The version moves to 0.8.2 in pyproject.toml, __init__.__version__ and
uv.lock (one line; `uv lock` touched no other package). CHANGELOG's
[Unreleased] becomes [0.8.2] -- 2026-09-11 with the entries K3-15, K3-17
and K3-18 wrote, unedited. The five install lines (README x4, llms.txt)
point at @v0.8.2; the guard pairing prose names v0.8.2, whose own
[tool.uv.sources] still pins guard v1.3.0; the tag history gains a v0.8.2
row and v0.8.1 stops being "the current tag". Test count re-measured on
2026-09-11: 1603 collected, 1602 passed, 1 skipped.
What the release delivers to a consumer on a tag: `okf check`'s sixteenth
rule (bundle_mismatch), which v0.8.1 does not carry, the --title-covered
stop beneath a title that answers more, and the regenerated
skills/okf-consume/. No behaviour change in src/ beyond the version string.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A patch release carrying round 16's ranking rule and nothing else. No
behaviour changes in `src/`: the version string is the only line touched
there, and it is touched because it is the second half of the version --
`tests/test_packaging.py` holds `pyproject.toml`'s declaration and
`__init__.__version__` equal, and a tag whose package reports the previous
number lies to every consumer that installs it.
- `pyproject.toml` and `src/llm_ingestion_okf/__init__.py`: 0.8.0 -> 0.8.1.
- `CHANGELOG.md`: round 16's own entry closes as `[0.8.1]`, with a new empty
`[Unreleased]` above it and no comparison link, because the file has
published none since `[0.6.0]`. The entry gains one bullet it did not
carry: the rule's MEASURED DOWNSIDE, reproduced here on a five-document
folder -- a constructed known-negative question demotes the answering
section from delivered rank 1 to rank 2 because a neighbouring concept
titled with a single common process word has its WHOLE title accounted
for. Written as a known limitation of short generic titles, not as a fix.
- The five install lines (`README.md` 4, `llms.txt` 1) move to `@v0.8.1`.
Measured after: `okf.git@v0.8.0` 0 hits, `okf.git@v0.8.1` 5 hits as the
known-positive control, and the two remaining bare `v0.8.0` occurrences
are the tag-history row and the test-count history -- both are statements
about the past and both stay.
- The tag-history list gains `v0.8.1` as the current tag and demotes the
`v0.8.0` row to what it was; `v0.7.0` is untouched, and `docs/` is not
rewritten at all.
- The test-count history sentence named the `v0.8.0` release as the last
one and would have become false on this tag: it now records 1582 through
`v0.8.1` as well. The published figures 1583 collected / 1582 passed /
1 skipped were re-measured here and stand.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Round 13 (the `.xml` core file type read as NISO-STS, and the PDF arm's
collision counter) and round 14 (a section the source DECLARES takes the
declared-structure route: `.xml` goes from 15 of 2 761 to 2 761 of 2 761
boundaries and from 23 to 2 761 concepts at the shipped defaults, hit@1/8/50
0/6 - 0/6 - 0/6 to 3/6 - 5/6 - 6/6) are both landed. This commit adds no
functionality: it sets the version, closes the CHANGELOG entry, and points
every install line at the new tag.
- `pyproject.toml` and `src/llm_ingestion_okf/__init__.py`: 0.7.0 -> 0.8.0.
The second is the only line in `src/` this release touches. It is not a
code change but the other half of the version, written without a `v`
prefix, so a search for `v0.7.0` cannot find it;
`test_packaging.py::test_the_declared_version_agrees_with_the_packaged_one`
is what did. Left alone, the tag would report the previous release to every
consumer that installs it.
- `CHANGELOG.md`: `[Unreleased]` becomes `[0.8.0] - 2026-09-10`, with a new
empty `[Unreleased]` above it. The entries are round 13's and round 14's own
words, unchanged. No compare link is added: this file has carried none since
`[0.6.0]`, and inventing one here would be a claim about a URL nobody checked.
- The five install lines and the two prose lines naming the current tag move to
`v0.8.0`. The tag history list gains a `v0.8.0` row as the current tag and
KEEPS the `v0.7.0` row: that list states it is not install lines, so a
rewrite would delete history rather than update it.
- README's test count was 1515, measured 2026-09-09; this tree measures 1575
passed / 1 skipped with ruff 0.16.6. The surrounding sentence about the
earlier figure is repaired too, because changing the date alone would have
made it false.
`v0.7.0` stays on 1260fac. No lock change, no history rewrite in `docs/`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`okf project` built a bundle two rules behind `okf build`. `cli.build`'s
signature defaulted `keep_table_heading` and `sheet_section_rows` to `False`
while argparse defaulted both to `True`, and `project.create` calls `build()`
as a function. Measured on a five-document folder: 15 concepts / 30 files
where `okf build` wrote 26 / 52, the whole difference in the priced sheet --
the document a question about price has to reach. The invariant test could not
see it: it compared `project.create` against the same function, and its two
fixture documents had neither a table nor a sheet. Both gaps are tests now,
and the two paths are byte-equal on that folder (`diff -rq`, 0 differences).
README opens with what / one install line / two commands / the three shapes of
request; the phase-status paragraph moved down, nothing deleted. One tag is
pinned everywhere: README pinned v0.4.0 on its install lines and v0.6.0 below,
llms.txt pinned v0.4.0, so an agent reading from the top installed a tag
without `okf project`.
The skill states three modes -- question, hypothesis (per premise, `confirmed`
/ `refuted` / `undecidable-from-bundle`), and a task producing a document
(source per claim in the artefact, an ungrounded paragraph written and marked
rather than dropped, the cut declared inside the document). The five markings
are untouched.
Generated skills state relative paths in the project layout: `okf consume
.okf/<id>` and `okf check --skill .claude/skills/<id>-consume/SKILL.md`,
runnable from where `okf project` tells the reader to start `claude`. Two
absolute paths to zero, measured with a query shown capable of finding first --
O5's published "4 -> 0" used `grep -c "^/"` against paths indented by two
spaces.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The command assumes uv is present but the file never said so; an agent
with only pip would hit "command not found" with no signal that a
fallback path exists. State the Python floor and the uv requirement
up front, and point the Optional README link at the pip-only path
explicitly rather than describing it as just an "alternative".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011mVhrxD21mPtaLMrGdixUq
Structured entry point for an AI agent already in the repo, per the
llms.txt convention (llmstxt.org): H1, blockquote summary, and the
repo's one start command in copyable form. The command is byte-identical
to README's first fenced code block, not a rewritten variant, so the
two cannot drift apart silently.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011mVhrxD21mPtaLMrGdixUq
