The `if False:` in this diff is a mutation DEFINITION -- a string in
`MUTANTS`, applied only to a throwaway copy of the tree inside the
harness and restored in a `finally`. No branch in this repository is
pinned by it.
The harness found this round's own change: its first run after H1 gave
`killed 34 of 35` and `ERROR: M21 ... pattern occurs 0 times -- NOT
MEASURED`, because H1 rewrote the `clean` property M21 mutates. M21 is
repaired against the new text, and X3 -- "a document refused whole is
clean again" -- is added beside it, because M21 now removes
`unverified`, `invalid` AND `refused` at once and would be killed by
any one of the three. Final run: killed 36 of 36, 0 survived, 0
errors, exit 0.
The round's report is
`docs/2026-09-19-regnskapsgaten-rest-og-normaliseringsdoren.md`, with
the gate's whole output, the exposure census behind the normalisation
door and the limits of the round.
CHANGELOG: this round's entries are folded into the UNTAGGED `[0.10.1]`
section, whose date moves to 2026-09-19, rather than into a new version
number. `v0.10.1` is not tagged and the packaging gate requires the
head to equal the packaged version; which version this ships as is the
operator's and is asked in the closing block.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Round 3 of the 0.10.1 review, and the finding is the pattern the three rounds
share: each bound an OUTPUT, and the bomb stepped one link along. The
declared size, then the first `FlateDecode`, then every `FlateDecode` -- and
then a link this package had documented as safe.
`ASCII85Decode` was classed as bounded "by its own input because it shrinks".
It quadruples: `z` is the shorthand for four zero bytes. And the output was
never the cost -- `base64.a85decode` appends one 4-byte object per group to a
list, about a hundred bytes of memory per byte of INPUT (101.4x at 1 MiB,
96.1x at 4 MiB, 94.5x at 16 MiB on CPython 3.14).
Paired subprocesses, idle machine, both sides from PINNED trees, the document
built once by a third process and read from a file because `ru_maxrss` never
falls and `b"z" * 64 MiB` alone costs 171 MB:
[/Fl /A85] z x 32 Mi 33 475 B CARRIED 3 261 599 744 -> too_large 42 070 016
[/Fl /A85] z x 64 Mi 66 090 B CARRIED 6 461 558 784 -> too_large 40 280 064
[/A85] z x 8 Mi 8.4 MB CARRIED 933 085 184 -> too_large 62 484 480
[/Fl /A85 /Fl] z x 32 Mi 33 488 B samples_invalid 3 519 180 800 -> too_large 43 438 080
The picture was CARRIED in three of the four: not a bound that fired late, no
bound at all. Doubling the `z` run trebles the old cost and leaves the new one
where it was.
WHY THIS FORM. `assets.MAX_FILTER_DECODE_BYTES` (512 MiB) is what decoding ONE
link may cost -- a separate number from `MAX_IMAGE_BYTES`, because that one
bounds the picture and this one bounds producing it. `FlateDecode` is measured
as it is paid; every other permitted filter carries a MEASURED cost ratio
(`assets.PDF_FILTER_COST_RATIO`) checked against its input BEFORE its decoder
is called, since those decoders take a whole string and return a whole string.
A filter with no ratio is refused unread. The budget TRAVELS: a deflate link
is inflated under the smaller of the picture's bound and what the next link's
decoder may be handed, or `[/Fl /A85]` pays 256 MiB for a refusal.
A chunked ASCII85 decoder written here was the alternative and was FELLED: it
would bound `_check_stream_cost` and not the run, because `stream.get_data()`
decodes the whole chain again with pdfminer's own decoder, and it would make
this package rather than pdfminer the authority on an image's bytes. The cap
is the only number that bounds that. `resource.setrlimit(RLIMIT_AS)` was
MEASURED before anything was built on it, as the order required, and is not
usable: Darwin 26.6.2 raises `ValueError: current limit exceeds maximum limit`
and does not enforce it. No child-process cap exists.
THE CAP IS READ OFF THE CORPORA, the posture `MAX_IMAGE_PIXELS` has: over the
9 668 image objects of the 77 PDFs on this machine, 16 decode through an
ASCII85 link and the largest input to one is 450 739 bytes, against a cap of
about 5.0 MB.
A PROPERTY TEST REPLACES THE LIST OF KNOWN SHAPES: every chain of length 1-3
over the ten filters pdfminer decodes, 1 110 of 1 110, both payload fills,
each delivered under the bound or refused with a published code and never paid
for on the way (`tracemalloc`, which counts allocations and is not disturbed
by load). Known-positive beside it: 258 of 258 chains over the permitted
filters still carry a small image.
MAJOR -- the backstop had no test. `check_payload` at the end of
`_check_stream_cost` could be deleted with the whole suite green, because the
second one after `get_data()` gives the same code one step later. The two
differ in whether the payment was made, so the test asserts `get_data` was
never called.
10 OF 10 MUTANTS KILLED, control green, each killer named in the report. Four
survived a first pass and two tests exist because of it.
NOT ONE PICTURE CHANGES HANDS, MEASURED BY NAME: `_pdf_images` over every PDF
on this machine from both pinned trees -- 9 306 -> 9 306 carried over 77
files, 50 -> 50 on R761, 0 of 78 files moving a count and 0 moving a code.
R761 also settles a question raised while this order was open: 50 objects, 29
[/DCTDecode], 21 [/FlateDecode], 0 ASCII85 links -- so round 2's count of 580
`[/FlateDecode /ASCII85Decode]` objects is reproducible from nothing on this
machine. It changes no decision; a bomb shape does not need a corpus.
Version stays 0.10.1, no tag. README, CHANGELOG, CLAUDE.md and errors.py
corrected TO what the code does; the round-2 report carries a correction block
rather than a rewrite. Report:
docs/2026-09-18-utgangsbudsjett-per-ledd.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The two findings of the 18.09 PM checkpoint of `0f308c1`. Red tests landed
first in `3b587ea`; this is what turns them green.
BLOCKER -- `_check_inflated` read `filters[0]`, measured that one link and
returned, which is not a bound: a PDF decodes a stream through a LIST of
filters. Measured in paired subprocesses from two pinned trees, idle machine:
[/FlateDecode] 400 MB 408 516 B 59 232 256 -> 62 017 536 B
[/FlateDecode x2] 400 MB 1 636 B 886 554 624 -> 52 367 360 B
[/FlateDecode x3] 400 MB 1 070 B 889 393 152 -> 61 390 848 B
[/FlateDecode x2] 1,2 GB 2 927 B 2 567 204 864 -> 60 403 712 B
542 000x the file at two links, and the picture WAS refused at the end -- by
`check_payload` after `get_data()`, once the memory was spent. The single-link
row is the control and does not move. It also left the 16 corpus objects behind
an `[/ASCII85Decode /FlateDecode]` chain unmeasured, since `filters[0]` is not
`FlateDecode` there.
`_check_stream_cost` walks every link. THREE CLASSES and no fourth
(`extract.bounded_pdf_filters`, pinned by a test): `FlateDecode` MEASURED, a
link with another expanding link behind it inflated under the same bound and
handed on; `ASCII85Decode`/`ASCIIHexDecode` bounded by their own input because
they SHRINK; `DCTDecode`/`JPXDecode`/`JBIG2Decode` PASS THROUGH. Everything
else -- `LZWDecode`, `RunLengthDecode`, `CCITTFaxDecode`, `/Crypt`, anything
written later -- is refused UNREAD with a new code `asset_pdf_unbounded`,
decided before the FIRST link is decoded so a document cannot make the run pay
for the links in front of the one we cannot bound. An encrypted stream is
deciphered and then measured, where `stream.decipher is not None` used to
return unmeasured; 0 of 5 142 objects here are in an encrypted document, which
is why nothing caught it.
NOT ONE PICTURE CHANGES HANDS, AND IT IS MEASURED BY NAME. Every PDF on this
machine -- 78 documents, K2 in both trinn1 and trinn2, the shipped fixtures and
R761 -- run through `_pdf_images` page by page from both pinned trees:
images carried 9 356 -> 9 356
documents losing one 0 of 78
documents gaining one 0 of 78
asset_pdf_unsupported 322 -> 314
asset_pdf_unbounded 0 -> 8
The 8 are the 4 `CCITTFaxDecode` stencil masks (`/ImageMask true`,
`/BitsPerComponent 1`), counted twice because trinn1 and trinn2 hold the same
document. They were refused before and are refused now, one step earlier and
under a code that says why.
MAJOR -- `check_payload(len(data))` after `get_data()` is the counted refusal
four documentation surfaces point at, and deleting exactly that line passed all
2 132 tests. It is reachable through a stream pdfminer has ALREADY decoded
(`decode()` sets `rawdata` to `None`), which is now the ONLY case outside the
bound and has a test.
Eight mutations, one line each, every one DEAD, with the unmutated tree run
first as the control: first-link-only, loop dropped, inequality reversed,
encrypted skipped, backstop deleted, unknown filter passed through,
intermediate link not carried forward, whole check removed.
`tools/okf_accounting_gate.py` gains one line, the new code in
`REJECTION_CODES` -- what a rejection code requires and nothing more. Gate
unchanged: exit 1, GATE RED rows 2, 3, 6. Version stays 0.10.1, untagged.
Suite after `git add` against a clean tree: `uv run pytest -q` ->
2152 passed, 1 skipped (226 s). ruff, ruff format --check, mypy --strict clean.
Report: docs/2026-09-18-filterkjeden-og-backstoppen.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A second independent review read `230d1cb` -- the commit that closed the
`v0.10.0` review's two MAJOR findings -- and found one of them open. The
bound read `/Width` and `/Height`, which an untrusted document writes, while
`get_data()` pays for the stream beside them; `/Length` is the COMPRESSED
length and the two numbers are independent.
Re-measured here on `ed8d9d7` before anything changed, in its own
interpreter: a 408 516-byte PDF declaring 1x1 and carrying 400 MB of deflated
zeros was CARRIED, no rejection, 891 904 000 B peak RSS. After: 0 carried,
`asset_too_large`, 57 065 472 B. At 1,2 GB of zeros, 2 436 MB -> 64 569 344 B
-- the cost no longer scales with the bomb. End to end through the CLI with
the shipped defaults: 838 000 640 B and an asset written -> exit 0,
79 650 816 B, `0 carried of 1 found`, no `assets/`.
Three numbers are bounded now, not one: what a container DECLARES, what a
carried FILE measures (`read_image`, so a 49 MP PNG of 47 705 bytes is not
passed on to a consumer), and what a PDF stream DECOMPRESSES to
(`assets.inflated_size`, a chunk at a time, output discarded, before
`get_data()`). The limit is stated rather than implied: the stream
measurement runs where `FlateDecode` is the first filter and the document is
not encrypted; every other chain is a check on the decoded length AFTER the
decode, a counted refusal and not a bounded one.
A non-positive declared dimension is `asset_size_invalid`, its own code,
raised before the stream is read. `-1 x 40000000000` is a NEGATIVE pixel
count, under which every `>` bound read as satisfied, so the check returned
silently and the refusal arrived from `encode_png` as
`asset_samples_invalid`. Its own code because a publisher shipping a picture
bigger than this package carries and a dictionary written to be read wrong
are different facts about a document.
Two smaller findings in the line that says what is missing, both introduced
by the first fix: the address was written twice, once bare, and a linkifying
renderer autolinks a bare URL -- written once now, in one code span; and
`label` became a dead parameter, so the figure's caption was dropped, a
regression against 0.10.0. It is written again in the `-- <label>` form a
carried pointer uses.
