Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
805a2d50d9 fix(okf-v0.2): generated.by is process:okf-ingest — the id commons decided
v0.5.0a1 shipped the one actor value the spec owner had already excluded.
Caught before any pilot was notified, so it costs a tag, not a migration.

Commons decided <fast id> = process:okf-ingest on 2026-07-31, on this repo's
own proposal, superseding option (d) (process:llm-ingestion-okf) chosen here on
07-27. The exclusion is ingest-spec.md:7-8, frozen on the spec being
framework-neutral: normalising OUR repo name into the normative id would force
every other conformant implementation to write it into its own output. Verified
against three independent sources before touching anything — commons' coord
message 20260731T154140Z, their plan :215-216/:244, and their STATE :37.

Why this had to land before the pilot notifications rather than after:

  actor is both the stamp written and the value owned back (OwnershipPolicy),
  and recognition is one-way. A pilot that had run Test A against the excluded
  id would hold bundles this library stops recognising the moment the id is
  corrected — collision_unstamped on their OWN files. That is the A-E5 failure
  mode, and we would have inflicted it.

Worse, it would not have shown up as a failure: the plan's A-E3 expectation
(:854) named the same excluded value as the code, so Test A would have PASSED
and confirmed the error. Expectation and implementation agreeing is not
evidence when both predate the decision.

Nothing in the wild carried the old value: OKF_V0_2 did not exist at v0.4.0, so
the profile has never been released. v0.5.0a1 is abandoned, not moved — a tag
already on a public remote does not get force-pushed, and the history should
say plainly that a1 was wrong.

A-E3 now records both corrections with dates. The V1 paragraph at :1169 is
superseded in place rather than rewritten: its reasoning still holds, only its
outcome moved.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01CVTup4v7tW9QiVyBENk2LV
2026-07-31 20:50:21 +02:00
2504011010 feat(okf-v0.2): D5 — the v0.2 golden fixture, with okf_version in root frontmatter
Placement settled by catalog's own reading of upstream at the pinned commit
3fcbb9f: SS8:509-510 and SS12:773-775 both put `okf_version` in a bundle-root
`index.md` frontmatter block, and SS12 calls it the only place frontmatter is
permitted in an index. Catalog's spec says the opposite about the same file;
that divergence is theirs against upstream, and we conform to upstream.

The value never touches a profile. `OKF_V0_2.index.root_frontmatter` names the
key; the caller supplies the value through a new keyword-only
`root_frontmatter_values` mapping. That keeps V4/V-A5 intact - `okf_version`'s
value tracks the upstream Google version and belongs to catalog (E1), so a
constant here would claim a decision we do not own and would have to be chased
on every upstream release. In the fixture the value is fixture DATA
(`okf-version.txt`), not a literal in our source.

Ordering comes from the policy, not the caller's mapping: a dict preserves
insertion order, so two callers passing the same keys would otherwise emit
different bytes. A key the policy does not name is refused fail-fast, before
any disk mutation. Omitting the argument emits no block at all - SS12 is a MAY
and none of upstream's four reference bundles declares the key.

The block is written only when the index is CREATED, so a re-run into an
existing bundle stays byte-identical (A-E5).

Raw-byte assertions rather than parsed ones, on the committed fixture as well
as on fresh runs: catalog measured that a quoted value fails their shape regex
with exit 1 and that a BOM hides the marker while still exiting 0.
`yaml.safe_load` returns "0.2" either way and strips a BOM first, so a parsed
assertion masks exactly those two defects. Asserting the frozen fixture catches
what a self-comparison cannot - regenerating from a broken emitter moves both
sides together.

A-E6 is now placement-explicit (promised catalog in 99cf987), and separates the
two byte properties: BOM-free is a property of the file, unquoted is a property
of CATALOG'S GATE and not of OKF v0.2 - upstream's own SS12 example is quoted,
so their gate rejects the spec's canonical form.

README gains the upstream-version section it was missing; CLAUDE.md gains the
mechanism behind "no profile hard-codes an upstream version": a profile names a
key, a caller owns its value.

550 -> 559 tests. test_profile_threading's `OKF_V0_2.index is DEFAULT.index`
assertion is replaced rather than deleted: object identity was a proxy for "the
shipped profiles differ in no NAME-bearing field", which is what makes the
synthetic test profile necessary, so the guard now asserts that directly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_013dgkSPjkLpACjMayd9R5jx
2026-07-31 17:27:48 +02:00
9dd86b1b18 feat(examples): ship the §11 golden fixtures with byte-exact conformance
TDD step 8: three golden cases per the §11 format (manifest.json,
fixture/, ingested-at.txt, expected-bundle/) — ingest-golden-file and
ingest-golden-sql are the conformance MUSTs; ingest-golden-http
documents and exercises the optional extension against mock payloads.
The conformance test re-materializes each case into a fresh directory
and compares byte for byte; offline and credential-free (the sql
fixture is a committed database file, http never opens a socket).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QeqhJpYQyghASjiJo5EhGg
2026-07-16 20:09:03 +02:00