`uv sync --frozen` resolved ruff 0.15.22 and the tree read clean. A loose
install resolves 0.16.6, under which the SAME untouched code reports 148
findings -- 4 more than round 9 counted, because this round added four files.
All of them are new rules rather than new defects: 0.16 widened the default
rule set to whole families (YTT, ASYNC, PL, ISC, C4, UP, B, SIM, FURB, ...).
(`[skip-docs]` is for CLAUDE.md, which a lint-configuration change does not
reach. README's developer section IS updated in this commit.)
THE DEFECT IS NOT THE 148, IT IS THAT NOBODY CHOSE THEM. `[tool.ruff]` set only
`line-length` and `target-version`, so the acceptance was ruff's default, and
the tree stayed green only as long as the lockfile froze an old ruff. `select`
is now written down: `E4`, `E7`, `E9`, `F` (the historical default), `I`
because this tree already keeps imports sorted, and `RUF100` so a `noqa` that
has stopped meaning anything is caught rather than left as decoration. Pin
`ruff>=0.9` -> `ruff>=0.16.6,<0.17`.
Per rule, before -> after: RUF100 50 -> 0, I001 20 -> 0, ISC004 19, PLW1510 8,
C408 8, EXE001 6, RUF007 5, PLE2515 4, UP031 3, B017 3, and fourteen more with
2 or fewer -- the families out of the declared set are 0 by selection, and 148
is the number to start from if they are adopted, which is a separate decision
and not one to take inside a version-pin commit. 57 were auto-fixed; one E402
was reintroduced by the import-sorting fix merging a block away from its
`noqa`, and got the directive back rather than a bare one.
`S` IS MEASURED OUT, NOT ASSUMED OUT: it reports 2657 `S101` on a suite whose
every assertion is an `assert`, and `S603` flags 19 subprocess calls of which
one was ever marked -- selecting it buys 18 suppressions and no defect. Two
`noqa` directives naming non-selected rules were dropped with that reason
recorded in the configuration instead.
THE TWO FILES 0.16 WOULD REFORMAT ARE MARKDOWN, NOT PYTHON: `README.md` and
`docs/2026-09-08-blindsone-below-k-k2.md`. 0.16 formats fenced Python inside
markdown, and both blocks are RECORDS -- the second is a quotation of
`COST_VOCABULARY` as it stood when that measurement was taken. Reformatting a
quotation makes it stop being one, so markdown is excluded from the formatter
and `ruff format --check .` stays in the acceptance over `.py`.
`tools/okf_consume_measure.py` is fenced by the order as run-not-edited, so its
three findings are exempted by path with the reason and the debt named, and its
bytes are untouched.
THE LOCKFILE TRAP IS CLOSED, NOT AVOIDED. `uv.lock` predated the `[ocr]` extra,
so any unlocked resolve wrote that extra's transitive tree back into it -- 681
insertions over 4 deletions, twice now, and round 9 recorded the cause as
`uv run` OUTSIDE the project when it is `uv run` without `--frozen` INSIDE it.
The relock is complete for every declared extra (703 insertions, 26 deletions),
and measured after it, an unfrozen `uv run` leaves the file alone.
`ruff check src tests tools`, `ruff format --check .` (0.16.6), `mypy src` over
21 files and 1535 tests, all green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Until now "run the door over a folder" was a shell loop over two scripts
under `tools/`, with nine flags between them and a `--path-prefix` rule
that lived in a code block in a measurement report. Neither script was
packaged (`pyproject.toml` ships `src/llm_ingestion_okf` only), so the
path the published K1/K2 numbers were measured on was reachable from a
clone and nowhere else.
`okf build <folder> --bundle <dir>` is that path, packaged, declared as a
console script and installed with the wheel. It is orchestration only:
the proposer and the corpus harness MOVED into the package
(`llm_ingestion_okf.propose`, `llm_ingestion_okf.corpus`) and the two
`tools/` scripts became thin entry points to them, so the published
reproduction blocks still run and there is exactly one implementation of
each rule. Neither move adds a dependency or a model call.
Two decisions belong to this layer and are stated where they are made.
A document's proposed paths are scoped by its RELATIVE PATH minus the
extension, not its basename: the door walks recursively now, and two
documents named alike in different folders would otherwise collide on a
path Door B is supposed to make impossible rather than merely detect.
And omitted timestamps do not come from the clock -- `--ingested-at` and
`--proposed-at` default to one shared epoch constant, because a
wall-clock default would put a changing byte in the artifact and take
rebuild-equals-incremental away from every caller who did not pass them.
Arm C and Arm D stay off and are not exposed here.
Measured on the 43-file K2 corpus, one invocation against the two-script
bundle of 2026-09-03: N = 43 computed, merged 39/43, coded rejections
4/43 (`extractor_unknown` 3, `extractor_empty_pdf` 1), K1b 39 + 4 = 43,
exit 0, 779.43 s. 1107 of 1108 files byte-identical. The one that
differs is the root `index.md`, by exactly the `log.md` link a commit
fifteen hours younger than the stored artifact adds -- appending that
line to the stored file reproduces the new one byte for byte. Against
the two scripts at THIS commit the trees agree in full, which is what
the byte-identity test holds.