Version bumped to 0.10.1 across all ten places. Nine were unbound and stale:
four README install lines naming the previous release, two prose lines, the
"current tag" entry, `uv.lock`, and a CHANGELOG whose 0.10.1 content sat
under `[Unreleased]`. Two new packaging tests bind them to `__version__`, and
the README's guard tag to `[tool.uv.sources]`.
Every test was red first. The fate of every image is identical with and
without the new bound on three K2 PDFs carrying 800 images (464/464, 311/311
with the same 12 rejections, 25/25), and the second inflate is below the
noise floor there. 0 shipped artifacts move: no bundle under `examples/`,
`skills/` or `tests/fixtures/` carries an image pointer at all, measured
against a known-positive control.
`asset_too_large` was undocumented in the error registry; both codes are
there now. `tools/okf_accounting_gate.py` gains the new code in its closed
list -- one string, no behaviour change, stated because that file belongs to
another order.
Suite 2141 passed / 1 skipped, ruff + format + mypy --strict clean.
Report: docs/2026-09-18-bildestien-holder-0-10-1.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Row 6 was GREEN with R761 100 % rejected: every element of a refused document
is booked as a coded rejection, so u = 0 and d = 0 and the bundle is empty.
`refused_whole` asks that question on its own now -- the build order asked for
an honest red there, and PM re-measured the green on 2026-09-18 with
`okf build` exiting 1 unseen.
A skipped row no longer leaves the verdict unqualified (`GATE GREEN (row 6 not
run: ...)`), and the exit code is non-zero locally when a corpus source is on
the machine and its row did not run. m-2.
N200 Vegbygging:2024 joins R761 as a second real corpus. R761 holds 0 `fig`,
0 formulas and 0 references, so the only real corpus could not have found the
hole in the STS role map; N200 carries 194 citations, 49 figures and 135
footnotes. A `.json` whose root holds an STS node tree is counted as STS
rather than as keys and leaves -- the container is not the content.
M-4: the review's 26 mutants, ported to the code as it stands, plus 8 for the
new checks. 34 of 34 killed. `tools/okf_gate_mutants.py` runs on a copy of the
tree, and a pattern that does not match is an ERROR and exit 2 -- a mutant
that could not be applied was never measured. That fired once, on M13, after a
refactor moved the line it edits.
m-3: `APPROVED_EXCEPTIONS` was read by no row, so approving one changed
nothing. Each pair is now checked against the witness's own vocabulary and the
run says why it moves no denominator. The gate also prints its OWN limits
beside the verdict, m-5 among them.
The product's accounting tests state the new truth instead of the old one:
`okf build --accounting` over the fixture corpus exits 1 with SIX unaccounted
elements in its own vocabulary -- its first real finding, reachable only now
that fixtures carry the constructs. Four shared element names disagree with
the witness, each pinned with its cause; one of the four is a double count
this package makes (a text box's paragraph, once inside the box and again in
the paragraph carrying it).
Three fixture defects were found and fixed while building them, each of which
would have reported a loss the build never had: a shared string table not
related to the workbook, a `graphicData` with no `uri`, and an odt
`styles.xml` without `<office:styles/>`.
Report: docs/2026-09-18-regnskapsgaten-herdet.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two MAJOR findings of the independent v0.10.0 review, both with the
shipped defaults, both new in 0.10.0. Repros rebuilt as tests first.
- A remote <img src>/xlink:href became a LIVE markdown image link in the
persisted concept, with the address and query string chosen by whoever
wrote the document. Extraction opens no socket; a consumer rendering
the bundle does. Now inert text with the address in a code span,
pinned by a property over the readers rather than by one string. The
tier asymmetry (user-upload refuses, trusted-source persisted) went to
the guard repo with the repro.
- Nothing bounded a declared image size: 9.6 KB of PDF declaring
3000x3000 grayscale zeros took 83 MB peak RSS, linear in pixels.
MAX_IMAGE_PIXELS (40 000 000) and MAX_IMAGE_BYTES (256 MiB) are read
off the corpora (largest measured 18.6 MP on K2, 1.4 MP on R761) and
checked on what the container declares, before any decompression;
over them is asset_too_large, counted. The same bound closes the
inline data: URI, which the review flagged and did not measure.
Also fixed, added by PM to this order: an inline PDF image was named
from id() of a Python object, so two concept files of the reference
corpus differed between builds. It is now named from its position.
R761 unchanged: 50 carried of 50 found, assets diff -rq clean.
Report: docs/2026-09-17-bildestien-0-10-1.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
okf build --accounting PATH inventories every source document before
extraction, in the gate's per-format vocabulary, and after the run gives
each element one fate (carried / pointer / coded rejection), written as
JSON and summarised in log.md. "carried" is checked against the written
concept bodies, so a gate that drops a line is found (test). Exit 1 on
anything unaccounted or double-booked. Opt-in: +744 s (+19 %) on the
43-document reference corpus, and that corpus fails the check on 24 real
losses (22 images on text-less PDF pages, 2 docx Title paragraphs).
Changed without the flag:
- okf build exits 1 when it extracted documents and persisted none.
Door B and corpus.measure are unchanged. One test relied on exit 0.
- An image file carried through a persisted document is its own K1b
column, no longer also extractor_unknown. The set is what the resolver
actually carried (ExtractedDocument.files), never a byte match.
tools/okf_accounting_gate.py (checks untouched) is green on all six rows,
R761 110 of 110 under both gates.
Report: docs/2026-09-17-innholdsregnskapet-bygget.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Capability loop step 3, no capability. tools/okf_accounting_gate.py asks,
per README file type, how many of the elements a SOURCE holds okf build
books as carried / pointer / coded rejection, with unaccounted and
double-booked both required to be 0. Exit 1 today on rows 2, 3, 4 and 6.
The fasit is tools/okf_witness.py (stdlib + pdfplumber + poppler, no
package import; tested on the live import graph), committed as
tests/fixtures/accounting/*inventory.json over one fixture per type.
Measured: no source inventory (0 of 13); two graphics/ files carried
through documents AND counted extractor_unknown (50 on R761 under
--gate none); a refused document logged "0 carried of 0 found"; R761
refused whole because guard 1.4.0 treats its 71 U+00AD soft hyphens as an
invisible carrier (asked of the security repo). The two R761 witnesses
agree once STS labels are counted by role, not tag.
Report: docs/2026-09-17-innholdsregnskapet-rod-gate.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Until now no reader in this package fetched, named, described or copied a
single image. `<img>`'s attributes were never read, a NISO-STS `<graphic>`
was walked past, a PDF was opened for its text alone, the converter's
markdown writer dropped every picture, and the only writer into a bundle
took `content: str`. The two lossiness warnings said so on every run, which
made the loss honest and did not make it smaller.
Measured on R761 Prosesskoden:2025, published as a 701-page PDF and as a
NISO-STS delivery: the process text is carried in full while 12 `Tabell N-N`
and 9 `Figur N-N` captions stand over nothing, because that publisher ships
those tables as raster pictures in both. Process 84's "toleranseklasse ...
er gitt i tabell 84-2" points at empty space.
THE GATE WAS WRITTEN FIRST AND RED. `tests/test_asset_gate.py` reads its
denominator out of the source (`page.images`, `word/media/`, `ppt/media/`,
`<img`, `<graphic`), never from a constant here. Measured at 332961a, built
from `git archive` and not from the editable tree: carried 0 of 8 local
images across 5 documents (9 declared), and no `assets/` at all. After: 8 of
8, with the ninth a remote source carried as a pointer without a file.
FIVE READERS PLACE, ONE MODULE DECIDES. `assets.py` owns what an image is
(sniffed from the bytes, never from the claimed extension), what it is
called (`<sha256[:12]>-<the source's own basename>`) and how it is pointed
at (one two-line block, one regex). `.xlsx` is deliberately not a row: a
block inside its pipe tables would break the `source_rows` locator, and 0 of
4 K2 workbooks hold media.
A PDF stream that is already a file is carried VERBATIM (29 of R761's 50
objects are DCTDecode); raw samples are encoded to PNG with stdlib zlib, so
no new dependency. Rendering the page region was the alternative and was
felled on determinism: a rasterised crop's bytes, and therefore the asset's
content-addressed name and the bundle's digest, would depend on the
installed rasteriser. What the encoder cannot express exactly is refused
with a code and counted, never approximated.
NO SIZE FLOOR, and that is a measurement: over the 4 828 image objects of
the K2 corpus the size distribution is a broad spread with no gap, unlike
OCR_CID_SHARE's bimodal one, so a threshold would be a number we chose.
ON BY DEFAULT, AND THE CONTROL IS TWO WHOLE BUILDS. The 43-document
reference corpus at 332961a versus rebuilt at HEAD with `--no-assets`:
865 files on both sides, `diff -rq` reports ONE difference, the added
`Images: NOT CARRIED` line in log.md. Every concept byte-identical.
Against the default: 453 -> 454 concepts, 865 -> 867 md, 0 -> 2 964 assets
(2 964 carried of 3 145 found, 4 622 pointers), 4.7 MB -> 115 MB, 2 414 s ->
3 088 s, peak RSS 6.26 -> 8.74 GB, 422 of 865 md files differ. The one new
concept has a measured cause: the pointers are body text, so a section
holding 146 of that document's images grew from 19.0 % to 30.6 % of the
extracted text and crossed `--outline-gate`'s 0.20 share clause.
THE IMAGE BYTES ARE NOT SCREENED. The guard is text-only, the pointer block
passes the gate as body text, the picture beside it passes nothing, and
log.md says so on every run.
Also fixed, both found by measuring rather than by reading:
- a markdown image is no longer read as a cross-reference. `structure._LINK`
never looked at the character in front of the bracket, so every pointer
would have arrived in the index as an edge to a concept that cannot exist.
- Door C carries the assets its merged concepts point at. Before this,
importing a bundle built with `--assets` merged 6 of 6 concepts and wrote
no `assets/` at all, so every pointer named a missing file.
Report: docs/2026-09-17-bilder-i-bundlen-trinn1.md
Spec proposal: docs/plan/okf-assets-section-6-4.md
Suite 1 955 passed / 1 skipped (from 1 896), ruff and mypy --strict clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two defects reported from outside by claude-code-llm-wiki (order
20260915T202332Z-228694739), both reproduced against this tree before
anything moved.
F1 -- the packaged CLI never ran the guard. corpus.measure wired an
unconditional approve-everything stub into process_inbox and 0 of 90
add_argument calls named a gate, so the one path most people use screened
nothing while pyproject.toml made the guard a mandatory runtime dependency
and the README recommended a composition the command line could not reach.
--gate takes guard-trusted-source (default), guard-user-upload or none.
corpus.resolve_gate is the one name->callable map, with the guard imported
lazily so importing the package still does not pull it in; an unknown name
RAISES rather than falling back, because a fallback reproduces the defect
with an extra step. The gate's NAME goes into the section 9 log.md -- a
stub is only dangerous when nothing downstream can see it -- and --gate
none renders NOTHING WAS SCREENED.
The default was chosen on a measurement: over the 453 concept bodies of
the pinned reference bundle, PRESET_TRUSTED_SOURCE persists 453 of 453 and
PRESET_USER_UPLOAD holds 1, costing that concept's whole source document.
Neither tier waves anything through -- an invisible carrier and a CRITICAL
finding fail secure at both. Door B's library default is UNCHANGED at
PRESET_USER_UPLOAD: an inbox drop is an untrusted upload, an operator
pointing this command at their own folder is not. The second tier ships as
guard_adapter.inbox_gate_trusted_source, the three-line adapter that
module's docstring already described, never a preset parameter.
process_inbox(segmentations=..., gate=inbox_gate) now has a test. Before
this, `grep -rl inbox_gate tests/` gave 1 file with 0 occurrences of
`segment` -- the recommended composition was untested, which is how the
defect survived.
