The bundle-only gate returned UNMEASURED and exit 3 on the very arm it was
built for: no metric computable from a bundle alone reaches boundary recall.
`boundary_share` -- declared boundaries that became a concept, over declared
boundaries -- is the one metric measured that orders the arms correctly, and it
needs the publisher's own structure, so it arrives as an input.
Measurement first, threshold after, which is what the order asked for.
P1, the normalisation, derived rather than guessed: stripping all whitespace
and lowercasing reproduces the fasit's own `norm` from its own `title` on
2 761 of 2 761 rows (alphanumerics-only scores 58). P1's own bar is 99 % on the
known-good arm and the literal reading of it reaches 22 of 2 761 -- not because
the normalisation is wrong but because okf's default route moves the numbering
token a publisher glues into a heading over into the concept id. The pair form
(concept's own directory, residual title) reaches 2 737, either reaches 2 759
(99.9 %). Both forms ship and neither is a fallback: `r761-2025-d1` is the
control in the opposite direction at 2 727 literal, 0 paired.
P2, the single corpus, is in the OUTPUT and not only in the document: the bar
is declared `corpora = 1`, every boundary row prints `N = 1 corpus`, and the
line states that `--fasit` is the caller's ASSERTION that this bundle is a
build of the document the fasit describes -- the posture `okf consume --ref`
has. Measured: the K2 reference and `n100-2023` score 0 of 2 761 and read FAIL,
which is the assertion being wrong rather than the bundle being bad.
One bar, at the pinned artifact's own value, 2 759/2 761. It is tight and the
cost is published rather than tuned away: 2 of 4 R761 builds fall under it
(2 752 and 2 727), while any bar between 41.6 % and 98.8 % separates the
known-bad arm from every R761 build measured. The known-bad arm
(`860019-mdb-100`) is 1 148 of 2 761 -- FAIL and exit 1, where the bundle-only
gate gave exit 3.
A fasit is validated at the door: not a list, a row missing `title` or `norm`,
or anything that is not JSON exits 2 with the reason, never a quiet UNMEASURED.
A fasit under five rows is UNMEASURED -- the document floor in the fasit's own
unit.
Without `--fasit` the command is byte-for-byte what it was, held by a test.
`okf check` is untouched; no version bump and no tag. 17 tests red on
assertions before the implementation, the two new doc pins each driven red and
back. Suite 1 869 passed / 1 skipped / 1 870 collected (base 5e5d01c: 1 851).
docs/2026-09-12-g37-terskler.md SS 7 carries the premises re-measured, the
seven bundles, the interval any bar could sit in, and the honesty limits --
including the correction of SS 2's own grep claim, which went false in the
commit that wrote it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
G37. `okf check` is a CONTRACT check and a green one is not a quality gate:
measured 2026-09-10 by `vegnormal-okf`, three arms over one corpus all
returned 0 findings and exit 0 while their hit@k ranged from 6 of 6 to 0 of 6.
`okf quality <bundle>` asks the other question, per file type, with the
denominator on every line. A separate command rather than `okf check
--quality`, because the two answer different questions and a caller must not
be able to read one as the other. `okf check` is untouched.
Three verdicts and no fourth -- PASS, FAIL, UNMEASURED -- and a type with no
measured threshold is never PASS. Exit 0 judged and clean, 1 at least one
FAIL, 2 did not run, 3 nothing could be judged: exit 0 over a table of
unmeasured rows would be the silent pass this command exists to stop.
Two bars today, both `structure_null_share` (documents of a type yielding
exactly one concept), read off the pinned 43-document reference bundle: .pdf
8/32, .docx 2/5. Plus one definitional bar for every type, taken from the
harness's own degenerate-merge definition: 0 concepts with an empty body,
measured 0 of 8 602 concepts over four bundles. A bar needs five documents on
BOTH sides -- its own and the judged bundle's -- so .xlsx (2), .xml (1) and
every type with no corpus class in `extract._EVIDENCE` are UNMEASURED and
print their numbers without a verdict.
The floor on the judged bundle was found by RUNNING the gate, not by reading
it: one PDF cut into 2 182 concepts scored 0 of 1 against the 32-document
reference and read as PASS.
The gate walks the index tree and never a directory (SS 9.2; controlled
against the listing on four bundles, 453 / 2 761 / 3 206 / 446 either way),
and prints the bundle's own run log beside its counts -- a document rejected
at extraction leaves no row in the bundle, so the pinned corpus's 33 PDFs
show up as 32 and the two denominators must never be read as one.