Suite 1127 passed after `git add` (1113 before), mypy --strict clean,
ruff clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Door B listed `inbox.iterdir()` and kept only top-level files. A file in a
subdirectory was neither ingested nor refused: it appeared in none of the
result's buckets, so a nested drop produced a bundle that was silently short
of what was dropped and no count said so. That broke the K1b identity for any
inbox with folders in it. Operator decision 2026-09-06.
- `walk_inbox` is the ONE walk rule, shared with `tools/okf_corpus_run.py`:
the denominator N is now counted over exactly the set of files the door
ingests, rather than over a second listing that happened to agree.
- Sorted on the whole relative path, not the basename, so the order is a
function of the tree; that is what keeps rebuild-from-scratch byte-equal to
an incremental update.
- A concept's `source_file` is the path relative to the inbox root,
`/`-separated. The concept NAME still comes from the basename, so two
folders holding one basename hit the existing §3 collision refusal instead
of one silently claiming the other's concept.
- Dot-directories and a bundle directory inside the inbox are skipped with a
CODE, in a new `InboxResult.skipped`. Recursion makes the door's own output
reachable as its own input; a silent skip would be the same
absence-without-a-denominator defect one level down.
- `--path-prefix` reduces per component and rejoins with `/`, so the caller
driving a nested corpus can carry the relative directory. Reducing the whole
string folded the separator into a `-` and flattened `sub/sub2`.
`tests/test_inbox_flow.py::test_subdirectories_are_not_walked` asserted the
opposite and is superseded in place, with the reason written down.
Measured on the K2 corpus (flat, N=43): 39/43 merged, 4 coded, K1b holds. The
bundle digest is
`1472e98aec8643c5beee540f4c42b5e437bd26e7c61d69a91bcff799f06a6d13` over 1108
files -- byte-identical to a run of the same corpus at 190086f WITHOUT this
change (`diff -r` exit 0), so recursion costs a flat inbox nothing. It differs
from the stored 2026-09-03 artifact by one line in `index.md`
(`- [Corpus run history](log.md)`), which 95eb271 added 15 hours after that
bundle was built.
Suite 1113 passed, `ruff` clean, `mypy --strict src/ tools/` clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Arm C is NOT defined in docs/2026-09-02-k3-k4-k5-metode.md -- that file
contains no occurrence of the word, and neither Arm A nor Arm B is defined
there either. The definition implemented here was written for order
20260904T145630Z and is reported as the author's, never as a ratified one.
Arm C = Arm B's mechanical rules, plus one deterministic rule that cuts
any proposed span longer than a declared cap at the nearest paragraph
boundary at or before it, the whole document counting as one span when
the rules find no boundary at all.
One rule and not two, on purpose. The two failure modes the K2 rebuild
measured -- a PDF with no outline (Bilag 9.1, 217 472 characters) and a PDF
whose headings are its table of contents, so the trailing segment absorbs
the body (Bilag 3.1, Bilag 1) -- are the same failure of SIZE, and a second
rule aimed at each would confound which one moved the number.
`--max-segment-chars` defaults to 0, which is OFF: the artifact is then
byte-identical to Arm B's, pinned by a test that writes both and compares
bytes. The standard profile does not move, and the K2 bundle a consumer is
running against right now is not rebuilt.
What Arm C deliberately does NOT change: the region before the first
candidate is still covered by no segment. That is a real coverage defect --
the K3 baseline's blind rater named it -- and fixing it here would put two
changes behind one measurement.
A part carries TWO rule names in `derived`: the heading rule that opened the
span, and `rule:size-split` for the cut. Dropping the first would make a
part traceable to arithmetic and nothing else.
Tests first: 13 red, then green. 1055 -> 1068.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Measured on the K2 corpus 2026-09-03: 11 of 39 documents proposed zero
segments -- overwhelmingly PDFs with no declared structure, which Topic 1b
had already measured at 23 of 33. The proposer wrote an artifact for each
of them and exited 0.
An empty plan cannot be replayed. `process_inbox` refuses one by design,
because a plan naming no entry would persist nothing for a document that
was dropped, so the only thing a zero-entry file can do is fail a run
later -- and it did: the first segmented corpus run stopped on
`segmentation_plan_invalid` before writing a single concept.
Exit 1 with no artifact, distinct from 2, so a driver can tell "this
document lands as one flat concept" from "stop". The orphan check's test
now observes the same property through the status.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Measured on the K2 corpus 2026-09-03: 39 documents proposed 618 entries
under 601 distinct paths -- 17 paths were claimed by two documents each.
Section numbering is document-local (`1 Innledning` is in most procurement
documents), so this is structural, not unlucky. Every collision reaches
Door B's gate, which refuses per DOCUMENT, so those documents would land as
coded rejections rather than concepts and a corpus run could not be built
at all.
`--path-prefix` is an argument and not something the tool derives: the
proposer sees ONE document and cannot know what else is in the bundle. It
is reduced to the id grammar before anything is read, and a prefix that
reduces to nothing is refused rather than silently producing the unscoped
paths the caller asked to avoid. Without the flag every artifact already
produced is byte-identical.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