F2 -- a fenced code block declared structure. `# Use the opus[1m] alias`
inside a ```bash fence became a level-1 ATX heading: the document was
refused entirely where the line carried [ or ] (5 of 191 pages of the
reporter's corpus), and the concept TITLE came from somebody's shell session
on 62 of 191 (32.5 %). The fix is in the proposer and never in Door B's
title rule -- that rule is right, and a heading that was never a heading is
what has to stop being proposed. propose.fenced_lines is computed once per
text and no rule reads a fenced line, including Arm D's outline RUN, which
selects from the whole line list. Backtick and tilde fences, three leading
spaces, a closing fence at least as long as its opener, and no backtick in a
backtick fence's info string -- that last one keeps a line holding only
`okf build` from silencing a document.
MEASURED ON THE BYTES, and this is the number that decides: the 43-document
reference corpus built at b6da09c (from git archive, never the editable
tree) and rebuilt at the shipped defaults differ in log.md alone, by the one
added bullet. 865 concept files on both sides, every concept byte-identical.
Found by that control and NOT caused by this work: the pinned artifact
K2-bundle-default-20260912 was written 2026-09-09, two days before ed0418f
changed title: quoting, so it differs from what HEAD produces on 42 concept
files. test_default_bundle_pin stays green because it pins the count and the
hit@8 ranks, not the bytes. Re-pinning is the operator's call.
Suite 1896 passed / 1 skipped (+27 from 1869). ruff, ruff format and mypy
--strict clean. No version bump, no tag, no push.
Report: docs/2026-09-15-f1-f2-gaten-og-kodefencen.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The bundle-only gate returned UNMEASURED and exit 3 on the very arm it was
built for: no metric computable from a bundle alone reaches boundary recall.
`boundary_share` -- declared boundaries that became a concept, over declared
boundaries -- is the one metric measured that orders the arms correctly, and it
needs the publisher's own structure, so it arrives as an input.
Measurement first, threshold after, which is what the order asked for.
P1, the normalisation, derived rather than guessed: stripping all whitespace
and lowercasing reproduces the fasit's own `norm` from its own `title` on
2 761 of 2 761 rows (alphanumerics-only scores 58). P1's own bar is 99 % on the
known-good arm and the literal reading of it reaches 22 of 2 761 -- not because
the normalisation is wrong but because okf's default route moves the numbering
token a publisher glues into a heading over into the concept id. The pair form
(concept's own directory, residual title) reaches 2 737, either reaches 2 759
(99.9 %). Both forms ship and neither is a fallback: `r761-2025-d1` is the
control in the opposite direction at 2 727 literal, 0 paired.
P2, the single corpus, is in the OUTPUT and not only in the document: the bar
is declared `corpora = 1`, every boundary row prints `N = 1 corpus`, and the
line states that `--fasit` is the caller's ASSERTION that this bundle is a
build of the document the fasit describes -- the posture `okf consume --ref`
has. Measured: the K2 reference and `n100-2023` score 0 of 2 761 and read FAIL,
which is the assertion being wrong rather than the bundle being bad.
One bar, at the pinned artifact's own value, 2 759/2 761. It is tight and the
cost is published rather than tuned away: 2 of 4 R761 builds fall under it
(2 752 and 2 727), while any bar between 41.6 % and 98.8 % separates the
known-bad arm from every R761 build measured. The known-bad arm
(`860019-mdb-100`) is 1 148 of 2 761 -- FAIL and exit 1, where the bundle-only
gate gave exit 3.
A fasit is validated at the door: not a list, a row missing `title` or `norm`,
or anything that is not JSON exits 2 with the reason, never a quiet UNMEASURED.
A fasit under five rows is UNMEASURED -- the document floor in the fasit's own
unit.
Without `--fasit` the command is byte-for-byte what it was, held by a test.
`okf check` is untouched; no version bump and no tag. 17 tests red on
assertions before the implementation, the two new doc pins each driven red and
back. Suite 1 869 passed / 1 skipped / 1 870 collected (base 5e5d01c: 1 851).
docs/2026-09-12-g37-terskler.md SS 7 carries the premises re-measured, the
seven bundles, the interval any bar could sit in, and the honesty limits --
including the correction of SS 2's own grep claim, which went false in the
commit that wrote it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
G37. `okf check` is a CONTRACT check and a green one is not a quality gate:
measured 2026-09-10 by `vegnormal-okf`, three arms over one corpus all
returned 0 findings and exit 0 while their hit@k ranged from 6 of 6 to 0 of 6.
`okf quality <bundle>` asks the other question, per file type, with the
denominator on every line. A separate command rather than `okf check
--quality`, because the two answer different questions and a caller must not
be able to read one as the other. `okf check` is untouched.
Three verdicts and no fourth -- PASS, FAIL, UNMEASURED -- and a type with no
measured threshold is never PASS. Exit 0 judged and clean, 1 at least one
FAIL, 2 did not run, 3 nothing could be judged: exit 0 over a table of
unmeasured rows would be the silent pass this command exists to stop.
Two bars today, both `structure_null_share` (documents of a type yielding
exactly one concept), read off the pinned 43-document reference bundle: .pdf
8/32, .docx 2/5. Plus one definitional bar for every type, taken from the
harness's own degenerate-merge definition: 0 concepts with an empty body,
measured 0 of 8 602 concepts over four bundles. A bar needs five documents on
BOTH sides -- its own and the judged bundle's -- so .xlsx (2), .xml (1) and
every type with no corpus class in `extract._EVIDENCE` are UNMEASURED and
print their numbers without a verdict.
The floor on the judged bundle was found by RUNNING the gate, not by reading
it: one PDF cut into 2 182 concepts scored 0 of 1 against the 32-document
reference and read as PASS.
The gate walks the index tree and never a directory (SS 9.2; controlled
against the listing on four bundles, 453 / 2 761 / 3 206 / 446 either way),
and prints the bundle's own run log beside its counts -- a document rejected
at extraction leaves no row in the bundle, so the pinned corpus's 33 PDFs
show up as 32 and the two denominators must never be read as one.
Three of the order's five premises moved when re-measured, and they are in the
document rather than glossed: the four evidence corpora carry `source_file` on
0 of 446, 0 of 1 133, 0 of 270 and 0 of 2 756 concepts, so they name no file
type and cannot PASS; "41,6 %" is `vegnormal-okf`'s number and not in this
repository; and the same 828-document bundle carries two published hit@k
figures from two question sets.
Three candidate metrics measured and NOT shipped: duplicate titles within a
document (0 of 3 206 on the known-bad arm against 349 of 2 761 on the
known-good one) and short concepts (5.6 % against 14.6 %) order the two arms
the wrong way round; duplicate titles across the whole bundle order all four
correctly (37.8 / 16.3 / 12.6 / 5.7 %) and still ship without a bar, because
any bar separating them is read off the two bundles it would judge.
19 new tests, each rule exercised in both directions; the three README pins
were each driven red before being kept. Suite 1 850 passed, 1 skipped, 1 851
collected, run after `git add` -- +19 against a base of 1 832 collected,
measured on the stashed tree (STATE's 1 831 is one short of that).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The release report in R6's form: premises re-measured, the one-line lockfile
diff, the README lines the tag would have made false, the gates, and the
acceptance gate run from a local `git archive v0.8.5` export.
Two bookkeeping figures in K3-25's report corrected after re-measuring: the
tests/ call denominator was 129 occurrences on 128 lines (not 112 across 13),
and the outside-tests figure was 19 on 17 lines in 5 files (not 129, which was
the tests/ number written into the wrong paragraph). The "exactly 1 changed
result" finding is unaffected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
What the default was and is, the three signatures, the naming choice against
the module's other eight constants, the CLI-flag decision with its zero, both
gates with this round's numbers beside round 23's, the consumer list with its
denominator, and the honesty limits.
The deviation is stated first and it is the order's own acceptance row: `S1
spent 28 020 B at the default k` is round 23's X column -- the flagged bundle
with the line SCORED -- and the new default is round 23's Y, whose published
value for that cell is 31 031. Measured here in one process on one bundle:
`link_in_signal=True` gives 28 020 and the default gives 31 031, the unflagged
build gives 31 031 too. 16 of 16 cells of the Y column reproduce to the byte,
so neither failure the stop-rule guards against is present; the row was
transcribed from the column being retired.
Also corrects one label in round 23's own file, which is otherwise untouched
because a report is a measurement with a date. The row reading "distinct tokens
the path ever contributed" carried 31/22/8, which is the QUESTION-token count:
the path's segments are `r761` and `prosesskoden`, and `prosess` is a question
token that reaches the second through the stem prefix rule -- measured,
`consume.tokens_match('prosess', 'prosesskoden')` is True at
`MIN_SHARED_PREFIX = 4`. The label is what was wrong, and correcting it is what
makes the table agree with the paragraph under it, which already explains
`prosess` that way. The numbers stand, and no CHANGELOG figure is touched.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The measurement round 21 deferred. On R761, of the 39 newly delivered concepts
the door's link line ever added a question token to, 39 gained it from the
bundle-absolute PATH and 0 from the link's title; every token it ever
contributed is a segment of the document's own directory. So the cost is not
the link, it is the path inside it -- and only that statement points at a fix.
Rank movement and budget displacement are separated on one bundle by three
readings plus a scratch-only fourth: X vs Y is ranking, X vs W is bytes, and
Y equals Z on 16 of 16 rows, which is what makes the separation measured
rather than assumed. hit@1/8/50 stays 6/6 and the known-positive at rank 1
under every reading.
`--shell-parent` stays off at the current link form: two of three acceptance
conditions fail. The third exit is measured with the same numbers and
recommended -- reading the body without the line moves nothing on the 5 of 5
bundles anyone ships, and would make the flag free.
The link cost is 71 616 B / 4.45 %, not round 21's 72 265 B / 4.49 %; the rule
behind the number is stated, and round 21's file is left standing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`_render_sources` gave three measured reasons for refusing to emit the block
form. Two of them fell with `28f9a4b` and are struck rather than left
standing: a block list no longer round-trips to an empty value (4 609 of
4 609 concept files), and B6's acceptance test can now pass.
Reason 2 STANDS and now carries the emission rule alone, re-measured by
reading `portfolio-optimiser` at `6eb58e5`: `read_provenance` returns
`UnreadableProvenance(reason="block-sequence")` for a block value. It is not
the guard's objection -- guard 1.4.0 reads the block form on 4 609 of 4 609
of the same files -- so the answer to "should our own emitter write block" is
NO, with the number that carries it, and the measurement that would make it
decidable is named in STATE rather than deferred without one.
The README paragraph said this library "cannot read the block form" where one
reader could and one could not. It now separates the two by KEY: `sources` in
either form through every reader, every other block mapping still refused,
with the D1b pointer intact.
Report: 222 lines, S7 form. Five deviations first, including the acceptance
sentence naming THREE flat readers rather than one, a `title` denominator of
7 372 rather than 5 372, and the `okf check` rule answered NO with a
measurement (`contract_check` holds 0 occurrences of `sources`, and
`consume` already writes `sources_unreadable` for the state a rule would
restate; `len(RULES)` is 17). Honesty limits name the one-key-wide set, the
block `verified:` fixture still reading empty, and the rendering not being
byte-identical to the source.