Three of the order's five premises moved when re-measured, and they are in the
document rather than glossed: the four evidence corpora carry `source_file` on
0 of 446, 0 of 1 133, 0 of 270 and 0 of 2 756 concepts, so they name no file
type and cannot PASS; "41,6 %" is `vegnormal-okf`'s number and not in this
repository; and the same 828-document bundle carries two published hit@k
figures from two question sets.
Three candidate metrics measured and NOT shipped: duplicate titles within a
document (0 of 3 206 on the known-bad arm against 349 of 2 761 on the
known-good one) and short concepts (5.6 % against 14.6 %) order the two arms
the wrong way round; duplicate titles across the whole bundle order all four
correctly (37.8 / 16.3 / 12.6 / 5.7 %) and still ship without a bar, because
any bar separating them is read off the two bundles it would judge.
19 new tests, each rule exercised in both directions; the three README pins
were each driven red before being kept. Suite 1 850 passed, 1 skipped, 1 851
collected, run after `git add` -- +19 against a base of 1 832 collected,
measured on the stashed tree (STATE's 1 831 is one short of that).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`### Binary extraction` carried its own six-row Format/Reader/Evidence table
over the same rows the pinned table now holds. It was true when written and
reachable by exactly the failure this module exists for: three evidence classes
copied into prose no test reads. That section now points at the pinned table
and keeps its prose about the extra.
A fifth assertion in `tests/test_docs_promises.py` holds the duplicate gone.
Known-positive: the same query finds 8 table lines in that section on the
previous commit, so it can go red.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The extractor registry reads 13 extensions. The README's opening line named
five of them, and the full list existed only in a hidden
`<!-- extract-formats: ... -->` comment, which no reader reads -- so the README
undersold what the code does and stated no evidence class anywhere a consumer
would look.
A `## Supported file types` table now carries one row per extension: reader,
dependency (core or the `[extract]` extra), the evidence class `_EVIDENCE`
records for the row, and one honest note. The three `constructed` office rows
carry their denominators (N = 1, N = 2, N = 1) in the table itself, so a row
that has met no document anyone wrote cannot read as a supported one; `.htm`
does not borrow `.html`'s 828-file class, because the code records none for it.
A `Not read today` section states the absences (`.doc`, `.epub`, `.eml`/`.msg`,
image files, source files, `.one`/`.vsd`) as facts, not as a queue.
Test first, red before the table existed: four assertions in
`tests/test_docs_promises.py` pin the table's row set to
`_CORE_EXTRACTORS | _OPTIONAL_EXTRACTORS`, each evidence cell to `_EVIDENCE`
(and to a fixed `stdlib, no corpus class` where the code records none), the
core/extra split to the registries, and the opening to the table.
No change to `extract.py` and no version bump: nothing about what is read
moved, only what the README says about it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Round 9: the four rests in STATE's NESTE that needed no operator decision.
CLAUSE 1 CLASSIFIED BY THE NUMBER, NOT THE TITLE. `_TRAILING_PAGE_NUMBER`
admitted a candidate into a contents run by asking whether the title ended in
an integer -- a question about the number. A drawing's dimension chain, a
schematic's labels, a door schedule, a coordinate column and a soil-layer
table all end in integers and name nothing. Measured over the 43-document
corpus: 68 candidates discarded over 11 of 39 readable documents, of which
19 over 5 documents are data rows.
That corrects round 8's own decomposition. Its "four misclassified numeric
tables and seven real contents listings" needs each document on one side, and
two of the eleven are both. Read across all 68 titles rather than the
three-title sample: 5 documents carry a data row, 8 carry a real entry.
`--contents-name` requires a NAME to survive stripping the page number. The
threshold is SWEPT, not chosen, and collapses at both ends: at an alphabetic
run of 1 a door schedule keeps a stray `V` and 13 of 19 are rescued; at 3 the
two-letter section name `VA` stops being a name, falls out of run membership,
and takes `RIB`, `MMI` and `Tittelfelt` below `CONTENTS_RUN` with it -- one
acronym costing four REAL entries. At 2: 16 of 19 rescued, 0 of 49 regressed.
The three not rescued carry a real word and are named rather than rounded off.
THE CONVERTER'S ANCHOR WAS IN THE CONCEPT ID. Pandoc writes a sheet as
`## <name> {#sheet-N}` and a titled slide as `## <title> {#slide-N}`. Because
a filename is reduced FROM the title, the anchor reached both. Operator
authorised the strip 2026-09-09 after the exposure was counted: 2 of 810
concepts on the previous default bundle, 2 of 1108 on Arm B, 1 of 26 on the
operator's folder. Two ids renamed, one of which `portfolio-optimiser` has
cited in writing; both are in the report so that message can be sent.
