llm-ingestion-okf/docs/2026-09-07-k3-enhetsark-metode.md

# K3 unit worksheet, 2026-09-07

Order `20260907T141419Z-2723316647-from-.claude`. Pure reading and
generation: no production code, no threshold, no rating performed by this
session. The worksheet itself is local-only and gitignored, because it
quotes corpus document titles, extracted text, and concept splits, and this
repo's public convention (`CLAUDE.md`) never tracks K2 corpus content or
paths. This file states what the worksheet is and how it was built, without
any of that content.

## Why it exists

`docs/2026-09-07-k3-arm-e.md` § Verdict left the K3 result conditional on a
question no method text resolves: what counts as **one unit of knowledge** in
this corpus -- a top-level chapter, a numbered subsection, or something else
-- and whether a table is a unit on its own or only together with the prose
that introduces it. The question surfaced twice on identical material: once
under Arm D (two blind raters split on the same document), once under Arm E
(the same document, same split, changed reasoning). It is prior to any
threshold: a threshold on an undecided unit measures the rater, not the arm.

The operator asked for a concrete artifact rather than an abstract question.
This worksheet is that artifact: one worked example per sample document, with
the operator's answer left blank, that becomes the reference the next K3
round is measured against.

## What the worksheet contains

One section per document in the K3 sample (n = 12, the same draw every K3
round has used), in canonical position order 0-11:

1. **The concept split under three arms** -- Arm B (shipping default), Arm D
   (`--outline-run 3`), Arm E (`--outline-run 3 --table-grid`) -- as an
   indented list of concept title and character length per arm, capped at 25
   lines with a `... (+N)` suffix when a document has more.
2. **The document's own heading structure**, independent of any arm: every
   ATX (`#`) and dotted-numbered heading the shipped grammar recognises, plus
   contiguous table spans (a maximal run of pipe-delimited rows and grid rule
   lines merged into ONE span, rather than fragmented the way the shipping
   per-row candidate rule reads them) -- capped at 30 lines.
3. **Three checkbox questions per document** -- what a unit is here, what a
   table is here, which arm is closest today -- plus one free-text line, all
   left blank for the operator.
4. **A closing summary table**, 12 rows by 3 answer columns, that the
   operator fills in. That filled table is the deliverable: the next K3
   round measures against it, stated as such at the top of the worksheet.

## How it was built

Reading and generation only, run in the foreground this session, nothing
written under `src/` or `tools/`:

- The sample draw was reproduced via the shipped `draw_sample` function in
  `tools/okf_outline_measure.py` (hex SHA-256 of the NFC-normalised filename,
  stratified 8 pdf / 3 docx / 1 xlsx) against the corpus directory, **12/12**
  matching the order published in `docs/2026-09-07-k3-arm-e.md` § Appendix.
- Concept splits per arm were read from the archived plan JSON files for
  this K3 round -- Arm B from the archived baseline plans, Arm D from the
  archived Arm D plans, Arm E from the Arm E round's own plans -- matched to
  each sample document via each archive's own `_index.txt` (position, exit
  code, filename), not by re-deriving a path prefix.
- The document's own heading structure and table spans were read with the
  shipped `_ATX`, `_NUMBERED`, `_TABLE_ROW` and `_GRID_RULE` patterns from
  `llm_ingestion_okf.propose`, imported rather than re-implemented, for the
  same reason the reach instruments import them: a worksheet carrying its
  own copy of the grammar would describe a second definition that can drift
  from the shipped one without anything going red.

## Verification

- **Sample draw:** 12/12 documents match the published Arm E appendix order.
- **Entry counts per arm, all 12 positions:** cross-checked against the
  entries column of `docs/2026-09-07-k3-arm-e.md` § Appendix (Arm B / Arm D /
  Arm E). All 36 figures (12 documents x 3 arms) matched exactly, including
  the four documents where Arm B wrote no plan at all ("1 concept").
- **Tracked-file content boundary:** this file was checked for the corpus
  root directory name and any absolute filesystem path -> zero occurrences.
  It names no document title, no corpus path, and no extracted text.
- **Worksheet content boundary:** the local-only worksheet was checked for
  absolute paths and the corpus root directory name -> zero occurrences; it
  names document titles, which is expected and permitted in a local-only
  file, but carries no filesystem path into the corpus.

## What this is not

No arm is built, changed, or shipped by this worksheet. No threshold is set.
No rating is entered by this session -- every checkbox and free-text line in
the worksheet is blank. The worksheet's own notes quote three findings
already published in `docs/2026-09-07-k3-arm-e.md` (positions 5, 10, 11) as
context for the operator's judgement; they are not new findings.