Suite 1807 passed / 1 skipped, rc 0, 98 s.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The release report for v0.8.4 (69dc51f): the lockfile moved four lines,
not three (the guard's own version follows the pin); the dependency floor
measured against guards 1.2.0 / 1.3.0 / 1.4.0 and left standing; the
acceptance rows re-measured from a local export of the tag, including
guard 1.4.0 refusing 0 of 28 frontmatter blocks where 1.3.0 refuses 26.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The record for K3-21 A-D: what an excerpt, a heading-only body, the checker
and the index now carry, and every gate with its denominator -- the pinned K2
bundle (7 passed in each export), 32 regression payloads, R761 with and
without `--shell-parent` (hit@1/8/50 6/6 at both k, the known-positive at
rank 1, 675 of 710 shells with exactly one link and 0 broken, 710 of 710
pointing at the source's own ancestor after D), consumption 6 of 6 in both
forms, the byte cost against the consumer's 51.0 %, the ranking cost the
link's path carries, and the 35 shells with no ancestor holding text, listed.
Deviations from the order stated first; honesty limits last.
CHANGELOG under Unreleased; README and CLAUDE.md say 710 of 710, 17 rules,
and that the outline mark keeps its depth. The README's project measurement
was re-run (26 concepts, 0 checkout paths, `okf check` 17 rules, 0 findings).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3-21 B. The second form of `parent`: `okf consume --follow-parent`
(`consume.attach_parent_text`) puts the enclosing concept's text inside an
excerpt's `parent`, with that concept's own `sha256` so a claim resting on it
is cited as that concept. It runs AFTER the cut, on the room the cut left, in
rank order, so the delivered set, its order, the withheld list and the
denominators are the same with the flag as without it -- inherited text
cannot displace an excerpt, the mechanism a consumer measured when copied-in
ancestor text pushed the right section to withheld place 504 and 1 069. A
text that does not fit is cut to the longest prefix that does and marked
`truncated`; a parent the payload already holds, or one a higher-ranked
excerpt already carried, travels once. OFF; the defaults are chosen on the
measurement that follows this commit.
`delivered_text` is the one normalisation an excerpt's `text` and a parent's
share. Contract SS 8 point 6 gains the MAY; the template tells the reader
what `text`, `sha256` and `truncated` mean. README and CLAUDE.md name the
flag.
Moved on purpose: the SS 7.4 known-positive again (14 455 / 14 083 / 372 ->
14 721 / 14 346 / 375), and `skills/okf-consume/` regenerated with it.
`tests/test_parent_text.py::test_no_room_means_no_text_and_no_lost_excerpt`
changed from its red form: it asked through `build_payload` at `limit ==
spent`, where the knapsack's 500 B buckets admit nothing at all
(`budget_admits_nothing`); it now holds the rule at `attach_parent_text`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3-21 A. `okf consume` resolves a concept's `parent:` pointer -- a
`segment_id`, unique only inside one document's plan -- among the concepts
sharing its `source_file` (`consume.link_parents`, one pass, no file opened
again) and an excerpt carries `parent: { concept_id, title }`. Conditional
like `req_number`: a concept with no `parent` key moves no byte. A pointer
that lands nowhere is named `parent_unresolved: true`, never dropped.
The door writes ONE line into a heading-only body whose entry has a parent:
`Enclosing section: [<title>](/<bundle-relative path>)` (SPEC SS 5.1 lineage
through links, SS 6.1 the recommended absolute form and the kind in the
prose). Only such a body, so the segmented goldens' declared parents -- bodies
holding text -- are untouched. Appended AFTER structure derivation and
screened on its own (`_screened`, the `description` rule): read as body text
the link was derived into a second, unresolved `references` edge, measured on
the fixture. `segmentation.heading_only` is the one predicate the proposer and
the door share.
`okf check` gains its seventeenth rule, `parent_unfollowable`: a `parent`
that is not a concept_id and title, names its own excerpt, or names a concept
in neither `excerpts` nor `withheld` (together every considered concept).
Contract SS 8 point 6 added, the figure carries `parent`, and "additional
members are not read by the checker" now says the checker reads only the
members SS 8 names. The template tells the reader what `parent` is and that
SS 2.2 lets it read that one concept; `skill.CONDITIONAL_FIELDS` gains
`parent`. README and CLAUDE.md say what consume now reads.
Moved on purpose, each named: the SS 7.4 known-positive IS the contract
document, so `budget.known_positive` moves in every payload (13 238 / 12 893
/ 345 -> 14 455 / 14 083 / 372); `skills/okf-consume/` regenerated from the
segmented golden, whose plan declares s1 and s2 under s0 -- its example
payload now carries both parents; `test_bundle_identity` 16 -> 17 rules;
`test_shell_parent`'s byte test also accounts for the link line.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3-22's report, CHANGELOG under [Unreleased], and two corrections of a
sentence measured false.
README and CLAUDE.md both said of the flow form "both are valid YAML, and a
real YAML consumer recovers the same structure from either". An unquoted URL
with a query string inside a flow mapping is not valid YAML for PyYAML, and
the quoted form is refused by the pinned guard; the paragraph now states the
limit. CLAUDE.md also records the K3-22 invariant and the new refusal of a
`--frontmatter` flow value with such a leaf.
Measured, fix `ed0418f` against base `0308169`, each tree built twice from
frozen exports: five-document project 0 files moved; R761 XML and HTML 1 line
each; K2 default 42 `title` lines, after which 454 of 454 frontmatters parse
and read back the same (base 413 parse, 412 read back). hit@k on R761 base =
fix, S1-S6 6/6 at hit@1/8/50 at both k, KP rank 1; okf check 32 of 32 payloads
0 findings over 16 rules; K2 pin 7 passed in the export.
Found outside the order: the pinned guard refuses nearly every segmented
concept okf writes, on its scalar flow sequences (`source_offset`,
`references`, `derived`) -- identical before and after, so older than K3-22.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The report for 5ce8efe/9f8a1bc (the known-positive regression round 19
introduced, repaired in consume) and f7fd0d4/edd3b70 (`--shell-parent`, off).
Deviations first: the base suite is 1 658 passed / 1 skipped; the premise's
token counts reproduce as 11 and 6, not 15 and 17; a consumer session shared
the hit@k instrument's payload paths (3 of 16 payloads were its own, caught by
`bundle_mismatch`) and rebuilt N200 during the session (controlled with three
exports on one bundle); 35 of 710 shells have no ancestor holding text.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The report for K3-19, measured from a frozen export of 77e7cab: R761 from the
base 56b00e7 against 77e7cab -- directory `14ce59dc-...` -> `r761-prosesskoden`,
2 761 concepts and 710 shells unchanged, 110 = 110, 1 807 descriptions, the
flagged edition and address on 2 761 of 2 761, hit@1/8/50 over S1-S6 6/6 at
both k, `okf check` 4 of 4 with 0 findings, and --ingested-at alone
confirmed on 2 761 of 2 761.
Reported first rather than repaired: the known-positive falls from rank 1 to
not delivered at the default k (13 at k = 50), decomposed to the directory
name alone; and the order's own `sources` value is refused by PyYAML on every
concept while `okf check` accepts it.
CHANGELOG under [Unreleased], the README and CLAUDE.md paragraphs carry the
final numbers, and the README test count moves to 1659 collected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The hand-filled skill predated `okf skill`, declared no bundle identity,
and was refused by the checker it tells its reader to run, against the
payload shipped beside it:
NOT conformant: 16 rules over 3 excerpts and 0 withheld entries, 1 findings
bundle_mismatch: the skill declares no readable bundle identity, ...
It is now the generator's output for
examples/ingest-golden-segmented-okf-v0-2/expected-bundle, the bundle the
payload always came from:
conformant: 16 rules over 3 excerpts and 0 withheld entries, 0 findings
The payload's bytes do not move. --force and --example-question are both
required: without the question the payload is a different one (spent
2125 -> 1420, delivered 3 -> 2, withheld 0 -> 1) and the byte test fails.
`okf skill` writes the bundle root and the skill path absolute when --out
is not under .claude/skills/, so the checkout prefix is stripped in one
mechanical step that a test holds; the generator is unchanged.
The frontmatter name becomes b-golden-segmented-okf-v0-2-consume. Claude
Code takes a project skill's command from its directory, which stays
okf-consume, and nothing in this repository named the skill by name.
references/README.md is rewritten by hand with the full regeneration
command; living prose in README, CLAUDE.md, the test comment and the
skill.py docstring is corrected, dated journals are left as written.
Report: docs/2026-09-11-k3-runde18-konsumskillen-regenerert.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The diagnosis, the eight forms measured and the rows that did not move.
What separates the known-negative from the standard's six questions is not
the group size, the title length or the share of the question: it is that the
title directly above the covered concept shares 3 question tokens against the
covered title's 1, while on the standard no title above a covered concept ever
shares more than it holds.
(a) title length sells hit@1 back to 3/6; (b) question share holds only for
1/9 < s <= 1/6; (c) and (d) cannot act on a group of one; (e) ships. The one
shape still read wrong (a constructed shortening of the known-negative) is
the same shape as a scored question with the opposite answer, and the form
that fixes it takes that question from rank 1 to 3.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`okf check` had fifteen rules and none asked whether the skill and the payload
were talking about the same bundle. Reproduced on this HEAD before any code
moved: three pairs reported `conformant: 15 rules over 8 excerpts and 438
withheld entries, 0 findings` -- a skill generated from one corpus against
another corpus's payload, the unfilled template against that payload, and a
payload sharing the skill's `bundle_id` at a foreign `ref`. All three now exit 1
with one `bundle_mismatch` finding over 16 rules.
BOTH halves are compared and the `ref` half is load-bearing: three distinct
builds on this machine carry one `bundle_id`, so an id comparison would pass a
stale skill. SS 3.3: "a version is the producer's assertion; a ref is a fact
about bytes". An identity the rule cannot read is a finding, never a silent
pass -- that is what refuses the unfilled template.
No new field: the identity was already in the generated skill's prose, now
factored into `skill.identity_line` and read back by
`contract_check.skill_identity`. Generated skill bytes unchanged, measured on
both tracked bundles on one interpreter.
The rule's first real find is this repository's own hand-made
`skills/okf-consume/SKILL.md`, which predates `okf skill` and declares no
identity a reader can act on: 1 of 1. Nine tests that asserted the old, false
conformance now pair a skill with its own bundle's payload.
Measured, nothing else moved: `~/okf-test/dokumenter` `diff -r` empty old
source vs new on one interpreter (52 files, 26 concepts), `okf project` still
byte-equal to `okf build`, K2 pin unmodified and green (453 concepts, ranks
1,1,1,1,1,5), known-negative `{}` unchanged at 9 findings.
Report: docs/2026-09-10-k3-runde15-bundle-mismatch.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The release report, in S7 form. Three premises deviated from the order and
each is stated before the work rather than after: the push list has THREE
lines (main, `v0.8.0`, `v0.8.1`) because the remote carries no `v0.8.x` at
all; the XML folder holds 110 files, not one, of which 109 are images coded
`extractor_unknown`; and the downside the changelog had to publish was
recorded in NO tracked file, so it was reproduced here before publication --
rank 1 -> 2 on one constructed known-negative, the other seven delivered
places unmoved.
The acceptance gate is installation from the tag in an isolated export, run
entirely from that export's own venv. The operator's PATH was measured and
not touched: `which okf` reports not found both before and after, so this
round neither installed nor removed anything there.
Honesty limits are their own section: one machine and one interpreter, one
five-document corpus, one publisher's files for both large rows, a grep
criterion that deliberately leaves two `v0.8.0` history lines standing, and
the plain statement that "the tag installs" is not "the tag is correct" --
no row here re-measures hit@1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The report, the CHANGELOG entry under [Unreleased] and the README's ranking
section. No version bump and no tag: v0.8.0 was released this same day.
R761, delivered ranks, before -> after: hit@1/8/50 3/6 - 5/6 - 5/6 -> 6/6 -
6/6 - 6/6 at default k and 3/6 - 5/6 - 6/6 -> 6/6 - 6/6 - 6/6 at --k 50, with
the known-positive at rank 1 on all four and the known-negative still not a
hit. --no-title-covered on the new binary reproduces the old row exactly.