One rule in one function, read by BOTH title-forming sites -- a rule in only
one would leave the id and the title naming the same concept differently. The
known-negative is the point: `Mal for {kundenavn}` is a title an author wrote.
odt/rtf/pptx MEASURED END TO END FOR THE FIRST TIME, on hand-built documents,
because the corpus denominator is genuinely zero (86 files: 66 pdf, 10 docx,
4 xlsx, 2 zip, 2 smc, 2 doc). `_EVIDENCE` gains a third class rather than
stretching an existing one: `constructed` means the row has met a document,
but not one anyone wrote for their own purposes. odt 1 of 1 declared headings;
pptx 2 of 2 on a deck that declares slide titles and 0 of 2 on one that does
not -- round 7's reading of pptx was a fixture property, not the format; rtf
0 segments, because the container has no heading style and the author's title
is bold text. rtf is the one open finding.
ACCEPTANCE, all four. The 12-position reference is label-identical in BOTH
readings (pdf 7/8, docx 3/3, xlsx 0/1 or 1/1, sheet 10/12 or 11/12). One K2
bundle carrying both changes: 453 concepts / 865 md, hit@8 [1,1,1,1,1,None]
on it AND on Arm B, with the known-negative still reproducing on the new
bytes. `okf project` byte-equal to `okf build`, `diff -r` empty. Consumer
cost is a re-run: 436/832 -> 453/865, digest 21af4a1aa98315cf.
Three published numbers corrected: README's 596 tests (1515), README's "15
concepts out" for `okf project` (that was the O6 defect; it is 26), and O6's
print-mode method, which does not reproduce without --allowedTools.
Report: docs/2026-09-09-k3-runde9-restene.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Door B listed `inbox.iterdir()` and kept only top-level files. A file in a
subdirectory was neither ingested nor refused: it appeared in none of the
result's buckets, so a nested drop produced a bundle that was silently short
of what was dropped and no count said so. That broke the K1b identity for any
inbox with folders in it. Operator decision 2026-09-06.
- `walk_inbox` is the ONE walk rule, shared with `tools/okf_corpus_run.py`:
the denominator N is now counted over exactly the set of files the door
ingests, rather than over a second listing that happened to agree.
- Sorted on the whole relative path, not the basename, so the order is a
function of the tree; that is what keeps rebuild-from-scratch byte-equal to
an incremental update.
- A concept's `source_file` is the path relative to the inbox root,
`/`-separated. The concept NAME still comes from the basename, so two
folders holding one basename hit the existing §3 collision refusal instead
of one silently claiming the other's concept.
- Dot-directories and a bundle directory inside the inbox are skipped with a
CODE, in a new `InboxResult.skipped`. Recursion makes the door's own output
reachable as its own input; a silent skip would be the same
absence-without-a-denominator defect one level down.
- `--path-prefix` reduces per component and rejoins with `/`, so the caller
driving a nested corpus can carry the relative directory. Reducing the whole
string folded the separator into a `-` and flattened `sub/sub2`.
`tests/test_inbox_flow.py::test_subdirectories_are_not_walked` asserted the
opposite and is superseded in place, with the reason written down.
Measured on the K2 corpus (flat, N=43): 39/43 merged, 4 coded, K1b holds. The
bundle digest is
`1472e98aec8643c5beee540f4c42b5e437bd26e7c61d69a91bcff799f06a6d13` over 1108
files -- byte-identical to a run of the same corpus at 190086f WITHOUT this
change (`diff -r` exit 0), so recursion costs a flat inbox nothing. It differs
from the stored 2026-09-03 artifact by one line in `index.md`
(`- [Corpus run history](log.md)`), which 95eb271 added 15 hours after that
bundle was built.
Suite 1113 passed, `ruff` clean, `mypy --strict src/ tools/` clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The README told consumers that `docx` and `xlsx` ship no parser and always fail
fast. True when written; false the moment the converter seam landed -- and
false SILENTLY, because prose has no test. This repository has been bitten by
that exact shape before: a published guarantee is a test obligation.
So the correction comes with `tests/test_docs_promises.py`, which compares the
README's declared format list against the registries it describes and fails on
a format added without touching the README, on the old claim reappearing in any
wording, on an unmeasured row going unnamed, and on the exclusions being
dropped. Negative control: removing one format from the README's marker turns
it red.
The README now states which rows are measured and which are not. Three of the
five office rows have denominator ZERO in the corpus -- they work by
construction and have never met a document anyone wrote. They are not known to
be broken and not known to be right, and a reader should not have to open the
source to learn which.
The CHANGELOG's shipped entry is left as written, because a changelog records
what a release did; the correction is stated at that line instead so a reader
arriving there is not misled.
Suite 913 -> 917.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
