruff check src tests tools`, `ruff format --check .` (0.16.6), `mypy src` over
21 files and 1535 tests, all green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`okf project` built a bundle two rules behind `okf build`. `cli.build`'s
signature defaulted `keep_table_heading` and `sheet_section_rows` to `False`
while argparse defaulted both to `True`, and `project.create` calls `build()`
as a function. Measured on a five-document folder: 15 concepts / 30 files
where `okf build` wrote 26 / 52, the whole difference in the priced sheet --
the document a question about price has to reach. The invariant test could not
see it: it compared `project.create` against the same function, and its two
fixture documents had neither a table nor a sheet. Both gaps are tests now,
and the two paths are byte-equal on that folder (`diff -rq`, 0 differences).
README opens with what / one install line / two commands / the three shapes of
request; the phase-status paragraph moved down, nothing deleted. One tag is
pinned everywhere: README pinned v0.4.0 on its install lines and v0.6.0 below,
llms.txt pinned v0.4.0, so an agent reading from the top installed a tag
without `okf project`.
The skill states three modes -- question, hypothesis (per premise, `confirmed`
/ `refuted` / `undecidable-from-bundle`), and a task producing a document
(source per claim in the artefact, an ungrounded paragraph written and marked
rather than dropped, the cut declared inside the document). The five markings
are untouched.
Generated skills state relative paths in the project layout: `okf consume
.okf/<id>` and `okf check --skill .claude/skills/<id>-consume/SKILL.md`,
runnable from where `okf project` tells the reader to start `claude`. Two
absolute paths to zero, measured with a query shown capable of finding first --
O5's published "4 -> 0" used `grep -c "^/"` against paths indented by two
spaces.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The reading direction existed only for someone standing in a clone. `consume`,
`contract_check` and `skill` moved from `tools/` into the package and are
reachable as `okf consume`, `okf check` and `okf skill`; `okf project` is new
and does the whole thing in one command.
The red measurement: a consumption skill generated from a checkout carried 4
lines naming that checkout by absolute path, 2 of them the commands the skill
tells a reader to run. It now names `okf consume` and `okf check`, and a test
asserts this repository appears in it nowhere, with a known-positive so the
zero is a measurement rather than a search that could not find.
The `tools/` files stay as ALIASES, not re-exports: a re-export binds copies of
the names into a second module object, so a caller patching one patches a
binding the implementation never reads. Two tests that monkeypatch okf_consume
went green again only under the alias. Every published reproduction block runs
unchanged.
The template and docs/consumption-contract.md (the section 7.4 known-positive)
are force-included into the wheel from the file they are authored in, so both
travel with the commands that cannot run without them and there is still one
authored copy of each.
Step 0, before any of it: okf build's default gained Arm E (--table-grid),
with --no-table-grid as its opt-out. The default moved to D plus F earlier the
same day on Arm F's published 5 of 12 -- a figure measured with Arm E ON.
Without it the fold has no joined table to fold, and the shipped default scored
2 of 12 with docx 0 of 3. Measured on the operator's folder: 30 md / 15
concepts on the new default against 43 / 28 without Arm E.
Install measurement from a fresh uv tool install, empty folder, this repository
nowhere on PYTHONPATH: 5 documents in, 15 concepts out, 0 references to tools/
in the generated skill, okf check conformant (15 rules, 0 findings).
Deviation stated rather than hidden: the order asked that
tests/test_okf_consume.py be left untouched. Two assertions in it read a PATH,
which is the one thing this work changes. Both were moved and the second made
stronger -- it now asserts every command the README recipe names is a
subcommand the CLI registers, which a file existing on disk never proved.
Suite 1414 -> 1427. ruff clean, mypy --strict clean over 21 files.
Record: docs/2026-09-08-o5-okf-project.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude <claude-opus-5>