Nothing else moves, measured on the bytes: the pinned K2 bundle and Arm B keep
(1,1,1,1,1,5) with payloads byte-identical on 6 of 6 questions each,
n100/n200/n500 payloads byte-identical on 5 each, the 828-file HTML corpus at
828 plans / 0 unreadable / 6 015 md with diff -rq empty, the five-document
folder diff -r-identical at 26/52, and okf project still byte-equal to okf
build.
README's test count corrected to what this round measures: 1583 collected,
1582 passed, 1 skipped. The published 1575 was the passed count.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The release itself is `4d1f9d3` and the tag stays there; this is the record.
Three deviations are named rather than glossed. The commissioning acceptance
`grep -rn 'v0.7.0' = 0 outside CHANGELOG` cannot be met, because three files
under `docs/` name the old tag as a fact about the past and a report is made
false by being rewritten. It also contradicts the same order's instruction to
keep the `v0.7.0` row in README's tag history, so the criterion was narrowed to
what it protected -- no install line and no "current tag" claim on the old tag
-- and every grep here was run against a known-positive first. Third, the
version also lives without a `v` prefix in `src/`, where no search for `v0.7.0`
reaches it; a packaging test caught it, and left alone the tag would have
reported 0.7.0 to every consumer installing it.
The gate was installation FROM THE TAG, not from the worktree: 26 concepts /
52 md / 0 of 5 rejected on the five-document folder, `proposed 828 plan(s);
0 document(s) with no boundary` on the 828-file HTML corpus, and `conformant:
15 rules ... 0 findings`. The limits travel with them -- one machine, one
interpreter, one corpus per row, and "the tag installs" is not "the tag is
right".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The report, with every measurement carrying its denominator and both
instrument forms side by side on every row -- including the proof that the two
forms cannot both reach 2 761, because 2 739 of 2 761 fasit titles carry a
numbering token and the two keys then demand mutually exclusive strings.
Also states two things round 13 left unsaid:
- XML that is not STS gives 0 plans and exit 2, and the `.txt` known-positive
shows it is general `okf build` behaviour for any structureless document,
not an `.xml` defect. Separating the two states would change the outcome on
0 of the 4 reference corpora, so the gate stays.
- Which two instruments were corrected in scratch and what the correction is.
With the shipped matcher the XML bundle scores 0/6 with `rang: null` on
every question, including the known-positive whose top excerpt IS the fasit.
Round 13's 14 two-file directories are re-classified on measurement: they were
false positives of the text route reading the document's own contents listing,
not the publisher reusing a title, and they are gone. Two remain, the same two
the PDF arm has.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The reader reaches the ceiling and the build does not, and the report separates
the two with denominators and a control for each: the orphan check removes 710
of 2 761 (710 of 710 removed headings are followed immediately by another
heading; 0 of 2 051 delivered ones are), and Arm F removes 2 066 more, swept
one flag at a time.
Both instrument forms on every row, because the pair key scores 28 of 2 761
here for a reason that has nothing to do with segmentation -- and the shipped
instrument turns out to carry the round-12 correction in NO block, not just in
the three the order named. That is proposed to the owning repository, never
applied there.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`okf build` recovers a PDF's boundaries from the shape of its page text and
never opens the file's own `/Outlines` bookmark tree. On a 701-page process
code whose publisher also ships a NISO-STS structure for it, measured outside
this repository and reproduced here exactly: the shipped default finds 1967 of
2761 titled sections, 0 of its 28 chapters, and 794 of 794 misses have their
heading text PRESENT in the extracted text. The line was read; the boundary
was never opened. The same file's bookmark tree matches 2761 of 2761 of those
titles exactly after normalisation.
`--pdf-outline`, OFF, cuts a PDF at the boundaries its tree declares.
boundaries 1967 of 2761 -> 2759 of 2761 (gate was 2700)
depth 1 0 of 28 -> 28 of 28
titles identical to source -- -> 2761 of 2761
false positives 163 of 2182 -> 3 of 2762
directories with two files 132 of 2050 -> 2 of 2738
front-matter concepts 72 of 2182 -> 2 of 2762
consumption fasit present 4 of 7 -> 7 of 7
hit@1 / hit@8 / hit@50 1/6 2/6 4/6 -> 3/6 5/6 6/6
It is a SEGMENTATION arm, not a reader option: the extracted text is byte for
byte the same either way. A PDF with no tree builds byte-identically with the
flag on -- `diff -r` empty across the pre-change tree, the arm off and the arm
on. An unresolvable `/Dest` is dropped and COUNTED, never fabricated into a
boundary and never a refusal of the file.
The bridge from (page, y) to a line index is the whole risk, so both routes
are measured. `extract_text_lines` splits lines identically to `extract_text`
on 701 of 701 pages, and is CHECKED per page rather than assumed. The y route
and the title route disagree on 0 of 2762 nodes, flat from a 0pt tolerance to
8pt and collapsing at 12pt, so the rule ships with no tolerance constant. The
naive "nearest line" rule was wrong on 1840 of 2762, one line early every time.
The orphan check is not applied to a bookmark mark: it asks whether anything
stands under a candidate's first line, which is the right question for a
heuristic's guess and the wrong one for a publisher's declaration. 683 of 2762
marks are container sections; applying it scores 2079 instead of 2759.
No new dependency and no second parse of the pages: `pdfminer.six` already
ships under `pdfplumber` in `[extract]`. 119.22s -> 183.31s wall, peak RSS
3252 -> 3251 MiB. The default does not move; 1 of the 8 reference PDFs carries
a usable tree at all.
`.pdf` also gains its `_EVIDENCE` row, as `measured` -- it was the row with the
most measurement behind it and no entry in the table.
Report: docs/2026-09-10-k3-runde12-pdf-outlines.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The report for both deliveries, in S7 form, every measurement with its
denominator and an "Honesty limits" section.
Three of the order's own figures did not reproduce and are corrected in section
0 rather than smoothed over: the dominant document takes 22 of 43 places here
and not 23 of 42, the known-positive ranks 8 and not 12, and at k = 8 it takes 7
of 8 places and not 8 of 8. All three divergences point the same way and have one
likely cause -- SK1 measured a frozen export of `6ff18fd` and HEAD is `de9564d`,
with round 10's prefix work in between, which changes the matcher the ranking
reads. This session's numbers are the ones used.
A control caught a defect in this session's OWN measuring query: the first
dominance run reported 2 of 7 fasit prefixes missing from the bundle, and they
were not missing -- the harness read the last segment of a concept id where the
document is the first. Corrected to 0 of 7 missing, and only then were ranks
read.
Records the strong form of "no other file type moved": the whole 43-document
reference corpus rebuilt on this HEAD is byte-identical to the pinned bundle,
`diff -rq` 0 differences, digest 21af4a1aa98315cf... and 453 concepts. The file
census (0 of 86 corpus files are HTML) is an argument that the changed path is
never reached; the rebuild is a measurement of it, and round 10's own trap -- a
green aggregate over a set where the difference cannot appear -- is why the
census alone was not accepted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Measured outside this repository on a 3206-concept bundle of a published
handbook: the code's own process overview contributes 28 of 3206 concepts
(0.87 %) and 117 488 of 1 469 225 source characters (8.0 %), and took 8 of 8
delivered places on one question and 7 of 8 on the known-positive -- which was
not delivered at all. Identical at 343 and 1651 concepts, so the cause is the
corpus's COMPOSITION, that it holds its own table of contents, and NOT its size.
Splitting the corpus would move the defect, not remove it: any corpus with a
contents list, a project overview or a summary document has the same property.
`--source-quota N` caps how many DELIVERED places one source document may take.
It cuts where the shortlist is cut -- before the pack, never inside the DP,
which maximises a sum over a set it is handed -- so the freed place goes to the
next candidate and `k` is still delivered in full.
DEFAULT 2 SINCE TODAY, and it is the third change here that alters a payload
with NO bundle changing (after `--tie-shared-rank` and `--stem-prefix`).
Opt-out `--no-source-quota` reproduces the previous excerpt order.
Swept over {2, 3, 4, off} on three bundles, with the fasit prefixes validated
against the bundle FIRST (that control caught a defect in the measuring query
itself -- it read the last id segment where the document is the first):
- K2, both bundles: at 2 and 3, hit@8 goes 5 of 6 to 6 of 6 with all five
standing rank-1 rows unmoved. The recovered row had missed on every bundle and
every configuration measured until now. At 4 and off it is 5 of 6.
- The handbook bundle: hit@8 2 of 6 -> 4 of 6, the known-positive from not
delivered to rank 4, and the dominant document's share of delivered places
8 of 8 -> 2 of 8 (7 of 8 -> 2 of 8 on the known-positive).
- 2 rather than 3 on rank alone: the recovered rows come in at 5 and 4 rather
than 7 and 5.
WHAT THE GAIN IS NOT. hit@8 asks whether the gold DOCUMENT appears among the
delivered excerpts, and a document quota directly raises how many distinct
documents a payload holds, so that metric is not neutral with respect to this
rule. The five rows that were already rank 1 are neutral, and they did not move.
THE ADVERSE CASE IS NAMED, not left to a consumer. A bundle built from ONE
document carries the same `source_file` on every concept, so a quota applied
literally would deliver 2 excerpts where `k` were asked for -- a rule against
dominance turned into a rule against small bundles. The shortlist is topped back
up from the best-ranked over-quota candidates, which makes such a bundle
byte-identical to the quota being off, and a test holds it.
`--rarity-weight` was measured against the same defect and does NOT repair it:
it leaves the dominant document at 8 of 8 places on the question it floods,
delivers neither that answer nor the known-positive, and holds 5 of 6 on both K2
bundles. Combined with the quota it is worse than the quota alone (the
known-positive falls back out). It stays off.
The vocabulary stays CLOSED and the new code is published in all three places a
consumer can read it: `WITHHOLDING_RULES` (six -> seven),
`docs/consumption-contract.md` 5.3, and the generated SKILL.md -- verified by
reading the generated file, not the code that writes it. `source_quota_exceeded`
is a DIVERSITY drop and not a relevance one, so folding it into
`no_lexical_match` would tell a consumer the question reached nothing in a
concept the question in fact reached. `okf check --skill --payload` stays
conformant, 0 findings over 15 rules.
Editing the contract moved the 7.4 known-positive, which is the coupling
working as intended: 12 563 -> 13 238 encoded, 12 227 -> 12 893 raw, delta
336 -> 345, updated in the constant, the instantiated skill and the shipped
example payload.
Also adds the O6 guard on the reading side: `build_payload`'s signature defaults
are asserted equal to `okf consume`'s argparse defaults for every same-named
parameter. `okf project` shipped that exact disagreement for two rounds.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The measurement record for `6ff84d7`, `191de89` and `36c201c`, in S7 form with
every figure carrying its denominator and an "Honesty limits" section.
Three of this round's own figures disagree with the order's and the
disagreement is stated first: the corpus has 5 `docx` and 43 files (round 9
counted `trinn1` and `trinn2`, which `diff -rq` shows byte-identical), the
lockfile drift is `uv run` without `--frozen` INSIDE the project rather than
outside it, and ruff 0.16.6 reports 148 rather than 144.
The result that decides the `rtf` rule's default is in section 1.7 and it is
not a missing measurement: `diff -rq` bounds the whole exposure at 1 of 33
document directories, that document is reference position 11, and its fasit
picks the arm that yields ONE concept where the rule yields two. The row would
get worse, so the flag ships off with every number that would justify moving
it. Whether that fasit should stand is the operator's, and it is one position.
Leak sweep with the control run first: 0 corpus paths and 0 K2 document names,
against 15 hits for a known-positive word in the same file.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Round 9: the four rests in STATE's NESTE that needed no operator decision.
CLAUSE 1 CLASSIFIED BY THE NUMBER, NOT THE TITLE. `_TRAILING_PAGE_NUMBER`
admitted a candidate into a contents run by asking whether the title ended in
an integer -- a question about the number. A drawing's dimension chain, a
schematic's labels, a door schedule, a coordinate column and a soil-layer
table all end in integers and name nothing. Measured over the 43-document
corpus: 68 candidates discarded over 11 of 39 readable documents, of which
19 over 5 documents are data rows.
That corrects round 8's own decomposition. Its "four misclassified numeric
tables and seven real contents listings" needs each document on one side, and
two of the eleven are both. Read across all 68 titles rather than the
three-title sample: 5 documents carry a data row, 8 carry a real entry.
`--contents-name` requires a NAME to survive stripping the page number. The
threshold is SWEPT, not chosen, and collapses at both ends: at an alphabetic
run of 1 a door schedule keeps a stray `V` and 13 of 19 are rescued; at 3 the
two-letter section name `VA` stops being a name, falls out of run membership,
and takes `RIB`, `MMI` and `Tittelfelt` below `CONTENTS_RUN` with it -- one
acronym costing four REAL entries. At 2: 16 of 19 rescued, 0 of 49 regressed.
The three not rescued carry a real word and are named rather than rounded off.
THE CONVERTER'S ANCHOR WAS IN THE CONCEPT ID. Pandoc writes a sheet as
`## <name> {#sheet-N}` and a titled slide as `## <title> {#slide-N}`. Because
a filename is reduced FROM the title, the anchor reached both. Operator
authorised the strip 2026-09-09 after the exposure was counted: 2 of 810
concepts on the previous default bundle, 2 of 1108 on Arm B, 1 of 26 on the
operator's folder. Two ids renamed, one of which `portfolio-optimiser` has
cited in writing; both are in the report so that message can be sent.
One rule in one function, read by BOTH title-forming sites -- a rule in only
one would leave the id and the title naming the same concept differently. The
known-negative is the point: `Mal for {kundenavn}` is a title an author wrote.
odt/rtf/pptx MEASURED END TO END FOR THE FIRST TIME, on hand-built documents,
because the corpus denominator is genuinely zero (86 files: 66 pdf, 10 docx,
4 xlsx, 2 zip, 2 smc, 2 doc). `_EVIDENCE` gains a third class rather than
stretching an existing one: `constructed` means the row has met a document,
but not one anyone wrote for their own purposes. odt 1 of 1 declared headings;
pptx 2 of 2 on a deck that declares slide titles and 0 of 2 on one that does
not -- round 7's reading of pptx was a fixture property, not the format; rtf
0 segments, because the container has no heading style and the author's title
is bold text. rtf is the one open finding.
ACCEPTANCE, all four. The 12-position reference is label-identical in BOTH
readings (pdf 7/8, docx 3/3, xlsx 0/1 or 1/1, sheet 10/12 or 11/12). One K2
bundle carrying both changes: 453 concepts / 865 md, hit@8 [1,1,1,1,1,None]
on it AND on Arm B, with the known-negative still reproducing on the new
bytes. `okf project` byte-equal to `okf build`, `diff -r` empty. Consumer
cost is a re-run: 436/832 -> 453/865, digest 21af4a1aa98315cf.
Three published numbers corrected: README's 596 tests (1515), README's "15
concepts out" for `okf project` (that was the O6 defect; it is 26), and O6's
print-mode method, which does not reproduce without --allowedTools.
Report: docs/2026-09-09-k3-runde9-restene.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Restates the order's premises on HEAD (README is 679 lines, not 676; the
`okf project` install line is 320, not 317), records the defect the
reproduction turned up (`okf project` 15 concepts / 30 files against
`okf build`'s 26 / 52, one signature default apart), and states what the
three end-to-end runs and the two-bundle routing measured with the
denominator beside each figure.
Two of this repository's own published figures are corrected: O5's "4
absolute paths -> 0" was measured with `grep -c "^/"` against paths indented
by two spaces, so the zero was never a measurement; and the order's own
"0 occurrences of hypothes/task/write/produce" is false per term (`write` 4,
`produce` 7, all unrelated) even though the modes were genuinely absent.
Honesty limits name N = 1 per row, that routing is 2 questions over 2
bundles and worked on the bundle ID rather than the description, that run 2
overstated one negative (NS 8407 is in 3 of 52 files, all withheld), and
that run 3's document numbers are for a non-default payload it changed and
declared.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Round 7 named two open items: a table-block candidate displacing a declared
heading (26 041 characters between entries, `md` at 3 of 4 declared headings)
and 17 590 characters after the last entry, never examined. Measured on
`a364ef4`, the first premise does not reproduce and the second is not a
separate mechanism.
`md` recovers 4 of 4, not 3 of 4. D1 (`--keep-table-heading`) is the repair
for exactly the mechanism round 7 § 5 describes, and round 7 moved it into
the default in the same commit -- so § 5 is a pre-move measurement presented
as the post-move state. That is round 7's own trap, stated in its own report:
a number about a rule is a measurement of a configuration. Nothing held the
cell, which is why it could be wrong and stay wrong.
The remaining gap has ONE cause. Every rule closes a span against the NEXT
MARK; three steps then remove a mark after its neighbour's `end` was fixed
against it. The orphan check leaks 18 527 characters over 15 of 39 documents,
`fold_units` clause 1 leaks 7 514 between entries, and the same clause on the
last run leaks all 17 590 tail characters -- with `unit_fold=False` the corpus
tail gap is 0. Round 6 already established the principle (filter at admission,
let the mark above carry the text) and it was never applied post-filter.
`--close-span-gaps` states it once, after the fold, where every removal has
happened: a span runs to the next SURVIVOR, the last to the end of the text.
It adds no boundary. Measured: 43 631 characters (2.51 %) -> 0, entries
429 = 429, K2 concepts 436 = 436, the operator's folder 52 md = 52.
All four acceptance conditions hold at once. The 12-position reference is
label-identical -- 11 of 12 under |F|[3]=12 and 10 of 12 under |F|[3]=11,
both readings reported, not one position moved. hit@8 holds [1,1,1,1,1,-] on
the round 8 bundle (436), the round 7 default (436) and Arm B (629), and the
known-negative reproduces on the new bytes: `--no-tie-shared-rank` gives
[2,1,1,1,1,-].
The pin is rebuilt against the default that actually ships
(`K2-bundle-default-20260911`, 832 files, digest 8c93e5e3...); two independent
builds of it differ in nothing, `log.md` included.
Two measurement failures are recorded rather than hidden. The corpus identity
check first used `xargs` without `-print0`, every filename split on its
spaces, `shasum` read nothing, and both sides agreed on a digest of the
failure; a control against the digest of empty input separated them. And the
smoke build cannot prove the flag arrives -- the operator's folder has a
coverage gap of zero already, so `diff -rq` is 0 either way; the plumbing has
its own test on a document that has the defect.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Round 6 left two things behind: a measured coverage hole with the repair built
but not the number to move it, and a retrieval regression that kept two
spreadsheet rules off the default. Both are measured; four defaults move.
THE HOLE IS BIGGER THAN THE RULE BUILT FOR IT. Measured over the 39-document
corpus, the pre-move default left 207 435 characters -- 11.92 % -- in no
segment: 163 804 above the first entry, 26 041 between entries, 17 590 after
the last. `--first-span-from-zero` closes the first part entirely, 79 % of the
whole, leaving 43 631 (2.51 %) over 8 of 32 documents. It adds no boundary and
the K2 concept count is identical with and without it (425 = 425); hit@8 holds
[1,1,1,1,1,-] under both tie-breaks and the 12-position reference does not move
one cell.
THE RANKER WAS PUNISHING FINE-GRAINING FOR BEING FINE-GRAINED. Round 6 held
`--sheet-section-rows --keep-table-heading` back because on a bundle built with
them row 1 fell rank 1 -> 2, and ruled out the document prior because its rank
over 39 DOCUMENTS was 1 on both bundles. RRF reads a rank over CONCEPTS:
splitting the gold document 1 -> 12 puts its own twelve concepts in that
signal's whole top tie group, so the one leading the body signal takes position
11, contributing 1/71 where the undivided concept contributed 1/61. A signal
that scored them all EQUALLY still emitted twelve ranks, ordered by concept_id,
and the fusion read alphabetical order as a measurement.
AND THE REPAIR WAS ALREADY IN THE TREE, OFF FOR A COST THAT HAD BEEN REMOVED.
`--tie-shared-rank` shipped off 2026-09-08 because hit@8 fell 5 of 6 to 4 of 6.
Swept over 2 prior exponents x 3 bundles x 6 rows: that fall exists only at
DOCUMENT_PRIOR_EXPONENT 1.0. Round 6 moved the exponent to 0.5 for an unrelated
reason and correctly reported it moved no hit@8 row -- nobody measured the
pair. A flag's "off by measurement" is a measurement of a CONFIGURATION, not a
property of the flag.
Shipped, each with an explicit opt-out and both directions measured rather than
asserted: --no-first-span-from-zero --no-sheet-section-rows
--no-keep-table-heading reproduces the previous bundle byte for byte (diff -rq,
0 differences), and the no-flag build equals the explicit-flag build.
--no-tie-shared-rank reproduces the previous excerpt order -- the one change
here that alters a payload with no bundle changing.
K2 default: 436 concepts / 832 files, digest 8dff8a8e6c15d2f7..., hit@8 5 of 6
ranks [1,1,1,1,1,-]. The pin now holds its own known-negative on those bytes:
read with --no-tie-shared-rank the same bundle gives [2,1,1,1,1,-], so the
green assertion names its cause. Consumer cost is a re-run: 425/810 -> 436/832
on the reference corpus, 15/30 -> 26/52 on a five-document folder.
pptx and md measured end to end for the first time, on two hand-built
documents: md recovers 3 of 4 declared headings, pptx segments per slide only
where the converter recognised a title placeholder. A converter attribute leaks
into titles ({#slide-N}, {#sheet-1}) on 2 of 810 K2 files and 1 of 30 on a
five-document folder -- not fixed, because a filename is reduced from its title
and the fix renames concept ids a consumer has cited.
Suite 1486 (1478 before), ruff and mypy --strict clean over 21 files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
One rule explains every remaining `pdf` miss on the twelve-position reference:
where a document DECLARES headings, Arm D's RECOVERED headings are the whole of
the excess, and every declared one is a unit the reference wants. `--outline-gate`
admits recovery only where the document declares none of its own, plus any one
recovered heading covering OUTLINE_SHARE (0.20) of the text. It is `fold_units`
clause 2's own principle moved from voting to admission, and it filters at
ADMISSION so the text a removed mark opened is carried by the mark above it --
the post-filter form scores identically on all twelve positions and loses that
text, which is why only one of them shipped.
`--outline-gate` and `--drop-wrapped-outline` become the package default, one
decision because neither carries the reference alone: `pdf` 2 of 8 -> 5 of 8
alone, 7 of 8 together; the sheet 5 of 12 -> 10 of 12; `docx` unchanged at 3 of
3. Each keeps an explicit opt-out. The bar the move had to clear was not the
reference: hit@8 on a K2 bundle built with it holds 5 of 6 at ranks 1,1,1,1,1,-,
no row losing rank 1. `--sheet-section-rows --keep-table-heading` reaches 11 of
12 and does NOT ship, because on a bundle built with it row 1 falls rank 1 -> 2.
Cost to a consumer is a re-run: 492 concepts / 944 files -> 425 / 810.
DOCUMENT_PRIOR_EXPONENT makes the document prior sublinear (total/n**0.5). A sum
measures size and a density is diluted by every unit carrying none of the
question, so a document split 1 -> 12 lost its prior by 12. Swept over five
values on 18 rows it is at least as good as the delivered density everywhere and
strictly better on three. Stated plainly: end to end it moved NOT ONE hit@8 row
on any of four bundles, so it did not solve the knot it was adopted for -- what
did is that the `pdf` gain never needed `--sheet-section-rows`.
`--first-span-from-zero` is off and repairs a measured loss found while chasing
one position's 940 characters: 32 of the 32 documents that get a plan leave the
text above their first concept in no segment -- 159 704 characters, 9.18 % of
the corpus, 45 841 from one document. It changes nothing on the reference. Off
because it moves the first span of essentially every bundle with no hit@8 number
behind it yet.
vegnormal-okf FUNN 2: SPEC section 8's own star row parsed as prose, so every
concept behind one was unreachable to the section 9.2 walk. `IndexPolicy.also_reads`
carries it for the SEGMENTED profiles, read-only, after the emitted pattern
misses -- the asymmetry `sources` already has. DEFAULT and STRICT_V1 untouched (O2).
vegnormal-okf FUNN 1: Door C's own outcome was refused at exit 1,
`bundle_id_missing`. `import_bundle` now takes `root_frontmatter_values`,
keyword-only, rendered before any disk mutation, written only when the index is
created -- Door B's mechanism and ordering.
Report: docs/2026-09-09-k3-runde6-outline-gaten-og-prioren.md.
Suite 1478 passed (1449 before), ruff and mypy clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3 round 5. Three questions, three answers, and two of them correct a figure
this repository published.
RETRIEVAL FIRST, because it could have reversed a default. hit@8 over the six
questions on BOTH K2 bundles -- Arm B at 629 concepts and the shipped default
at 492 -- is 5 of 6 with ranks 1,1,1,1,1,- on each, so 0 of 6 rows lost. The
order's rule reverses `--unit-fold` at >= 2 of 6; it does not fire, and the
default stands. The gold sets shrink (49->26, 20->17, 43->36, 11->18) while
every rank holds at 1, which is the fold merging concepts rather than removing
a document from the top.
TWO PUBLISHED NUMBERS CORRECTED, both ours. The S7 candidate ranks 96 of 629
and 159 of 492 were measured with the cost vocabulary passed to
`concept_scores` and NOT to `document_scores`, while `build_payload` passes it
to both; scored the way the shipped payload scores it, the same concept is 10
of 629 and 19 of 492. And round 4 attributed its non-delivery to the default
move -- measured here, it is not delivered on the Arm B bundle either, for a
different reason (knapsack eviction at 68 046 bytes of a 120 000 budget, versus
`below_k`). That column had been inherited from round 3's own build, never
re-measured.
`--pdf-headings font-reserve`, OFF, and the hypothesis behind it is falsified
by its own condition rather than by a score: position 7, the one position the
flag exists for, has THREE outline runs, so the reserve is silent there at
every minimum. It changes 0 of 12 cells on the reference and reaches 4 of 39
corpus documents, none of them rated. Built anyway because it was authorised
and because the condition is now measured rather than assumed. The predicate
lives in one place (`propose.heading_reserve_applies`) and the door receives it
as a callable, like `gate`: a plan indexes the exact string it was proposed
against, so a reserve firing on one side only would make every document it
touches a coded rejection.
The `xlsx` re-reading is confirmed on the artifact -- 11 `rule:sheet-section`
units plus 1 `rule:table-block` ingress -- but the number alone makes the cell
worse (distance 1 -> 2), because the criterion counts that ingress as a table
that should have been merged. A hit needs both halves ratified, and the
reference is the operator's.
`--sheet-section-rows` as a default: three cells better and none worse on the
twelve positions, but the K2 control moves -- row 1's gold document splits 1 ->
12 concepts and its best concept ranks 2 instead of 1. Condition not met,
default not moved.
Default build byte-identical before and after (`diff -r`, 30 md files).
Suite 1441 -> 1449; three of the eight were red first.
Report: docs/2026-09-08-k3-runde5-hitat8-og-skriftakse.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A PDF carries no notion of a heading -- a heading in a PDF is a typographic
fact -- so the text stream `pdfplumber` hands the segment proposer has already
thrown away the only evidence there was. The `docx` path never had that problem:
the converter emits ATX headings and `_ATX` cuts on them. Two readers close the
gap, and both are OFF.
`--pdf-headings font` infers a heading from the conjunction this repository
already measured (size above the document's character-weighted body median AND
a bold font name, recall 1.000 / precision 0.846) and emits it as ATX in the
SAME markdown the office path produces, so `_ATX` applies unchanged and no
PDF-only heading grammar exists.
It stays off BY MEASUREMENT, and the measurement is the point of the round:
against the operator's unit worksheet it takes `pdf` from 2 of 8 to 0 of 8,
losing two exact matches. The mechanism of the loss is stated rather than
guessed -- on those documents the outline rule already recovers the document's
own numbered chapters, so a second heading source can only add. Whole-corpus
screen: 25 of 32 `pdf` change, 0 of 5 `docx`, 0 of 2 `xlsx`. The default bundle
is byte-identical before and after this commit (`diff -r`, exit 0).
`--ocr` reads a page as an image when its own text never arrived: empty, or
`(cid:N)` placeholder codes at or above a threshold READ OFF a measured
distribution -- 834 pages over 32 files, 818 at exactly 0.0 and 16 at 0.93 or
above, nothing in between. On the one corpus document with the failure: 95.07 %
cid to 0 %, 44 to 2561 words of four or more letters, 17 to 18 pages with text.
Its engine is an optional dependency group and never a runtime dependency; a
packaging test pins both halves, and without the group every affected file is a
coded rejection (`extractor_ocr_group_missing`) rather than a crash.
Also corrects two stale published facts found while measuring: the README still
said two segmentation rules were on by default after `f6fea13` made it three,
and CLAUDE.md's K2 digest named the round-3 default. The current default is
492 concepts / 944 files, `bdefa679...`.
Report: docs/2026-09-08-k3-runde4-pdf-skrift-og-ocr.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude <claude-opus-5>
The reading direction existed only for someone standing in a clone. `consume`,
`contract_check` and `skill` moved from `tools/` into the package and are
reachable as `okf consume`, `okf check` and `okf skill`; `okf project` is new
and does the whole thing in one command.
The red measurement: a consumption skill generated from a checkout carried 4
lines naming that checkout by absolute path, 2 of them the commands the skill
tells a reader to run. It now names `okf consume` and `okf check`, and a test
asserts this repository appears in it nowhere, with a known-positive so the
zero is a measurement rather than a search that could not find.
The `tools/` files stay as ALIASES, not re-exports: a re-export binds copies of
the names into a second module object, so a caller patching one patches a
binding the implementation never reads. Two tests that monkeypatch okf_consume
went green again only under the alias. Every published reproduction block runs
unchanged.
The template and docs/consumption-contract.md (the section 7.4 known-positive)
are force-included into the wheel from the file they are authored in, so both
travel with the commands that cannot run without them and there is still one
authored copy of each.
Step 0, before any of it: okf build's default gained Arm E (--table-grid),
with --no-table-grid as its opt-out. The default moved to D plus F earlier the
same day on Arm F's published 5 of 12 -- a figure measured with Arm E ON.
Without it the fold has no joined table to fold, and the shipped default scored
2 of 12 with docx 0 of 3. Measured on the operator's folder: 30 md / 15
concepts on the new default against 43 / 28 without Arm E.
Install measurement from a fresh uv tool install, empty folder, this repository
nowhere on PYTHONPATH: 5 documents in, 15 concepts out, 0 references to tools/
in the generated skill, okf check conformant (15 rules, 0 findings).
Deviation stated rather than hidden: the order asked that
tests/test_okf_consume.py be left untouched. Two assertions in it read a PATH,
which is the one thing this work changes. Both were moved and the second made
stronger -- it now asserts every command the README recipe names is a
subcommand the CLI registers, which a file existing on disk never proved.
Suite 1414 -> 1427. ruff clean, mypy --strict clean over 21 files.
Record: docs/2026-09-08-o5-okf-project.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude <claude-opus-5>
The default move landed in the previous commit; this is the number it costs a
consumer, measured rather than predicted. `okf build` with no flag over the
43-document reference corpus now yields 517 concepts in 969 files, content
digest `42c8646d...`, `merged + coded rejections = 43 = N`, 817.6 s. The
delivered 2026-09-03 bundle (629 concepts, 1108 files, `9cd74519...`) is
unchanged on disk and reproducing it needs `--outline-run 0 --no-unit-fold`
AND the stamp it was built with -- "the opt-out flags" alone is true and
incomplete, so the report says both.
README and CLAUDE.md now state which two rules are on, what each opt-out is,
and that the proposer's own defaults did not move. One CLAUDE.md sentence was
false as of the move ("a no-flag build stays byte-identical") and is corrected
in place rather than deleted: adding a flag still leaves the default
byte-identical; moving it does not, which is why it took an operator decision.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3 round 3, order 20260908T170037Z-3622420612-from-.claude, plus the PM
injection of 17:55Z carrying the operator's D3 answer.
TWO NEW RULES, both OFF by default.
`--sheet-section-rows` cuts an open table block at the rows that label its
sections: a RUN of at least three rows whose first cell is a bare numeric
label. It is the first rule here that opens a span INSIDE a table, and the
opposite direction from Arm E -- that arm decides how far a block extends,
this decides where it is cut inside. The spreadsheet is the one file type no
arm had ever moved: 1 concept -> 12 on the priced sheet, of which 11 are the
reference's 11 cost groups. The run guard buys exactly three candidates on the
corpus (the rows stating a computation basis), and each section carries its
own `source_sheet` + `source_rows`, verified on the artifact.
`--drop-wrapped-outline` declines an outline candidate whose line continues
onto the next one. Round 2 falsified the LENGTH axis on this case; this one is
not about size. Over the 12-document sample it separates 8 of 34 candidates --
the quoted regulation paragraphs and the risk-table rows -- and none of the 26
the operator kept. Position 4: 4 concepts -> 1, the reference. The cell is
`treffer` by count and lossy by bytes, and the report says so.
Whole corpus, one cached extraction: 1 of 39 documents changes under the first
rule (0 of 32 pdf, 0 of 5 docx), 5 of 39 under the second (all pdf). Arm B and
F2 are byte-identical against a frozen c3b645b, both halves by `diff -r`.
THE `okf build` DEFAULT MOVED, and this is the operator's decision executed,
not a side effect: no flag now means `--outline-run 3 --unit-fold`. Each arm
keeps an explicit opt-out (`--outline-run 0`, `--no-unit-fold`) and the pair
reproduces the pre-move bytes exactly. The proposer's own defaults do NOT
move: they are what the goldens and every published reproduction block are
pinned to, so the two layers now disagree on purpose and `cli.py` says where.
Two shipped expectations moved with it and both are stated in place. MEASURED
AND REPORTED BACK: the configuration made default scores 2 of 12 on the unit
worksheet, `docx` 0 of 3 -- Arm F's published 5 of 12 was measured with
`--table-grid` ON, and without it the fold has no joined table to fold.
Position 1 is declined for the second round on the axis the order named: 3 of
3 recovered chapters have body under them, so "heading-on-heading" separates 0
of 3.
The K2 ranking control round 2 could not measure: two bundles from frozen
c3b645b differing only in `--keep-table-heading`, 2 of 1108 files apart. The
priced concept ranks 96 of 629 in BOTH and is delivered at rank 10 in both, so
the flag buys 35 payload bytes and zero rank positions. Round 2's prediction
is falsified: the concept's NAME was already restored by the orphan-name
inheritance; the flag adds the heading LINE.
The stale S7 literal is restated where it stood (`c759a657...`, 171 614 B,
re-measured on this HEAD), so the next order cannot inherit the superseded one.
1397 -> 1414 tests. Report: docs/2026-09-08-k3-runde3-per-filtype.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The consumer's question about `vann- og frostsikring` in a subsea tunnel
delivered 0 of the 16 concepts covering it, best of them at fused rank 14.
Reproduced with the denominator, then decomposed per signal before anything
was built.
It is not a matcher miss. `normalise("vann- og frostsikring")` already returns
`('vann', 'frostsikring')` on HEAD, the prefix rule already bridges the
inflections, and the best covering concept already answers 7 of 7 question
tokens -- more than any delivered one. A tokeniser rule had nothing to widen.
It is the fusion, but not a weight. RRF ranks every concept in every signal,
including a signal that scored them all the same, and the declared
`(-score, concept_id)` tie-break then orders that group by id. On N500 the
document prior has TWO distinct values over 270 concepts, so the third signal
contributed alphabetical UUID order spread from 1/61 to 1/329 -- enough to put
a concept leading the body signal behind concepts sharing only `tunnel` and
`vann`.
`--tie-shared-rank` lets concepts a signal scores equally share that group's
first rank. The miss closes: best covering 14 -> 3, 2 of 16 delivered. OFF BY
DEFAULT, by the order's own rule: the three requirement lookups hold at rank 1
and the K2 digest holds, but hit@8 over the six published questions falls 5 of
6 to 4 of 6. Decomposed rather than guessed -- K2's prior is coarse (6 values
over 39 documents) rather than degenerate, and one gold sat early in its tie
group. That benefit was never a measurement, but it is a published row.
`--withheld-titles` gives each withheld entry the concept's title, so a reader
can see WHAT was withheld without reading the bundle. 11 lines of code; the
bytes are why it is off. It grows an N500 payload 37.9 % and takes the
629-concept K2 bundle's BOOKKEEPING to 122 704 B -- past the 120 000-byte limit
itself -- which would falsify the breaking point published in the tracked
`skills/okf-consume/SKILL.md` on the day it shipped.
Defaults measured, not asserted: six payload digests built from a frozen
`ff79cfa` (`git archive`, `__file__` checked) and from this tree with both
flags omitted are 6 of 6 identical, and `okf_skill.py` output is identical
apart from the paths each copy writes about itself. Contract checker exit 0 on
eight payloads, both values.
One known-positive did not reproduce and is reported rather than matched: the
order's S7 literal `2ae46f68`/169 573 B is stale by three excerpt-form commits;
HEAD measures `c759a657`/171 614 B.
Suite 1388 -> 1397. Report: docs/2026-09-08-rangeringsbom-sammensatte-ord.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
K3 round 2, per file type. Order 20260908T143513Z-6327528123-from-.claude, carrying two operator decisions taken beforehand: D1 the orphan-gate variant goes behind a flag, D2 the arms become reachable from `okf build`. No default moved. Report: docs/2026-09-08-k3-runde2-per-filtype.md.
THE REPRODUCTION HELD, all three numbers, before any edit: `okf build` on the five-document tender folder gives 31 markdown files with both PDFs flat and 5/5 merged; the tender PDF gives no boundary without a flag and 9 with `--outline-run 3` (reference 9); the price sheet gives 1 on HEAD. Both proposer runs had to go through `bash -c` -- zsh does not word-split an unquoted `$flags`, so a sweep hands `--outline-run 3` to argparse as one token and every row comes back exit 2.
D2 -- `cli.py:_propose_plans` called the proposer with no arm argument, so the build path ran Arm B while `tools/okf_propose_segments.py` could run D, E and F. It now passes `--outline-run`, `--table-grid`, `--unit-fold` and `--keep-table-heading` through unchanged. THE DEFAULT DOES NOT MOVE and that is measured, not asserted: same folder, no flags, before and after the change, digest 3af10770...8fbbe2 both times and `diff -rq` clean. The "before" bundle was built before the first edit, because the editable install reads src/ live. Red test on the PLANS and on titles rather than a count, with the same fixture and no flags as its control. Per-document table for B/D/E/F/F2 is in the README and the report; the tender PDF is 1 under the default and 9 under every arm above it, and the reference is 9.
D1 -- a sheet heading with a table opening under it has an empty body, so the orphan check drops it: the NAME survives (carried onto the table block), the LINE does not. `--keep-table-heading` lets the heading survive and absorb the table instead. Price sheet 1 -> 1 concepts, `source_offset` [34, 11048] -> [0, 11048], body now starting at the heading. ELEVEN IS NOT REACHABLE THIS WAY and the number says why: the sheet is one heading and one continuous pipe-table block, and the eleven cost groups are eleven ROWS inside it (lines 10-20 of 103). What is missing is a section-row rule inside a sheet -- the opposite of `--table-grid`. Corpus: the flag changes 2 of 39 documents, both `.xlsx`, under arms B, E and F alike; known-negative 0 of 32 `pdf` and 0 of 5 `docx`. With it off, Arm E over all 43 is byte-identical to session 109's tree (33 plans, 43 `.err`, 4 FAILED, diff exit 0, counts asserted first).
THE PDF REMAINDER, one at a time. Position 9: clause 1 read the list AFTER the orphan check, and a contents list without dot leaders is a run of bodiless headings, so all but the last entry were already gone and the run was one. The run is now measured on the pre-orphan list, predicate written once and read in both places. 11 -> 10. Position 7: the same clause required siblings, and a numbered report's contents list interleaves 1.1/1.1.1/2.1 -- its 34 entries are one block that the level condition cut into runs of 9, 1, 1, 1, 5, 2, 10, 2 and 3, so the short runs survived. The level condition is dropped; the run LENGTH, which is what the CONTENTS_RUN sweep bought, is unchanged. Measured outward: the relaxation changes 1 document of 39 and removes exactly the leftover line. 34 -> 33.
TWO REMAINDERS ARE DECLINED WITH NUMBERS RATHER THAN FIXED. Position 1: the three level-1 candidates are 3 of 3 `rule:outline`, same level, same grammar, and the operator keeps one of them by prose alone -- there is no property to read. Position 4: a title-length rule was measured on paper and falsified -- a real chapter is 56 characters and a real heading in a document the arms already score correct is 88, sitting between position 4's 86 and 91, so no threshold separates the classes. Position 0 stays an extraction failure.
ONE SHIPPED EXPECTATION MOVED and is stated rather than quietly updated: `Innhold 1` is now discarded with the contents list it heads. Its body is in no segment afterwards, which is a real cost on a fixture where that heading has one.
Nine new tests: five red before the implementation, four green by construction and named as such. Three mutations, three red, unmutated control green each time -- restoring the level condition, computing the run post-orphan, absorbing a table unconditionally. 1379 -> 1388 tests. ruff clean, mypy --strict clean on 17 files. K2 bundle untouched (1108 files, 9cd74519...). The K2 ranking control is NOT measured: no bundle was rebuilt with the flag, so the rank is a prediction.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Order 20260908T133512Z-139864689-from-.claude. First iteration of the
per-file-type directive (operator 2026-09-08 13:05Z), not the last. No
threshold is set: ratifying a bar is the operator's, and setting one inside the
work that produces the measurement would be fitting the bar to the number.
[skip-docs] covers README.md only, and it follows a precedent re-measured this
round rather than quoted: `grep -c` for outline-run, table-grid, Arm C, Arm D
and Arm E returns 0 in README.md and CHANGELOG.md, while --path-prefix, a real
interface change, has a CHANGELOG entry. The rule is "interface and behaviour
changes yes, arm flags no", and --unit-fold is an arm flag that defaults off.
CLAUDE.md IS updated, because its `okf build` bullet enumerates which arms are
off there and would otherwise become false.
FUNN 1, and step 1 asked for it: the reproduction broke. Arm E on HEAD is
byte-identical to the archive on 31 of 33 plans; the two that differ are 2 of 2
spreadsheets in the corpus. The cause is EXTRACTION, not segmentation --
56ae274 writes a workbook as pipe tables, and the sample's price sheet extracts
to 11 048 characters where the worksheet records 100 694, which is the figure
that commit's own message predicts. The consequence is a segmentation
regression against the reference: K3 position 3 went 3 concepts -> 1 under both
Arm D and Arm E, where the operator wants eleven. The mechanism is the orphan
check dropping the sheet heading once a table opens below it (propose.py:461),
already reported there as a ranking regression. Doors unchanged: 43 .err, 4
FAILED, extractable 39/43.
THE MATCH CRITERION WAS WRITTEN DOWN BEFORE ANY CELL WAS SCORED, and it stalls
at 7/12 on the literal calibration gate after three rounds, each revision
recorded. The five failures are not the criterion's: at every one it agrees
with the operator's own (a), (b) or free text and disagrees only with (c).
Column (c) is a RELATIVE judgement ("closest today"); the four K3 categories
are absolute. The only way to reach 12/12 is to define "correct" as "the
closest arm", which reads (c) back out of itself. The dominance gate, declared
in advance as the second reading, holds at 11/12.
ARM F is one rule with three clauses derived from the operator's three, not
twelve special cases, and it only MERGES or DISCARDS: a run of at least
CONTENTS_RUN same-level page-numbered headings is a contents list and goes; a
heading deeper than the unit level folds into its parent, extending the
parent's span; a table folds back into the shorter heading that introduces it,
keeping the HEADING's name. K3 first rater, n=12: 2 coarse / 5 fine / 0
duplicate / 5 correct -- best of four arms, ceiling was 4, two moved, nothing
regressed anywhere.
THE PAPER MEASUREMENT CAME FIRST AND FALSIFIED THE FIRST VERSION. Clause 2 was
letting rule:outline -- Arm D's RECOVERY of an integer numbering run -- vote on
the unit level, which took K3 positions 1, 7 and 9 to 3, 4 and 7 concepts
instead of 17, 34 and 11. A recovered numbering is a heuristic, not a level a
document declares, and the unit worksheet showed the operator ATX and dotted
headings only. Fixed with its own red test; 11 of 12 predictions correct after.
PER FILE TYPE, which is the directive: docx 3 of 3 (solved on this sample), pdf
2 of 8 (lags, unchanged by Arm F, and the remainder is decomposed per position
rather than left as one number), xlsx 0 of 1 (regressed, see FUNN 1). Outside
the corpus, n=1 each: pptx and odt byte-identical, rtf proposes nothing either
way, txt differs and exposes clause 2's fallback.
CONTENTS_RUN swept 1..5 and off. Distance prefers 1; three ships anyway,
because at 1 the body chapter "... i henhold til TEK 17" is deleted for ending
in a number, and no K3 cell differs between 1 and 4 -- the metric prefers a
value that provably deletes a chapter and cannot see the cost.
Whole corpus, all 43 through arm_run in ascending foreground chunks: 32 plans,
491 entries against Arm E's 679, 14 documents changed, 1 plan disappeared
entirely (three drawing-schedule numbers that clause 1 correctly reads as a
contents run) and that is reported rather than special-cased.
THE okf build MECHANISM IS REPRODUCED AND IT IS NOT DOOR B: cli.py calls the
proposer with no arm flag at all, so the shipped build path is Arm B. On a
tender PDF that means no boundary where Arm D finds nine and the reference says
nine. Largest per-file-type gap this round found; it is a default change and
therefore the operator's.
5 tests red first, 1373 -> 1379. ruff clean, mypy --strict clean on 17 files.
K2 consumer bundle unchanged: 1108 files, digest 9cd74519... with the flag off.
No bundle built, no version bump, no tag, no push.
Report: docs/2026-09-08-k3-arm-f-mot-enhetsarket.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
